Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
RealBand
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
J
joe5 Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
Elsewhere someone said RB is pretty "basic." What does it lack that most others have?

RealBand
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,631
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,631
VST timing for one
Basically this is because it is MIDI based (not sample based) which means less accurate audio edits at times.

Otherwise it likely does what you need, but the the path to getting satisfactory results may be different than other DAWs and the graphic interface less attractive.

For a lot of us the benefits of the regeneration features being available outweighs the sacrifice of the other aspects.

If I 'need' the other features I'll switch, but not until then.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
RealBand
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,353
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,353
Joe5, have you tried using RealBand?

It's not as feature packed as other DAW's costing many hundreds of dollars, but it has some really great options, is very usable, and supports a pretty reasonable feature list. The fact that it integrates with Band In A Box styles is one of its strongest features.

You need to know what you need to do, and what are your expectations.

One thing is guaranteed, RealBand has features that you won't find in any other DAW (e.g. Track Generation for BiaB styles)


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
RealBand
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,567
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,567
Originally Posted By: joe5
Elsewhere someone said RB is pretty "basic." What does it lack that most others have?

Have you used any other DAWs? If not you may find RB does the trick just fine. As others have said it has a single feature that other DAWs don't...the ability to directly interface with the amazing RealTracks.

On the other hand, there are DAWs that are free and that cost as little as $60 that are far more feature-rich and way more state-of-the-art in their GUI. If that does not matter to you then you may be fine with RB.

Personally I love my DAW to be packed with features and relatively bug-free. I find RB to be slow and glitchy with a clunky interface that I do not enjoy using.

So, I use mainly BIAB and then go straight to my DAW (Reaper). If I want additional options in the RealTracks I will use RB in between to generate more RealTrack options but I try and finish in RB just as quickly as I can so I can get back to my modern DAW!

Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 08/10/16 04:43 PM.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
Similar to the ability to regenerate a portion of a track, RB has a feature called Multiriff. Multiriff generates 7 versions of the selected audio even to include the complete track.

You can audition each of the 7 multiriffs and select any one of them or save any number of the 7 to individual tracks to edit portions of each into a custom multiriff. The multiriff audio can extend beyond the beginning and end of the selected audio if you wish which helps to create a seamless and professional edit.

You can choose Multiriff from two options. Open multiriff to regenerate the current instrument or open Multiriff choosing a different instrument.

The result of multiriff is that you can create a custom track by auditioning hundreds of variations and edits in minutes that would take hours in BIAB. An added benefit of Multiriffs is that a midi track is created at the same time so that a midi instrument can be chosen to double the riff.

I recently created a guitar track of lead fills that consisted of 18 sections selected to place the fills. 7 tracks each of the 18 fills resulted in 126 takes of audio to choose the best fill for each section. Imagine having a session player doing 126 takes during a recording. There may be hours of recorded RealTracks for the Multiriff to review and generate new audio from.

Another feature I found on that project is by using two instruments from the same style often provides audio clips that compliment each instrument by generating similar riffs so that it sounds like two players working together at the same time during a recording session. This provides very unique and realistic sounding tracks.

Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 08/10/16 06:07 PM.

BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
RealBand
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Joe5: quite an impressive response to your question.

Here are some videos you will want to see for more info:

http://www.pgmusic.com/videos.realband.htm

DE


Win 10, 64 bit, love my Lenovo T420, BIAB 2019 (613), RB 2019 (2)

Short term memory is getting shorter.
RealBand
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,784
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,784
Joe, see my answer to this question in the other thread.


Me, it's not about how many times you fail, it's about how many times you get back up.
Cop, that's not how field sobriety tests work.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,324
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,324
As I wrote....

Yeah, it's pretty basic. A simple down and dirty DAW. It gets the job done. However, it's not designed to go head to head with Sonar, Cubase, Ableton, or the Mac ProTools....at least not yet.

It has a number of good functions, the main one being it's ability to generate Real Tracks. '

It's lack of timing sync with VST's and awkward audio editing leave much to be desired if you're trying to use it as a production DAW on a music project.

I really gave it a try on a project a few years back. I was determined to complete a project using it. However, I ran into some issues that I could not resolve (and don't remember the details on now) so I had to move the tracks to my Sonar DAW to complete the project as I intended.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
RealBand
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
J
joe5 Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
As I said on the other thread (didn't mean to have this conversation going in 2 places, the other one just kind of led there smile ), thanks for the replies!

J3, it's funny you mentioned Reaper as that's the only DAW I've tried to date and didn't care for the interface at all. It's all so subjective. But as I said in the other thread, it was a pretty cursory look; I'll probably revisit that and try a few others, but my needs are (I think) not too complex; it's just me as a solo artist on a synth, so much fewer concerns about stuff like mic placement, mixing etc.

RealBand
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
I wasn't aware of this thread and posted some of the additional benefits and features other and the ability to generate tracks in the BIAB 101 thread in the Recording Forum.


BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
I am interested in knowing how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar. We had a coincidence where Floyd used the same sample and real track as I did and one of his songs started with the exact same riff as one of mine. On one of my current songs I did a multitrack 8 bar solo section, and then did it again, and then again. That made 21 tracks. Of those 21, 14 of them sounded so similar that it was obvious that there were not a lot of sample snippets to choose from in a section of a song that went 1-4-1-1-5-4-1-5..... I ended up cutting and pasting from that pallet and coming up with the intro I needed, but that showed some limitation as far as what is available in Real Band. And you really can't switch real tracks as far as performer, because you'd end up going from Les Paul to Tele to Strat and very different tonal properties, so if you use a Brent Mason real track, you have to use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing. for this CD, which is SLOWLY in the works, I am creating sample solos and bringing in players to play live based on those generated segments. The sound generation feature is obviously the bread and butter of PG products, but I now see why people pull the generated tracks out of RB and move it to a better DAW. I just started using Protools and though it takes time to dump tracks to individual wav files and then import to Protools, woking in Protools is MUCH better as far as the DAW side of things. Of course Protools can't create music, but it never claimed to.

