This new real track has some excellent slower (long drawn out) phrases which fit well into Blues Shuffles especially when you select the simplified version.
However it also has lots of phrases that are just plain wrong (not in tune) or in a completely different Genre.
It also has way way too many "stabbing" phrases which again are not suited to Blues or Rock in any time and of any variety.
There is also no space in it so the notes and phrases are not musical and just loose all meaning - they are just a big mess.
There is also no "build" in this real track - good phrases are not built on with variations - instead they are followed by utterly different phrases in a completely unrelated genre.
I also notice it plays quite differently depending on which song key you select - e.g. if you select Gb, F or E all the good long notes are gone regardless of how many times you regenerate the song.
Therefore this very promising realtrack is virtually useless.
I would really appreciate it if somebody familiar with Blues, Blues/Rock or RnB music at PG Music could take a look at this realtrack and make it a real asset for all of us.
Thanks & Best Regards Nigel
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
Not only this one, but some things about other more recent RTs i don't like. F.i. most Irish instrumental backing RTs are far too busy when put together i a mix, soundwise in the same frequency range like some slightly muddy sounding acoustic guitars, cellos and bodhrans. Nice when solo-ed, but for backing? Also there's too much of a colliding syncopation rhythm racket going on at times when used together. Nathalie Haas' cello is very nice but quite un-useful due many rhythm sycopations getting in the way of melodies. Some editing could be done there in regards of simplifying rhythms at least. But that's all IMO .....
I find that to get the most from the real tracks, I have to pick and choose what sections I want. In other words, I don't just take the whole track and use it "as is". I use volume envelopes in my DAW to edit out the things I don't want to use.
I also find that occasionally, I hear a part I like but it's in the wrong place in the track. I use audio edit to cut it out and move it to where I want it. It takes a bit of work but it's well worth the effort.
I do understand what you say about some tracks simply don't work because they are too busy or don't fit the groove. I've deleted more tracks from projects than I wish to recall, for that reason. Somehow, it always tends to work out. I look for a different track that does work, or I simply do without. No one knows in the end but me.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Quite often my way to work things out with the soloist type RTs too ..... But some times the generated solo parts just seem to be really off, and around totally different chords, and even totally missing when there are 4 chord changes in a 4/4 bar measure f.i.
It probably is a hellish job to get things right for the programmers.
It would be great if you could email us a frozen .SGU and comment on the specific bars that you hear issues, and we can see if it is fixable. I did notice a few oddities in the key of F, but I'm not sure if it's what you're hearing, and a frozen .SGU from you would be worth a thousand words.
Perhaps I did not explain myself very well. This is not a bug in your software - no it's a problem with the music itself.
I'm not sure what has gone wrong with Real Track 3211 and all the rest of that performer's real tracks - but they simply don't work.
As I'm sure you are aware good music is not about how many notes you can play per minute - it's all about the quality of the notes.
Try it yourself on any 12 bar 130 bpm shuffle - it simply doesn't work does it?
I tried my usual trick of rendering Realtrack 3211 twenty times then lining up all the renders in my DAW. In each 3 minute render I may have been able to use around 5-10 notes out of the thousands being played.
With someone like Brent on Guitar I only have to render his solos 3-4 times and I can always mix and match to get a good result.
I'd like to think you could just revisit all the musician's recordings and redo the Realtracks - but unfortunately the material just isn't there.
Such a shame as the tone and the quality of the recording is fine and we can't have enough "real" Blues Realtracks for my liking.
Best Regards & Keep Up The Great Work. Nigel
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
I just loaded the demo for the style _GAMBLIN.STY, which contains 3211, and it played fine for me. It's a great harmonica sound.
Does the track that you have RT 3211 loaded on have "double-time" set by any chance. When I set "double time" in Realtrack Picker for 3211 in _GAMBLIN.STY, it did not sound too good. Maybe something like this has happened.
I think you and Andrew need to sit down with some of the great harp players and hear how it should be done e.g. Little Walter, Sonny Boy Williamson II and Charlie Musselwhite. This is real music.
Good Luck on your musical journey of discovery.
Regards Nigel
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
Hi Noel, .... some of the great harp players and hear how it should be done e.g. Little Walter, Sonny Boy Williamson II and Charlie Musselwhite. This is real music.
Good Luck on your musical journey of discovery. Regards Nigel
Allways wondered why a harmonica is called a harp ... enlighten me ?
There is not a definitive reason why the Harmonica is commonly referred to as a Harp.
However here are a few snippets from my browsing on the subject:
The name "harp" is not a replacement for "harmonica."
The instrument was called a harp before it was called a harmonica.
And harmonica was already the name of another instrument.
The first harmonicas were called Aeolina - which refers to a harp whose strings are excited to sound by wind. Here the reeds replace strings. Other early harmonicas were called "mundharfe" - mouth-harp. I'm not sure when the harmonica name was first borrowed to refer to our instrument.
Meanwhile, the name "harmonica" referred to at least one other instrument, the most recent of which was the glass harmonica, which operated by the friction of the fingers against wet glass. Benjamin Franklin is said to have invented a form of this instrument that resembled a treadle-operated lathe, with several glass discs of different sizes (and pitches) rotating in a trough of water.
Mouth organ is perhaps the most technically accurate, as free reeds are also used in organs and harmoniums.
Best Regards Nigel
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
Thanks .... heard music from Laos once, i think the thing was called sheng or cheng; sounded just like a blues harp, also the way in was used in a song ...
Makes one think it should be called sharp then, as the sheng instrument seems to be much older. sheng
I'm not sure what has gone wrong with Real Track 3211 and all the rest of that performer's real tracks - but they simply don't work.
Originally Posted By: NigelSpiers
Try it yourself on any 12 bar 130 bpm shuffle - it simply doesn't work does it?
It just so happens I'm working on a 12 bar 130 bpm I-IV-V shuffle at the moment, using mostly _COOKIN.STY. I dropped in that realtrack 3211 and you are right, it doesn't work. Maybe the part of the realtrack that determines what riffs to play for each chord is wrong??
Thanks for addressing the problems with the LD Harmonica soloist Realtracks so quickly with Build 625 - much appreciated.
I installed 625 today and immediately tested out the LD Harmonica Realtracks.
I tried them with both Blue and Green Part markers and also Simplified mode.
Unfortunately there is no difference at all - they all seem completely out of tune to me and also still playing all those weird staccato phrases which are totally unrelated to Blues Music or any other Genre that I can think of. They are so out of tune that I had to keep muting the harmonica Realtrack to make sure that something weird was not happening to the bass and piano parts.
Maybe it's because my test song is a 12 bar in Gb and with a timing of 105 BPM SW. I know this is not ideal for use with a 130 BPM SW Harmonica Realtrack but timing is not one of the the issues here.
Please advise what I am doing wrong.
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
I followed Icelanders advice on using the Soloist generator instead. You can adjust quite some perimeters at maybe a little confusing sub- and sub-sub menus BIAB-wise, and got slightly better results, but it takes a bit of experimenting. Some soloist tutorial video, Callie, for the next one?
Both IMO, and eachtime i tried it over the years it sort of acts like an unbranded untrained horse going places never seen before. Rarely coming up with something (melodically) interesting for me. Food for Jazzers i guess mainly. MIDI delivers more variation than RTs, RTs only some slight variations.
You include this harp soloist in the first two bars, mute them in the next two bars. Include them in bars 5-6, mute them in 7 & 8. Include them in bars 9 & 10, Mute them in bars 1 & 12. Then you render the song 30 times. Then you edit in DAW to mute all phrases where the harp gets totally out of control. 50 hours work! Bingo - you have yourself a song!
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
Did you provide a sample sgu/mgu file with frozen tracks as Andrew requested +++ HERE +++ March 08, 2019?
The full name of RealTracks 3211 is "Harmonica, SoloistBluesShuffleFieryLD SW 130". The folder contains 25 audio files. A sample sgu/mgu file will go a long ways toward identifying issues. With a sample file and your notes identifying what bars and beats have issues PG Music support can identify what audio the program selected. With that in mind, emailing a sample sgu file is definitely the next step forward toward resolution.
Email to "support@pgmusic.com". Make sure in the email header indicates the email is about an issue with RealTracks 3211, "Harmonica, SoloistBluesShuffleFieryLD SW 130". I would indicate that Andrew requested the sample sgu file and provide a link to this thread. I would also include whatever notes you made regarding which bars and beats have issues.
However, I suspect there may be another possibility. When I used the RealTracks Picker I noticed RealTracks 3211 is one of 10 RealTracks included in RealTracks set 303. When I read the memo notes for the RealTracks I keep seeing terms like "blistering", "fiery" and "gritty". I translate those words to loosely mean "distorted", "full of runs" and "more distortion".
I'm wondering if the issue isn't more that you don't agree with the production guidelines provided to the artist more than there are errors in the recordings? If you're wanting a smooth, easy blues performance then these RealTracks aren't for you. I remember when this set was first released I wondered aloud in a forum post if the set had any simple variations that weren't so busy and direct input without the distortion.
If the second possibility is what's going on then the next step is to make a wishlist request in the +++ Styles and RealTracks Wishlist +++ section of the forum.
I can read your frustration and desire to have a RealTracks that works for you. I hope my ideas help.
Last edited by Jim Fogle; 06/27/1906:14 AM. Reason: Added screen shot
I agree, this soloist is not for me either. Way too busy. I just auditioned all the soloist tracks by LD Miller and he's way too busy and choppy on all of them even the slow ones at 80. Not soulful blues at all. This is just me listening to the demo's in the RT Picker. Then I set up a 12 bar blues in Biab and tried different keys and tempos. I've never had a guy play harp in a blues band sound like this. There are so many different styles of blues from all over the world now who knows what's considered good? I'm sure LD must be considered a great player but if this is really his style it's not for me.
To Nigel I don't think there's anything wrong with these tracks from a production pov, they're just not what you're looking for in a harp player and I agree with you. If LD sat in with me and played like that I'd give him one song then say "Thanks for sitting in man, see ya around".
It just so happens I'm working on a 12 bar 130 bpm I-IV-V shuffle at the moment, using mostly _COOKIN.STY. I dropped in that realtrack 3211 and you are right, it doesn't work. Maybe the part of the realtrack that determines what riffs to play for each chord is wrong??
It must have gotten fixed with a realtracks patch. When I first tried it it was definitely playing wrong notes, notes that didn't fit the chords. Tried it again just now on the same song and it is fine. Sounds pretty good actually as far as the notes he is playing.
A bit too busy for my tastes, but a lot of modern blues guitarists strike me as too busy also. To each his own
I agree, this soloist is not for me either. Way too busy. I just auditioned all the soloist tracks by LD Miller and he's way too busy and choppy on all of them even the slow ones at 80. ...
Bob
I didn’t listen and have no opinion on this genre but your use of the term ‘choppy’ caught my eye. If that’s choppy playing, that’s just his style, but if it’s choppy stitching together phrases by BIAB, I wonder if trying that RealTrack at a timebase of half-time would sound more pleasing? Just a thought for an experiment.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Dave is right the RT is ok the phrases stitch together well enough. Rereading Nigels original post there's no out of tune problems or wrong notes so an update must have fixed those issues.
Thanks for all your excellent comments - high quality as always.
You are all correct:
1. PG Music has largely fixed the errors with the LD Miller set of recordings.
2. It is a lack of direction and production guidelines.
What I hope will happen from raising this matter is that PG Music will take more care with future live recordings of fine musicians by giving them more musical direction e.g.
1. Please play in the style of XXX while adding your own character. Here is a list of musicians playing in the required style as a guideline.
2. Please remember that our clients will require reasonably straight forward, top quality phrasing and production to suit the widest range of tastes and musical applications.
NB All musicians appreciate clear and well thought out guidelines from expert musical directors.
The answer is to get LD Miller back in the studio. He is clearly a talented musician he just needs guidance.
I trust this is of assistance PG Music.
Best Regards
Nigel Spiers Christchurch, New Zealand info@nzacoustics.com
No one but PG Music and the musicians know what directions and guidelines the musicians are given. Our best hints are the RealTracks names, audio compilations and memo notes.
In this case, read through the RealTrack names and memo notes and I think you may concur the musician followed directions and guidelines. There is a reason the RealTrack has "fiery" in the track name.
RealTracks are amazing but PG Music is creating content that is trying to please a pretty big and diverse world wide audience. Just because this set is not our cup of tea doesn't mean that is true for all users.
Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!
The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!
There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.
If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.
We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!
Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean