Hi Experts, Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...
Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?
I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?
If not,when and where is the best time to use this?
Cheers,
Neil C Warrington UK
Dell Inspiron 5748 iPad Mini. iRig HD2. BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank. Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle. Amplitube,BIAS FX. Behringer MS20 Monitors. Several guitars. Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
I use Audacity always as the next to last step in my process.
I do the best job of mixing that I can in the step before that, carefully watching my meters, and doing the best I can with EQ, also using compressors on certain tracks like bass and drums (or others if they need it.)
Then I will open the export in Audacity. I am looking for a .wav file that looks smooth and curvy (like a, well, wave) and not jagged or ragged with many spikes or transients. I am sure you know the picture I am talking about--it looks more like the image of a drum .wav than a song .wav---it looks "shredded." (The screenshot below gives you an idea of what a mix that needs compression and normalization will look like.) If I see that, I know I have no other choice but to compress and normalize. So I use a mild compression in Audacity (1.5:1), then normalize to -0.7.
Then I will use negative amplification to "trim the hair" of any remaining spikes that will reduce my headroom.
If it does not need compression at this phase, I will normalize it to -0.7 in Audacity before going further. My point is, if it is ragged you have to both compress AND normalize. If the mix looks elegant to the eye, all you to do is normalize, and yes, that is normal.
From here, I proceed to mastering in something like Ozone, or another tool, depending on the genre.
I NEVER boost to 0 dB with the next to last step .wav though. I always want to go into Ozone with a -0.7 mix so the effects used in the mastering tool (you have to have one) have room for transient shaping, maximizing, Eq-ing, etc. That is where you set your threshold.
I sometimes set the threshold to -.1 but most of the time -.2. I just don't think you have to max it out.
For the type of stuff I do, I find you begin to lose nuances when you max it to the limit and I would rather people hear dynamics.
I do not want to compress at the next to last phase unless I have to, because mastering tool presets add compression and I do not want compression times compression. But, if you start with a ragged .wav as your export, you have little recourse because it will be next to impossible to control your dynamics or loudness in the mastering phase before you clean things up a bit.
In the best of all worlds though, I try and mix so that I do not need to do this Audacity compression step before mastering, but it does not always work out that way.
Hope that makes sense.
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
I used to always normalise all tracks to 0.00 dB. For BIAB users who read this and don't know what 'normalise' means, the term refers to scaling a waveform (i.e. sound) so that its highest peak reaches 0.00 dB. Most peaks in the wave will be noticeably less than 0.00 dB. Normalising does not change sound integrity if it stays under 0.00 dB; in most cases, it simply raises the volume of the sound.
Then I read somewhere that it's always best to leave a little bit of audio headroom so that if a track has effects added to it, the effect processor has audio 'space' to work in so that it can maintain the integrity of the sound while adding, and after adding, the effect. In a number of articles, I came across the minimum recommended normalising value of -0.3dB and so I started using that.
These days, I normalise to -3.0 dB. I chose this value randomly after watching a friend mixing a song he had composed -- he is an audio engineer at a nationwide radio station and I noticed that he never normalised to 0.00 dB and always had substantial headroom above (and below) the highest peaks in the audio waveform. Since he is a professional in this field, I took his lesson on-board.
Audio that comes from BIAB mostly needs to be normalised. Wave volumes (that is, 'peak heights') are set by PG Music in a style such that the mixer will always show '90'. This means that some audio, when transferred to a DAW, will be noticeably quieter than other audio. To make it easier to work with these varying-volume audio stems, I always like to increase the height of the wave as it makes both editing and mixing that wave much easier. I'm happy working with -3.0 dB normalisation these days. It gives me a good clarity of sound.
Hi Experts, Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...
Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?
I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?
If not,when and where is the best time to use this?
Cheers,
Neil C Warrington UK
Good question. So.... yeah I tend to use it on everything as my LAST step. What it does is pretty simply. You select the level. As most have said they choose 0dB as the reference level. So, normalization looks at the file you are wanting to normalize and it finds the highest peak in the song. It moves that peak to 0dB. It amplifies everything else by the same amount. Nothing is amplified more than anything else, like would happen in a compression level to 0dB for example.
As I understand it, this is how it works. It's never given me any issues. They recommend -3dB for MP3. and Waves can go to 0dB..... BUT.... if you plan to have a mastering house master your song, they normally want around -6dB so they have room to work without squashing anything.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
I use normalisation totally differently. When I pull the tracks into my daw (usually Reaper) I normalise all the tracks to -10db to -15db depending largely on the number of tracks. With all tracks playing I then like to be about -6db or less. I have a quick listen . I might renormalise (usually drums and bass) to put them up a couple of dB to have them better in the mix. I then do the mixing. At the end of the mixing process I like to have about -4db to -6db or less for headroom for the “mastering”. The final stage in the mastering chain has a limiter which I use to lift the track to -14 LUFS with a true peak of -1db. This way the songs all come out about the same level, reasonable balanced and ready for use.
In nearly all cases if I pull them into Audacity the songs are at -1db a different way to arrive at the same result.
I often use MP3 files to use when performing I put these through MP3Gain which in a sense renormalises again.
All seems like extra work but IMHO it in fact saves time.
Tony
Last edited by Teunis; 12/30/1812:18 PM.
HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home, Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612 BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
I never use the Normalize function anymore. In Studio One there is a way to raise the track level gain by just selecting the event and dragging it up and down. This simply adjusts the volume level of the track without changing the dynamics of the track. It also does not change the Volume fader either. I like to get it around -12db per track and no more than -6db. I always leave headroom for when it is ready to master. Studio One also has a built in plugin called Mixtool that does this to the track as well as phase.
Most DAWs have a gain level knob of some sort for doing this.
Brian
BIAB 2024 Ultrapack- Studio One Pro 6.5 Windows 10
Superb range of suggestions,many thanks everyone...and anyone else who wishes to throw in their Two Bob's worth..
I'm quite suspicious now that a problem piece of work I'm dealing with at the moment,also mentioned in this forum(which Brian also offered up some suggestions towards)may be due to the fact that all the guitar stems have been normalised relative to 0dB and that once mixed down,alongside the use of AudioSnap in Cakewalk,may be the cause of the issue.
I've never even considered normalising to a value other than 0dB,so this will definitely on the "To Try" list next time
Not a negative commentary on Cakewalk by the way,which must qualify as freebie of the year,merely my possible erroneous usage of AudioSnap.
Here's to Build 611 taking us to VST nirvana...
Thanks Guys!
Neil Cummins Warrington UK
Dell Inspiron 5748 iPad Mini. iRig HD2. BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank. Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle. Amplitube,BIAS FX. Behringer MS20 Monitors. Several guitars. Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!
His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean