You need to be logged in to post
Options
Index
#204722 - 05/29/13 06:16 PM [User Showcase] Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals)
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
When I posted a song a while back recorded using Sinsy, Don Gaynor had expressed hope that with this sort of technology he'd be able to sing again. While the fine folk at DynaVox haven't gotten back to him yet, I thought I might have a go at solving the problem.

You may have noticed I've been a bit absent from the board since then. blush

Here's the result: Loch Lomond (with harmony)

It's "state of the art" 1980's formant synthesis. It's not the technology I'd intended to use, but that's a rather long story. I'm still working out the bugs in the code. It's not ready for end users, but it's finally "singing."

There's a bit of post-processing on the vocals. I used the PG Vinyl plugin to reduce some of the popping on consonants, and a low-pass filter to kill some of the high-end noise. I've also run things through EZ Mix to add some reverb and compression.

Most of the phonemes are fairly acceptable, but there's an /H/ and /L/ that seem to have gone missing. I've only tweaked one of the phonemes. At 0:15 there's what sounds like a breath noise. It's actually a bug, so I lowered the volume there. (I intend to add support for breaths at some point).

The accompaniment is PJONPBA.STY (PopBalladPiano & Ac.Guitar[85RS]). I guessed at the chords from the sheet music, so there may be some clinkers in there. The harmony is just thirds above the melody, so there may be some clinkers there, too.
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#204723 - 05/29/13 06:35 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 8892
Loc: Oklahoma, USA
Don Gaynor Offline
Veteran

Registered: 12/10/03
Posts: 8892
Loc: Oklahoma, USA
I love it David! Thanki, mate!

Now you may understand the difficulty I ran into trying to overcome inertia and reluctance to change on the part of Corporations, especially from ootsiders. Very frustrating and disheartening. It's extremely difficult to keep on slugging when we see no progress. I have several dead-end projects that I am stymied on including "The iPod Project" (qv).


Edited by Don Gaynor (05/29/13 06:48 PM)
Edit Reason: To make a semblance of cents to Canadian readers and moderators.
_________________________
Donny

SoundClick: http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=1209254&content=music
SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/donald-gaynor
BIAB 2021 w/current updates.

Top
#204730 - 05/29/13 07:21 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
Hopefully, I can shape it into something useful. I've taken a couple of days off work in an effort to get this into shape, and I've just found a major portion of the code that needs to be rewritten.

Once this is stable, I still need to set up some sort of front end for it. The current plan is to have it read MusicXML files. I've got some code I've written for a different project I should be able to re-purpose.

I also need to write some code to do dictionary lookup. I've got a nice hyphenated phonetic dictionary, so hopefully the majority of that work is already done.

But... I still need to stabilize this code.

If you're really lucky, this will give incentive to DynaVox to finish up their project, and you'll get some real voice synthesis. wink
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#204740 - 05/29/13 09:48 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 12/06/05
Posts: 4047
Loc: 80 Mi North of Sacramento CA
seeker Offline
Veteran

Registered: 12/06/05
Posts: 4047
Loc: 80 Mi North of Sacramento CA
David,

This effort you have made into this cutting edge technology is outstanding.
I've spent thousands of hours since the 70's working on coding projects that
had never been done before. Can really appreciate the efforts you have put into
this.

Hang in there and continuing good efforts on your "projects". Note didn't say
good luck. Patience and stamina, be with you.
_________________________
FrankB

Down The Street vs2015 12-03-2014
Win7, AMD QuadA8-5500,16GB,2TeraHD, Komplete 10
PG Ultra Plus 2016,Alesis 12USB, Sonar Platinum

Top
#204748 - 05/30/13 01:42 AM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: seeker]
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
Originally Posted By: seeker
This effort you have made into this cutting edge technology is outstanding.


Yes, cutting edge 1980's technology at it's best. wink

This is about four generations removed from current voice synthesis technology. You might recall S.A.M. (Software Automatic Mouth), which was the basis of MacInTalk. If you play with the demo on that page (decompiled from assembly into C, and then converted into JavaScript!), you can hear the familial resemblance.

Interestingly, the company that put out S.A.M. is still in business as SoftVoice, Inc., and it was their demo of Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star that convinced me that while formant synthesis might not create realistic results, it might be "good enough" for my purposes. Since they've been doing this for the last 30 years, I think their example is probably as good as this technology gets.
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#204794 - 05/30/13 12:34 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 06/22/12
Posts: 2873
Loc: Karlsruhe, Germany
boehm Offline
Veteran

Registered: 06/22/12
Posts: 2873
Loc: Karlsruhe, Germany
Hi David,

a milestone in your efforts. Following your blog I know
what a lot of work this was and still is.

Guenter
_________________________
http://www.21d.de/
Latest Song: What You Desire

Top
#204807 - 05/30/13 02:59 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
The next step it to make this usable.

I'd like to write a UI that displays the music on a staff, and integrates with the CMU phonetic dictionary. Nothing terribly complex - just good enough to "get the job done." It'll output a .wav file, which BiaB can load.

The rest is up to Don. whistle
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#204822 - 05/30/13 04:49 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 08/10/12
Posts: 9497
Loc: Florida
floyd jane Offline
Veteran

Registered: 08/10/12
Posts: 9497
Loc: Florida
David,

I commend you on the effort that this must require. Standing ovation for that, alone. Bravo.

floyd

Top
#204856 - 05/30/13 09:27 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 05/30/08
Posts: 4785
Sundance Offline
Veteran

Registered: 05/30/08
Posts: 4785
Kudos David. What a thoughtful thing to do - not to mention all the time and effort involved. I'm sure it will bring Don and others lots of fun in making their music when you're done.

Top
#204913 - 05/31/13 12:25 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
Thanks! smile
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#204957 - 05/31/13 05:54 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 10/31/08
Posts: 17381
Loc: Australia
Noel96 Offline
Veteran

Registered: 10/31/08
Posts: 17381
Loc: Australia
Hi David,

This is amazing! I can't even begin to comprehend the amount of effort that must have been involved. You realize that you'll have to change your signature's saying now! "Loch Lomond" is all about 'voice control' at it's absolute cleverest smile

Regards,
Noel
_________________________
LINKS TO MY BIAB/RB SONGS


Top
#205047 - 06/01/13 12:01 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 10/25/08
Posts: 7985
Loc: Winston-Salem, NC
Pat Marr Offline
Veteran

Registered: 10/25/08
Posts: 7985
Loc: Winston-Salem, NC
David,

I've got to be honest and say that my (very) first impression of this was that the timing of your presentation couldn't have been worse, considering the fact that Guenter has recently posted some excellent projects using a more advance synthetic voice. Comparisons are inevitable, and you are at a disadvantage being a single developer working for free without any kind of subsidy.

But the more I listen and compare your synth voice to the one Guenter is using, the more impressed I am with yours.

The biggest difference to my ear is that yours has a pronounced artifact where the syllables are joined together, whereas the other engine has figured out a way to blend the syllables more smoothly... which, in a song environment is definitely more musical.

Having dealt with artifacts when blending snippets in a DAW, I have to wonder if it would help to fade each of your separate syllables on both ends so the sharp edge that causes the artifact is less pronounced when they are joined together.

In the final analysis, all comparisons aside, what you have accomplished here is PHENOMEnal! (pun intended)

I wish you much luck with further development and I look forward to hearing more examples as time goes on.


Edited by Pat Marr (06/01/13 03:24 PM)

Top
#205060 - 06/01/13 02:10 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 12/05/11
Posts: 10741
Loc: GA USA
Janice & Bud Offline
Veteran

Registered: 12/05/11
Posts: 10741
Loc: GA USA
The patience of Job must have gone into that. I can't imagine the code (and I used to do a little programming). Gonna be fascinating to see how it plays out. Thanks.
_________________________
J&B Soundcloud
J&B YouTube
J&B Website

Top
#205064 - 06/01/13 03:19 PM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: Pat Marr]
Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
dcuny Offline
Veteran

Registered: 09/27/10
Posts: 4327
Loc: Sacramento, California
Hi, Pat.

Thanks for the your response. Before getting into details, I should clarify: this project is just re-implementing what others have already done, and much better than me. From text to speech: The MITalk system (Allen) was a great resource for me. The technology is essentially abandoned for other, better approaches. I'll give an explanation why I was unable to go down that route.

Also, my immediate goal is to get Don something usable. If DynaVox finally gets him a better synthesis program, then, Hurrah!. No need for this program.


I'm aware of the Vocaloid software - I've got the Avanna as well, because it's probably got the best English accent of all the current Vocaloids.

