Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
H
Hugh2 Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
H
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Hi all,
I have a strange interesting question.Ive made a Disco song and have followed closely the style and production of "Dancing Queen" from ABBA.This included the final Mastered Wav which had a LUFS of 8.4 which and is what Dancing Queen had on CD.(I intend to do a youtube master of 13 Lufs also)
Two Things:
1:My Wav file Physically was smaller in width(about 8 to 10%) than the Dancing Queen wav even though the measurements were all the same.Why would that be?
2:As an experiment I did three Mastered wavs at different Maximizer values and the most compressed one was the same width as Dancing Queen at about 7.5 Lufs but sounded the best.Is this because the Genre Disco is more condusive to Compression? (because Disco is steady and more equal from start to finish)I heard the boys from ABBA saying they had to compress the hell out of Dancing Queen.
For instance I wouldnt be putting that much compression on any other songs Ive done.
I am not sure whether to go with the 8.4 level equal to Dancing Queen or go with the hotter slightly better sounding one is my delemma
Ps All the track levels and buss levels in the mixing were good and no clipping or red lights and enough headroom was left for mastering.Thanks for any ideas on that urs Hugh

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
You want opinions on which to use without us hearing them?
Only way I can think of to answer is to add more considerations.

Back when ABBA compressed this song there weren't any hard wall brick limiter digital compressors/limiters. So it was harder back then to get the numbers/results.

Nowadays, adjusting between the threshold (input and amount of compression) and limiter (top end) can make a lot of difference, turn one up and one down .. and then makeup gain can change all of the above results, so without data I'd say 'if it sounds good it is good', as long as you are in the safe limits.

Your question threw me; I immediately thought of wav 'file size' (not display) .. which should be pretty much the same for each.

Pushing a whole bunch of energy through the signal and then using the Limiter to get the Lufs level at the end may result in a mix with a smaller end signal display (being limited more).
I'd generally consider the larger wav display to have more dynamics and thus better if I had to look at them and decide, but like I said, use whichever one sounds better.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663

The CD version of Dancing Queen I have is 14 (streaming quality) LUFS and a respectable 11.5 in Dynamic Range.

It peaks at about -0.7 so it is not hot or over compressed by today's standards. It fact in has a pleasant sound. It is not a big monster fat .wav. but not skinny either, about what you would expect from that time period.

14 LUFS and 11.5 to 12 in DR are what you are aiming for today, no matter were you are peaking volume or amplification (headroom) wise. LUFS is not the same as volume, per se. It is something you have to google and study.

https://www.audiodraft.com/blog/audio-levels-101-all-you-need-is-lufs/

But basically, if you keep it below zero dB (start with headroom in your mix) and try and get 14 LUFS and 11-12 dynamic range you will sound good almost anywhere.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,089
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 5,089
From your description (your file with the same LUFS is smaller in width than the original) I think the issue is your audio file is too compressed.

If the original audio is too compressed, the only way to reach a target LUFS of 14 (for example) is to reduce the amplitude of the entire track.

Watch this video (link originally provided by Tony) that demonstrates this in action.

Skip ahead to around 4:00 or so where he shows the two files and then later when he shows them with the same LUFS: https://youtu.be/n1Yfl6KGRk8



Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Thanks Dave and David for your links. Interesting reads/videos.




Steve

BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
H
Hugh2 Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
H
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Hi Rharv and David,
Thanks for the answers.So I have now gone back and looked again and I notice a couple of things.I may not have been measuring the lufs correctly as I didnt take account of the input meter of Ozone when using their plugin "insight".So Im going to look at that again.
Also David I realize that I must have a different version of Dancing Queen and I went to youtube and found this interesting comparision of the versions from Vinyl to a 2010 release.I have the 2010 release im guessing as its compressed to the last and similar to the wav in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThTc0K49oVo
Thanks for the info guys.I will hopefully have it ready for upload asap and you can let me know what you think h

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
H
Hugh2 Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
H
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Hi Dave thanks great link and its interesting that he used EDM to demonstrate his point.The Dancing Queen wav display I have looks very similar to the over compressed wav he uses on the video at 4mins .I will now have a look at how compressed the mix is just in case I could get a better sounding version than the one I have
Hugh

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Glad it helped.

This is why I always put the final meter(s) very last in the chain, even after I see the levels in Ozone (for instance).

I want to see how all the measurements interact in the end result.

If you use a separate meter system afterwards you see more of the Ozone end result.
Inside Ozone you see each effect .. but final meters shows what's happening at the very end, which can be different.

I get the LUFS concept, but I still want to see how that end result is affecting certain other aspects.

How close am I to zero, and how often?
How much dynamics do I have on a relative scale? During a given time frame and overall?
What's the Peak/Average ratio on the song?

Funny, but here, the RMS readings seem to correlate closely to LUFS in most real life tests. At least here (and kinda confirmed here):
http://productionadvice.co.uk/lufs-dbfs-rms/

One other thing to note, as mentioned in the video, LUFS is not really a mastering consideration, except to know how public standardized playback (TV,Streaming, etc) will alter the sound volume.

A CD or DVD likely has no LUFS effect. So if you want something louder/softer, you can. Depends on what you are mastering for. Songs do not get 'averaged' on CD.

I think of LUFS as a a broadcast spec more than a recording/mixing spec.
If I am wrong please tell me.

Last edited by rharv; 08/22/18 03:12 PM.

Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Happy Easter! Holiday Hours...

2024 is well underway - it's already Easter Weekend!

Our Customer Service hours this weekend are:

Friday, March 29: 8-4
Saturday, March 30: 8-4
Sunday, March 31: closed

Regular hours resume Monday, April 1st - no joke!

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,396
Posts732,513
Members38,442
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
danielsk, Mark Morgan, zagrajbarke, Ernest J, Izzy
38,442 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 116
dcuny 87
rsdean 85
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5