Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,563
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,563
Originally Posted By: MarioD
learn about setting up non-GM MIDI sounds and learn about MIDI controls, i.e CCs.


MarioD or others can you suggest sites where we can learn about this not just the list of the controllers but examples of application of their use

thanks


Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit 16GB RAM\2018 13” MacBook Air casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2023 everything pk both with Current builds
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
The problem with GM is the number of instrument choices even if you have the very best GM sound bank in the world. Example, say you're doing a country tune and you want a nice steel string guitar. Your GM sound bank has one. Count em, one steel string guitar. It also has one electric one jazz and maybe another one. That it. Now that one steel string may be a very good one and it sounds great. But, my Sampletank using the Sonicsynth library has at least 25 different electric guitars to choose from, none which is GM. I've got distortion, amp modeling, one called Dark Prince, another one called Chet something, many different choices.

If you're happy with one good guitar patch great. GM is simple and easy.

As far as cost a decent but not the best, softsynth is about the same as a good hardware module, roughly $500 and there are good and bad points to each.

The biggest plus for software is no desk clutter with midi and audio cables running around plus the big one is fast rendering of your midi tracks to audio. When you look at your "save as" choices one is to render all DXi/VST tracks to audio. A typical 4 minute song will render in 15 seconds to a minute depending on how fast your computer is.

A hardware module can't render. You have to route the audio out from the module back into your computer record it in real time just like the old days with a live band. A 4 minute song takes 4 minutes to record.

Bob


Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,638
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,638
Originally Posted By: pghboemike
Originally Posted By: MarioD
learn about setting up non-GM MIDI sounds and learn about MIDI controls, i.e CCs.


MarioD or others can you suggest sites where we can learn about this not just the list of the controllers but examples of application of their use

thanks


Google/bing Learning MIDI and you will find a ton of information.

IMHO you will learn more by looking at the list of controllers and comparing it with your synth's MIDI implementation chart. Note some soft synths don't have one but they do have a learn MIDI function, more on that later.

Most but not all synths (by synth I mean hard and soft synths) use CC7 or CC2 for volume with CC11 as a subset of them. However Garritan and possibly others use the mod wheel, CC1, for volume. Others use CC1 for vibrato or filtering. In other words CCs can be left to the discretion of the MFG, thus setting examples may or may not work exactly the same for you depending on your synth.

MIDI learn function is a system were you can dedicate any knob. slider or button on your MIDI controller for a function on your synth. For example my keyboard controller has 9 programmable sliders and 8 programmable knobs. I have two knobs dedicated to volume and pan on all of my synths. For my Hammond B3 soft synth (NI's B4II) those sliders are programmed for the synth's drawbars but are programmed for other things in other synths. It's not hard as you can just right click on a soft synths function, select MIDI learn then just move a slider or knob on your controller, then that slider or knob will control that function. You can also program a specific MIDI controller knob or slider to send a dedicated CC. For example one of my keyboard controller's knobs only send CC7, usually volume, while another only sends CC10, almost always pan.

Actually these things are harder for me to explain than to it is to do. It is very easy to do and I can show you a lot faster if you were here.

The main point is giving you examples may or may not work the same with your synth.

I hope I didn't confuse you too much.


Me, it's not about how many times you fail, it's about how many times you get back up.
Cop, that's not how field sobriety tests work.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Here is my response:

PG music has some pretty decent stuff built in to Real Band, like the free Sample Tank synth that comes with it (IK Multimedia) and ye olde Coyote for very basic stuff. Moving beyond that you may want to check out Garritan's sample libraries for piano, orchestra, and Jazz Band. The Garritan Personal Orchestra and Jazz Band samples are great. The Abbey Road Grand is amazing. All compatible with Real Band. Garritan libraries can also be bought in packages on the PG Music site. Google Garritan.

If you play the notes yourself, any decent keyboard with a midi out will do, because you are only looking for the keys to drive the software synths, such as the Aria Player. Obviously in this case, you are playing the keys into a midi track in Real Band or another DAW and assigning an instrument patch from Sample Tank, Garritan or another software synth. (Soft synth.)

If you are simply taking BIAB generated midi tracks such as strings, you probably still want to run them through a player such as Aria if you want a real piano sound, for example.

I use Sonar to produce in, and that comes with a lot of free and excellent built in synths that are probably more than you will ever need, if you also have some classical stuff like Aria. The Session Strings in Sonar are actually very, very nice.

The learning curve on all these soft synths can be pretty steep but it is worth it once you figure it out. To start with, why not fool around with Sample Tank in Real Band and get a feel for how it goes? Then check out some of the other synths other folks have recommended, once you know what it is you want the most, orchestral strings, or Motown. Different synths suit different purposes.

As a side note, I am finding that is is actually easier to record and edit audio in Real Band than in some other DAWS. I think Real Band gets overlooked or underrated sometimes when actually it is totally awesome for recording a nice clean audio signal, and editing is a snap. I almost never get clipping with Real Band even if I have my amp turned up to 11 and the mic shoved right in front of it. Then once you have really clean audio tracks and Real Tracks you can move them to a DAW like Sonar that has all the fancy production stuff and more soft synths for midi than you will need, probably. The midi export dashboard in Real Band is a dream. Another piece of really sweet programming that doesn't get the praise it deserves.

I hope this makes sense. Tell me if it doesn't and I will try and be more specific. It takes a while to learn the ropes with midi and soft synth production. It isn't always easy so if you're frustrated any at all, you're in good company.

smile

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,301
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,301
In a natural progression... most folks start with the basics and them move up the ladder one step at a time as they discover the need for something better.

My progress was along this line, and followed it very closely in this order.

TTS basic synth..learned how midi worked and made music with it.

SFZ sound font player: Sounded better than some, but not all, of the TTS patches

Garritan Personal Orchestra: a nice step up in quality over the GM libraries and fonts.

Miroslav Philharmonic: similar in quality to GPO but had different tonal qualities

Kontakt (actually the Komplete Kollection package): Step up to the big leagues in quality and versatility. Nice quality sounds, and huge libraries and after market products.

East West Silver << this was a free full function limited version. It contained some really nice string sections, but it was limited and simply intended to give you a taste of the full, very expensive, but extremely nice sounding E/W offerings.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Bob (jazzmammal), judging from your last post, I suspect you just never had a good GM synth.

Only one acoustic guitar?

The General MIDI bank on my SD90 has 16 different acoustic guitars for patch 26

It also has 16 different acoustic guitars for patch 25.

Clean Electric? 16 different electrics on patch 26 including Tele, Strat, 335 and others.

GM patch 27 provides 4 jazz guitars and 4 pedal steels including a Hawaiian

16 different muted guitars (GM patch 30)

12 different distorted guitars (patch 31)

and 8 different harmonics or feedback patches (#32)

All GM patch numbers and it's easy to get to the alternate sounds. You can either twist the knob on the sound module or assign MSB and LSB numbers in the patch assignment dialog box in your sequencer.

So not all GM synths give you one sound per patch number. Like all things synth, it depends on the synth you use.

And as I said before, a couple of nice things about hardware synths are

(1) you can use 16 or 32 at a time without causing any problems with your CPU maxing out

(2) since the sounds are stored in ROM instead of each note being created by the CPU, in a good synth, the sounds can be much more complex

(3) since there is virtually no latency [about 5ms] you can mix and match as many synths as you want, picking the best sounds for the particular song

(4) when your computer OS upgrades or if you decide to switch platforms or even use them with a tablet, keyboard or other computer, they still work and will probably work for decades to come.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Ok, didn't know that. I see it's been discontinued so I can't find the original price but Amazon has one for $875. It looks like that's a very high end module.

I stopped using my hardware for a variety of reasons. I think my comment is still correct for all the softsynths.

Bob


Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
As always - thank you all for your informative responses. I like to throw these open-ended questions out to learn what I don't know I don't know...and I did learn some of those things for sure.

Sometimes - I jot down a few of the comments - and when I see a sale or something, just buy one of the new largely recommended toys listed. I'm not nearly serious enough about my recording (hek, I really don't do much recording at all) - but I LOVE knowing what's out there and tinkering with some of it.

Yes - this sure is an expensive hobby for someone that likes to discover and tinker rather than professionally record his own music, but - as Popeye says "I am what I am"...

