Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#175612 10/08/12 10:29 AM
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Which I guess you guys call mastering....

How do you make these songs so they sound the same everywhere? I have this thing where if I listen to the same song on 5 different devices they sound five different ways. I even see that here. One of my songs long ago sounded fine when I played it here. The next day I had an email saying there was too much bass. 2 hours later I had another email saying "I can't hear the bass". I have this feeling that no 2 of you hear the same thing when you listen on Soundcloud. How do I fix that?


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
No, that's not mastering -- it's still a mix issue. Mixing allows you to produce a recording that should pretty much sound the same everywhere. Like most of us (or at least me), you probably have not taken the time to acoustically measure your room to see if bass builds up and/or there are peaks and nulls. The way to overcome that is to acoustically treat your room, get a monitoring system you can trust and to find the best place in your room to record/mix.

I have not treated my room yet, so I am also stuck trying to play things in many different environments to get the best trade-offs in mix decisions. I have been reading about acoustic treatment for about a year now and I think I know what I have to do -- but I just haven't spent the money/time yet to get it done.


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
My room is irrelevant. Everything is recorded direct. There are no room acoustics involved when recording Real Band bass and drum tracks. Even when I record live instruments it is all line level. The only time a mic is involved is when I sing, and that is done in a foam lined enclosure that is completely anechoic. It's my inability to EQ correctly, and I go so far as to listen to the monitors and 3 different sets of cans, all of different quality, and I get 4 different sounds. When the near field sound good, the phones sound bass heavy. Then I take the same file downstairs and play it through the main 6 speaker sound system and it sounds okay. Over the the office computer with a 5.1 speaker system, bottom heavy. And while I CAN play with tone contriols on the various playboack devices, that's not the point. It needs to sound good everywhere with the playback set flat. Very frustrating to not be able to make the final mix consistent over any playback device.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Quote:

My room is irrelevant. ...



When you are mixing using monitors your room is very much relevant. ... and mixing using headphones has all the problems that have been discussed numerous times before (I mix using headphones -- ha, ha -- and monitors).

Quote:

...foam lined enclosure that is completely anechoic ...



Foam usually absorbs mid and high frequencies, so you probably have real bass issues in recording your vocals.

The reason you have too much bass and then not enough bass is most likely due to your room and your monitors in your room (and the headphones are not solving that issue for you).

Just my relatively "acoustic treatment" novice opinion here.


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Eddie, unless you mix exclusively with headphones, your room absolutely matters, where the speakers are located in each room, etc. all matters ALOT. Remember when you posted pix of your room and I was warning you about how close your monitor speakers were to the angled roof? You'll get all kinds of comb filtering off of that roof at your mix location.

The mix really can't sound consistent over different playback systems in different 'rooms'. What it can do is sound acceptable, but it will never sound 'the same'.

Even with treated rooms for mixing, that can't account for when you take your mix into a room with a corner loaded sub that is set a little high, that it's not going to sound different than playing it in your car, or over cans, etc.

Also, the passing of time reveals mix issues you simply can't hear when you are in the throes of a project. I listened to one of my songs I did about 5 or 6 years ago the other day and I was appalled by the 'room' sound in the reverb, a sort of unnecessary booming in the 250-500 Hz range. I would totally mix that thing differently now.

Here's a different test, where you say a song is bottom heavy - how about a reference recording being played back on that same system - is it bottom heavy also? When you know you are done is when you can take those reference recordings, and duplicate the playback anomalies in your own songs that are due to the system/room that are revealed in the reference recording playback played over the same systems.

This is why reference recordings are important to have on hand. Pick some recordings that you think have the vibe that you are shooting for and buy the CD. Take notes of how that sounds played back on the kinds of systems on which you want your recording played.

Make notes (recording X is a little bass-heavy on the 5.1 system - it's o.k. if mine sounds similar, etc.)

-Scott

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881
Quote:

My room is irrelevant.




Not if you use speakers at any point in the mixing process. The room can make a HUGE difference in how you hear things. For example, while mixing get up and move around the room, or simple lean forward or back & listen to how the sounds changes.

Quote:

And while I CAN play with tone contriols on the various playboack devices, that's not the point. It needs to sound good everywhere with the playback set flat.




That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome. .

But really, a lot of the popular tracks that everyone loves today sound different to me on different systems also, mostly in the "mud" area of 200 to 600Hz, so even the "pro's" are not perfect, tho they get a LOT closer than I do! LOL

Grab an analyzer, like the free SPAN one from Voxengo, place that after your EQ in the Master section, and adjust until the line is a flat as you can make it, then you have a flat mix.

Or grab the 21 day trial of the AAMS Software and give that a try....the advantage of this system is that it will give you a print out of what the audio is doing, so you can go back & make adjustments in the mix.

What, I am using my EYE'S not using my EAR'S? So what, it works for me and a lot of my clients that don't have the $$ to send it out. I am NOT a mastering engineer, but I can over-EQ & slam the life out of a mix with the best of them! LOL


i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
RealBand
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Quote:

..Grab an analyzer, like the free SPAN one from Voxengo, place that after your EQ in the Master section, and adjust until the line is a flat as you can make it, then you have a flat mix. ...




Or, better yet, see what the EQ curve looks like on Voxengo SPAN using a reference track like Scott mentioned above. You will see that the EQ curve is not "flat".


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Quote:

That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome.




Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
It just dawned on me that you guys meant the room acoustics when LISTENING. Duh.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Quote:

Quote:

That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome.




Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?







It has to do with the "Fletcher-Munson Curve".


http://forum.recordingreview.com/f8/fletcher-munson-curve-ideal-way-eq-24461/

RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Quote:



Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?




I don't know about you, but I hear just fine in nearly the entire audible band, and graphic audio EQs are manipulating the audio spectrum, not sub and supersonic (technically below 20 Hz and above 20,000 Hz).

The 'Loudness' button on many stereos is doing the low side of the smiley face for you. It's a matter of the equal loudness perception (look up fletcher munson curves) that is at play when listening at lower levels. It takes more juice in the low and high ends to sound similar to mids.

-Scott

RealBand
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
The obvious thing to mention is that your mix is indeed going to sound different on different systems, and those people are going to judge that by reference of how 'other stuff sounds on that system'.
It comes down to the old saying; learn to know your monitors.

Listen to well done professional CD's on your system (at low volume) during breaks .. and let your ears adjust to that sound.
Then get your mix to sound like that 'on that system'.

Of course it will sound different on different systems. That's the reference part of monitors. That's where you start. You can't compare a boombox to a car to a home stereo. The idea is to learn how to make the mix representative on all systems, and that starts with knowing your own.
I'd like to get a little better treatment in my home mixing room, and I may remodel it this winter, but I've spent time learning the monitors and the room. Both matter. Not saying you need the absolute best of both, just that you need to learn the ones you have and get to where you can trust them.

Last edited by rharv; 10/08/12 03:44 PM.

Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Quote:

Listen to well done professional CD's on your system (at low volume) during breaks .. and let your ears adjust to that sound. Then get your mix to sound like that 'on that system'.




That's what the pros do and get huge amounts of money for it, right?

Quote:

I'd like to get a little better treatment in my home mixing room, and I may remodel it this winter, but I've spent time learning the monitors and the room. Both matter. Not saying you need the absolute best of both, just that you need to learn the ones you have and get to where you can trust them.




And there again, 10 different people will tell you 10 different "the best way" stories. "You want a lot of sound deadening material." And the next reply says "Don't overdo it with the sound deadening material." "Put your monitors right by your head and at ear level." And then "Keep your monitors away from you some." "Roll off the high end some." followed by "You want a good amount of high end for crispness."

I have read many articles online and in Electronic Musician magazine. They constantly contradict each other. Much like my songs do when played on different devices. One has too much high, one had too much bottom....

