|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 118
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 118 |
I have BIAB 2014 and have a question about getting realistic sound output on my songs. I am using Coyote and wonder if there is any better way to get realistic instrument sounds. What equipment do I need to add to my setup? I'm using a laptop w/Win 10
Music is what feelings sound like.
Windows 11, Behringer UMC204HD Audio Interface, BIAB/RB 2022 Ultra Pak Plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,607
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,607 |
Asus Q500A i7 Win 10 64 bit 8GB ram 750 HD 15.5" touch screen, BIAB 2017, Casio PX 5s, Xw P1, Center Point Stereo SS V3 and EWI 4000s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583 |
Ray answered about RealTracks, but they won't let you hear your melody, since the RT phrases are pre-recorded. To play specific notes and phrases, you need to use MIDI. I'm presuming that you mean the Coyote WT that comes with BIAB/RealBand. However, all the Coyote WT does is "wrap" the default MIDI sounds that come with Windows. It's a way to get you up and running with a DXi synth without having a DXi synth. As such, it isn't going to sound very good. For $40, you can get the Coyote Forte GM2 DXi synth, which will give you better sounds, but not great sounds. For about the same amount, you can get a copy of CakeWalk Music Creator 7, which will include the TTS-1 General MIDI GM2 DXi synth. It's similar to the Coyote Forte in sound quality, but also different. It really depends upon the sounds you are looking for. And then you can spend even more money from there. Check out the products from IK-Multimedia or Native Instruments to step up another level. You can also use hardware synths (either a keyboard or dedicated synth unit), but you can't "render" those to audio - you have to "record" the whole song to get an audio file. While they can sound great, you have to account for more time to capture your creation (a 4 minute song takes 4 minutes to render; likewise, rendering individual tracks take that time to render). With a DXi or VSTi synth, rendering to audio takes a few seconds. Another free option you can pursue is to use Soundfonts. There are some free/low cost soundfont players and a ton of free sound fonts available on the web. However, soundfont technology is pretty much dying away; but you can still get some pretty decent sounds. Fantasize Soundfont Player costs $29. Synthfont costs 15 euro. You can google for others.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
Real tracks are basically non-editable.
A nice sound module like a Ketron SD2 will do wonders. I admit I haven't heard a lot of MIDI modules, but this one has the best General MIDI sound set I've heard. It makes the coyote sound like a kazoo in comparison.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton  Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583 |
Agree with the Ketron (but I'm biased, since I have one).
The sounds really are great.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358 |
Agree with the Ketron (but I'm biased, since I have one).
The sounds really are great.
I'm with Notes and John. The Ketron is impressive for both its size and price.
BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,816
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,816 |
Agree with the Ketron (but I'm biased, since I have one).
The sounds really are great.
I'm with Notes and John. The Ketron is impressive for both its size and price. I'm with them. My friend JonD has the Ketron and it is the best sounding GM sound source that I have ever heard.
Me, it's not about how many times you fail, it's about how many times you get back up.
Cop, that's not how field sobriety tests work.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 6
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 6 |
Ketron/Solton. If you haven't experienced this sound, you have no idea what you've been missing. Allan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358 |
I should clarify.
The Ketron is awesome for MIDI sounds.
I agree with Ray though about the RealTracks.
Horses for courses
BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 126
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 126 |
Have to add my two cents. Software synth-wise, I have a hand-full, including most of what comes with SONAR version 5 and X1 (TTS-1, ZT3A+, Dimension Pro, Pentagon, Studio Instruments, Session Drummer, Rapture and True Piano) Granted, none of those are high-dollar high-end soft synths. I also have Coyote, Sample Tank, and Garritan. I'll use Coyote with BB only as a quick and dirty draft. With Notion, I'll used either the Notion instruments, Garritan or Dimension Pro, and my hardware synths. With SONAR, I use a variety of those SONAR associated synths, and always use one of both of my Yamaha hardware synths (classic Motif keyboard and rack-mount Motif ES). I use the rack Motif ES for my synth-enabled guitars. Even though my Yamaha synths are long in the tooth, for both live and studio, they are hard to beat for realism and extremely low propagation delay compared to soft synths. With programmable velocity and after-touch, and, the Yamaha breath transducer, you can get some realistic flute and sax such as reed/breath chirps. There is a large degree of control and customization available in these hardware synths that don't require another VST plug-in. Now, if I looked at the newest Yamaha Series, I definitely would be writing a large check...but they are astounding. The software synths definitely have come up in quality, but I don't have any software glitches in either of my hardware synths or bus competition to deal with. And, unlike some of the software synths (usually mid to high-end), I don't have to connect to the internet just to re-validate a license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
Agree with the Ketron (but I'm biased, since I have one).
The sounds really are great.
I have a dozen synths and synth modules by Yamaha, Edirol, Roland, Korg, and Ketron. The collection includes an SD90 with some fantastic, realistic sounds and an XV-5050 with thousands of great synth sounds. I also have a few software synths (I prefer hardware but I explored softsynths). Of all of these, Ketron has the best General MIDI bank. I export from BiaB and work in a DAW. I can assign different tracks to different sound modules, and I almost always include many SD2 tracks, sometimes more than any other synth. I can even change the sound of an instrument. My SD90 has dozens of guitars, Tele rear or front pickup, 335, LP, Strat, and others with more generic names. Plus sometimes that piano might sound better as a Rhodes, the guitar as a Clav, the brass as synvox, and so on. I always 'explode' the drum track so I can put the kick on a channel with no FX, assign different modules to different drums, and again, there are usually at least a couple of SD2 drums in there. I mix Real Tracks with MIDI tracks, and use the RTs when they are just right for the song I'm doing. But if they aren't just right, I'll prefer a MIDI track because I can edit it, doing thousands of things that aren't available with RTs. BiaB and a DAW are my toys, and I like to pay with my toys. MIDI gives me thousands of ways to play with the music that RTs don't. We have a few tools in our musical took kit. Sometimes the RT is right for the job, and sometimes MIDI is right for the job. Using the right tool for the job ends up with the best results for your music. Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145 |
I'm very new to the BIAB 2016. Am I correct in my assumption that with the proper script file, I can use the voices from my Tyros 5 in place of the Coyote MIDI voices built into BIAB? As you likely know, the Tyros 5 voices are quite stellar. Thanks.
- Lee
Gear: Tyros 5, MOX8, SoundCraft EFX12 mixer, two Bose L1 Compacts, Yamaha HS-8 monitors, BIAB 2016 UltraPlusPAK, Cubase 8, Steinberg UR-44 interface.
"If everyone played a musical instrument, we wouldn't need police officers or armies." Lee B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635 |
Yes, but no script is really needed. Grab the patch file from here: http://www.pgmusic.com/support_miscellaneous.htmIn the top section of the above page there are links with information on how to use them for BiaB, RB, and PT. Your only challenges will be Getting the MIDI from BiaB to the synth (MIDI Out port) and Getting the sound from the Tyros (mixed in with any other needed sound sources) to your monitors. The Patch file I mentioned is only needed so all your Tyros factory patches can be easily accessed. If you only need the GM sounds, it will not be needed. You will need a way to get MIDI to the Tyros (USB ?) and then the sound from the Tyros to your ears in either scenario.
Last edited by rharv; 05/14/16 07:18 AM.
Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145 |
Gear: Tyros 5, MOX8, SoundCraft EFX12 mixer, two Bose L1 Compacts, Yamaha HS-8 monitors, BIAB 2016 UltraPlusPAK, Cubase 8, Steinberg UR-44 interface.
"If everyone played a musical instrument, we wouldn't need police officers or armies." Lee B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 671
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 671 |
Ray answered about RealTracks, but they won't let you hear your melody, since the RT phrases are pre-recorded. To play specific notes and phrases, you need to use MIDI. I'm presuming that you mean the Coyote WT that comes with BIAB/RealBand. However, all the Coyote WT does is "wrap" the default MIDI sounds that come with Windows. It's a way to get you up and running with a DXi synth without having a DXi synth. As such, it isn't going to sound very good. For $40, you can get the Coyote Forte GM2 DXi synth, which will give you better sounds, but not great sounds. For about the same amount, you can get a copy of CakeWalk Music Creator 7, which will include the TTS-1 General MIDI GM2 DXi synth. It's similar to the Coyote Forte in sound quality, but also different. It really depends upon the sounds you are looking for. And then you can spend even more money from there. Check out the products from IK-Multimedia or Native Instruments to step up another level. You can also use hardware synths (either a keyboard or dedicated synth unit), but you can't "render" those to audio - you have to "record" the whole song to get an audio file. While they can sound great, you have to account for more time to capture your creation (a 4 minute song takes 4 minutes to render; likewise, rendering individual tracks take that time to render). With a DXi or VSTi synth, rendering to audio takes a few seconds. Another free option you can pursue is to use Soundfonts. There are some free/low cost soundfont players and a ton of free sound fonts available on the web. However, soundfont technology is pretty much dying away; but you can still get some pretty decent sounds. Fantasize Soundfont Player costs $29. Synthfont costs 15 euro. You can google for others. John thank you for outlining this subject in a way I can understand. I just happen to be evaluating how to utilize soft synths, and which to consider.
