|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,569
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,569 |
Quote:
John, one thing you may be missing is you don't have to make RB generate a whole track. You can simply generate however many bars you need by highlighting those bars with your mouse first. Then the generation times are very fast and remember don't open a Biab song in RB, D&D the tracks.
thanks Bob. I was aware of this but just have not had this need yet.
another reason I prefer a separate DAW is for the separate community. many DAWs have amazing communities and 3rd-party add-ons, tutorials, support, documentation, etc. I feel I benefit from being a part of that community in addition to the PG community. Here a lot of the focus is (rightly) on generation of music while the focus in my DAW community is more on recording and mixing audio.
and regarding the comments about how you can do anything in RealBand that you can do in any other DAW...if it works for you then great! I would strongly advise any BIAB user new to audio mixing to try RealBand and Reaper (or whatever DAW interests you) on a couple of projects and decide which one works best for your workflow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821 |
Quote:
I would strongly advise any BIAB user new to audio mixing to try RealBand and Reaper (or whatever DAW interests you) on a couple of projects and decide which one works best for your workflow.
John3, I would advise any new BiaB user to stay with RB. If you haven’t had any other experience with DAWs why not use the one that comes with BiaB? In fact I have given this advise many times.
Remember that this is from a Sonar user!
I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
@All,
My comments about PG's midi excelling above all else is individual note editing - that is where I think it's better than pretty much anything else.
What stinks is the lack of other editing/mixing functions like all midi CC control automation, that is node based - as Robh points out.
One day, I will probably buy back in to PG with the MegaPak. I left the fold when I got hooked on low-latency VSTi handling with freebie instruments that brought back the goosebumps from the old days. I then made some investments that I got used to and now it would be hard to go back to being without them, just like I would not like to do without cruise control on a car. Sure I can do it manually, but I'd rather something else take that off my mind/effort.
I don't need autogeneration of tracks right now. In fact, the 'smart instruments' in my Garageband on iPhone do a serviceable job of this. Oh, it's a 5$ app. I can't feed it a chord sequence, but I can pre-select which chords are going to be used in a track and simply trigger when the chords change. There's enough variety that I can get the song idea down.
So - making a long story shorter:
If you need to autogenerate backing tracks, there is nothing else on the market like BIAB/RB.
If you need modern flexibility and utility of recording software, most other products on the market - even low priced offerings - have more features. If you like those features (midi tempo communication between plugins and the host, automation flexibility, ReWire, modular signal routing within the host, etc.) then you likely use a 2nd program to do these things.
No harm, no foul.
It would be cool if these long term (some for 5+ years) wishlist items would get included in RB, then it gets much closer to calling BIAB/RB both the best autoaccompaniment software in the market AND a great DAW to boot. Those of us that do use this latter list of items regularly have been yammering on for 5+ years about some of them - we speculate whether they can even be done, since it seems like these would remove what we perceive as inequality as a "Digital Audio Workstation", but then again, this is not what the thread title uses - it uses "Sequencer", which for a long time meant MIDI only, and some of the items like the automation and VSTi/VST tempo use, are standard fare even in other midi-centric sequencing function of other DAW softwares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,342 |
I do not use RB at all. I did look into the program when it was first released, but I didn't like the feel and the workflow. So I can not give any form of comment on the latest versions of RB. I did buy and use Powertracks Pro Audio 12 for a while. I liked it and that DAW worked for me, but then I tried a version of Cubase. That DAW fit me like a glove. The workflow, the great VST's and VSTi's that come with it and the support for third party VST's are great.
So Cubase (6.5 at the moment. I do have 7 (grace period), but I have to upgrade my XP to Win 7 or 8 first) is the heart of my studio. I use BiaB to compose music and create certain tracks. These are all imported dry (with no effects and no panning) into Cubase where I add other tracks, apply effects, edit tracks etc. I also do quit a few live recordings of bands and choirs with a Roland R1000 recorder. All these tracks are loaded into Cubase so I can mix them.
I think there are a lot of great DAWs on the market these days. Ranging in price from free to quit a lot of money. Yes, there are differences in these DAWs, but in the end all boils down to the skills of the man/woman behind the wheel. If you bought BiaB, you got RB thrown in for free. If RB works for you, that is great: no need to look for a different DAW. Should you run into limitations or develop the need for something else, that will be the time to look around for another DAW.
Just like I have worked with Windows XP on my DAW-computer and never felt the need to upgrade the OS. Untill now, since Cubase 7 will not install on XP. That's when you run into limitations and are forced to look for something new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311 |
I've stayed away from this thread up until now because I think that which DAW you use is all down what you want to do with it and personal preference as to how you work. I do find though, that some people (not directed at anyone here) will criticize a product without having a full working knowledge of it.