Some place out there is a "the way to do it". I'll find it yet.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Eddie. I think what you've just identified here, is that it's not an exact science.

rharv has it right - use reference CDs and learn how your own system sounds. Then compensate for any problems.

ROG.

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
A great thread on mixing - a great mix is much easier to "master".


http://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?s=a62a11be49e6b3b6c986ddcca162acab&t=29283

RealBand
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Quote:

...

And there again, 10 different people will tell you 10 different "the best way" stories. "You want a lot of sound deadening material." And the next reply says "Don't overdo it with the sound deadening material." ... They constantly contradict each other. ...




I think if you read enough "experts" as opposed to general forum posters (like me!), then the contradictions start to fade away alittle.

For proper mixing, everyone agrees on this point: You have to be able to trust what you are hearing. That means:
1.) good placement of listener and monitors in a given space
2.) Best quality monitors you can afford
3.) Adequate treatment to reduce mid and high frequency reflections and deal with bass nulls and spikes.

#3 has a lot of controversy, but the consensus seems to be:
a) Measure your room using an omni-directional mic and free analysis software. Actually measure using a few possible monitor listening locations (if possible).
b) Print out the graphs and send to pro acoustic suppliers along with room dimensions and layout to get suggestions on what to do. (or post to sites like gearslutz.com)
c) buy or build the least amount of acoustic absorption material that you think will help out (1st reflections and some kind of corner bass trapping).
d) re-measure and see if it has solved your major issues.


Now at bandcamp: Crows Say Vee-Eh @ bandcamp or soundcloud: Kevin @ soundcloud
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Eddie,

The acoustic treatment items I have described to you in the past are well documented physics/acoustics behavior that are tried and true. I could break out the Euler's formulas and teach the room acoustics portion of my master's program, but I think that would quickly bore folks to death.

The room does matter when you mix. Your monitor placement relatively to walls and other reflective surfaces does matter when you mix.

My mentioning of using some reference recordings earlier in the thread should help you to see how they translate to the various playback systems you employ. Put your mixing of songs aside and do that homework first.

Try to avoid some of the no-no's of monitor placement - one of them being too close to walls and or reflective surfaces. Some things that can happen - too close to walls - you might be over emphasizing the room acoustic modes (translation - your mix will be bass heavy), too close to a reflecting surface that is not a wall - you can comb filter your mix very easily and it messes with your ability to properly eq mids. Comb filtering results when there is basically a strong time delay of a signal arriving at your ears at the same time as the direct signal, causing constructive and destructive interference based on the time difference of the reflection/direct relationship. One source of this is mixing with monitors place directly on the meter bridge of a large mixing desk. Yes, you will see SOME pros put their Yamaha NS-10 monitors on the bridge. But they are getting strong reflections off the mix desk surface. In your posts from maybe a year ago, I seem to recall your monitors being quite close to your angled ceiling in your room. It was a recipe for comb filtering at your mix location.

You can't fix all of this. Period. But you can work with reference recordings to get an idea how they sound on all the different systems you have at your disposal.

You can fix some of it. It's worth the effort to do so to eliminate as much of the distracting anomalies as possible.

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,293
Scott, at some point tonight I am going to get some photos of my room and email you a link to them. I'd be grateful for your suggestions. They obviously don't have to be where they are now, but since I have never had them anywhere else I don't know the difference. Anybody else who would like to see the studio please let me know and I will PM you here with the link.

What I found interesting/astounding was that when my back is to the speakers, so my chair is spun around 180, it sounds different than when I am facing the speakers.

And I use powered Wharfedale monitors, 100w per side.


I smashed the hell out of my car today. When the cops came I told him "Officer, that guy was BOTH texting and drinking a beer." The cop said "Sir, he has every right to do that. I mean, it's HIS living room..."
RealBand
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
O
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
O
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
First, I have read a lot of books and articles on mixing. One thing I do is have a big pile of cd's and I burn one and go to my car and listen. Then I go to my main stereo and listen. Then I go to my second stereo and listen. I also will strem it via iTunes through my house and iPod. I take notes and tweak as best I can. It drives my wife crazy by the way.

RealBand
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Quote:



What I found interesting/astounding was that when my back is to the speakers, so my chair is spun around 180, it sounds different than when I am facing the speakers.






This is due to the fact that your pinnae (your outer ears - Mickey Mouse's were big circles) have an intentional acoustic shadowing effect that will change the amount of high frequency that you can hear relative to low frequencies. This is one of the mechanisms/responses by which we are able to localize sound. This is not due to room acoustics - it's due to the acoustics of your ear shape and relationship to direct sound. You should note a decrease in perceived mid-high frequency content in the 'reverse' position. This is part of what tells your brain the sound is coming from behind you - this and the very small inter-aural time delays that occur as you rotate your head away from the source.

Look up Head-Related Transfer Function or HRTF for short, to see how your physical head and ear shape and whatnot 'EQ' sounds. It's a fascinating topic. There are binaural recording dummies (of which I have used Brüel & Kjær, Head Acoustics extensively, and to some extent GRAS and Neumann) which try to use generalized HRTFs to help record sound more in the way that we hear sound.

Regarding your room - from what I recall in previous photos, you had your monitors tucked right up against the angled ceiling of the room. This WILL cause comb filtering at your listening/monitoring location. To what extent remains a bit of a challenge - but one should avoid any hard reflecting surfaces within a few feet of your monitors - particularly the mid and high frequency driver locations for your monitors. Auralex recommends putting absorptive material (depth is dependent on wavelength) on surfaces where if you mounted a mirror, you can look from your listening location to the mirror and see the monitors in the mirror. This is simply ray-tracing acoustics at play. If the room is big enough, the comb filtering effect from walls dissipates as the reflected energy is much much lower than the direct energy from the speakers. However, the photo I recall from your room was that the monitors were nearly touching the angled ceiling. The reflected energy will be strong enough to constructively and destructively interfere (enhance and reduce) certain frequencies at your listening location.

-Scott

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

New with the DAW Plugin Version 6.0, released with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows: the Reaper® Panel!

This new panel offers built-in specific support for the Reaper® DAW API allowing direct transfer of Band-in-a-Box® files to/from Reaper® tracks!

When you run the Plugin from Reaper®, there is a panel to set the following options:
-BB Track(s) to send: This allows you to select the Plugin tracks that will be sent Reaper.
-Destination Reaper Track: This lets you select the destination Reaper track to receive media content from the Plugin.
-At Bar: You can select a bar in Reaper where the Plugin tracks should be placed.
-Start Below Selected Track: This allows you to place the Plugin tracks below the destination Reaper track.
-Overwrite Reaper Track: You can overwrite previous content on the destination Reaper track.
-Move to Project Folder: With this option, you can move the Plugin tracks to the Reaper project folder.
-Send Reaper Instructions Enable this option to send the Reaper Instructions instead of rendering audio tracks, which is faster.
-Render Audio & Instructions: Enable this option to generate audio files and the Reaper instructions.
-Send Tracks After Generating: This allows the Plugin to automatically send tracks to Reaper after generating.
-Send Audio for MIDI Track: Enable this option to send rendered audio for MIDI tracks.
-Send RealCharts with Audio: If this option is enabled, Enable this option to send RealCharts with audio.

Check out this video highlighting the new Reaper®-specific features: Band-in-a-Box® DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Video

The new Band-in-a-Box VST DAW Plugin Verion 6 adds over 20 new features!

Watch the new features video to learn more: Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2024 - DAW Plugin Version 6 New Features

We also list these new features at www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.plugin.htm.

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,391
Posts732,463
Members38,440
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Ernest J, Izzy, BenChaz, Csofi, mmpartee
38,439 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 113
dcuny 87
rsdean 83
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5