|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
I've happily posted works on the internet without any thought to officially registered copyright, membership in PRO's, formal publishing or any other such stuff above my place in the music business. Up to me, I'd continue to do so happily.
Lately, I've gone back to Fiverr looking for people to play a lead instrument on a chordal arrangement made in BIAB. I asked for something "melodic". Now, I know they give rights to commercial use and it is considered a "work for hire"...but this is about right and wrong, and not about "rights".
What if what they come up with is really uniquely "melodic" in the sense that it becomes "the song"? What if it is so coherent and beautiful that it could stand alone even without my "backing"? I truly hope that happens, and that it is not simply joining the harmony....if that makes sense.
There is, to my mind, a continuum between playing along and composing within limits where a collaborator/musician affects the outcome to such a degree that he/she ought to be considered a co-writer.
While I ponder that, I think I need to prepare for such contingencies to share in a more concrete "business" way not just credit but ownership.
But I don't have a clue how, even if I can figure out "when".
What do I need to do? If it's good advice, I might even start doing it for myself (and my back catalogue and collaborations).
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/27/20 02:22 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,861
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,861 |
When people hire me to play on their tracks, I do a lot of preparation to build on what they already have, not introduce something that might warrant a co-write decision. I use their music to suggest the harmony, counterpoint, or even hook. I think that takes more skill than just doing my own thing.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,125
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,125 |
You are hiring a musician to perform on your session, in other words a session musician. Part of the agreement should be the musician receives money up front and in return signs away their rights to any audio they provide you.
One of the reasons people hire session musicians is to have access to their creativity. I've heard that most of the signature riffs you hear in popular music were created by session musicians "on demand". The producer says "we need something special" and they deliver time after time.
Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanks, Matt. I'm assuming, though, when people hire you to play on their tracks, they have already written a melody. All I "wrote" was a chord progression. I suppose there is melody in there (even if it's just the root notes), but it's not coherent and beautiful.
Likely what I will get back is improv over chords. That's probably not "co-write" worthy. But it is possible that I'll get back something I can also do for myself--draw out a melody from the progression that stands alone and "becomes" the composition or the song. It's melody that is copyright-able, and rightly so. Nobody hums chords. And to my mind, regardless of whether or not they worked for hire, that is something worth recognizing.
Note: I'm speaking as a song-writer. The world of composition has never really been my world, and both law and custom may apply differently.
Jim. Yes, they sign away rights to audio. I can use it any way I see fit. But there remains that component on the continuum when a simple improv or lead-line becomes the piece itself. Not a riff. Not a phrase. The piece.
I'm not trying to protect myself here. I'm trying to do the right thing.
Anyway, answers that tell me how to do THIS will also inform me how to do it for solo works and other collaborations, past and future.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/27/20 03:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,125
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,125 |
Tangmo,
I understand your intent and where you're coming from. The law is one thing but what's right is another.
Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8 Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251 |
Jim is correct. That's what session musicians get paid to do, there's no "agreement" per se, it's just an industry standard and it's always been done that way. It's a fair arguement that they should get some kind of royalty - in most countries, artists/producers/session musicians get a performance royalty, or "performance in a sound recording". The U.S. is one of a very small group of countries that does not pay that royalty. Efforts have been made, and continue to be made, to change this, but the radio broadcasters lobby is one of the most powerful lobbying groups in the U.S. and they have thus far completely blocked that from happening. They should not, IMO, get a co-writer credit on the songs they play on however. If a session musician ever asked me for that, I would tell them (not very politely) to pack their gear and take a hike. They get paid a fee to perform a service - they get paid regardless if the song ever gets recorded, or becomes a hit, or not. They assume none of the risk, take on none of the responsibility of trying to get the song recorded, or played, etc. To get paid master or demo scale, and get writing credit on top of that, is double dipping and there's no way I would ever go along with that. It should be addressed in the performance in a sound recording, and that's not happening because of broadcasters. Watch a bit of the videos below of legendary session guitarist Reggie Young. He played some of the most iconic guitar licks in history, and he didn't get songwriter credit for any of them - never expected to. He DID argue later in life that they (studio musicians) should get a performance royalty, and I agree with that. But that's entirely different than writing credit. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EEkHO6jxjchttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-6zd-z1qm8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,861
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,861 |
Tangmo, no, none of the artists I played for gave me a song with no melody. A chord progression alone is not copyright-able so I suppose I would negotiate at this point, and depending on what results I might ask to be a co-writer. The song would not be finished enough without a melody for me to do my session work.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Roger, I don't know how or if you collaborate and/or share song-writing credits but imagine this: Someone brings you a really nice, somewhat unusual chord progression and demos it strumming on acoustic for three minutes. You write a melody line for it. Would you not think it was reasonable that you get at least a share of the writer's credit? That's essentially what I've done...wrote a (hopefully) good progression. It's something beyond the usual, and because it is BIAB, it's something more produced and polished than a guitar strumming. My guy might spice up the progression with complimentary lines, licks, etc. Is he a co-writer? No. Neither is PGMusic or the players on RealTracks. He got paid and I got what I got. But my guy MIGHT write a beautiful, coherent, hummable melody from my progression that works as a complete piece of music on its own, even if it no longer needs my progression at all. Is he a co-writer? Forgetting what the law says...I think he is. My having paid him does not mean he is not. If music business lawyers need to get involved to justify their existence, we'd just call it an advance on future royalties.  Indeed, he may even turn out to be the primary writer. And I'm not the least bit sad about it! A good number of my songs have started this way...someone else's chord progression in a produced work (backing?) inspires my vocal melody. (on the music side of the write). I guarantee you, I think I'm co-writer of the music...but I'd NEVER EVER contest that if he thought differently. I would not have done MY bit if he had not does his. Again, song-writing and music composition may be two different worlds and models. I'm not trying to parse the two. I'm not trying to protect myself. I'm not trying to either follow or break custom. I'm just looking for coherent info on how to set up shop so I can do what I want.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Seems like the only solution to your personal dilemma is for you to also write the melody lines and pay the 5er musicians to play the melody you wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251 |
I've been writing songs for a living since 1985, and have cowritten hundreds of songs with other writers during that time. All I'm telling you is what I've always done, what all of my peers have always done, and the general way the business has always been done, and provided the Reggie Young example.
If you feel morally compelled to give someone writer credit, knock yourself out. It's really that simple, it's your song-your choice. Over the years I've had artists record songs of mine and make changes to them (Trace Adkins & Ricky Van Shelton made substantial changes that I disagreed with) without asking for or receiving songwriter credit. I've also had artists/producers try to 'strong arm' me into giving them writing credit on songs that they've made no change to whatsoever, with the stated threat that if I don't, they won't record the song(s) - in which case I've always said no, usually in a pretty colorful manner. I've also had a substantial number of artists record songs of mine and copy the demo I produced, on more than one occasion note-for-note. The musicians who played the signature licks/solos didn't get writer credit, and I didn't get production credit on those projects either.
For me personally, if I sit down in a room with someone to write, and a song gets written during that time, they are a co-writer on it - doesn't matter if they don't have a word or a note in the song, my feeling has always been that I wouldn't have written what I wrote if that person hadn't been there...maybe they said or did something that spurred a thought. Not everyone does it that way, that's just me.
Bottom line is, if you genuinely feel the person in question made a substantial contribution to the WRITING of the song, by all means give them a piece of the writer credit. But understand there is a significant difference between WRITING and PRODUCTION. Coming up with a great solo, or intro, or turnaround, or ending; a grooving bass line or drum pattern; adding pushes, stops, or any dynamic movements - things like that are production, not songwriting - and it has been my experience, and is my opinion, that those do not warrant songwriting credit, unless the musician(s) in question are willing to waive their payment for playing on the project as side men.
Hope all that stuff clarifies what I was saying. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Thanks, Roger. You're not the first professional song-writer I've "talked" with and I value your perspective on all this. I actually agree with everything you said...especially the part about adding some color to a refusal to be strong-armed. I'll be happy to collaborate on vocabulary, but I have the feeling you've got it covered. What I will do is listen to my guy's contribution all by itself. If it sounds like a lead-line or improv over chords, he got paid and I am satisfied. If it sounds like a real coherent melody, then I'll decide and come up with a way to notate it. Hell, I may even post it like that for "comment". The real purpose of the thread, though, is to say I just feel like I've been playing in the internet sand-box for a long time and, even though I have no plans or any real dreams of turning "professional", I'd like to organize my "hobby" in a more professional manner. It can't hurt. And if it doesn't cost me an arm and a leg, I'd just feel better about it and more willing to "reach out", if that makes sense.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 06:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Seems like the only solution to your personal dilemma is for you to also write the melody lines and pay the 5er musicians to play the melody you wrote.
I laugh maniacally now, but one day it may still happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 730
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 730 |
I've been writing songs for a living since 1985, and have cowritten hundreds of songs with other writers during that time. All I'm telling you is what I've always done, what all of my peers have always done, and the general way the business has always been done, and provided the Reggie Young example.
If you feel morally compelled to give someone writer credit, knock yourself out. It's really that simple, it's your song-your choice. Over the years I've had artists record songs of mine and make changes to them (Trace Adkins & Ricky Van Shelton made substantial changes that I disagreed with) without asking for or receiving songwriter credit. I've also had artists/producers try to 'strong arm' me into giving them writing credit on songs that they've made no change to whatsoever, with the stated threat that if I don't, they won't record the song(s) - in which case I've always said no, usually in a pretty colorful manner. I've also had a substantial number of artists record songs of mine and copy the demo I produced, on more than one occasion note-for-note. The musicians who played the signature licks/solos didn't get writer credit, and I didn't get production credit on those projects either.
For me personally, if I sit down in a room with someone to write, and a song gets written during that time, they are a co-writer on it - doesn't matter if they don't have a word or a note in the song, my feeling has always been that I wouldn't have written what I wrote if that person hadn't been there...maybe they said or did something that spurred a thought. Not everyone does it that way, that's just me.
Bottom line is, if you genuinely feel the person in question made a substantial contribution to the WRITING of the song, by all means give them a piece of the writer credit. But understand there is a significant difference between WRITING and PRODUCTION. Coming up with a great solo, or intro, or turnaround, or ending; a grooving bass line or drum pattern; adding pushes, stops, or any dynamic movements - things like that are production, not songwriting - and it has been my experience, and is my opinion, that those do not warrant songwriting credit, unless the musician(s) in question are willing to waive their payment for playing on the project as side men.
Hope all that stuff clarifies what I was saying. Cheers. In the early days and I am sure even to today, people have forced people to add "writers" to their songs so they have to split the proceeds. They used to do it with Elvis' stuff all the time, basically if you wanted Elvis to record your song, you need to play ball etc. I agree with what you are saying here. Production choices etc. are not co-writing the song. I also agree that if the guy talking in a commercial get's paid every time it airs, the guys or girls playing the music should to and they still don't here in the US. Many songs that the "wrecking crew" folks played on would not have been what they were without their (the studio musicians) contributions so there should have been a way for them to get something other than union scale for their work, but that is the way it works still.
My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Watched the videos Roger linked. Just makes me that much more determined to do what's right. My fiverr guy will make more money than I will. But if he actually accomplishes what I asked for...
We'll see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,786
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,786 |
Imagine a very-berry talented hairstylist will start shaving his/hers "logo" on customers heads...
...And then you apply for a 500K executive job and you win that bid.
Would the stylist be entitled to "royalty" because he perfected your "looks" that he/she might presume tipped the scale in your favor when you got the job?
I see it like this, if you like what you got, tip the performer or even better, spread the word about him/her.
P.S. Just having fun. Interesting discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Imagine, now, a very talented hairstylist using your head as a canvas to create a new logo and use pictures and video of it to turn his TM into a 500K asset. His money or yours? I offered my "head" and paid him for the "haircut" and if it turns into something beyond my real expectations...(fades out pondering).
*******************
The conundrum isn't whether or not to do it. Roger told me I could do it if I want to. So there.
It's more of a judgement call concerning WHEN I might want to do it. That depends on how far above it stands.
HOW! Now that's the real problem. If I want to and think it's right, HOW the hell do I do it in a (semi) professional manner?
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 03:10 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251 |
As to the how, you don't have a lot of options. If you're wanting (insisting) on giving songwriting credit to someone who may or may not be deserving of it, all you have to do is determine how much of your copyright (property) you would like to give away.
50%? 25%? More, or less? Totally up to you.
Just understand you will now be co-owners on a piece of intellectual property, in perpetuity. You can't do anything with the song without your co-writer's approval or blessing. A movie studio wants to put your song in a feature film, but your "cowriter" won't agree to the contract? It's dead in the water.
I applaud the moral position driving your thought process, but the business side of it doesn't make sense. One of my old publishers had a plaque on his desk that said "Emotion + Business = Big Mistakes".
I'll also say this, as someone who feeds his family by writing songs. If I were to make a melodic suggestion on your song, and you offered me co-writing credit, I wouldn't take it. Because I (and this is me personally) don't want my name on anything that I don't feel like I made a significant contribution to.
Follow your own conscience on this, I hope I'm not backseat driving. I just think you should have all the information to consider that you can get.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,378 |
Roger, thanks for that. What if the rights were assigned to a publishing company that I owned 100% of. Would my guy have a say in whether a not a piece was placed? I'm talking about the rights to the composition, no matter who recorded it...not necessarily the rights to the audio that will eventually likely make its way to the showcase here.
Last edited by Tangmo; 05/28/20 04:00 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 251 |
Possibly, but there's no obligation (or real incentive) for the prospective cowriter to give you their share of the publishing. Again, once you give writing credit, you have given away property. In that scenario, if I'm the co-writer, there's no way I'd give you my publishing. The way the royalty structure on a song works, half of the revenue is the writer share and the other half is the publishing share. So on a 50/50 co-write, each writer's royalties are 25% of the total, the other 25% being the publishing share.
Asking someone to give you their publishing is asking them to relinquish half of their potential income. No way in hell I would do that.
Again, and I say this very respectfully....you're trying to be very kind and generous in a business setting - that's rarely a good move. It's called the music business, not music benevolence.
As I read what I've responded with to you, I recognize that some of it may come across as harsh or greedy....but when art and commerce intersect, it's a pretty big collision. For years and years, I had to swallow bitter pill after bitter pill because songwriters are, and always have been, the lowest rung on the music business ladder and consequently get stepped on the most. I've seen a lot of peers and friends make really bad business decisions that effected them for the rest of their lives. Perhaps I err too much on the side of "keeping what's yours", but it's because of how many repeated times I've seen songwriters duped in business dealings because it's our nature to consider what we do "art", when everyone else in the business views what we do as "commerce".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!
The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!
There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.
If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.
We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!
Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!
We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!
There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.
Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.
Thank you to everyone who has contributed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,587
Posts734,734
Members38,500
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean