Does anyone else see a need for the Utility Tracks to be treat the same as Legacy tracks with respect to bar settings and volume control?
I wasn't a BiaB user when the distiction between legacy and utility came into being so I'm sure there is a lot of history here. But I find it quite clunky to have to go into the AudioEdit window and add in nodes to mute a utility track that I might not end up using.
Note in the screen shot that the "Piano" track is not on the Bar settings list.
I also notice that WendyM is currently struggling with this (or a related issue) so I'm guessing others struggle with this too.
I'm aware that the individual tracks can be exported and then imported into a DAW where you have full control over volume levels. I'm doing this more and more in Studio One thanks to MarioD's comments. But when sketching out song ideas in BiaB quite often I need a quick listen to see if the track is even worth keeping in the song. So to export, import and adjust a track in S1 only to find I don't like it is even less efficient.
Is there a reason why Utility tracks are "2nd class citizens" ?
Last edited by Bass Thumper; 10/17/2208:34 AM.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
We’ve had many discussions about this and I think you are correct. The conclusion we came to last year was that the natural evolution of ‘all tracks are equal’ means that major changes in BIAB are required to make Utility tracks function as the legacy tracks do now.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
< Does anyone else see a need for the Utility Tracks to be treat the same as Legacy tracks with respect to bar settings and volume control? >
Not at all. That's a step backwards. Besides, PG Music developers made all the Legacy Tracks work the same as Utility Tracks with respect to Mute/Unmute and volume control that provides greater accuracy and control and it's nearly universally ignored. The Bar Settings and Volume Control tools are better in the Utility Tracks than the coarse, rudimentary controls of the Legacy Bar Setting Dialog Window.
< Is there a reason why Utility tracks are "2nd class citizens" >
Yes. It because folks prefer to export files to DAWs for simple editing tasks even though it can be done faster and function's exactly the same when doing them in the Audio Edit Window.
Counting exporting to a DAW as an option, there are ten other tools in the Audio Edit Page to treat a Utility Track instrument volume. The most used and recognized method is 'export to a DAW' followed by volume automation and I speculate 90% of users can't name all ten.
Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.
1)Settings at the bar for Util tracks will save a lot of time, especially for sketching out stuff. ACW is great, but it is for fine editing. And will take ten times slower to do same in Settings at the bar. And if you change number of bars / insert bars, good luck re-volume everything. They are different features, and I hope that both will be available in future.
2)There is absolutely no reason for Utility tracks not to gain full functions of legacy tracks. Especially Shots, Holds, Rests. Offering existing "workarounds" for these is no go, as they are absurd.
A Big +1! to OP post.
Utility tracks have been evolving, but not there yet. To make full use, they have to match capabilities of legacy tracks, there is no doubt about it. I hope that this is something in the books for 2023. Or at least a good step forward, either Settings at the Bar or Shots, Rests, Holds and Pushes. Hopefully both
P.S. Bass Thumper, I don't like "workarounds" when it involves core functions, but I thought you should know that you can use ACW to node control volumes of instruments for now for Utility tracks. Not ideal solution compared to quick and easy "Settings at the bar", but at least doable. Actually, if proper automation is programmed to ACW in the future, I would prefer that instead of Bar Settings. But that is another discussion. There is a benefit to ACW as you can adjust volumes precisely. If you are not aware of the method, see attached.
I am much more worried about Shots, Holds and Rests for Utility tracks. I hope it is being considered as the workaround for these is very painful and for the sake of sanity, I will not even mention it here
To be equal, I suppose the legacy tracks and utility tracks must work exactly the same way, but I see Charlie’s point and I was very careful not to commit to supporting a particular solution. Making a few dozen tracks all controllable by radio buttons and F5 would be a serious rewrite.
PG Music has not stated how this will be handled, to my knowledge, and I can still see some version of ‘separate but equal’ being plausible. If the slogan ‘all tracks are equal’ had not been used, and instead they had said something like ‘new this year, additional tracks for storage’ there wouldn’t be the fuss over ‘equal’ and we would just get our work done.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Matt, Radio buttons: "a few dozen" - 2 dozen + through and master I am fairly certain that most people who came to BIAB in the past 10 years do not use radio buttons. (this would actually be an interesting poll) While I read users arguments "for" them, a sensible solution would be to be able to hide... and reveal this bar, which is taking valuable screen real estate and has absolutely no meaning or uses to most newcomers. There are several ways these radio buttons can be handled. For example 1) all can easily fit in two rows 2) display only those, which tracks are occupied. 3)A custom number.
F5 Menu: I made and shared a mock sketch some time ago and they should all fit on screen with slight rearrangement of existing buttons. Again, there are "ways" to do this ergonomically pleasing. For example dynamic sizable window, similar to what we have with mixer, or choose a custom list of tracks to be displayed, etc.
