Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#130335 10/03/11 06:37 PM
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
I can not get good results from that this to save my soul. Anybody have much idea how to use it? No matter what I do I sound like I am talking through a megaphone like Rudy Valee in Winchester Cathedral. One particular song of mine has TERRIBLE sounding vocals and I just can't work with that EQ. Is there a way to run that EQ in real time? Change, apply, test, change, apply, test, change, apply, test, change, apply, test, change, apply, test, change, apply, test, change, apply, test, .... really gets old when you are guessing to start with.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
My advice; hang it up with offline EQ because with a graphic EQ, you need to be able to audition while moving sliders.

There are two plugins I would recommend here for free; you should use both a graphic EQ as well as a spectrum analysis tool

For a nice linear phase graphic EQ, http://www.voxengo.com/product/marvelgeq/

From the same company, get their fft analyzer, SPAN http://www.voxengo.com/product/span/

If you put these in a chain, try an instance of span, then the eq, then span again. You should be able to hear and see the changes you are making.

You might be dealing with room effects that will be hard to fix in your room without absorption treatment of some kind. Refer to posts from several weeks ago.

-Scott

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
I record vocal tracks direct in with no room volume on, and my early projects saw the vocals really boxy so I used the parametrics on the mixer and now they are worse than even. I need to set them back to flat and record the vocals on this song again. I mean it's only 5 minutes out of my life, but geeze....

I will try those plugins. What I am missing is feeding back out of the DAW into a real mixer. A physical, tangible mixer that I can touch and work sliders rather than moving a mouse. Everything on this track is fine except the megaphone vocals. They really suck.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Eddie - hang some blankets behind your mic. Sing quiet. It worked for Simon & Garfunkel and countless others - it can work for you.

Try that with zero EQ for starters. What kind of mic are you using?

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Shure SM58.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
OK - that should be fine. Put some hooks in the ceiling, put a rod (broomstick) across the two hooks, and find the fluffiest comforter you have in the house and hang it over that broomstick.

PUt the mic about 18"-24" away from the comforter. Record your vox with no EQ. The SM58 is directional enough that you should be cool.

Experiment with two broomsticks 3-4' apart and hang that comforter across both of them, making a sort of booth.

SM58 is actually a really nice mic to use for home recording. But if you have big-time room issues, then you are going to have issues in the recording that are very difficult to remove after the fact. It's not just about EQ, it's also about early reflections that shouldn't be there - those cannot be removed with EQ.

I generally go for the sing quiet method. But I've got enough treatment options that I can belt it out if I want to as well and not get major room noise in my recordings.

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
I actually have a gobo made from 2 doors with a moving pad stapled to them so that I close them to 90 degrees and stand behind them when I do vocals, and using the door to the room I can make a square isolation enclosure if I want to. The main thing is that I did a poor job of equalizing when I recorded it. I will record vocals again when I next have the chance to work up there. Rehearsal tomorrow night after work.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Eddie - you shouldn't be doing any EQ while recording except perhaps a high-pass filter set at 80 Hz or so.

Can you type out your signal chain starting at the mic; something like:

SM58-->Mic Preamp on mixer-->EQ on Mixer-->Line outs of mixer-->Analog input on sound card x-->

etc.?

-Scott

RealBand
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Vocals are very tough to do especially your own vocals. You want your recording to sound like you think you sound. You hear yourself differently. Approach the vocals like they were someone else and try to get it to just sound clear, clean & with full timber.
Here's one of my songs. How does it sound to you? What would you do to it?

Blue Eyes Crying In The Rain


John
ESI Gigaport HD+
Lenovo Turion II /4 Gig Ram/ Win7x64 be
15.6" Monitor
"The only Band is a Real Band"
www.wintertexaninfo.com/BANDS/JohnnyD.php
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
SM58-->Mackie mixer -->4 band EQ on Mixer top +2, high mid +2, low mid +2, bottom +3 -->Line outs of mixer to M-Audio Fast Track Pro MIDI interface to USB on computer

I HAVE a 31 band EQ but it is not in the loop. Totally bypassed. Early recordings saw the vocals lacking body so I boosted where I thought my baritone voice was. That made it sound like I was in a tunnel. Or the Rudy Vallee megaphone thing.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Hi Eddie - I too use an SM58. My mic interface is an older Tascam 8 tk Portastudio 488. I record with the EQ flat.
I also make sure that I stay 6 in. away from the mic. The SM58 has a great proximity effect for live singing, but can be over-powering on the low end for recording. So if you keep back from the mic (behind a pop filter helps) you can save yourself some EQing hassles on the low end, and then as Scott suggests, use a highpass filter for light tweaking on the low end.
At least that's how I've learned to handle the 58 on my system. Sometimes I use a nano compresser set at 2 or 3:1 because my voice can be spikey trying to hit high notes, or too soft trying to hit low. But generally no applications of anything until after a clean record.

