Here's an idea:
Why not just do away with the guidelines, and appoint a Screening Committee to
audition proposed submissions to determine if they meet the Criteria established by the Committee?
1. Does the Submitter have a song currently on Page 1?
2. Is there anything “actionable” in the submission?
3. Is this one of the Submitter's “best recordings”
4. Has the Submitter made sufficient obsequious comments on other poster's songs?
That might work. When are the elections?
Bob,
you raise some legitimate questions here in a funny way... and I think that's good. But the core thing we're dealing with here is a difference of opinion that has potential to split the forum into factions. Based on comments I've read, most of us want to settle the differences amicably and end up with an official guideline... and NOT split the group into factions.
The problem with your input here is that it is specifically intended to declare a new faction that's at odds with the position echoed by just about everybody who has weighed in so far. Why are you doing that?
Here's another idea:
Why not leave changes to the Showcase guidelines to PG Music and people who actually
post music there?
well, apparently you mean me. Two responses to that question:
1) if you actually read the whole thread, the first umpteen posts were made by people who actually post music.
2) If anybody who posts raised the issue it would have come across as self-serving. I'm a neutral party since I don't post, and therefore it makes sense for the impartial observer to present the will of the posters to PGMusic to see if they agree. I don't care one way or the other.. why would I?
But people who post on the user showcase communicate with me, and I have been aware for a long time that this is an issue that could potentially blow up on us if it doesn't get addressed. So we're trying to address it and maintain harmony in the group.
Now, regarding your legitimate objections:
I actually agree in principle that fewer rules are almost always the way to go. It's worth mentioning that both groups... the veteran posters AND the new posters... have both expressed a desire for an official guideline on this.
“The problem with your input here is that it is specifically intended to declare a new faction that's at odds with the position echoed by just about everybody who has weighed in so far. Why are you doing that?”
Man. Where do you come up with this stuff?
“... specifically intended to
declare a new faction...”
I don't even know what that means.
I would never knowingly be a part of any 'faction'.
Allow me to elucidate.
My 'input' here was specifically intended to observe that something that could have been discreetly handled in PM's has caused embarrassment to some new members by admonishing them in an open forum – unnecessarily.
I would ask you your own question to me:
“Why are you doing that?”“if you actually read the whole thread, the first umpteen posts were made by people who actually post music.”
Actually, the first post is a quote from
you, admonishing a new member for improper etiquette.
“Now, regarding your legitimate objections:”
This statement exemplifies the hubris that I also “....specifically intended to declare...”.
So you are the arbiter of what is 'legitimate'? Did I miss an election for Hall Monitor somewhere?
In future, I'll run my objections by you for your approval prior to posting.