Last edited by dga; 05/14/16 07:32 AM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954 |
google + free vst instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,816
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,816 |
google + free vst instruments Also google/bing Kontakt Player. This is a stripped down version of Kontakt. It comes with some sounds and many third party patches will work with it. Native Instruments also has other free players that you might want to look into. IKMultiMedia also has a free SampleTank 3.
Me, it's not about how many times you fail, it's about how many times you get back up.
Cop, that's not how field sobriety tests work.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
I know that different tools are for different people, and what is best for me isn't necessarily best for everybody. I'm not really wild about soft synths, VST or otherwise. Why? - External hardware synths have a longer shelf life. I still use my 1980s TX81z and MT32 - I got them when Win3.1 was on the PC and Mac used OS6 on Macs with Motorola CPUs. With all the OS changes and orphaned software synths, my old ones still work. Some of the sounds are still great, and I can mix them with the newer sounds of my more recent synths
- External synths have minimal drain on the computer's CPU making it more stable (fewer glitches/crashes). The soft synth requires the CPU to 'do the math' for every note played and ever expressive device use.
- Since external synths don't tax the CPU I can put a dozen of more synths into the mix. I can use the great Dr.Solo sound of my MT32 on one track, the woody acoustic bass of my i3 on another, the great mute guitar of my SD2 on another, the Tele rear pickup sound of my SD90 on another, the FM Rhodes of my TX81z on another and so on, choosing the best patch from my array for each part on the song. Since the sounds are in ROM and/or created by the sound module and not the computer, I could probably use 256 synths with no performance problems on my computer.
- External synths all have about the same latency, 5 or 6ms. That means I can mix a dozen or more synths, and they are synchronized. I've seen soft synths with almost a half second latency, try adjusting that track with one that has a quarter of a second latency.
I started with a DDD5 drum, added the TX and MT shortly after when my keyboard broke, and added newer synths when needed. If I used soft synths I would have had to replace them when OS upgrades happened, and then again when the next upgrade happened, and again and again, making them not only longer lasting but in the long run less expensive than soft synths. Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,358 |
All quite reasonable points, Notes.
But I especially have to concur with the first one. Ain't that the truth!
How many times have we upgraded hardware and operating systems only to then find we have to leave perfectly working software behind.
BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
It's a problem with computers.
I have a 1925 alto sax that works perfectly. I have synth modules that I bought in the 1980s that work perfectly. I have a guitar that was made in 1970 that works perfectly.
But software that worked in the first versions of OSX won't work anymore, and software that worked fine on Win7 won't work on 8.1, much less 10.
There are probably dozens of software synths that will not work on the newest OS from either Microsoft or Apple.
I make my living by playing music live. Why would I want to learn to depend on a soft synth sound for up to 500 songs only to find one day that the synth will no longer work on the new computer OS?
The sparkle of some of the FM synthesized melodic percussion sounds have really never been duplicated by the modern ROM based synths. So my TX81z and DS8 have an important place in my songs, Rhodes, Vibes, and a few others are stellar.
Dr Solo in my MT-32 is a great voice, and newer editions of it that don't use L-A synthesis just don't cut it.
My VL70m synths recreate solo sax, trumpet and many other instruments with the nuances that no other synth not using Physical Modeling synthesis can do, and currently, nobody makes a PM synth.
If I were using software synths, all of these sounds would be gone for me now, and I would miss them dearly - plus, I just wouldn't be able to make music that sounds as good anymore.
That's not to say more modern synths are no good, they excel in different sounds.
And that's the beauty of hardware synths. I can mix the old sounds with the new and get the best of both.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098 |
The software didn't really quit working, it became obsolete as people abandoned it in favor of the bigger, newer and 'better' versions. A high end XP soft synth program that won't work on version 7,8 or 10, still works perfectly in XP.
XP machines are still available and easy to find. They are dirt cheap, many are given away free. Components are still abundant and easily obtained. High end components are now available at more than reasonable cost. Connect your midi instrument to your XP machine just as you always have and you get the same sound just as you always have; the same as Notes gets from his external equipment.
No external module was ever sold that comes close to the quantity sold of XP machines. Therefore, the availability of parts and replacement units cannot match the availability and ability to repair or replace an XP unit. A $0.75 proprietary chip that a replacement cannot be located can turn an obsolete external module into useless trash. Notes' machines are full of cheap but proprietary chips and obsolete components. The manufacturer may or may not have the capability to repair or replace any of Notes units.
At this point in time, an XP machine can be maintained and stay functional indefinitely. The sound they produce can be captured by any audio recording device.
Notes has taken care of and maintained his equipment and assumes it will continue to operate as it always has. That is not the case. The longer a piece does continue to operate, the greater the likelihood that if and when it does fail, there will no longer be a repair or replacement available. Currently, all components of an XP machine are abundant and readily available.
Lastly, Notes is limited to the quantity and quality of the sounds of his external modules. He can stack modules and has more sounds available to him than he likely will ever need. However, compare the quantity of total sounds available to him from his external modules with the much greater number of software synths that were made to operate on XP machines. It's no contest in quantity or overall quality. There are probably hundreds, if not thousands of software synths that will not operate on new OS computers. But they work flawlessly on the OS in which they were designed to.
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 05/17/16 04:53 AM.
BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
Some good points Charlie, but following your reasoning, for the sounds I currently have available I should have a the minimum, one each of the following computers: - Motorola OS 6 or 7 Mac
- Power PC through OSX Mac
- Intel OSX Mac
- Win3.1 PC
- Win95 PC
- WinXP PC
- Win10 PC
on my workbench. And I would have to mix and match the sounds from each of these machines together, not to mention synchronize them. And even in the simplest sense, if I wanted to use a great but discontinued soft synth on XP and also use a spiffy new synth sound only available on Win10, syncing them together is a major PITA. And how many computers from the mid 1980s still are running? My Atari, Win DOS5/Win3.1, Motorola Mac, Win 95, Win 98, Power PC Mac, and an XP or two computers have all died. I have 1980s synths with zero moving parts that still work today. My oldest computer is a 2002 XP ThinkPad. Synths last longer than computers. - - - And yes, I have thousands of sounds I'll never use. I'll probably never use the helicopter, demon from hell, sitar, bottle blow, air pad, sinosound rave, cascade, shattered, and so on (but who knows). They are fine sounds, but not for me right now. My XV5050 alone has well over a thousand sounds in it. I use about 30 of them. I bought it used for a great price, but even if I bought it new, it would be worth it for those 30 sounds. And who knows, I might want to use more if I change the kind of music I'm playing. But yes, there will probably be thousands of sounds I'll never use. On the other hand, I don't play every song in a music book, I don't visit every website on the Internet, I don't listen to every station on my radio, if I watched TV, I'd never watch all the cable channels, I don't watch every video from Netflix, I don't read every article on my e-newspaper, I don't use all the settings on the microwave, I don't use every app on my computers (or tablet or phone), I don't drive on every road my tax money built, I don't even use every feature in BiaB, etc. I don't look at it as things I'm paying for and not using. I look at the things I use. If there are enough features on a device to make it worth my money, I buy it and don't worry about the things that I don't use. Those are simply extra features for another customer, or perhaps some day I'll find a use for them. I buy things for the benefit they bring to me, not the extra features I don't use. And when the soft synths and XP computers are all but gone (like Win3.1 computers and Motorola Macs), my hardware synths will probably still be working. They seem to be very rugged beasts and have outlasted a number of computers already. Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326 |
I have BIAB 2014 and have a question about getting realistic sound output on my songs. I am using Coyote and wonder if there is any better way to get realistic instrument sounds. What equipment do I need to add to my setup? I'm using a laptop w/Win 10 Having good gear is a plus....and using a synth that can play samples is good too. I rarely use midi any more. It's generally audio with an occasional sampled midi synth sound. First: select the BB styles that use real tracks. They sound better than the 100% midi styles Second: open the file with real band and let it create all real tracks. Third: If you need more than that, use sampled sounds and the appropriate synth to play them. This would be my choice if I needed something to play a specific melodic line in a song. Of course, you need to play the parts on a keyboard to do that. Basic keyboard skills will get it done.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 05/18/16 05:43 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
While its true that RTs sound better than MIDI, they sound only slightly better than a good MIDI synth.
However MIDI can be edited to coax more expression that is appropriate to the song you are making, and expression is much more important than tone.
Expression more important than tone?
Definitely.
Just think of the scores of singers that have poor voices but yet are or were extremely popular: Dr. John, Stevie Nicks, John Lennon, Blossom Dearie, Leon Redbone, Bob Dylan, and the list goes on and on and on and on and on.
And what is good tone anyway? The two most popular jazz tenor saxophonists of the 20th century both played the same model sax. But if you take a non-musician and play a recording from John Coltrane and Stan Getz the overwhelming majority of normal listeners will say they don't even play the same instrument - not a different make and model, but an entirely different instrument.
Tone is overrated and expression is underrated to musicians, because to the vast majority of listeners it's just the opposite.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098 |
I agree with all you say Notes. You would not necessarily need a separate machine for each OS. Many software programs were cross platform so one machine could house several different software programs from older OS systems.
My point was simply that these older soft synths are not 'lost' and can still be available if someone wanted them. Also, as things in computing are currently, an XP system doesn't have to die. Every component of XP systems is replaceable, thus repairable. An offline, dedicated unit can be as reliable as external hardware.
My point was that if I had a very expensive, top of the line XP compatible software synth and library, a dedicated CPU may be worth having just for the soft synth and library.
BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
You have good points.
However my old synths work fine in the rack without another computer. They are virtually maintenance free, turn on in a few seconds, and if I ever need a replacement, I see them on Ebay all the time.
It's much easier for me to hook up another synth in the MIDI branched chain than another computer.
I suppose I could run an XP computer forever, if a desktop, but the repairs (I can't do that myself) would possibly be too expensive.
I have a 2002 ThinkPad that gave me over 10 years service doing one-nighters, bouncing on stage, riding in the van, constantly changing temperatures, and running flawlessly every night.
A few years ago it developed a problem. It still works fine, but the laptop screen has to be in certain positions to see the display. I took it in, the Lenovo repairman said IBM quit making those parts years ago. If I buy a broken machine of the same model, I could probably fix it. I told him 'No thanks'.
BTW, the other 2002 ThinkPad is still working flawlessly (I run two on stage). I replaced the defective one with a newer ThinkPad.
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098 |
Your stage setup sounds very stable and reliable. I'm referring more to producing synth sounds for a studio recording setup than for live stage use. If I had purchased $700 NI Komplete package in 2008-09 era for my XP and knew the product inside/out, there is no reason it could not be performing the same function for me today even though my BIAB/RB 2016 is running off a Kompact incompatible Windows 10 desktop. Having an XP machine would make perfect sense to me. BTW, your thinkpad could probably still be used daily in your studio by connecting a external monitor to the VGA output. 
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 05/20/16 07:13 AM.
BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
I'm sure the 2002 ThinkPad would work with an external monitor, but with the single core Pentium III processor, it takes too long to boot or do anything complicated. If playing soft synth sounds, I'm afraid the latency would be too much for me. And when playing with a half dozen or so synths at the same time, latency becomes a big issue. Most hardware synths run at 5 or 6 ms latency. There is no consistency with softsynths. One could be a tenth of a second, another almost half a second, and there is no way I'm going to tweak the tracks, ppm by ppm until the both play at the same time. Multiply that by six. On stage I use the machines for 2 things, play the backing tracks I create myself, or display the words, music notation or both. With over 550 songs in our 'book', the newer ones aren't memorized yet, so I need to glance at the music and/or words. And for those songs we haven't played in a long time, that first glance is usually enough to jog the memory. And also, in the middle of a song, even while you may be singing or playing the sax/guitar/windsynth someone might come up and request a "Happy Birthday" or another song, jerking me out of 'the zone'. A few glances at the music can help me find my place in the backing track and get back to the business of performing. I never understood why people come up in the middle of a song to say something. I guess they don't understand it's like coming up to the podium while someone is in the middle of a paragraph in his/her speech and asking a question. We forgive them for they know not what they do Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145 |
"I never understood why people come up in the middle of a song to say something." Agreed. That drives me nuts too! I can only do 35 things at once. When people talk to you, that equals 36 things. At that point I'm doomed .
Gear: Tyros 5, MOX8, SoundCraft EFX12 mixer, two Bose L1 Compacts, Yamaha HS-8 monitors, BIAB 2016 UltraPlusPAK, Cubase 8, Steinberg UR-44 interface.
"If everyone played a musical instrument, we wouldn't need police officers or armies." Lee B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687 |
I'll go OT here to relate one of my favorite stories. The world renowned pianist Paul Smith used to perform at a Velvet Turtle right down the street from me in a small lounge. He was right in the middle of a smoking solo of Tunisia when this woman is walking all scrunched over trying to keep her head out of his spotlight with a paper in her hand. As she gets close to him he motions to his bass player and stops cold right in the middle of his solo. She was obviously startled. He smiles and says pleasantly "What would you like to hear, dear?" He looks at the paper and says, "Sure we can do that", gives her another big smile and picks right up with this killer solo.
I thought that was so cool. He actually embarrassed the crap out of her without obviously doing it, you know?
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,102 |
Wow! I could never do that. I could be kind and stop playing, but never pick up where I left off. But then, I play with backing tracks that I create myself. Perhaps with a real band I could resume, but it would definitely take me in a different direction (perhaps better, perhaps worse).
Back on topic.
More realistic sound got me thinking.
All sounds are real.
I play saxophone, it's my main instrument, and has been for decades. I was first in the all-state band every year I was in school, and for a tenor player, that is quite a feat - it goes to the alto player by default.
I have two great tenor saxes and one alto with the voice of an angel.
But I probably play the WX5/VL70m MIDI sax on stage as much as I do the acoustic ones.
Why?
Sometimes the synth sax sound is simply more appropriate for the song.
Just as a pianist might switch for the Rhodes when he/she wants that sound, I switch to one of the synth sax sounds.
Do you mean acoustic instead of realistic?
Once a sound is recorded, it is no longer acoustic anyway.
The criticisms of MIDI are very similar to those aimed at electric guitars way back when.
And the saxophone itself was dissed when it first came out. German bands among others refused to use it, and considered it an inferior clarinet-ish sounding instrument.
There is a time for acoustic, a time for acoustic electric, and a time for electronic. The trick is picking the right tool for the right job at the appropriate time.
And since virtually every recording that has made it to one of the Billboard charts in the past 30 years has MIDI deeply embedded into its DNA (Per Alan Parsons and Craig Anderton), there is obviously nothing wrong with MIDI.
The A-List pros know.
Insights and incites by Notes
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145 |
The man (Paul Smith) has class, Bob!
Gear: Tyros 5, MOX8, SoundCraft EFX12 mixer, two Bose L1 Compacts, Yamaha HS-8 monitors, BIAB 2016 UltraPlusPAK, Cubase 8, Steinberg UR-44 interface.
"If everyone played a musical instrument, we wouldn't need police officers or armies." Lee B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 145 |
Excellent post, Notes! I've always wondered the same. I've heard some pretty crappy MIDI voices even on my Tyros 5 (although rare) but after they are placed in the mix, they fit like an expensive pair of leather gloves. They seem to sound natural. I think Yamaha knows this, and goes to great pains to design voices that sound good inside and outside the mix. Then there's effects, which can make or break a MIDI instrument's sound...but I digress . - Lee
Gear: Tyros 5, MOX8, SoundCraft EFX12 mixer, two Bose L1 Compacts, Yamaha HS-8 monitors, BIAB 2016 UltraPlusPAK, Cubase 8, Steinberg UR-44 interface.
"If everyone played a musical instrument, we wouldn't need police officers or armies." Lee B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!
The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!
There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.
If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.
We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,629
Posts735,237
Members38,522
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean