|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 113
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 113 |
The little playing around Ive done so far it seems Reaper is more intuitive, easier to figure out how to do things in.
I really want to just do basic recording and mixing, nothing fancy.
Is my initial experience correct or should i give Real Band more of a chance..............
The short version of this question:
What is easier to use for Basic Recording? Real Band Or Reaper?
Thanks,
BBB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047 |
BBB,
Came out of the Power Tracks Pro world into BIAB with RB.
Gave me RB edge.
But never knew anything about VSTi's and only little bout
VST plugins. With help from the forum folks was/am able to
make decent music using RB.
If you listen to folks on the showcase forum, many are using
RB.
I have a decent ear for music, but no serious audio recording background.
If you haven't purchased Reaper yet, I'd give RB a whirl.
Look into the tutorials and training video's some on YouTube I think.
Do believe the audio quality and results within BIAB are very good.
For professional studios, other products "May" be better, don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The little playing around Ive done so far it seems Reaper is more intuitive, easier to figure out how to do things in.
Go with the one that seems more attractive to YOU. It is far more important to get in there and get your feet wet, start creating stuff, and repeat that process. Keep RB around, though, for there may come a day when it can do something Reaper can't do as readily and then you will be able to go for that as well. --Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,371
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,371 |
Remember also that you will not be able to generate Real Tracks inside Reaper, so all of your material has to be 'ready to roll' before you import it into Reaper. Whereas, in Real Band you can change all of part of a track, regenerate etc, right from within the program.
BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687 |
It all depends on you and what you're experience is and how you work. Years ago Power Tracks was the first DAW I ever worked with and I found it pretty easy to learn so now I'm totally familiar with Real Band because it's based on PT.
If you already know how Reaper works then you probably feel the same about that, you know it, you're familiar with it so why bother with something new unless you think you're missing something.
Keep reading this forum about RB and if someone here is doing something that sounds cool to you and you can't do it in Reaper then try RB.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636 |
My view; try both.
If you like one better than the other, enjoy it.
You already have RB and Reaper has a free unlimited trial version.
In my experience; for simpler, as mentioned above, I already knew PT so RB was very intuitive. If you cut your teeth early on in the computer recording timeline RB/PT should be pretty intuitive. Also you can continue to work in a BiaB mindset (generating tracks, or portions of tracks and even multiriffs). This has a huge benefit for small project studios. However, if you cut your teeth on Adobe (for instance) another software may be much more intuitive for you.
For me, if and when I find I need to move from RB I do, but until then I find the features available in RB too inviting to move to something else before I need to.
Many of my requests for work/help come from PGMusic based projects, so RB is the right choice. When a request comes in for something done in another DAW, I adapt and keep moving on. The differences are often just in personal preference, so try them both and decide for yourself. Which is better/easier/simpler depends on the need and your personal history.
If you know BiaB, there is a good chance you'll appreciate RB more. Without a knowledge of your previous workflow it is impossible to guess which is better for you, really.
If you've never used any other DAW to begin with, I'd suggest RB simply because many features of BiaB can be accommodated. Moving to Reaper, then realizing you can't generate the same drum sound for another 8 measures can be frustrating.
Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,074
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,074 |
The little playing around Ive done so far it seems Reaper is more intuitive, easier to figure out how to do things in. You may have answered your own question already. Speaking only for myself, the hardest part of using software to record music has been the software learning curve. Few things are more frustrating than knowing what you want to do, but you can't figure out how to make the software do it. On the "intuitive" part of your question, my experience has been exactly the opposite of yours. I bought Reaper and have tried to wrap my brain around it several times, but it doesn't seem intuitive to me at all. RealBand, on the other hand, was a breath of fresh air for me from the very first version... to me, it just made sense... Software is definitely not a "one size fits all" product. If you wear what fits YOU, you'll always be comfortable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803 |
That is somewhat like saying what is easier to drive a ford or a chevy. Really depends on what your used to.
Lenovo Win 10 16 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2022, Realband, Harrison Mixbus 32c version 9.1324, Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app, Komplete 49 key controller.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
"Easy" and "Multitrack Recording" can become mutually exclusive terms in half a heartbeat...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,302
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,302 |
There is not and will never be a right answer to a question asking about opinions. Any question like that has to have "for you" at the end of it. Some people love Protools. I think its among the worst and most complicated pieces of software ever. Some say the same of Sonar, which I prefer.
What is best and easiest FOR YOU? This is like asking what kind of strings to use on your guitar. Use what YOU like.
Some people refuse to experiment and learn new things. They still use Bob's DAW from 1986.
Use what YOU like. They all do the same thing. They mix tracks of music into a finished product.
I am using the new 1040XTRAEZ form this year. It has just 2 lines.
1. How much did you make in 2023?
2. Send it to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
"Bob's DAW from 1986"
I like that.
But, having lived through it, Bob's DAW from 1986 was ALL MIDI, no audio, and it wasn't even called a DAW yet, if anything they called 'em, "sequencers" or "sequencing software"...
Still love the old "Bars 'n Pipes" program from that era, though, as MIDI sequencing goes, that one could do literally anything.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732 |
How about Dr. T's KCS? A classic old MIDI editor I used on the Amiga back in the day.
 Steve BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636 |
Hey,
Am I being blamed somehow?
Signed,
Bob
Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583 |
Am I being blamed somehow? Depends on which DAW you were using in 1986... 
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I finally paid Bob the last payment on that great software deal.
In 2003.
The boyz he sent down from michigan were real nice.
Last visit, they mentioned something about tuning me up.
What service.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,302
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7,302 |
Hey,
Am I being blamed somehow?
Signed,
Bob Well, as usual, it IS your fault.....
I am using the new 1040XTRAEZ form this year. It has just 2 lines.
1. How much did you make in 2023?
2. Send it to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687 |
Hey, I wrote Bob's DAW in 1982 what are you guys talking about? It was cool, way ahead of it's time or my time or somebody's time. Whatever, my cat liked it. You could do anything you wanted with that one track as long as you didn't break the string...
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,651
Posts735,440
Members38,526
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean