Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#315705 10/25/15 04:22 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
How do I move a Biab sgu file into RB for further editing?

Strat

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Open it in RB is simplest way

I'd save it as a .Seq file in RB format once opened though, for future use.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
rharv #315711 10/25/15 05:02 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604

Thanks Rharv
My main problem is that I have a hard time finding where Biab saves my file (blushing)

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,407
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,407
Fist thing you need to do is create a project file. Then "save as" into the project file.

I have directories set up for my

d:\Reaper Sessions\sngtitle\

and

d:\RB Sessions\sngtitle\

or

d:\BIAB Gigfavorites\sngtitle\

The last thing you want is to not know where your music project files are!



Dan, BIAB2024, SoundCloud Win11, i7(12thGen), 32GB, 1TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD), 2TB Libraries, 1 TB(WD-Black), 2TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD)Data, Motu Audio Express, Keystation 61, SL88 Studio, Reaper

DrDan #315719 10/25/15 06:05 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
And now when I succeeded getting my sgu file into RB, everything sound different from Biab, how do I remedy that?
Please bear with me, up until now I have used RB as a multitrack recorder :-)
Strat

DrDan #315722 10/25/15 06:28 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
Seems like all the powerful sounds from Biab have lost their power when played back in RB, guess it's maybe some softsynth set up that behaves differently in Biab and RB?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Strat,

I've discovered that if you want to use both RB and BiaB to develop a song project it is better to do minimal work in BiaB and transfer the project to RB. The reason I say that is that many of the settings you make in BiaB are not read by RB.

When I want to use both programs on a song project I divide the project into two phases where BiaB is used to build the song structure and RB is used to develop instrument tracks.

In BiaB I concentrate on selecting the song key signature, tempo, swing or even feel, primary style, main instruments, basic chords and number of verses. I don't try "fancy" things like using F5, instrument patch changes, or using repeats because they don't always translate well to RB so they either waste my time or mess up in RB.

When I move to RB the first thing I do is (if the import has midi tracks) raise the file resolution to a higher setting then save the import in RB's native file format which is SEQ. That way future saves take less time and I always have the original BiaB SGU or MGU file as a fallback or safety.

Now I am in RB and can import other styles, try different instruments, use the multi-riff feature, modify the chord chart and do any other "trick" I can think of to create great instrument sounds.

Hope this helps.


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
Glad to hear you say that, it makes sense and matches my own experience, after all these Biab years I'm still trying to figure out how to deal with Biab and RB both. How to make the most out of two worlds.

Strat

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Originally Posted By: stratocaster
Seems like all the powerful sounds from Biab have lost their power when played back in RB, guess it's maybe some softsynth set up that behaves differently in Biab and RB?




You're using two different synths in BIAB and RB? If you're using RealTracks, they should sound the same in either program.


Regards,

Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Some people have better success by using the 'Freeze all tracks" feature in BiaB before saving it and opening it in RB.

Like Jim, I move on to RB as soon as I can. Saves time for me.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Originally Posted By: stratocaster
Seems like all the powerful sounds from Biab have lost their power when played back in RB, guess it's maybe some softsynth set up that behaves differently in Biab and RB?


Both BiaB and RB have programming options to choose default soft synths. If you don't select one the default is the Windows GS wavetable. Perhaps you've selected something different in one program but not the other?


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
S
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 604
Seems like I have gotten my RB windows [*****] totally up, too high resolution tracks view, my left side graphics went outside the screen, any way to reset the setup to factory settings ? It's been way too long since I have used Biab/RB, sorry guys but at least I'm honest about it ;-)

Strat

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
The files are compatible back and forth between the programs BB & RB. Open cna close as well as edit as needed with no worries.

I always move my files into a folder set up specifically for a song project once I decide it's a viable song.

I have the general folder.... "SONGS 2015" ... one for each new year set up on my desktop for easy reference.

In each of the annual folders are individual song project folders which contain ALL the files related to that song project. That way, everything is on one place.