In fact, it's been my experience that most people only know a proportion of the capabilities of their own DAW - I've been using PowerTracks since it went audio about 12 years ago and I'm still discovering new aspects of it.
The thing which is puzzling me and why I've joined in at this late stage is that there have been lots of references to the lack of automation with RB/PT. I find I can automate the channel fader, pan control and eight aux sends on all 48 channels. In addition, I can do this either by moving the controls in real time on the mixer, or by drawing or editing the curve for all these controllers in the PIANO ROLL window. I can also use this method to automate all other MIDI controllers. I accept that it would be nice to have the sub-groups automated, but other than that, what is it that people feel is missing?
Just curious...
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803 |
The DAW is the tool set, and the user the carpenter. I can take the very best tools that the wood working industry has to offer, and some old master carpenter can beat me to pieces with a basic set of tool. The skill to use these tools comes from experimentation, practice, and time.
Take a tool set that works and learn it. I wish i had the time i spend chasing all the different programs back, and had use that to really learn just one system.
Lenovo Win 10 16 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2022, Realband, Harrison Mixbus 32c version 9.1324, Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app, Komplete 49 key controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 881 |
Quote:
I wish i had the time i spend chasing all the different programs back, and had use that to really learn just one system.
I sometimes feel this way also, but then I think that I would have lost out learning WHAT the differences are between the DAWs, diffrent verbs-eq's-comp-etc.
Just like settling on "your" instrument, how do you find that guitar-bass-keyboard-drum stick that you use now, that is your 'go to"? By playing as many instruments and picking up as many sticks as you could until one just "fit".
Yup, it takes time to get comfortable for the journey...  
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,569
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,569 |
Quote:
Yup, it takes time to get comfortable for the journey...
and when ya think about it, the journey is really all we have!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
The thing which is puzzling me and why I've joined in at this late stage is that there have been lots of references to the lack of automation with RB/PT. I find I can automate the channel fader, pan control and eight aux sends on all 48 channels. In addition, I can do this either by moving the controls in real time on the mixer, or by drawing or editing the curve for all these controllers in the PIANO ROLL window. I can also use this method to automate all other MIDI controllers. I accept that it would be nice to have the sub-groups automated, but other than that, what is it that people feel is missing?
Just curious...
ROG.
ROG,
Can you see the list of what is automatable for any plugin that's on a track? If so, and if the curves are simple draw notes and mess with the node time and level points, then I would say that the automation is up there with other tools.
Let me just give you a simple example. My favorite reverb is a freebie from Aries Code. Once I put this reverb on a track and click on automation for the track, it gives me the list of automatable parameters for this particular plugin. If I check an item in the list, the curve I draw/edit belongs to that particular control for that particular parameter for that particular plugin, and it adds it to the list of automation curves I can edit for that particular track. In this case, this reverb plugin has the following automatable items:
dry level, wet level, Geometry, FB Matrix, FB rot 1, FB rot 2, FB inv, Base dly, LF Life, HF Life, In rot, Out Rot, Mod Dep, Mod Per, Mod spr, Dry amt, Wet amt, Nonlinear
This is just one example. It doesn't matter what the VST/VSTi is, if it has automatable parameters, which most do, the list for those plugin are immediately available as soon as they are instantiated on a track - I don't think this is Midi CC - I think PG's automation, as you describe it, is MIDI CC only. Not so here.
As it turns out, I usually only use presets for this particular reverb, on an aux bus with automated send level to that bus, but I used it simply as an example.
For experimental stuff or even kind of standard 'electronic' music, automating effect parameters is a must-have item. One thing folks do often is automate the delay length in a delay, using an automation curve to shorten/lengthen these values in a musical way.
We've had the 'dubstep' discussion here as this style of electronic music has made it to the mainstream in TV commercials and so forth. The bass 'wobble' effect that you hear in many dubstep tunes is automated filter cutoff amounts in time with the music. More traditional 'trance' type of electronic music automates filter cutoff/resonance/strength amounts over much longer periods of time, many times over several bars of music.
So, while most here may not use this type of automation, this is what is being referred to in other softwares in addition to mixer type of automation.
For the Jamstix plugin, one of the key items to automate, once you've picked out your drummer, is the amount of drive/laid back amount for the drummer, in addition to a bunch of different feel parameters.
Maybe it's in PG stuff - I don't know. Last I checked, it wasn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311 |
Hi Scott - thanks for the explanation. It certainly helps me to understand where you're coming from. I can't see a time when I'd need to automate plugin parameters, but I can see why others might want to.
Like I said, it all depends on what you're recording and your working practices.
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,645
Posts735,406
Members38,526
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean