Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#294651 05/09/15 02:59 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 457
So I always record in 24 bit in Sonar platinum mixdown to 24 bit, work on the songs in sony sound forge in 24 bit and burn them to CD with cd architect. The people manufacturing my latest project asked me to upload the files as 16 bit. I've always thought that was logical as it's going to wind up that way but mastering houses asked me for 24 bit masters. Oddly enough after I'd saved the songs as 16 bit and burned test discs I found I liked that sound better than doing it from 24. In case anyone's interested.
WSS

Last edited by Westside Steve; 05/09/15 03:02 AM.
Westside Steve #294663 05/09/15 05:34 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Hi Steve.

Recording in 24 bit gives you a bigger dynamic range than 16 bit. That being said, most pop/rock tracks don't use a quarter of the dynamic range of even 16 bit, so it really doesn't matter which you use in that respect.

However, if you record in 24 bit to burn a CD (16 bit) you introduce an extra process called dithering. Depending on the program and algorithm used for dithering, some people say they can hear the difference. There is a similar conversion process if you record in 16 bit for burning to a DVD (24 bit).

Personally, I like to keep the same bit rate throughout the project, even though I can't really discern any difference - it just feels tidier that way!

I'm sure my pal rharv will wade in on this one, even though I know that discussions about dithering give him headaches.

ROG.


Westside Steve #294741 05/10/15 02:02 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Yeah.... what ROG said.

I always record in 24 bit and Sonar will render it to 16 for a wave. You can select 24 but in my case, it's really not needed.

Mastering houses want as much dynamic range head room as they can get.

With the popular use of compressors, I would venture to say that headroom gets squashed out quite drastically in some genres.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Westside Steve #294772 05/10/15 06:57 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Quote:

even though I know that discussions about dithering give him headaches


Section IV of this PDF puts it in 'simplified terms' (which can still produce headaches):

http://downloads.izotope.com/guides/izotope-dithering-with-ozone.pdf

.. and here's more detail for actual use:

http://help.izotope.com/docs/ozone/pages/modules_dithering.htm

Statements like the below are what gives me headaches:

"Well, the theoretical maximum signal to noise ratio of a 16-bit recording is about 96 dB. That means, in basic terms, that the noise floor of a 16-bit recording is around -96 dB. The noise floor should not be confused (but often is) with dynamic range, which represents the difference between the loudest and softest signal that you can hear in the recording. You can hear a dynamic range which extends past the noise floor with proper dithering. Even if a signal is "in the noise", you will still hear it with proper dithering. "

/confused yet?



Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Westside Steve #294773 05/10/15 07:05 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
I knew you wouldn't let me down, rharv.

ROG.

Westside Steve #294774 05/10/15 07:08 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
smile

Found this recently also, interesting read for those who think they understand it all :

http://www.head-fi.org/t/415361/24bit-vs-16bit-the-myth-exploded


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Westside Steve #294782 05/10/15 07:57 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
A simply riveting read.

ROG.

ROG #294808 05/10/15 11:25 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,129
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,129
ROG,

For rharv's last link, which of the 229 pages are you thinking of? confused


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Westside Steve #294811 05/10/15 12:00 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
yeah, at about page 76 I really lost interest <grin>

/Point is, it's really just academic for most users .. if they want 24 bit, send 'em 24 bit



Last edited by rharv; 05/10/15 12:11 PM.

Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Westside Steve #294814 05/10/15 12:15 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
ROG Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
"Point is, it's really just academic for most users .. if they want 24 bit, send 'em 24 bit"

That sums it up perfectly, rharv. Good thread, though, all the same.

ROG.

Edit - I'm surprised you're not pushing that avatar into the red a bit.

Last edited by ROG; 05/10/15 12:18 PM.
Westside Steve #294829 05/10/15 03:30 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
I had a semester long master's level course in Digital Signal Processing, EE-638, at Purdue University.

There's plenty of mind-bending stuff in that course, but bit depth is one of the easier things to understand.

In a 16 bit A/D, there is 1 of 2^16 possible values the A/D converter stuffs the conversion into. That's 1 of 65,536 shelves to put the data on. When the A/D puts the data on a shelf, it's called quantization in the amplitude domain. Many books visualize this as a stair-step kind of a picture. 65,536 possible steps to be on.

In a 24 bit A/D, there is 1 of 2^24 shelves, or 1 of 16,777,216 possible steps to put the data on, to represent the same possible overall magnitude of the signal.

What this means is that the step height for 24 bit is way smaller than in a 16 bit recording. In fact, there are 256 of the 24 bit steps in a single 16 bit step.

So, why should we care?

Well, when the data is converted back to analog from the digital representation, there is a bit of noise that is generated taking that step value, and then doing the magic back to analog.

The easiest situation to think about is a signal that is nominally zero. The A/D process has to take the zero and decide is it going on the smallest shelf or the next largest shelf. Basically, 0000000000000000 or 0000000000000001 in the binary representation, for a 16 bit signal. For a 24 bit signal, it's 000000000000000000000000 or 000000000000000000000001. (those of you that know signed/little/big endian, etc. work with me here!)

IF the signal happens to be set on the 0....01 shelf in either case, when it's converted back to analog, that actually is something bigger than zero and a tiny bit of noise results in the analog signal.

For a 24 bit recording, this noise, known as quantization noise, is 48 dB quieter than in a 16 bit recording.

So again, why should we home recording types care?

Well, this 'which shelf?' decision happens for every single shelf, not just the lowest two shelves.

With 24 bit, this means you can record with your signal much less 'hot' and still get pristine A/D and ultimately D/A representation. With 16 bit recording, it's more of a concern to maximize the analog signal range to cover as much of the 2^16 values, so that those steps matter less when converting back D/A. With 24 bit recording, one almost has to work hard to make the signal level be so quiet that quantization noise factors into the output story/sound.

That was one takeaway from that class that sunk in. The other was how D/A conversion actually does recreate a smooth analog signal and not a stair-stepped analog signal, through the output anti-aliasing filter impulse responses of each sample. That's a discussion for a different day.

Last edited by rockstar_not; 05/10/15 03:31 PM.
Westside Steve #294891 05/11/15 10:32 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Thanks rockstar_not. That's starting to delve a little into my Electronics Engineering education from the 80's.




Steve

BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
Westside Steve #294921 05/11/15 01:58 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,129
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,129
Depending on your daw settings, when a song project is created using both 16 and 24 bit depth material, one or the other will be automatically or manually converted to match the daw setting as audio files are imported into the daw.

Pg Music audio tracks are 16 bit depth. If your audio interface is set to 24 bit depth and your using RealTracks, either your audio or PG Music audio is being converted. As two or more tracks are summed into a single track the daw is most likely using 24 bit, 32 bit, 32 bit floating decimal, 48 bit, 64 bit or 64 bit floating decimal calculations to maintain fidelity of the summed signals.

It use to be the advice was to keep the same bit depth throughout a project until dithering was used during the last step of conversion to 16 bit for CD mastering.

While the advice may be a good ideal to strive for, as a practical matter I think the inherent limitations of home recording such as noisy recording environment or people double tasking as performer and engineer create more quality of sound issues than whatever noise is introduced by multiple conversions.

You go Rockstar_not. I couldn't type that many zeros without loosing count!

I believe the increased headroom 24 bit depth recording provides overshadows any other consideration in a home studio. The additional 12 db of headroom may mean the difference between grabbing the perfect take versus the prefect take ruined because of a passage was recorded too loud.


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Westside Steve #294927 05/11/15 02:47 PM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,635
Quote:
I'm surprised you're not pushing that avatar into the red ..

It was a timing thing .. when you take the shot you have to anticipate.
I was aiming for getting the "0" but figured it was good enough as is.

/I don't even remember what I took that shot with, but I took it. I even cropped the 'roundness' from the rest of the image. It exhausted my graphic abilities at the time. <grin>
I think that particular preamp has an issue where the meter light doesn't work anymore .. or something. It's still here somewhere though.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,620
Posts735,176
Members38,517
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
maxrob61, TonyInManchester, jslynbrrs01, amdwilsns01, Juan Jose
38,516 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 185
DC Ron 99
dcuny 87
DrDan 73
Today's Birthdays
Bernard Rasson, John Temmerman
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5