Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#404559 03/30/17 06:45 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
I've posted several times that track names need to be revisited as to "labeling". It's great that now the instrument name displays on the tracks; however, there are still a number of features that require you to know the legacy track names to use them properly (Bass, Drums, Piano, Guitar, and Strings, plus Melody, Soloist, Thru, and Audio).

My new suggestion is (assuming a more comprehensive redo is not forthcoming) is that tracks be labeled by their existing lettered named. So wherever you see a track reference on the screen, you would see its corresponding letter.

That way, the legacy Drum track could just be labeled track "D". Piano would be "P", Bass would be "B", Strings would be "S", and Guitar would be "G". I suppose since the others don't participate in things like rests, shots, holds, stylemaker track references, etc), they could just be labeled "Mel", "Sol", "Thru", and "Audio", pretty much as they are now.

That way you would see on the screen at all times the letters associated with the tracks, and then when you wanted to "Hold" all tracks except the tenor sax soloist which happens to be on the legacy Guitar track, you would already see a "G" next to that track and would now to enter Cmaj7...G.

That makes it visible and easy to work with. Relabel the track names in StyleMaker and other places they are referenced by just the letter designation (and I don't think it matters it's not A, B, C, D, E, etc), and that completely disassociates the former track instrument name from the instrument that is actually on the track. And that would remove the confusion of why the trumpet is on the piano track.

I would suspect that this would take a little work, but I imagine most of those designations are implemented as constants anyway.

Just a thought, and again, this is a bridge until some of the other track issues are more comprehensively addressed (such as why do RealTracks need to overlay MIDI tracks - why not keep all the MIDI tracks and just include some number of RealTracks (which ultimately could get their own designations).

I have provided mockups below. I realize this is probably a stopgap, but it seems to provide a bridge until something else is done.

I hope that made sense.

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Main Instrument List.jpg (10.56 KB, 91 downloads)
Mixer.jpg (88.1 KB, 91 downloads)
StyleMaker.jpg (70.46 KB, 91 downloads)
VST Selection.jpg (75.29 KB, 91 downloads)

John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404566 03/30/17 07:40 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
+1

I like your idea John. It's neat and to the point.

For what it's worth, I have disabled automatic track naming based on instrument so that my tracks always show Bass, Piano, Strings, etc.


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2024
jford #404568 03/30/17 07:47 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
I'm just trying to get away from the whole "the sax is on the Piano track, the guitar is on the Strings track, the organ is on the B[*****] track, and the xylophone is on the Guitar track". Now remember that for when you want shots, holds, or rests, or when you need to select instruments or VSTi's (in which case the instrument is the name of the VSTi not even the instrument assigned - depending upon the VSTi, of course).

Instead, put the sax on the P track, the Guitar on the S track, the organ on the B track, and the xylophone on the G track.

NOTE: The reason "Bass" track is asterisked, is because when you bold the first letter of Bass, the forum considers the remaining three letters inappropriate.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404584 03/30/17 08:48 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
And the fun of having two or three 'S' tracks...

I like John's idea.

There was, of course, an extensive discussion of this with lots of good suggestions (though I think this good one is new). I kind of favor numbering the tracks, so no matter what else might be in the track name, you can deal with it by its relative position. But whatever works. John is correct that we are in limbo at the moment, unless you turn off the new feature as Noel did. And I feel for a new user who is reading the manual and not seeing anything resembling what's there.



BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
jford #404610 03/30/17 10:33 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Without intending to change the thought-train of this thread, is that something similar to this idea?

Definitely +1. It would be quite useful.


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
jford #404619 03/30/17 11:35 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
I think the change needs to be more comprehensive than what we have now, but my idea was to work within the framework of how things currently work until such time as a new solution is implemented.

When you do a hold, for example, you enter C7...G, to hold everything except the legacy guitar track. Well, where did that G come from, and if it's the guitar track, how come I am allowed to put a trombone on it?

By displaying the tracks using the legacy letter names (multiple S's, as Matt pointed out being the exception), at least for the tracks that get regenerated or are considered parts of a style, then you can see on the screen what they are.

If you change it to ABCDE or something, then would you have to enter C7...D to exclude the "D" (formerly Guitar) track? Well what happens when you load an old file that has C7...G in it?

That's all I was trying to get at.

Hope that made sense.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404621 03/30/17 11:46 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Videotrack's last post had track numbering, and that's what I recall. Yes, John your idea would be simpler to implement.

Definitely, find a way to tell the trombone to hold. laugh


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
jford #404625 03/30/17 11:55 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Quote:
Definitely, find a way to tell the trombone to hold.


Okay, I'll get him to hold my coat....

(Ducking and running...)

Lawrie Pardy might take offense at that. smile


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404646 03/30/17 02:59 PM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,131
Emphatic +1. The way track names work one way in the mixer (adapt the name of the instrument used in the track) and different with commands (use legacy names) can make using anything that uses track names confusing. John's suggestion offers a solution that eliminates much of the confusion.

For what it is worth, I strongly supported the idea of changing track names to match instrument names. However I never envisioned the change working the way it was implemented. To me this implementation is a missed opportunity for PG Music.

I've changed the default settings so track names reflect the legacy track names for the same reasons Noel96 cited.

jford, You asked a great question and included a terrific suggestion in your initial post, " ... (W)hy do RealTracks need to overlay MIDI tracks(?) - (W)hy not keep all the MIDI tracks and just include some (extra tracks for) number of RealTracks(?) (which ultimately could get their own designations). I would support this as a wishlist request.


Jim Fogle - 2024 BiaB (1111) RB (5) Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk by BandLab (CbB) - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Originally Posted By: Jim Fogle

jford, You asked a great question and included a terrific suggestion in your initial post, " ... (W)hy do RealTracks need to overlay MIDI tracks(?) - (W)hy not keep all the MIDI tracks and just include some (extra tracks for) number of RealTracks(?) (which ultimately could get their own designations). I would support this as a wishlist request.

Absolutely, add this to the Wishlist as a separate item maybe?


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
jford #404675 03/30/17 11:18 PM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
I was very excited when track names that matched the instruments were added. Then very disappointed that it was only partially implemented.

I switched back to legacy track names too.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Originally Posted By: VideoTrack
Originally Posted By: Jim Fogle

jford, You asked a great question and included a terrific suggestion in your initial post, " ... (W)hy do RealTracks need to overlay MIDI tracks(?) - (W)hy not keep all the MIDI tracks and just include some (extra tracks for) number of RealTracks(?) (which ultimately could get their own designations). I would support this as a wishlist request.

Absolutely, get over to the Wishlist with this one as a separate item maybe?


I have been suggesting for a number of years now that PGMusic open all 16 channels/tracks so we can add as many instruments as we want. An A/B switch so those that want it to stay as is can have that option.


I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
jford #404708 03/31/17 04:22 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
While possibly doable, I think at some point they're going to have to bite the bullet and sever the backwards compatibility so they can move forward. While there are still XP users, it isn't supported anymore and Windows 7 dies in a few more years. 64-bit isn't going away. We have to get away from 8.5 file names (it's been 20 years since long file names came on the scene!)

We don't know what PGMusic future plans are, but I suspect file formats may have to be considered as part of preparing for the future. At some point (probably to the chagrin of many), they may have to get away from not using the registry (and for some things, they just have to). Some apps do it, but also offer a portable version that deosn't, which may be the way to go, don't know.

Just some rambling thoughts.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404732 03/31/17 07:18 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
I concur, John; that's the future. By the way, there are a few mentions of BIAB in the Registry, for fonts and the last ten songs loaded, but those are not substantial.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
jford #404850 04/01/17 04:55 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 21
J
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 21
John,

This may be slightly off-topic but I have a question about something you mentioned in the initial post. You said "I suppose since the others don't participate in things like rests, shots, holds, stylemaker track references, etc), they could just be labeled "Mel", "Sol", "Thru", and "Audio", pretty much as they are now."

I may be misunderstanding what you meant, but I noticed that if I generate a solo in the soloist track into measures that have holds, then the solo will in fact have holds in those bars. I actually wanted to generate the solo over the top of some held instruments and couldn't figure out a way to add the soloist track as an exception using the C... method. "bpdgs" are the only tracks that seem to allow an exception. The only way I could do it was to generate the solo without the holds in place, freeze the soloist track and then add the holds back in to those bars.

So I was wondering if the soloist track is in fact NOT supposed to adhere to shots and holds. If not, is there a way to add the soloist track (or melody track) as an exception with the C... method or is the freeze method the only option?

Jason

Last edited by jdchess; 04/01/17 04:57 AM.
jford #404882 04/01/17 11:31 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
jford Offline OP
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Hi, Jason -

I haven't looked in a while, and it may have changed, but it used to be that soloists did not adhere to rests, shots, etc (well, on the soloist track, as you can actually have RealTrack Soloists on any track).
Otherwise, how could you let the soloist "take it" while the rest of the band was "holding"?

Likewise for the melody track, since the melody certainly can continue while the rest of the band holds or rests.

And you certainly can't exclude the soloist track from rests, holds, and shots in the chord settings dialog (or by explicitly excluding instruments.

EDIT: Okay, I just tried this and apparently RealTracks soloists honor the rests/holds/shots, but a MIDI soloist does not.

This should be consistent, and since you can specify the specific measures to create a solo, then I believe it should "not" honor the rests setting (oftentimes you want the soloist to keep playing while the band doesn't).

I'll report this as a bug.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
jford #404900 04/01/17 12:29 PM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Originally Posted By: jford
Okay, I just tried this and apparently RealTracks soloists honor the rests/holds/shots, but a MIDI soloist does not.

Hmmm.

Assuming this isn't an April Fool post, I agree, that's a surprise. I don't use those soloist tracks, so I didn't know this, but it's good info for us to have when answering questions.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
jford #404904 04/01/17 01:02 PM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 21
J
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 21
John,

Thank you for checking it out. I'm glad I mentioned it now, and glad it wasn't just me. smile

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Yes, correct workaround.
If the holds do in fact 'hold' in the Soloist, and you don't want them to, you can do this:

1: Freeze all the tracks (esp. if you have a generation that you like).
2: Unfreeze the Soloist.
3: Remove the Hold from the chord sheet and generate.
4: Freeze the Soloist that now plays through the holds.
5: Add the Holds back to the chord sheet.

Now, back to Track Names...


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,662
Posts735,550
Members38,532
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Jeffrey thomas, skyanderson3, akbrpra, Benfil77, William L
38,532 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 167
DC Ron 101
dcuny 85
WaoBand 74
rsdean 74
Today's Birthdays
jazzkeith, Mavrick20002, Pain-Driven, rolfie, Roycol
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5