I've also spent a lot of time looking at UTAU, a free synthetic singer written along the lines of Vocaloid.

In fact, my initial approach was exactly what you suggested: record various phonemes (using Vowel/Consonant/Vowel patterns), cross-fade them together, and use pitch shifting.

I've actually written a number of tools to do this. The stumbling block was the pitch shifting. The pitch shifting needs to shift some frequencies (the glottal pulse) and keep others fixed (the formants) or you get the "Mickey Mouse" effect.

BiaB uses the astonishingly good elastiq algorithm. I couldn't find any free libraries that gave decent results - even the RubberBand library, which has formant preservation, didn't do an acceptable job.

I tried FFT-based pitch shifting, but didn't have much luck.

I got better results with PSOLA (Pitch Synchronous Overlap and Add), but there were significant artifacts: Here's an example.


The examples I'd heard of formant-based synthesis convinced me that while it lacked realism, it was capable of creating intelligible and musical synthesis. I think you'll agree that, with some tuning, this synthesizer may not create realistic voices, but they can be understandable.


And to be honest, I've been focused on just getting the code to work. I've spent very little time on fine-tuning the phonemes. This is alpha-software, and there's lots of room for improvement.

That said, in Text-to-Speech Synthesis, Paul Taylor argues that formant-based synthesis is intrinsically un-natural because it can't capture the details of real speech, so I don't hold high hopes for it.

I've considered mixing pre-recorded audio with synthesized sounds like eSpeak, but that raises plenty of issues. And there's still the issue of handling sounds like /B/, /D/ and /G/, which are voiced and consonants. So for the moment, I'm sticking with "pure" synthesis.

I hope that somewhat explains that approach I've taken. Despite the many flaws, I figured it was time to move ahead with the project. For the moment, I'll be focusing on creating a UI.
_________________________
-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

Top
#205129 - 06/02/13 10:36 AM [User Showcase] Re: Loch Lomond (Synthetic Vocals) [Re: dcuny]
Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 4117
Loc: Helsinki, Finland
dani48 Offline
Veteran

Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 4117
Loc: Helsinki, Finland
Hi, David !

I am no expert on these matters
which maybe makes me better judging
the end result from a listeners point of view ?
I am referring to the tune. Maybe I am
partial as this tune has a special meaning
for me. You see, once I sang this song to my
dear wife Beni at the shore of this Loch and little
did I know then, that the words held a prophecy
as "me and my true love would never be allowed
to meet again on the bonnie, bonnie banks of Loch Lomond" !
She died of cancer on October the 26 th 2011 !

I think you have done a marvellous job David !
Keep on the good work !

Cheers
Dani

Top


PG Music News
Customers LOVE Band-in-a-Box® 2021!

Check out some of the latest Band-in-a-Box® feedback we've received:

"There's a saying 'Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for a lifetime.' That's exactly what my friend did in 1990. He taught me how to use BIAB and I've used it hundreds of time to do arraignment and to jam with any style band."

"Love BIAB. I use it daily. Their support is great too!"

"RealTracks are amazing!!! I use BIAB for backtracks in my solo act... Still using the basic package and it's all need..."

"I have used Band in A Box for many years. If it would have been around when I was young, I would have been a much better musician. I use it for all my songs I have written and recorded. With Band In A Box I can sit in my room and sound like a whole band without having to put up with them!"

"If you know something about music and take the time to learn the program, you can make it do some amazing things. It is a great help to songwriters who want to demo their song without paying for studio time. It makes changes and tweaks much easier as well."

"Been using it for so many years. It's a great tool. The instruments that I don't have or play make up the void and it saves so much time. I use this program for every song I write."

"Great tool for the songwriter!"

"An essential part of my studio! I write songs on piano, but I'm not a pianist by a long way. BIAB is like having a roomful of session players in your studio, and just the simple act of taking your basic idea and hearing a skilled pianist play it presents so many new ideas and options you hadn't thought of."

"Powerful, easy to use, inexpensive and they even split the modest payments up if you want. No complaints. Lots of satisfaction."

"I added a steel guitar to a fully produced original. He followed every change like he was in the studio reading the chart. Fascinating technology!"

"I have used it to make backing tracks for six CD's with about 12 songs on each. They make a great gift!"

"It's simply a necessity - buy it now - the staff and support do a great job as well!"

"A great tool for us songwriters!"

"I LOVE Band-in-a-Box!"

"I see it as a very worthwhile investment. In fact, from initial purchase about 8 years ago, using the backing tracks I have made, my income from that investment has returned over 5,000% on the investment!"

continued...

Do you have something to say about Band-in-a-Box®? Post your own thoughts for Windows or Mac version today!

Band-in-a-Box® - Boxing Clever - Sound on Sound #TBT

Did you know that Band-in-a-Box® is more than 30 years old? I stumbled across this 1990 magazine article explaining the relatively new program, and think it's an enjoyable read for any Band-in-a-Box user - it really shows that we are always listening to user feedback when developing our program!

Read the article: Boxing Clever: Band-In-A-Box Software

A few of my favorite statements:

"The intention of PG Music's Band-In-A-Box package is to couple that speed and convenience with the improved flexibility of the personal computer. Versions are available for the Atari ST, Mac, and PC compatibles. Have the programmers succeeded? And can they rid themselves of the stigma of the auto-accompaniment section? Given the above state of affairs, the first hurdle that the program has to overcome is one of acceptance and, frankly, a name like 'Band-In-A-Box' is a bad start."

(I think our name was a great start!)

"The final results are, to say the least, impressive. Band-In-A-Box achieves something that most hardwired auto-accompaniment sections have never been able to do - inject a degree of feel into the music. It really does sound more human than so many of the computer generated pieces I've heard."

"...I'm quite convinced that PG Music will have a winner on their hands. This is one piece of software that you can get more out of than you put in."

#TipTuesday Convert RealDrums to MIDI!

Did you know that you can convert RealDrums to MIDI?

VintageGibson shared this tip to our Tips & Tricks forum, which is a great place to look for program tips from other Band-in-a-Box users!

Read this handy trick.

Have a program tip or trick of your own? Share it on our Tips & Tricks forum today!

Band-in-a-Box® 2021 Italian for Mac is Here!

Abbiamo lavorato tanto e abbiamo aggiunto 80 nuove funzionalità e una straordinaria collezione di nuovi contenuti, tra cui 202 RealTracks, nuovi RealStyles, SuperTracks MIDI, Studi Strumentali, Performance degli Artisti, Bonus RealDrums "Singoli", trascrizioni RealDrums, MultiStyles PAK 1, Xtra Styles PAKs 10 e 11, e altro ancora!

Pacchetti | Nuove Caratteristiche

Export / Print a List of Selected Styles (Band-in-a-Box®)

Did you know that you can export a list of your Styles from Band-in-a-Box®?

Head to this forum post in our "Tips & Tricks" forum, where VideoTrack shares another handy tip for Band-in-a-Box® users!

Band-in-a-Box® Chord List Resource

Ever wonder which chords are supported in Band-in-a-Box®? Access the information from the Help file in the program, or read through the list with our Online Manual!

Chord List - Mac Online Manual
Chord List - Windows Online Manual

Review the other Reference topcs while you're there - with explanations of the different menus and the Keystroke Commands (Hot Keys), you'll definitely learn something new!

Band-in-a-Box® 2021 French for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2021 contient quelques 80 fonctionnalités inédites!

Nous avons beaucoup travaillé pour offrir à Band-in-a-Box® 2021® cette étonnante panoplie de quelques 80 fonctions inédites et sa collection de contenus originaux à savoir : 202 RealTracks, des RealStyles inédits, des SuperTracks MIDI, des Etudes Instrument, des Performances Artiste, un Bonus RealDrums "Solo", des transcriptions RealDrums, les MultiStyles PAK 1, les Xtra Styles PAKs 10 et 11, et bien plus encore!

Achat | Nouvelles Fonctionnalités

Forum Stats
34886 Members
66 Forums
70873 Topics
613795 Posts

Max Online: 2537 @ 01/19/20 07:09 AM
Newest Members
Bestmengqin, qcfoetus, Phantomio, Baccalaureate, Alex Di Carvalho

34885 Registered Users
Top Posters (30 Days)
VideoTrack 193
Simon - PG Music 148
Jim Fogle 142
Matt Finley 136
swingbabymix 135
Pipeline 132
David Snyder 129
rayc 123
MarioD 123
Torrey Bliss 117
Today's Birthdays
George Leering, Jeeep, knutschke