Last edited by eddie1261; 08/11/16 08:59 AM.

I am using the new 1040XTRAEZ form this year. It has just 2 lines.

1. How much did you make in 2023?
2. Send it to us.
RealBand
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Joe5 " it's funny you mentioned Reaper as that's the only DAW I've tried to date and didn't care for the interface at all. It's all so subjective."

I use Reaper, it's the most flexible DAW I've ever used.
I could take up paragraphs praising but I won't.
It's extremely inexpensive $60.
You can watch Version 5 for free at:
http://reaper.fm/videos.php
Kenny Goya (?) is the author and has dozens of Version 4 at:
https://www.groove3.com/

PS: You can buy a monthly pass for $15 per month (and see hundreds (all) tutorials).

DE


Win 10, 64 bit, love my Lenovo T420, BIAB 2019 (613), RB 2019 (2)

Short term memory is getting shorter.
RealBand
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,631
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,631
There are a few variations of real tracks that work well together, don't always have to 'use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing'.

Plus, guitarists use FX and change their sound all the time. One section can be one RT and another be a different one, be they verse, chorus or bridge (or solo) whatever.
Your average listener is not going to think about what guitar was used ..

FWIW I find mixing different styles/RTs to be quite enjoyable.
From what I understand, chord changes are given preference (weight) during generation. In other words, this section works well for this change, this one OK, etc
So this would make some generations weighted to use a given phrase at the opportune time more often than another. They do try to 'randomize' it, but that includes using a phrase at the beginning of one multiriff and again at the end of another.
Who knows?
Either one could be inspiring. A signature lick too early in a solo may make the rest mundane, while if you end a nice solo on that same really cool lick it may 'make' it .. so location can be a factor also.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
"I am interested in knowing how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar."


Here you go Eddie.


Say I Do


BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
Was it 126 guitars or 126 between guitars and sax?

Great use of panning as well.


I am using the new 1040XTRAEZ form this year. It has just 2 lines.

1. How much did you make in 2023?
2. Send it to us.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
126 guitars. I did the same for the sax but did not count them. There were not as many for the sax and I did them after the guitars and had the routine figured out by that time.

This is a later version than I originally posted here on the forum and it reflects changes in lyrics, mixing, panning from suggestions made by several members. Steve Young made the panning suggestion.


BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,324
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,324
Originally Posted By: eddie1261
how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar. We had a coincidence where Floyd used the same sample and real track as I did and one of his songs started with the exact same riff as one of mine. ...........14 of them sounded so similar that it was obvious that there were not a lot of sample snippets to choose from in a section of a song .............. that showed some limitation as far as what is available in Real Band. And you really can't switch real tracks as far as performer, because you'd end up going from Les Paul to Tele to Strat and very different tonal properties, so if you use a Brent Mason real track, you have to use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing. for this CD, which is SLOWLY in the works, I am creating sample solos and bringing in players to play live based on those generated segments. The sound generation feature is obviously the bread and butter of PG products, but I now see why people pull the generated tracks out of RB and move it to a better DAW. I just started using Protools and though it takes time to dump tracks to individual wav files and then import to Protools, woking in Protools is MUCH better as far as the DAW side of things. Of course Protools can't create music, but it never claimed to.



Yep.... I have heard some folk's songs that have similar licks in them, and that's to be expected since we're all working from the same palate of samples. Ditto on the guitar tone.... kinda hard sometimes to jump from track to track when, like you said, ones a Strat and the other is a Les Paul.

My song THE BEST CHRISTMAS.... on my music page somewhere.... has a compilation of 5 tracks being used to get the B Mason solo. The piano's are 3 tracks I think....

I'm a big fan of using live players for the lead guitars and even the rhythms because of that issue.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,301
It can be tedious stitching together a good solo, but the end result can be so remarkable that people can't believe it is not a live person. One of the songs on my CD, Here goes nuttin', has a pedal steel solo in it and I got an email from a pedal steel player that asked "Who played that solo?? I don't think I could duplicate that." And that solo was a compilation from 8 different iterations of an 8 bar passage. All cutting and pasting.... and much experimentation.


I am using the new 1040XTRAEZ form this year. It has just 2 lines.

1. How much did you make in 2023?
2. Send it to us.
RealBand
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Nobody has mentioned this so maybe you're doing it already. Are you aware that you can change the chord grid for each generation? Just make sure you're only generating a new track and leaving the existing ones alone.

Solo's especially tend to float over the chords, not necessarily strictly following them. Try using different but related changes and see what happens. In the key of C try using Dm for 8 bars or make the whole thing EbMaj7 if the tune is in Cm. You can try some of the common jazz changes like using tritone subs which would be using an F#7 for a C7 once or twice during a chorus.

You can put a swing solo against an even beat or vice versa. For drums I'll make 3 or 4 completely different drum tracks with different RD's plus changing the part markers on the chord grid. That puts the fills in different places plus activates the substyles and gives you tons of choices.

Bob


Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
RealBand
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
Good point Bob. I do that sometimes and along that same thought, I may experiment with changing the song style during the chorus.

I picked up the idea from songs like Gene Chandler's Duke Of Earl



Charlie

Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 08/24/16 12:05 AM.

BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,587
Posts734,736
Members38,500
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Krystal Mcclain, Tusar Sarkar, RTW, wtsy365, DerFlex
38,500 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 191
DC Ron 109
dcuny 81
WaoBand 75
Today's Birthdays
AlberMaxSax, Lloyd Morris
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5