I can archive the annual folder to a storage drive & backup drives easily once they are over 2 years old to keep the C drive clean.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Originally Posted By: stratocaster
Seems like I have gotten my RB windows [*****] totally up, too high resolution tracks view, my left side graphics went outside the screen, any way to reset the setup to factory settings ? It's been way too long since I have used Biab/RB, sorry guys but at least I'm honest about it ;-)

Strat




That's called "Return To factory Settings (in the Opts. menu). You can set up your synths like this:

http://www.pgmusic.com/tutorial_bbw_nosound.htm


Regards,

Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 56
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 56
Originally Posted By: JimFogle
When I move to RB the first thing I do is (if the import has midi tracks) raise the file resolution to a higher setting...


Jim, what exactly do you mean when you say, "raise the file resolution to a higher setting?" That sounds important, because my workflow sounds a lot like yours: sketch it out in BiaB, then finalize in RB.

Thank you!


BIAB Audiophile 2016 for Windows, Cubase LE AI Elements, Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit, Axium Mini-Air 32, UR22, Alesis Monitors, AT2020
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Originally Posted By: cklester
Originally Posted By: JimFogle
When I move to RB the first thing I do is (if the import has midi tracks) raise the file resolution to a higher setting...


Jim, what exactly do you mean when you say, "raise the file resolution to a higher setting?" That sounds important, because my workflow sounds a lot like yours: sketch it out in BiaB, then finalize in RB.

Thank you!



In RealBand 2015 (8) in the menu bar you can change the midi resolution for the song by selecting "Options" at the top of the screen then "Resolution". The default setting is in parathesis beside the word "Resolution". When your mouse highlights "Resolution" a pop-up menu opens with selections that vary from a low of 48 to a high of 3840. I normally select 3840.

To change the RealBand 2015 (8)'s program default midi resolution select "Options" at the top of the screen then "Preferences". Select tab "3-File" then check the third checkbox "Convert PPQ of Loaded Files To". The selection box defaults to "480 PPQ". The choices range from 48 PPQ to 3840 PPQ. I normally select 3840 PPQ.


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
The 'reset to factory' is different in RB than BiaB.

For RB total factory reset (to my knowledge) is;
Close RB
Rename the files RB.CFG and Realband.INI to something else.

Then launch RB and it will go through the initialized setup process again and recreate those files.

If you don't like the result; rename the original files back ..

There is a way in Prefs-Drivers area to reset just the drivers and make RB retest/reload these, but the method above also includes other settings and is much closer to an actual factory reset scenario.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Quote:
Jim, what exactly do you mean when you say, "raise the file resolution to a higher setting?" That sounds important, ..

It IS.

Options-Resolution in RB.

RB and BiaB both default to 120 'slices' per beat, whether it is MIDI or Audio. Changing this setting to the highest allowed makes for much more surgical editing, and more accurate recording of data (not quantized to nearest 120th) etc.

This is an important function, especially once you start editing audio in RB.
VERY important IMO.

The one thing I would want to point out is it does NOT apply to only MIDI. This setting affects RB/PT for Audio also.

Audio events are triggered by this setting. You should be able to see this by looking at the Event List for an audio track. This can be enlightening.

The higher the resolution, the smaller chunks available = more accurate
/simplest way I could explain it
//I can go further if needed/requested


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,098
"//I can go further if needed/requested"

I'll bite and request you go a bit deeper. I understand the higher resolution/smaller slices information provided so far and that it can make for greater accuracy in editing.

On the help page from the menu where the resolution can be changed, Help tells us that no difference can be heard between the resolution of 120 and 960 so they default to 120...
Since there is no perceptible sound difference, then resolution must be drawing on greater CPU resources or else PGMusic would take advantage of the higher resolution benefits in editing.

Can you confirm this and maybe provide some guidance as to what to look for if the resolution has been set at too high a value and is taxing the CPU and becoming detrimental to the quality of the project.


BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Not sure of your help page referenced but maybe my explanation below will help. Since they reference 960 I'm guessing that was written a while back before RB/BiaB got higher resolutions.
When MIDI sequencers started being popular, 120 resolution was standard for many, if not all of them early on.

As for computer CPU load, any affect would be so minute as to be imperceptible in 99%+ of cases.
You'd be surprised how much of the time an AVG CPU is waiting for something to do. It is rarely the bottleneck. A 'sign' that the system is struggling is usually the cursor not moving smoothly during playback. Whenever I see this, I save, close out and reopen. This lets me know I have burned this session, but that's a whole 'nother aspect of DAW use (resources).

Lets start with audio and resolution. Doing audio edits is downright painful at 120 resolution. It is dang near impossible to get a clean cut/paste of a waveform exactly where you want it. The image below is zoomed in to show where a bass note begins on a track (it starts ahead of the beat as you can see). Anyone who has done audio editing knows you want a clean edit to avoid the nasty tell-tale pops/clicks of poor editing jobs. If I want to start this edit exactly where the bass note starts (sometimes called the zero point) I can do it very exacting using 3659 (with resolution at 3840).
With resolution at 120 I would have to decide on whether to use 114, which has the tail end of the previous note included, or 115 which is even worse because it is well off the zero point and will almost certainly make a noticeable click.
Then I would have to fight the same battle when deciding where to paste it in.
Does this make sense? I think this is why some think audio editing is terrible in RB; if you are trying it at 120 resolution it will be very 'clunky' and 'chunky'.

Now let's talk about MIDI and how Tempo and Resolution combine.
Since Resolution is defining the number of slices per beat, the number of beats per minute determine just how small a chunk of time each slice is.
At tempo 120 each beat is 500 mS (half a second).
If resolution is also 120 then each 'slice' = 4.17 milliseconds
If resolution is set to 3840 then each slice = 0.13 milliseconds
At tempo of 96 the results are 5.2 mS compared to 0.16 mS. Still huge difference.

Now if your most precise 'slice' of digital information is going to be every 4 to 5 milliseconds or so, every piece of data that comes in to get recorded (think MIDI here) is going to be written in one of those chunks, whether you played that note at exactly that point in time or not.
As an example Year of the Cat by Al Stewart comes to mind. Listen to the opening piano.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvBfIdhG974
If this were recorded (in MIDI) at 120 resolution some of the nuance of this performance would be lost. If the Cmaj7 chord and D6 chords did not roll (arpeggiate) the way they do the song would lose some character. Instead of each note being adjusted a tenth of a mS or so (at 3840), each note would be adjusted 5 mS or so at 120. The larger the chunks of adjustment the less 'real' the performance is. It's important to understand that no matter what actual point in real-time a given note was played, it is going to be written to the nearest 'slice' available.

Many times it may not be perceptible, but sometimes it is. If just 2 of the notes in the above referenced chords ended up being written in the same time slice, it changes what was actually played. In essence it has been quantized.
It is very small, but quantizing is actually taking place and you can decide how you want your performance quantized from the very beginning.
Once recorded at 120 resolution though, going to 3840 later does absolutely no good for MIDI. However, it does for Audio! you can raise your setting later to get more surgical control over edits.
What's interesting is RB/PT use MIDI to control audio events. Audio snips are 'triggered' using MIDI. To understand this open the Event Editor for an audio track.
The bottom picture shows a typical audio track here that has had edits done. Notice the resolution is at the 3840 setting .. makes for more accurate edits as mentioned above.

Hope this Helps explain how I look at it.







Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Resolute.jpg (91.2 KB, 34 downloads)
AudioEvents.jpg (17.92 KB, 34 downloads)
Last edited by rharv; 10/31/15 02:27 AM.

Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,645
Posts735,414
Members38,526
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
theyearofjess, OlvaJownDay, Tranner Track, Ely Bass, Barking
38,525 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 183
DC Ron 101
dcuny 89
rsdean 71
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5