Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#206128 06/12/13 10:53 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/apr12/articles/lost-in-translation.htm

After reading the article linked above, now I know why my mixes sound different on Soundcloud, BandCamp, etc., (since they all stream 128 mp3 quality) than they sound as the original wave. Not sure about Youtube or Vimeo, maybe the sound quality is better. So I figure well it's what we all have to live with and it's different but listenable.

But I was about to post a new song and the mix which I thought sounded good here sounds absolutely wretched at 128 kbps with warbling almost garbled acoustic guitar and artifacts so it’s back to the drawing board to figure what on earth I did.

From what I’ve read after searching, possible culprits could be - headroom ( but I’m no where near clipping), too much high freq (maybe but I‘d be surprised), panned too wide (hard to believe that would do it), compression (don‘t think so but …), or phase (checked in mono that’s not a problem). Thought it might be a bad connection so I put the wave into Audacity and used the LAME to encode a 128 mp3 myself - the result was not quite as wretched but still bad. Drat.

Is it just me, or do any of ya’ll have ever have to go back and remix to get things to sound right at that low bitrate? I’m just frustrated. It seems like sometimes I take one step forward and two steps back on this mixing. smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Hi Josie.

I find that it varies from track to track without any discernible reason. Most tracks convert just fine with no real problems, but a few suffer quite badly.

I prefer to convert the track myself before uploading, rather than rely on the host to do it - the result tends to be more predictable. At the end of the day, I won't ever change a mix just so it plays well as an MP3 - I'll either put up with the artifacts, or simply not post it.

ROG.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Originally Posted By: ROG
Hi Josie.

I find that it varies from track to track without any discernible reason. Most tracks convert just fine with no real problems, but a few suffer quite badly.

I prefer to convert the track myself before uploading, rather than rely on the host to do it - the result tends to be more predictable. At the end of the day, I won't ever change a mix just so it plays well as an MP3 - I'll either put up with the artifacts, or simply not post it.

ROG.


yep

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Hmm

If I can adjust an mp3 version I would.
Or use wma instead (and see how the end result turns out).

Panning (which affects phasing) is a real possibility.
So is the hi-freq content (especially when combined with phasing once compressed)

If it's a post for a forum thread I wouldn't bother and agree with Scott and ROG that I'd accept it or not post it .. but if it were something someone needed for their website/ video I'd rework it until it sounded right at the end result (format). Depends on how much it means to you.

A posted mp3 (or video) should not be assumed to be indicative of the original, and actually if I liked your MP3, then bought the CD I'd be disappointed if the CD didn't sound better than the MP3 (or m4a or whatever).

The audio for a TV commercial using a known song is usually not the same quality as the original. This is intentional for the use.

Same thing applies.
Compression is usually 'lossy' and sometimes you notice it more than others.
.. and sometimes you need to rework it.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,801
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,801
Josie, you mentioned YouTube. My experience is that the sound is made considerably worse by them. It becomes more highly compressed, and sometimes out-of-sync with any accompanying video.

One thing I learned is never to compress an already-compressed audio file, if you can help it. Better to return to the original quality and redo it to create the intended final compression.

I recall when a technician made a video for me, he compressed it to make its size no more then 100 MB, because he said that was (at the time) the threshold for YouTube before they compressed it even more.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,302
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,302
Most of the internet players, especially the free ones limit the streaming to 128 on the free accounts.

HOWEVER... even though you know it will be trashed down to 128kbs.....
NEVER, NEVER, NEVER upload a 128kbs file to their servers...NEVER.

Go ahead and convert from wave to 320KBS and upload that. No matter what you upload, they will convert and it does make a difference what you send.

A few years back, I was loading 128's thinking that would work. the 128 in my studio sounded just fine. But once it was uploaded the piano sounded warbled and just plain nasty. I rendered it again to 320 and redid the upload. This time the piano was clean and steady.

Send the highest bit rate MP3 that fits in the maximum size allowed for the account. If it's too big, drop ONE bit rate and try again. Soundclick limits to 10MB.... so I check now before I upload.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,838
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,838
Hi Josie,

These days, and following advice that I've read from a number of sources over the years, I always upload the raw wav file to a host site. I dither the final audio file to 16 bit and usually use 44.1 kHz. That way the site's compression routine is using the best quality audio to work with. I used to find that if I uploaded an already-compressed file, it's compressed a second time and the sound quality plummets.

I wonder if you try dithering to 16 bit and using 44.1 kHz if you'll get a better reception at the host site?

Regards,
Noel

P.S. If you want to send a snippet of your song, I'm happy to play around with it.

Last edited by Noel96; 06/20/13 01:49 PM.

MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2024
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Thanks everybody. Appreciate the tips. Noel that was a kind offer.

Turns out it was mostly upload glitches. This seems to happen more often with Chrome so I switched to the old uploader on SC. I stepped away from this song and will come back to it with fresh ears this weekend. Sometimes that helps more than anything to get my perspective back when I get all frustrated. smile

BTW, it finally dawned on me to upgrade my LAME converter to the latest one which sounds 1000% better for checking before I upload from now on. I know it's not the exact same as what I'll get from the different site converters processing my wav but should be close enough to give me a good idea of what to expect.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,302
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,302
Always listen to the complete song when you upload it anywhere.

There can be glitches in the upload that make the song sound bad, click and pops, and other issues.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Happy Easter! Holiday Hours...

2024 is well underway - it's already Easter Weekend!

Our Customer Service hours this weekend are:

Friday, March 29: 8-4
Saturday, March 30: 8-4
Sunday, March 31: closed

Regular hours resume Monday, April 1st - no joke!

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,402
Posts732,580
Members38,444
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Descoward, danielsk, Mark Morgan, zagrajbarke, Ernest J
38,443 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 200
Al-David 132
DC Ron 115
rsdean 84
dcuny 83
Today's Birthdays
(charlie), WobblyGstring
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5