Cheers - Ian


Ian
My "Original Tunes" Site
My gene pool needs more chlorine.
RealBand
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,333
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,333
Quote:

Vocals are very tough to do especially your own vocals. You want your recording to sound like you think you sound. You hear yourself differently. Approach the vocals like they were someone else and try to get it to just sound clear, clean & with full timber.
Here's one of my songs. How does it sound to you? What would you do to it?

Blue Eyes Crying In The Rain




Damn Google Docs - why do they need to have us register and put in a password. Any ohter options for posting?


Dan, BIAB2024, SoundCloud Win11, i7(12thGen), 32GB, 1TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD), 2TB Libraries, 1 TB(WD-Black), 2TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD)Data, Motu Audio Express, Keystation 61, SL88 Studio, Reaper

RealBand
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
I'm in the process of dumping them.
Try this. Blue Eyes Crying In The Rain

Mic plugged into the Harmony GXT/HW Mixer/Auxout to Audigy 2 ZS Notebook card.No other processing.

As a side note listen to the screwed up harmonies at the very end. Minor chords really used to confuse this thing if the trigger track was not in root position. I'm half way through fixing this issue.


John
ESI Gigaport HD+
Lenovo Turion II /4 Gig Ram/ Win7x64 be
15.6" Monitor
"The only Band is a Real Band"
www.wintertexaninfo.com/BANDS/JohnnyD.php
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Quote:

SM58-->Mackie mixer -->4 band EQ on Mixer top +2, high mid +2, low mid +2, bottom +3 -->Line outs of mixer to M-Audio Fast Track Pro MIDI interface to USB on computer

I HAVE a 31 band EQ but it is not in the loop. Totally bypassed. Early recordings saw the vocals lacking body so I boosted where I thought my baritone voice was. That made it sound like I was in a tunnel. Or the Rudy Vallee megaphone thing.




Here is a better solution: SM58-->Fast Track Pro. Period. Get the mixer out of the chain. No need.

RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Doh - was listening to Johns version thinking it was Eddie.

John, I would quit the harmonizer altogether. Try it clean or double your own vox naturally.

Last edited by rockstar_not; 10/05/11 10:55 PM.
RealBand
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Quote:

Doh - was listening to Johns version thinking it was Eddie.

John, I would quit the harmonizer altogether. Try it clean or double your own vox naturally.




I posted that in hopes of getting Eddie to post an example of his singing. Kind of hard to help out a phantom voice.


John
ESI Gigaport HD+
Lenovo Turion II /4 Gig Ram/ Win7x64 be
15.6" Monitor
"The only Band is a Real Band"
www.wintertexaninfo.com/BANDS/JohnnyD.php
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
Veteran
OP Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,294
I have not had a chance to breathe since Sunday. I will listen tonight and try recording my vocal track again but direct to the M-Audio.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
As a general rule Eddie, you want to record everything completely flat, no eq, no effects into your DAW. Then you switch hats to a mixing engineer and that's when you go track by track and apply all of that. One of my friends is a very good keyboard player and singer. I had him come over to do a vocal track, I plugged a SM58 into my EMU interface, he threw on a set of headphones and sang. That's it. When you do that you hear every little thing and it sounds mostly like crap no matter how good a singer you are but he's a pro, he knows that already and also knows what can be done later. Same for a sax friend too. I had him record his sax just straignt into the mic, he hated it because he likes verb and some eq. I do have the ability to do direct monitoring but I didn't have it set up at that time. After he did the take, he stayed and watched me "fix" the track in RB. He was quite impressed. Once you've done that a few times and realize what you can do with a flat track you stop worrying about how you sound while doing the take and just concentrate on your playing.

There's a lot of guitar/bass players who will even record their stuff direct in and use the verious modelling softwares after the fact too. The thing is even if you have a good piece of modelling hardware for your guitar, your recording engineer may have 10 different ones to choose from in the studio and if you give him a good straight recording with nothing on it then he's free to apply all kinds of goodies to it. If you give him an already processed recording, that really limits his and your creativity.

I do some live on site recordings using my Akai DPS16 recorder and the last two bass players I recorded asked me if I could take them direct because they already know that and they're used to massaging their sound after the fact. One guy has a nice David Eden bass set up and I was going to hang a mic in front of his cab but he still wanted to go direct so I did both since I had enough inputs. I got a nice sound off the mic and I still mixed some effects on the second track.

Just remembered something that's a cool little trick. My singer friend brought his favorite EV mic so I taped them both together and recorded each mic on it's own track. You can have all kinds of fun with two separate tracks of the same vocal.

Bob

Last edited by jazzmammal; 10/06/11 01:00 PM.

Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
IMO, mixers are evil to the home recordist. I have my reasons. Main reason is that it is simply unnecessary if you are recording an audio signal with most interfaces these days; particularly if you have mic pre-amps in the interface.

If you can abide it, you want the least amount of signal processing, both analog and/or digital, in between your source and the recorded 1's and 0's. This includes cable lengths.

At the Motown original studio, the guitarist and bass player were plugged in under the window of the control room and plugged into a patch panel in the wall. You can see it in this photo right here http://media.lonelyplanet.com/lpimg/20929/20929-9/preview.jpg right next to the hand-rail on the left side of the picture.

No amps were in that room during the golden years, or so we were told when I stood within inches of that patch panel.

I assume that you track your vocals after you have some scratch or guide tracks of keys, drums, etc. already laid down.

If so, name one reason why you need a mixer to track vocals, besides pre-amping the mic. If your card does not have it's own pre-amp, then perhaps you should use the mixer - but why not spend a little coin to get a decent pre-amp like some flavor of an ART and deal with equipment that is specifically designed for the sole purpose of pre-amping? I have a nice little single channel dbx mic and instrument pre-amp, but I rarely use it because the pre-amp in the sound card I've used for years is pretty doggoned nice.

Monitoring should be available from your sound card's headphone outlet.

I think you'll be pleased about the sound of the SM 58 directly into the Fast Track Pro, after tweaking. The pre-amps in that unit are decent spec, from those that I know that have one.

-Scott

RealBand
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026
I agree inexpensive mixers can add some color even flat , so unless you have an SSL ,ect. like the big boys direct mic into comp is best. I don't like SM 58's for recording vocals, there are cheap condenser mics out there that sound much better and priced about the same .

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

New with the DAW Plugin Version 6.0, released with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows: the Reaper® Panel!

This new panel offers built-in specific support for the Reaper® DAW API allowing direct transfer of Band-in-a-Box® files to/from Reaper® tracks!

When you run the Plugin from Reaper®, there is a panel to set the following options:
-BB Track(s) to send: This allows you to select the Plugin tracks that will be sent Reaper.
-Destination Reaper Track: This lets you select the destination Reaper track to receive media content from the Plugin.
-At Bar: You can select a bar in Reaper where the Plugin tracks should be placed.
-Start Below Selected Track: This allows you to place the Plugin tracks below the destination Reaper track.
-Overwrite Reaper Track: You can overwrite previous content on the destination Reaper track.
-Move to Project Folder: With this option, you can move the Plugin tracks to the Reaper project folder.
-Send Reaper Instructions Enable this option to send the Reaper Instructions instead of rendering audio tracks, which is faster.
-Render Audio & Instructions: Enable this option to generate audio files and the Reaper instructions.
-Send Tracks After Generating: This allows the Plugin to automatically send tracks to Reaper after generating.
-Send Audio for MIDI Track: Enable this option to send rendered audio for MIDI tracks.
-Send RealCharts with Audio: If this option is enabled, Enable this option to send RealCharts with audio.

Check out this video highlighting the new Reaper®-specific features: Band-in-a-Box® DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Video

The new Band-in-a-Box VST DAW Plugin Verion 6 adds over 20 new features!

Watch the new features video to learn more: Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2024 - DAW Plugin Version 6 New Features

We also list these new features at www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.plugin.htm.

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,395
Posts732,500
Members38,441
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
zagrajbarke, Ernest J, Izzy, BenChaz, Csofi
38,440 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 116
dcuny 87
rsdean 82
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5