Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
Hi BIAB'ers- Here's a song I wrote several years back, with a vocal by Lisa on a four track cassette player and recently revived with new BIAB backing real tracks, that better fit the style of the song. I recorded the cassette tracks into Digital Performer 8 with the vocal on a separate track, then matched the tempo and key and groove to create an new backing arrangement. I used the COLDRO Even 8ths real tracks style and added 1701 Brent Mason for guitar solos. COLODRO has 684 Bass by Frank Tobin; 848 el. rythym by Audley Freed; 1726 piano by John Jarvis; and real drums Nashville even 8ths by Brian Fullen. I synced the timing of the vocal to the drum track and used a variety plug in inserts eq,reverb, compression, on the vocal and master mix. I also did a little pitch tuning on the vocal. I'd love to here what you think of the song and the production. thanks ---Pete

here it is - http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=13078156&q=hi&newref=1

User Showcase
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,352
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,352
Peter
Interesting arrangement of a 12-Bar. Perhaps lift the vocals and/or spend a bit more time with mixing levels. I think could further improve the song.

Thanks for sharing


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
User Showcase
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,079
Peter,
Originally Posted By: VideoTrack
Peter
Interesting arrangement of a 12-Bar. Perhaps lift the vocals and/or spend a bit more time with mixing levels. I think could further improve the song.

Thanks for sharing


A good way to start the day

enjoyed

Alyn

User Showcase
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,613
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,613
As above.
Thank you for posting.
Good effort.
Rob.

User Showcase
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,095
A good song with a good vocal performance and good instrumental arrangement but the vocal and instruments from two different sound sources of unequal quality clash. You have done a good job with blending the two sources and a bit of tweaking can make it a more than passable production if that is your goal. At this point in your mix, the vocal mix is a bit muddy as well a sounding over processed with effects. Here on the forum, we don't know the true quality of the cassette vocals that you started with. Were the vocals printed effects from the original recording? Had age effected the overall quality and much of the high end lost? Was the original cassette recording recorded at the highest fidelity or at a lower fidelity? There are many variables that will affect the quality and blend of your final project but from where you are with it at this point, my thought is that you can continue to work with what you have and improve it somewhat but there's a limit to how good a result you will be able to achieve. According to your goal, will it be worth the time and effort?

It is a good song and arrangement and I would likely cut to the chase and record a new vocal track.

Charlie

Last edited by c_fogle; 03/26/15 03:19 AM.

BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
User Showcase
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,675
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,675
Pete,

Nice job of taking an old vocal and adapting it to RealTracks.
I like how you developed the "hot" theme as you went along and got "really hot" in the 3rd verse - that was clever...

I assume you have the vocal as a separate track on the original cassette tape? (and, therefore a separate track in a DAW?). If so, there are a couple of spots where you could line it up a little more...The 1st verse is pretty much in the pocket. The 2nd verse - especially the first half of it - is slightly ahead of the music - so it sounds like your singer is rushing (and I know it is VERY hard to get a vocal from another source lined up). It seems to get back on track about the last line of that verse. There are actually a few small incidental words you could cut to make sliding pieces around a bit easier - for example... the mailman line - you could cut the "he".. the phone ringing line the "I don't" could have the "I" cut...little bits like that... (again, I know it is tedious to cut and slide...)

Your drums sounds great. The opening guitar (and the other solos) are very nicely done! The piano is a bit busy to have it throughout the entire song (my opinion, of course). It is great for the song later on! In your first verse, I think it would work better to have the backing be a bit more subtle - to match your singer's tone - she starts out ""softer". Perhaps pull the piano out of the 1st verse and use another guitar in it's place - a muted sync electric works well for those kinds of builds... and then let the piano loose later as the song build (to a feverish pitch!) - and bring its volume up a bit to really stand as a "rock piano" - loud and proud...

All just suggestions. I think you have done a heck of a job reviving a cassette vocal - and demonstrated how BIAB can be used for doing that...

floyd

User Showcase
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888
Hi Pete,

as mentioned above this is a nice job of taking an old vocal and adapting it to RealTracks.
I would consider the advice given.
Thanks for posting.

Guenter

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
I'm going to reply to all the GREAT POSTS I have received on my song in this reply.

VIDEO TRACK - Lifting the vocals seems to be the consensus of opinions - and I know that more extensive mixing of the backing track levels will improve the song overall. That's on my to do list.

GIBSON - I'm glad you enjoyed the song despite some of the technical shortcomings. I'm basically a song writer and the whole point for me is to engage and entertain the listener, I had a lot of fun writing this.

Rob4580- Thanks for taking the time to listen and post. Without the response of people like you who just enjoy music what would be the point of all the technical work.

C fogel - Thanks for the detailed review. The original was recorded in the late 80's to early 90's on the lowest end Vestafire cassette recorder and a medium quality condenser mic. So yes whatever high end was there originally has been degraded over time. I recently bought a use Tascam mkII ministudio cassette deck to access these early recordings of my musical journey. The extensive use of effects was an effort to mitigate the high end loss. My goal was to- 1. Create the best representation of the song I could as a personal record and 2. Present a version of the song that might interest an artist to take it on from here.

Floyd jane - Thanks for letting me have the use of your acute ear on the musical detail. I haven't posted on the forum here in a while and as very impressed with the level of critiques I have received. We have great tools now to produce music, but unless you know what you are listening for, the results will disappoint. I did have the singer push the beat in the 2nd verse. It seemed to fit the singer's motivation to push her boyfriend for attention. I did however want the Johnny-on-the-spot line to be on the "spot". You're right it is difficult to align the tracks and I was using "beats" that DP found in the vocal track to align with the conductor track which was synced to the drum track.. It was a lot of "ear" work and at times "ear fatigue" sets in. Also trying to get the "IS HOT" to align with the cymbal crash. I can edit the vocal in the waveform editor of DP as you suggested - I had thought about it, but need to learn how to use this editor better. The whole project has taught me alot and I have better learned how to use the powerful tools I have at my fingertips. Not sure I want to bring another instrument into the mix but will consider and appreciate your notes on the piano track.

Boehm - great thanks for the listen and post! I can appreciate you got on the thread after the song had been extensively reviewed. I'm glad you didn't task me with more work to do! grin

User Showcase
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 117
H
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
H
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 117
Sounds good to me. Intresting that you were able to pull this off, seems like a dauting task. It all seems to work well together, well done.

User Showcase
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,051
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,051
I've thought for a long time about doing
this with some old tapes but I fear I'm way
too lazy. I know it's hard.

Floyd makes some great points and BTW he
revived an old tape tune a while back
called Diamonds that really worked. It's
worth searching to find here on the site.

This is a cool use of RT's and thanks for
posting.

User Showcase
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,048
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,048
Hello Pete,

I like the musical arrangement on this, but as for the vocals I tend to agree with Charlie: they sound kind of muddy.
I have some experience of my own with digitally redoing old four tracks recordings. It's probably best to record the vocals again.

Regards,
Rob


We are Rob Meulman and Anne-Marie Bovenkamp from The Netherlands.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1gsdNLE7_Gy8qavoOplQow/videos
http://rnam.net/


User Showcase
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,322
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,322
Yeah... Floyd nailed it.

The vox sounds overly compressed... in a few places you can hear the plosives and distortion.

Of course, knowing that cassette tape degrades just setting on the shelf, and not knowing what you had to begin with....it's hard to say exactly what the source of the problem is. Perhaps the tape track was overly compressed to start with. If it was, short of recording the vocal track again, you don't have a lot of options. If it's a clean track....read on...

You said you used compression on the vocal track.... well... go back and remove that. EQ it a bit brighter and crisper sounding.... cut the mids and lows since most females don't have a huge mid/low range anyway. Then push the level up a bit on the volume fader. When I use a compressor on a track it is generally a very light compression. Listen to the song on my soundclick site called Come & Go (Rose version).... try to get your vocal track to set in the mix like that one. I rarely use a compressor in a track for any reason. My compressor tends to be in the master buss and on the entire mix as a whole and very lightly applied. You just want to knock the highest peaks back a bit.

Lots of folks use a compressor to try to gain volume to bring a vocal track up in the mix. That's the WRONG way to do it. If you have a vocal that's struggling to be heard in the overall mix, and you have it's level fader to 0dB or higher..... DO NOT USE A COMPRESSOR to try to get it up to level..... take the opposite approach.... turn everything else down until the vocal sets nicely in the mix. You can always get the final mix up to volume but get the mix RIGHT first.... and if that involves turning everything down and starting again..... then that's what you need to do.

The song overall is good.... work on the 2 issues.... get the timing synced properly and get the vocal tweeked with EQ and levels and remove the compression. Then repost it.

Edit: if the track is bad to start with, remember, we have a few ladies here who would likely be willing to sing this for you.


Last edited by Guitarhacker; 03/27/15 02:11 AM.

You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
As the old saying goes easy when you know how, it's getting to that point that's the hard thing. wink

User Showcase
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,675
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,675
Pete,

From your response earlier, it seems you are doing your editing on a hardware DAW? (the DP). Have you tried a software DAW? Editing tracks for something like this is WAY easier in a software DAW. You owe it to yourself to try one out (if you have not). You can try Reaper for 60 days (I believe). I think there may be a free version of Studio One and one for $20... they would get you started (I may have misinterpreted your earlier statement)...

fj

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
I have a lot of tapes from what I'll call the woodshed period of my songwriting journey. All different genres and qualities - there are a few I'm going to work to digitize - the rest will be in a box.

As to the BIAB part - you have to find or build a style that has a matching groove or feel - that's mainly in the bass and drum tracks, it's pretty easy to match the tempo but without the right groove it still won't sound right.

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
I'm open to having the vocal track redone - the lyrics are the soundclick player I think if you press more info? Anyway they are there somewhere, the music is a twelve bar - 3 chord progression - I think this is in the key of B - all the backing tracks are listed - and I don't mind anyone who likes the song recording it
- I'd just like to be credited . Thanks Rob

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
Originally Posted By: floyd jane
Pete,

From your response earlier, it seems you are doing your editing on a hardware DAW? (the DP). Have you tried a software DAW? Editing tracks for something like this is WAY easier in a software DAW. You owe it to yourself to try one out (if you have not). You can try Reaper for 60 days (I believe). I think there may be a free version of Studio One and one for $20... they would get you started (I may have misinterpreted your earlier statement)...

fj


Hi Floyd , Yeah I'm using a software DAW - Digital Performer 8 which is a very powerful and fully featured DAW it's used a lot in movie scoring and made by MOTU. I also use a MOTU 4pre interface which gives me 4 mic/line ins and connects to my Mac by firewire. so I can record two guitars and two mics at the same time, which is the kind of recording I do most often.

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
GUITARHACKER - Thanks for spending the time on that detailed response. The pops and plosive t's and p's are all the result of the original. I've had to use a de-esser to tame the distortion and pretty well. But all you said is pretty right on about moderating the use of effects.

As I said above if there is a singer who would like to record this I would gladly provide the backing track, that was one of my goals in doing this. Even this less than perfect version is #14 out of thousands of country songs on soundclick without any promotion. So I think it could be a great vehicle for a female artist who identifies with the song to promote herself.

User Showcase
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
PeteG Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 664
I'm sending this remixed version back thru - I have addressed several issues mentioned above - the link on the original post will take you to the remixed version. I'd be interested in any comments on this work.

here"s a copy of the link for convenience.
http://www.soundclick.com/player/single_player.cfm?songid=13078156&q=hi&newref=1

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,577
Posts734,574
Members38,495
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Tony1234, trustedmedications, MAJORKEY, Fender601, VIPBET사설토토
38,494 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 193
DC Ron 112
dcuny 101
Today's Birthdays
STLSAXIST
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5