Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Ok,

So I am mastering two new albums I want to put out, and I am a little confused about loudness, LUFS, streaming specs, etc., though I have an arsenal of tools and such, and feel I am getting the handle of good mix.

Don’t laugh when I present my dilemma.

The availability of online tools and VSTs lets you see where you line up with streaming specs. I won’t discuss CDs since no one really buys them.

In the past, I usually shot for about 16 to 18 LUFS with – 2dB headroom. (I never like to max it out.)

When I run my stuff through a tool like this:

https://www.loudnesspenalty.com/#

It almost always says I am 2 or 3dB over the limit, and so Spotify, for example, will reduce it by that much.

SO, I have started exporting at about 20 to 18, or 19 LUFS, and that keeps me almost exactly in line with Spotify specs, but the headroom is always about -5 dB, and the DR is at a pleasant 11 or 12. (A target for me.)

If that is the case, why does anyone master any louder, or normalize to -1 dB, if Spotify will always turn it down?

In other words, any normalization I do by any means that brings a track to -1 or -2, or even -3 dB always makes it too loud LUFS-wise for Spotify.

So how much headroom do you want? And why would you master loud???

Screenshots of a weird example are below, from of all people, Glen Campbell, on his final album. The LUFS comes in at a horrendous 6, the wave looks like a blue brick, and it has a Spotify penalty of –7.4!!!

Why would anyone master that way in the first place?

I am confused now at what the targets and numbers should be and I thought I had it all figured out. smile

As a reference, most of the stuff I have been posting on the forum the past year has headroom of about -2 dB, and the LUFS have ranged from 10-14, approximately. So far, I have received compliments on the mixes.

Again, don’t laugh if I am being stupid, but I am confused about loudness targets now.



Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Ghost on the Canvas Brick.png (130.63 KB, 188 downloads)
YouLean Ghost.png (91.07 KB, 188 downloads)
Loudness Penalty Ghost.png (106.33 KB, 186 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Hi David, this tool and topic were discussed in depth a couple of years ago..... Check it out.

Your Loudness Penalty




Steve

BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
David, what are you using to measure your output. There are several measurements of interest and any one of them out of spec can create an issue. There is basically the overall average level, short term level and peak levels.

I found Youlean LUFS meter a really good tool. The paid version (which was not very expensive) can be set to a particular service provider and is very easy to see where in a song an issue occurs.

The Youlean Pro version is only $37 at the moment. Youlean is a very easy chap to deal with and sends out updates quite regularly.

The free version is also excellent.

See https://youlean.co/youlean-loudness-meter/

These days I tend to use Izotope Insight but only because I have it.

Just a thought

Tony

Last edited by Teunis; 07/22/21 11:40 AM.

HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663

Thanks Steve,

That is a useful thread!

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Thanks Tony,

I just got the YouLean freebie, and I have had the paid Waves loudness meter for a while.

I guess my only head scratching comes at what my targets should be in this day and age.

I think I am guessing that if I am somewhere between 13 LUFS and 18 LUFS I will be ok for most any purpose, and they can turn it down how they see fit on any service.

I don't mix as loud as some folks because I am way more concerned about dynamic range in my music, so you can hear the different instrument subtleties.

Thanks for the tips!!!!

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 13,978
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 13,978
I think there are a lot of variables in how "loud" a certain LUF target will be. Particularly the compression variable. I use Logic Pro X's loudness meter (comparable in function and results to Youlean) and I master at around 12 LUFs plus or minus one. This almost always gives me a less than 1 db +/- differential on the loudnesspenalty site.

FWIW I always use a four or five band multiband compressor when mastering which adds to or at the least does not distract from the more open feel that I aim for. I cannot technically explain this very well. But I know that the more single band compression I use with the same output on my limiter and the same LUF metered reading the louder the song sounds - and loudnesspenalty agrees with this. That's what drove me toward multi-band compression.

Sorry to further confuse the issue!

Bud

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
This morning I got an email showing iZotope Insight 2 is available at Pluginboutique for $39 at the moment. Insight 2 not only shows levels but also things such as stereo width, phasing and more. Also fairly easy to set things up for your requirements.

Tony


HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,609
To ride on Bud's coattails ..
multiband compression rules for end product.
Very rarely does a single band have anywhere near the goodness smile

When you can compress each freq range to the best detail for that range without affecting others, it's a cool tool.
Takes some learning but well worth the effort.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663

Thanks for all the comments and tips everybody!!

smile

The multibrand compressor is a good idea.

Since I have 847 plugins, I found one in my IK MultiMedia stack.

I am switching various things on and off in a mastering board, like Ozone 9, Ozone 6 (which I also use because of a massive number of presets) IK Multimedia stuff and other tools.

I can usually find the sound I want if I use one or 2 things judiciously, but it starts to fall apart if I overdo it.

* The real beast is Ozone 5 though. The best one they ever made IMHO.

smile

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Quad Compressor.png (240.99 KB, 124 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
It appears you’re using Cakewalk. May I suggest using the FX Chain in the Pro Channel. This will be ensure the plugins you’re using will be in the order you want (although I notice in the latest that all Pro Channel plugins but the EQ now seem to be removed).

It is or was very possible to look as if everything was good adding plugins in the FX part of the Master Track only to be over written by plugins in the Pro Channel. By default Cakewalk reads top down from the MasterTrack top to bottom then the Pro Channel top to bottom.

By using the FX Chain or several FX Chains in the Pro Channel one can position your required plugins exactly where you need them.

Right click in the Pro Channel select the FX Chain plugin then add your plugins in order then put the FX Chain down the bottom of the Pro Channel. This method allows you to use both the FX area of the Master Track and a separate areas in the Pro Channel.

It is easy to save the FX Chain once you have it set up.

Just a thought

Tony

Edit: what I’m getting at is you could have your LUFS meter at the bottom of your Master Track FX and all looks fine. Then Cakewalk goes to the Pro Channel does its thing and the output is lifted out of whack. The LUFS meter at least should be in an FX Chain box as the last thing in the Pro Channel. Then you’ll have a true indication of your output.

Last edited by Teunis; 07/23/21 12:34 PM.

HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 13,978
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 13,978
David, the dynamics module in Ozone 9 is a 4 band compressor. FWIW in Ozone 9 Adv all of the modules can be used standalone. I like to use them that way so I can insert other fx in the chain.

Bud

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Thanks Tony, those are great tips!

I have both the recent version of Cakewalk Bandlab but also use an older version of Sonar Artist for simplicity a lot.

I make sure to have my plug ins in the right order before they get to the final meter.

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663

Thanks Bud!

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Hopefully I have an image of what I'm getting at.

At the Master Track LUFS look ok after the Pro Channel way low. Note this can just as easily be reversed so the after the Pro Channel the levels are higher. The point is the actual level is the one from the Pro Channel (as I understand it)

Maybe I am wrong. However when adding A maximiser to the Pro Channel rather than the Master Track FX I get a consistent result. (that tells me the Master FX is the final place)

Note this is an example not a real working project.

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Master vs Pro Channel.PNG (285.39 KB, 114 downloads)
Last edited by Teunis; 07/23/21 01:44 PM.

HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Thanks Tony. Very useful.

This is turning into a cool thread. I would love to see more tips and screenshots and methods and tricks on mastering from others.

It would be fun to see what others are doing and have discovered.

Also, on Bandlab, I *think* that the effects on the Pro Channel on the Master track come BEFORE the rack menu slots (what you see on the Master strip when you close Pro Channel) on the signal chain. Otherwise you could not use 3rd party limiters and meters as the FINAL stage before output, right? For example, my Ik Multimedia Meter is the very last thing in my signal chain on the rack menu in the Master Track.

Whatever THAT says is what I get when I export and measure the export. Is that you are saying too? smile

I know everybody does things slightly differently and I always love to see what others are doing and are excited about in new mixing and mastering discoveries.

smile

I eat this stuff up.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
David et al, I don’t use any product or tool as a given. For example, I tended to use BIAB to generate my tracks as a basic usually Realtracks but maybe as some MIDI. If I am adding MIDI I tended to pull the song into Cakewalk to add and manipulate MIDI. I would then freeze and/or export the tracks and pull them into Reaper for mixing and “mastering”. Why, mainly to cut out the “nice” features of Cakewalk. I reckon whilst the Pro Channel is good if you use it, it can become an issue if you don’t use it. (It is there).

Ok why use Cakewalk for MIDI? I found Cakewalk easier particularly the Piano Roll and adjusting features. Probably because I spent years learning it.

However, once I purchased Tod’s Pedal Steel and worked with his ToolBars and subsequently created a number of Note Maps for various instruments I’ve found Reaper easier to use. Creating Note Maps and ToolBars that are saved with an instrument makes life way easier.

For example, an AmpleSound guitar has many key switches to adjust articulations, also many key switches to adjust Capo positions which require multiple keystrokes. Using a using a ToolBar for Capo Position it is a one button push. The button sets the cursor a bit before the note, adds the keystrokes. Easy and more accurate.

VSL Synchron Player control uses many CC lanes. To have these named in a “Note Map” really makes life simpler. Instead of trying to remember what CCs do they are named to tell you. Unfortunately Cakewalk does not have this ability (yet) as I understand it.

Different tools for different jobs. I believe a DAW is a tool and one should use it to their advantage. Which is the best tool :- the one you find the easiest to get the result you want to get the job done.

Sorry for the rant, just spent too long on a different topic with a different group.

Tony


HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Hey Tony,

Keep it up!

Listen. I can run a little experiment later, but just thought I would ask because I have not messed with Pro Channel that much, though I know I should.

SO--

In your experience, is it, or is it not true that the effects associated with Pro Channel (I mean Pro Channel inserts on the Master Track) come BEFORE the effects loaded on the rack menu on the front-facing strip of the Master Track?????

smile

I think the answer is yes, and has to be, but just wanted to see if that is what you are saying. Everything has follow a flow in the signal chain.

I *think" the flow is always top to bottom, like on the Pro Channel you have to move the modules around depending on what you want feeding into what, but the OUTPUT from the Pro Channel is to the rack menus, top to bottom to the LAST plugin in there, and that output is your final drip.

Is that the flow as you see it man???

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Tony,

So I experimented.

It appears the answer is YES. The Pro Channel does feed into the rack menu.

Interestingly, added and switched on the basic compressor in Pro Channel and it does add a little extra spice and clarity, without significantly impacting LUFS.

I will have to experiment a lot more with this.

Thanks for sending me on this mission.

smile


Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Bandlab Pro Channel Compressor.png (236.56 KB, 79 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,169
David, check out this video which demonstrates signal flow.

https://youtu.be/pRIZWiN6iZo

I still find the way though the Pro Channel a bit confusing which is why I ended up mixing and “mastering” in Reaper where I felt I had more control as it has nothing anywhere. Having said that there is nothing wrong with Cakewalk once you have FX chains saved and doing what you need.

Tony


HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,663

This is great Tony, thanks!

Exactly what I needed.

I love his little chart. Cool.

smile

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Happy Easter! Holiday Hours...

2024 is well underway - it's already Easter Weekend!

Our Customer Service hours this weekend are:

Friday, March 29: 8-4
Saturday, March 30: 8-4
Sunday, March 31: closed

Regular hours resume Monday, April 1st - no joke!

Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!

The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!

There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.

If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.

We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!

Congratulations to the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

We've just announced the 2023 User Showcase Award Winners!

There are 45 winners, each receiving a Band-in-a-Box 2024 UltraPAK! Read the official announcement to see if you've won.

Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.

Thank you to everyone who has contributed!

Video: Volume Automation in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created a video to help you learn more about the Volume Automation options in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows.

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Volume Automation

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#volume-automation

Video: Audio Input Monitoring with Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®

We've created this short video to explain Audio Input Monitoring within Band-in-a-Box® 2024, and included some tips & troubleshooting details too!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024: Audio Input Monitoring

3:17: Tips
5:10: Troubleshooting

www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024full/chapter11.htm#audio-input-monitoring

Video: Enhanced Melodists in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows®!

We've enhanced the Melodists feature included in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows!

Access the Melodist feature by pressing F7 in the program to open the new MultiPicker Library and locate the [Melodist] tab.

You can now generate a melody on any track in the program - very handy! Plus, you select how much of the melody you want generated - specify a range, or apply it to the whole track.

See the Melodist in action with our video, Band-in-a-Box® 2024: The Melodist Window.

Learn even more about the enhancements to the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/manuals/bbw2024upgrade/chapter3.htm#enhanced-melodist

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,396
Posts732,510
Members38,442
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
danielsk, Mark Morgan, zagrajbarke, Ernest J, Izzy
38,442 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 195
Al-David 124
DC Ron 116
dcuny 87
rsdean 85
Today's Birthdays
CeeDee, SethMould
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5