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,563
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,563
Originally Posted By: Joe V
I'm not nearly serious enough about my recording (hek, I really don't do much recording at all)


I have found Recording is one of the best ways to improve your playing


Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit 16GB RAM\2018 13” MacBook Air casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2023 everything pk both with Current builds
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Bob, it's true that a high end synth costs a few bucks, but when you consider that by the time you collect a few soft synths you are going to spend that much anyway, and add the longevity of a hardware synth, you end up saving money.

When the OS changes, even 30 years later, your hardware synth will still work. Even after USB changes to whatever is next your hardware synth will still work.

And you can pick up a Roland XV-2020 for around $200 and still have a few banks of sounds. It's a nice sounding module as well.

And unlike Real Tracks, the synths will play whatever you create.

I see we have two different approaches here, and as I've always said, there is more than one right way to make music.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,301
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,301
Originally Posted By: pghboemike
Originally Posted By: Joe V
I'm not nearly serious enough about my recording (hek, I really don't do much recording at all)


I have found Recording is one of the best ways to improve your playing


ABSOLUTELY 100% right on target.

Like singing, you can sing or play along with the radio and imagine you are as good as the artist on the record, but when it's just your singing and playing coming out of the speakers, man I'll tell you what, reality sets in might fast....and it's brutal at times. That's what makes karaoke so hilarious. You get folks who have sung along with their favorite songs and artists and suddenly, it's just them.....

Think you can sing, play or have good tone? Record it, listen to and and make adjustments, practice, develop your techniques accordingly. Recording is in your face honest. It doesn't lie. But it can also be your best friend towards improving your chops quickly.

Melodyne, not for it's ability to correct the issues, but for it's ability to SHOW you the issues, is one of the better tools for working on your vocals.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,332
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,332
Originally Posted By: Guitarhacker

Melodyne, not for it's ability to correct the issues, but for it's ability to SHOW you the issues...


Very well said! grin


Dan, BIAB2024, SoundCloud Win11, i7(12thGen), 32GB, 1TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD), 2TB Libraries, 1 TB(WD-Black), 2TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD)Data, Motu Audio Express, Keystation 61, SL88 Studio, Reaper

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
I wholeheartedly agree.

Recording yourself is a great practice tool.

It doesn't have to be studio quality, just good enough to show you the places where need to work on.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
To GuitarHacker's point about Melodyne - are there any entry-level articles to teach me how to use it to improve my vocals ? Also - what's the best price I will get it if I keep my eyes open (and which vendor).

Also - to the point about the brutal discovery of how one actually sounds...I've experienced this way too many times...it is truly eye opening to record yourself and only yourself performing a song.

The voice always sounds different to your own ears than other peoples - mine sounding so bad to my own ears I pretty much gave up on singing (in front of people, that is ; ) I'm not sure my voice could be pleasant enough to others to warrant all the singing practice it would take to make me feel like I can actually deliver a fair to good performance best utilizing my God-given abilities.

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
People don't care about your voice, they care about expression. Work on that.

Examples of multi-million sales singers with bad voices: Bob Dylan, Stevie Nicks, John Lennon, Dr. John, and the list goes on and on and on.

If you can express yourself well, and in a manner that resonates with the audience, it doesn't matter how bad the tone of your voice is.

Working on the fundamentals of singing can improve your voice, which will make it sound better to yourself, and will also give you enough control to be able to express yourself better and therefore connect with the audience.

Tone is over rated. Of course, it's important to musicians, and it should be, but we listen with musician's ears, the general public does not.

Just think of all the bad sounding popular formats people listen to when there are or have been better alternatives. 45rpm records, cassette tapes, 8 track tapes, mp3s, and on walk things or phones with tinny ear buds.

And what is good tone anyway? Since there are a lot of guitarists on this forum I'll take one example. Answer me this, who's tone is better? Jimi Hendrix, Jimmy Page, Eric Clapton, Slash, Carlos Santana, Jim Hall, Eric Gale, Kenny Burrell, Joe Pass, Zakk Wylde, Terry Kath, Dimebag, Johnny A, John Abercrombie, T-Bone Walker, Scotty Moore, Eddie Van Halen, Kieth Richards, Brian Setzer?????

IMHO in order of importance what you need is
  1. Expressiveness - this is what connects to the audience
  2. Technique - this is what you need to be able to get your expression from your soul to the ears of the listener
  3. Tone - least important of all, but definitely a plus if you have it so don't ignore that, but work on the others more


Back to the original question, I still recommend the Ketron SD2. But since I haven't heard all the synths I'd like to, there might be a better one out there that I just haven't had the pleasure of playing with.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Thanks for the encouraging words Bob...very inspiring.

Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,492
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,492
to enhance what Bob Norton says:

Tone is THE property to make YOU sound unique.

The better YOU are, the better the chance you might be copied.


(There are many sound-a-likes around, but they never came close to Elvis, Garth Brooks, Frank Sinatra... For some reason, some singers have a quality to outsing their copies on the long run.)


Desktop; i7-2600k, 8 GB mem., Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build
Laptop: i5-2410M, 4 GB mem, Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,079
Originally Posted By: GHinCH
to enhance what Bob Norton says:

Tone is THE property to make YOU sound unique.

The better YOU are, the better the chance you might be copied.


(There are many sound-a-likes around, but they never came close to Elvis, Garth Brooks, Frank Sinatra... For some reason, some singers have a quality to outsing their copies on the long run.)


How true!

Back 'in the day' many wanted to sound like Elvis, and a few came close in tone. But they never quite got Elvis' expression. And those that finally came close came with too little and too late.

I suppose a number of people could cover the Dr. John gravel voice, but I doubt that they could copy his personal expression too.

The Knickerbockers released a song "Lies" that sounded quite a bit like The Beatles, and they did an excellent job at it as well, but they would never be as big as The Beatles.

Your voice is unique, and your expression should be the sum total of all who influenced you plus your own instincts all blended into something that comes out unique. You don't have to be a copy of someone else unless you want to be in a "Tribute Band".

Of course having a great voice helps, but it's the expression that counts. So don't sell yourself short by saying you have a bad voice.

Take at least fundamental vocal technique lessons, breath support, projection, pronunciation, etc. and then sing, sing, sing. Every day, out loud, holding nothing back. The muscles need to be toned.

I had days when I thought I could never be a singer. I started on easy songs and in time I got to be a very good singer. I'll never be an Elvis, Tom Jones or Sinatra, I don't have that fine of an instrument. But I am expressive, have good control of my voice, and the audience loves it.

Charlie Parker (a great, innovative sax player of the bebop days) had a drug problem (not recommended) and had his horn in pawn shops from time to time. He would play loaners, or el-cheapo horns to gig, and even played with a plastic sax. Nobody cared because out of the horn came Charlie Parker's expression.

Just remember, voice is an instrument and it requires learning the fundamentals and practice to get decent.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

New with the DAW Plugin Version 6.0, released with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows: the Reaper® Panel!

This new panel offers built-in specific support for the Reaper® DAW API allowing direct transfer of Band-in-a-Box® files to/from Reaper® tracks!

When you run the Plugin from Reaper®, there is a panel to set the following options:
-BB Track(s) to send: This allows you to select the Plugin tracks that will be sent Reaper.
-Destination Reaper Track: This lets you select the destination Reaper track to receive media content from the Plugin.
-At Bar: You can select a bar in Reaper where the Plugin tracks should be placed.
-Start Below Selected Track: This allows you to place the Plugin tracks below the destination Reaper track.
-Overwrite Reaper Track: You can overwrite previous content on the destination Reaper track.
-Move to Project Folder: With this option, you can move the Plugin tracks to the Reaper project folder.
-Send Reaper Instructions Enable this option to send the Reaper Instructions instead of rendering audio tracks, which is faster.
-Render Audio & Instructions: Enable this option to generate audio files and the Reaper instructions.
-Send Tracks After Generating: This allows the Plugin to automatically send tracks to Reaper after generating.
-Send Audio for MIDI Track: Enable this option to send rendered audio for MIDI tracks.
-Send RealCharts with Audio: If this option is enabled, Enable this option to send RealCharts with audio.

Check out this video highlighting the new Reaper®-specific features: Band-in-a-Box® DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Specifically for Reaper®

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 DAW Plugin Version 6: New Features Video

The new Band-in-a-Box VST DAW Plugin Verion 6 adds over 20 new features!

Watch the new features video to learn more: Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2024 - DAW Plugin Version 6 New Features

We also list these new features at www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.plugin.htm.

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,390
Posts732,456
Members38,441
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Ernest J, ingridguerci94, Izzy, BenChaz, Csofi
38,440 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 114
dcuny 87
rsdean 83
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5