While you might disagree, extra tracks was/is one, if not the most significant features in BIAB for me and I am sure many others. Hoping that PG team will find a good way to handle volume/mutes in bulk and solve Shots, holds, rests for Utility tracks.
If the slogan ‘all tracks are equal’ had not been used, and instead they had said something like ‘new this year, additional tracks for storage’ there wouldn’t be the fuss over ‘equal’ and we would just get our work done.
Yeah, claiming a new feature that obviously is not true is always gonna cause a "fuss"!
Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.
I agree with Rustyspoon 100%!
No surprise. Misha didn't even mention the issues (in bold lettering) I responded to in my reply.
The subjects I addressed were specifically directed to the volume choices that can currently be made in the Bar Settings Dialog Window (F5) in comparison to Utility Track Bar Settings choices.
There's no question that Utility Track equivalent Bar Setting selections are finer resolution and more accurate than the Bar Settings selections. There's no question that Utility Track options that have also been expanded to apply to the Legacy Tracks and offer multiple methods to use to manipulate Utility Track and Legacy Track audio.
So when Bass Thumper wasn't satisfied with the clunky audio automation function, you guys didn't stay on topic and explain any alternatives to him, the conversation strayed off topic about "all tracks equal" and Misha presented a laundry list of shortcomings that were not mentioned in the original post. Regardless of the interpretation you fellows thought you read in the original post, the topic was clearly stated. The phrase "all tracks equal" isn't mentioned in the original post nor my reply.
The cause of the issues listed in the first post is Bass Thumper only knew of Volume Automation for the track he was working on.
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel. I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.
Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.
Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).
BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Charlie, Actually I wrote my "laundry" list, as you coined, before you posted yours. It just took me more time to prep graphics. And when I saw your reply before posting, I responded to it.
I believe, I replied to OP questions and voiced my support for his request.
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel. I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.
Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.
Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).
exactly what I'm looking for. A drop down in the F5 box showing ALL enabled tracks. Wendy x
BiaB2022PLUS,927. every extras pack I can find ;-),Sonar7XL,Win 10
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel. I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.
Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.
Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).
First, let me say that I consider myself a BiaB newbie that stumbled into the issue of not being able to mute a utility track in the same easy way that I can with legacy tracks and therefore requested a wish for this to be improved even though there is a (clunky in my opinion) work-around. I have no clue as to the historical background here and why this is the case.
Second, I apologize if my original post was not as well articulated as it could have been. And being the newbie that I am, I would never presume to be knowledgeable enough to specify how this wish should be implemented. There are contextual, historical, user-base, software and other ramifications that I will never be privy to. This is the domain of the experts. In any industry, multiple factors must be balanced, including customer experience with the product.
Third, AudioTrack captures very well what I tried to express. Because workflow matters, my brain appreciates intuitive and consistent software design.
Fourth, my interest is for PG Music and their awesome flagship product to be as successful as possible in the ever-changing and competitive domain in which they operate. There will always be competitors nipping at their heels. This (in addition to achieving smoother personal workflows) is why I offer suggestions in the wishlist.
Fifth, (an element dear to us bass players) let's pay it forward, share the love and work toward the common good.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
"I apologize if my original post was not as well articulated as it could have been."
It is very well articulated.
"Because workflow matters, my brain appreciates intuitive and consistent software design." "let's pay it forward, share the love and work toward the common good."
Bass Thumper, this is like many threads: it goes in several directions, provokes reactions, and helps to clarify what we want. It's good you brought it up again, as PG Music alone needs to decide how to make the next improvements.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
+1 for being able to easily mute/unmute Utility tracks on a certain bar without having to remember how to do it in the ACW automation. If I'm already muting tracks in the F5 Bar Settings menu or in my DAW, then I really don't want a 3rd place to manage it which I find takes longer to locate the exact bar to work on.
Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
Convenient Ways to Listen to Band-in-a-Box® Songs Created by Program Users!
The User Showcase Forum is an excellent place to share your Band-in-a-Box® songs and listen to songs other program users are creating!
There are other places you can listen to these songs too! Visit our User Showcase page to sort by genre, artist (forum name), song title, and date - each listing will direct you to the forum post for that song.
If you'd rather listen to these songs in one place, head to our Band-in-a-Box® Radio, where you'll have the option to select the genre playlist for your listening pleasure. This page has SoundCloud built in, so it won't redirect you. We've also added the link to the Artists SoundCloud page here, and a link to their forum post.
We hope you find some inspiration from this amazing collection of User Showcase Songs!
Our User Showcase Forum receives more than 50 posts per day, with people sharing their Band-in-a-Box songs and providing feedback for other songs posted.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean