Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
the art tube mp mic pre..a discussion.
(it costs around 50 buks or less often.)

some background. part1.
over the years ive seen many people knock this very inexpensive
mic pre.
then a few years back to counter the naysayers
i heard a trak done by a pro AE in a big studio useing an mp.
it was great.
so i thought..who is right ?? is it junk ??
so a couple years back i got one even tho' i do my own diy mic pre's.

background. part 2.
on a recording forum awhile back i saw some folks knocking
once again the mp. so a shootout ensued.
tween the mp and other much higher priced pre's.
it became very interesting and actually made some people think
about their position on the mp.

be curious on other folks opinions of the mp.
i personally have the following thoughts.
(ive used very expensive big studio stuff in the past.)
1. i feel trak conditioning post recording is more important
often than choice of pre.
2. with the mp ive noticed its very important how one sets
its controls. and feel some people boost it too much cos they
dont have good phone monitoring set up.
so they boost the mp too much so they can hear emselves.

i was testing out a new piece of software just the other day,
n mebe my vocs suck on this, but i thought what the hey n
dragged the mp out of the closet,
and used it to do the vocs on a daft likle song idea.
instead of useing a diy mic pre of mine.
heres the very short mp3 test.
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?jy2yzndzfzy

now mebe the song idea suks also. n the mix cos i did it very quik
n mixed over mini earbuds.
but theres just something bout the mp texture on my vocs on this i like.
i did no conditioning. just put a bit of fx round the vocs.

cos there are still loads of people who still tell me to use
a 2k pre etc etc. trouble is ive used big studio stuff in the past
n i just dont hear a big difference.
i STILL dont think its a bad pre. but feel free to slam me
n disagree.
listen on mini earbuds if you can cos i did a quik ruff mix on minis.
what is your opinion of the mp ??
cos all the naysayers who continue to this day still make me wonder
if i'm totally wrong that for the price noone can complain.



retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Two things to consider:

1) A good engineer with crappy gear will most probably get better results than a crappy engineer with good gear will.

2) Only one way to find out if this pre-amp works for you: test drive it. (and have fun doing that )

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
I'm gonna complain-
I'm complaining that I didn't get three of them when I saw a deal for $19/each one time. They $29 now most places.

I'm also complaining that the light on the VU meter burned out on the one I got and I need to replace it.
Even though the reason it burned out is it has been 10 hours a day every day for a couple years now, being used.

Oh, and I'm not going to complain about the sound. It does fine for what it is, I just try not to push the tube aspect of it too much. Some guys claim putting a better tube in it makes it a whole different pre, but I kinda like it just the way it is. No fuss No muss.

I have the Tube MPStudio version, may be a little different, I think it has an 'OPL' which is a limiter built in, but I leave that disabled anyway.. never liked that feature.

Now I will say there is a reasonably priced preamp I like better; VTB1. It just seems to have more depth and detail.But it costs a little more, not a lot, but it is more.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
1) It might just be that some people received units that were not up to snuff, used different components in places, or were broken. They would report a different situation than the people who got good working units.

2) It has already been mentioned, but it is also apropos that some may not be the fine sound engineers that they think they are.

3) Others may just be biased and trying to prove a point on an internet forum.

4) A "shootout" using a lot of different computers, soundcards, mics, rooms, noise floors, etc. isn't a fair shootout as all other aspects besides the mic pre are not equal in the first place.

5) Who cares?


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
yeh ive seen many complaints by mp owners bout component failures.
nothing i can complain about.
here in canada the mp is one heck of a deal cos one gets a nice long warranty
i seem to remember. cos of some hook up tween art n yorkville for service.
i just often wonder why on many forums the mp gets no love.
i mean i just brought it outta the gear closet the other day ,
n i just dont hear a huge diff compared to when i used
uber mics into a uber big studio console.
interestingly enough people seem to rave with praise for the mpa gold
mic pre also from the same art company. but of course its
a few hundred buks.

i totally agree bout the vtb1 btw.
i heard a shoot out of it awhile back compared to some really expensive pre's
recording a great singer n it sounded great. more than held its own imho.


retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881
I have owned one for a year with no problems, and like the sound of it.

I got it to use with my Nady RSM 4 ribbon becasue of the gain needed, but it is surprisingly good for a bass DI (with some tube added) and for the MXL990 mic to tame the harsh hi end...

And rharv I seem to remember that sale, MF?

Well worth the $30 IMHO.


i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
manning1, you already know the answer to your question.

With the relatively low noise floor of today's recording systems, unless it's a solo mic'ed track, any one of the ART preamps will do the home recordist and small studio owner proud.

I submit that on a whispery solo vocal or delicate classical guitar track, then you'll begin to notice the difference in mic preamps, but for what most of us do here, it's a great piece of kit.

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
scott.
actually kudos to you mate
re "whispery" .
this is one aspect where i find one has to be carefull with the mp
compared to other pre's ive used in the past.
it can still be done, but one needs to be carefull also in mic selection
possibly.
well said..thanks for reminding me.
once i get some family medical bills bills outta the way, i'll still keep the mp,
but might plop for something else.
lol..the last two years just as i save up for some new gear,
some family emergency occurs n i'm smacked down again,
such is life. good point mate.

for example i'm down on vets right now mate.
vet fees here have gone nuts n our cute doggie needed to visit the vet.
doggie takes priority.
the vet bill just sent us reeling frankly.
we were gobsmacked.
pretty soon seniors wont be able to afford pets at this rate.
no wonder vets drive flashy cars.


retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
I have 2 of the TubeMPStudio's. I had a power supply fail on one (under warranty) so I just replaced it. I use one and the other is in a box waiting to be used. At 29.99, it seems to work just fine (I might have gotten the first one for less, but I can't recall).

I haven't really done any comparisons, but I needed something for phantom power so I got it. I now run the bass and roland spd-20 through it when I use those instruments.

Kevin


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 654
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 654
This had better be good! You caused me to order one just to see what the hype was all about!

Oh, $29.99 on Amazon. The music stores were about $20.00 higher.


"The desire for fame is the last infirmity cast off even by the wise."
Cornelius Tacitus
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
Charlie..
theres a trick with the mp.
some people set the controls too high.
so test out sometime gentle boost of the mic with the mp,
then out of mp into a clean line mixer for added gain
before sending to sound device line in.
or say mp out into a mixer line in you might have hangin around.
frankly for 30 buks i dont think anyone can complain.
ps..i once used to work with some people from texas.
(i assume from the tx in your id thats where your from.)
we used to have a big laugh , me the english bloke trying to mimic the texas accent ,
and them trying the uk cockney sayings n accents.
it was an interesting cross cultural exchange.
man could those texans party. we had lotsa fun..lol.


retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 123
B
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
B
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 123
in my humble experience the mp is best used by using the tube more than the output, depending on the source I can sometimes put the tube up to nearly maximum & the output to nearly nothing, there is largely enough signal going into the computer & gives a very round, warm sound. I am in agreement with the last post about people setting the output too high, but you can really use & abuse the tube with good effect.

Last edited by bupper; 05/13/10 04:15 AM.
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
"mp is best used by using the tube more than the output,"

What does this mean? I Have an input gain and an output gain. I set them both a 50% and go. I always engage the 20db booster, but I have never messed with the Phase or OPL buttons.

Kevin


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
Off-Topic
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 199
S
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
S
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 199
Hey manning great to hear from ya. And yeah, roger that on the vet bills, sorry to drag attention away from the art but you touched a nerve when you mentioned that.

Last year my sister had a cat with an infected possum bite (out fighting at night). 2 nights o/n at the vets so she (the cat) could have some I.V. antibiotics over 24/24. Treatment and board for that brief excercise, ~$600. They were lucky they didn't have to spring for a clean up op, debridement and lavage kind of thing- the vet charges $20 a miniute for that! Who'd be a lawyer? They only make $7 a minuite here!

I used to joke that what this country needs is a health insurance scheme for pets. Then I discovered that the Fed Gov't here already offer one. I kid you not. Not sure about its full title, do you think "moggycare' or maybe "doggycare", but apparently it's real.

Ok back to mic pre's...

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 654
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 654
Hey manning, thanks for the tips (and everyone else's). Looking forward to experimenting once it arrives.


"The desire for fame is the last infirmity cast off even by the wise."
Cornelius Tacitus
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
Shackman
yeh i'm really down on vets right now..lol...
couldnt have come at a worst time cos i need to visit me 91 yr old mum in uk.
and theyve also bunged up all the airport taxes.
advert 99 buks return to uk..then in the small print a ton of airport taxes..lol.
i feel everyones out to raid my puny pension such as it is.
then the blinkin iceland volcano blew up , so me mum is worried bout me travelling from canada to uk right now. so delaying uk visit a couple of months.

by the way if ya ever visit the uk..my wife n i like this hilarious hotel..
just like the cleese fawlty towers. lol.
i'll give ya the name if yer ever wantin to visit ole blighty.
its a riot to stay in. all old brit brigadier types "i say old chaps"..etc lol.

charlie.
well i hope you enjoy the mp.
just set carefully.
god bless.


retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153
Okay,
I have to ask. I'm not a vocalist, the dogs and I have an agreement, I don't sing, they don't leave me presents on my lawn. I don't have an instrument to mic.

TO ME, using a tube amp of any kind only adds harmonics and noise to a recording. Yes, some people call it 'warmth' or whatever, but the truth is it is harmonics, noise and distortion. There's nothing wrong with that, if you want it.

So, why do you want it? Why not have as clean of a signal as you can get?

Curious.

Gary


I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
M
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
M
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
Gary.
it really depends on ones definition of warm.
ive got super clean diy mic pre's here that are as clean as a whistle
i built. useing very high end parts. 1db noise parts.
cant get any lower noise.
similarly some very high end mic pre's are ultra clean.
but the problem for some people is the sound is "clinical".

i had to laugh frankly. awhile back a whole bunch of people
on a high end recording forum who think de rigeur is one must spend
at least 1k on a mic pre were putting down the humble xenyx
mic pre's. so as a friend of mine didnt have many quids ,
i rented a xenyx just to see if the uber high end types were right.
(i'm a rebellious sort..lol.)
i put the xenyx thru its paces. recorded voc traks etc n compared
to voc traks ive done in hi end studios with megabux gear.
i came to the conclusion
the high end types had obviously never tried the xenyx.
cos i felt for such daft low money no one could complain.
getting back to your comment the thing i didnt like was it seemed
"clinical" once again.
as your aware theres a lot of BS when it comes to gear and marketing.
some people spend daft amounts of money searching for the ultimate.
i personally dont think of the mp as a super character mic pre.
to me it seems to provide just a little bit of character.

for over the top character awhile back i was trying to get for a fun
experiment an old stones vocal useing sorta a cokney style vocal.
in the original recording one can hear a bit of mic pre distortion or character
in the stones song. i couldnt get it straight ..clinical mic pre was too clean.
so i thought what the hey...bunged ..and your gonna laugh...
a guitar amp plug in on the track. fender bassman if i remember, twiddled a bit
with settings. n there it was , more a 60's old style vintage vocal with character.
much closer. weird huh ??

whats behind all this is (not me necessarily) some folks have the
"vintage sound" bug. so they spend large chaseing it.
but it can often be achieved with carefull use of a guitar amp plug in
if one chooses the right one for character.
ya know record 2 traks of vocs mebe.
put the guitar amp plug in on one..leave the other clinical n then balance to
get the amount of character versus clean one wants.

if i had the buks i would , instead of doing these kinda triks prolly
look at jlmaudio.com mic pre's.
ever looked at those gary ?? some folks love em.


retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153
Manning,
Because of my setup, and my needs, I don't need a mic or a mic pre.

I have several mic inputs on my Yamaha MG mixer, plus I have a dedicated two channel Lavry micpre in my LavryBlue, something I don't even use. It's outputs have never seen the inputs of the Lavry A/D in my set up, but then again, I don't use it. I have a Samson C05 mic because I wanted something inexpensive, yet not cheap. I could have spent a whole lot more, but there wasn't any need to.

But, I was really curious as to why people wanted that particular sound.

Gary


I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Gary, you are a jazz fan. You know what Billie Holiday sounds like recorded.

Some folks call that sound 'warm'. Some of the warmth is due to a lack of high frequency content - just plain signal loss through the whole signal chain and onto tape. But some of it quite possibly is some tube distortion that may have been added into the signal chain un-intentionally, or even tape saturation distortion.

The kind of harmonics added matters and can impart a pleasant sound. Yes it's distortion, no it doesn't have to be necessarily a negative thing. It's even harmonic distortion for the most part. You can think of a square wave as a sine-wave with even harmonics added. Still pretty smooth sounding, even though 'distorted'. A triangle wave, on the other hand, is odd harmonics and has a more brassy/grating sound.

Does that clear things up at all for you?

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

New with the DAW Plugin Version 6.0, released with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows: the Reaper® Panel!

This new panel offers built-in specific support for the Reaper® DAW API allowing direct transfer of Band-in-a-Box® files to/from Reaper® tracks!

When you run the Plugin from Reaper®, there is a panel to set the following options:
-BB Track(s) to send: This allows you to select the Plugin tracks that will be sent Reaper.
-Destination Reaper Track: This lets you select the destination Reaper track to receive media content from the Plugin.
-At Bar: You can select a bar in Reaper where the Plugin tracks should be placed.
-Start Below Selected Track: This allows you to place the Plugin tracks below the destination Reaper track.
-Overwrite Reaper Track: You can overwrite previous content on the destination Reaper track.
-Move to Project Folder: With this option, you can move the Plugin tracks to the Reaper project folder.
-Send Reaper Instructions Enable this option to send the Reaper Instructions instead of rendering audio tracks, which is faster.
-Render Audio & Instructions: Enable this option to generate audio files and the Reaper instructions.
-Send Tracks After Generating: This allows the Plugin to automatically send tracks to Reaper after generating.
-Send Audio for MIDI Track: Enable this option to send rendered audio for MIDI tracks.
-Send RealCharts with Audio: If this option is enabled, Enable this option to send RealCharts with audio.

Check out this video highlighting the new Reaper®-specific features: Band-in-a-Box® DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Video

The new Band-in-a-Box VST DAW Plugin Verion 6 adds over 20 new features!

Watch the new features video to learn more: Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2024 - DAW Plugin Version 6 New Features

We also list these new features at www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.plugin.htm.

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,391
Posts732,462
Members38,440
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Ernest J, Izzy, BenChaz, Csofi, mmpartee
38,439 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 113
dcuny 87
rsdean 83
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5