Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
This is mostly a theoretical question I suppose - but maybe an ear training question also:

How do inversions of chords function identically to their root-form counterparts even though their interval sequences are different ?

I ask for this reason:

1. in most theory books, you will find exactly that statement - that chord inversions function identically to their root counterparts

2. statement 1 is made after they clearly explain that the characteristic sounds of chords are with respect to the root notes and the sequential intervals built upon them (e.g. a C major chord is a major 3rd interval (C-->E) followed by a minor interval (E-->G)

They ask you to accept statement 1, but never explain how the function could possibly be identical given the different interval structures and lack of a root - to 'root' the sound as a starting point for your ear.

My guess is that it has something to do with the overtone series, but I don't know enough about it to articulate it in that way.

Can anyone shed additional light on this ?

Thanks in advance,
Joe V.

Last edited by Joe V; 11/15/13 04:20 AM.
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,739
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,739
Hi Joe,
Here is a stab at an answer, its all about context.

Firstly remember that chords can have MORE than one function. A C major 7 chord in first inversion can function of course as an E minor b6th .
This property of chords, ie. to have more than one function, is often used when modulating.
So don't think a chord has only one function. They can have functions (almost) 'identical to their root counterparts' (to quote you), but they also have other functions. Therefore one of your statements above does not exclude the other.

Secondly, when playing in a band the root is said to be supplied by the bass player - so, you get those 'Bill Evans' voicings that omit the root - he was playing in a trio. In these cases the full chord sound includes these bass notes supplied by the third party - the bass player.

Thirdly,
If you play a whole song solo, without accompaniment and you exclusively play inversions in the left hand, its going to sound peculiar - by which I mean it might sound exotic and in it's way OK (sometimes), but it's not going to sound like the original song.
If though, on the other hand, you substitute a left hand inversion here and there, that seems, (to my ears) to be fine. I would say that where the chord is in a prominant position such as the end of a song, an inversion would sound incomplete. "Normally" if there is such a musical term wink when playing solo, you would try to get the root of the chord in the left hand. This limits where your other left hand fingers can go of course, which is one reason why you might substitute an inversion here and there.

Chords and inversions are only a beginning of course, voicings and voice leading is where its at, a much richer canvas. However, personally I first spent a lot of time ensuring I could get to any inversion of any basic chord swiftly, then I started adding tensions to the voicings and of course missing out notes. This is just the way I approached this.

Anyway this is my attempt at an answer

Zero


Last edited by ZeroZero; 11/15/13 06:06 AM.

Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
In my opinion, right hand inversions are fine anywhere in a song and in fact many times more appropriate than root form. Root is almost always covered elsewhere. Gospel and rock forms, particularly in organ playing depend on moving fluidly between inversions and sometimes the root form doesn't sound right.

Look up concept of 'Phantom Pitch' in psychoacoustics references - not an entire explanation - but some of the reason inversions work.

Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Joe, remember that stuff taught back in EE school in the frosh or soph year where you learned about heterodyning?

Simply put, if we have to waveforms of differing frequency and we mix them, there will be created two other waveforms at about half the amplitude or so of the two original waveforms, one would be the SUM of the two frequencies and the other would be the DIFFERENCE value.

This is physics and applies "across the board" not just at RF frequencies.

Therefore, if we have two audio sinewaves of equal amplitude, one at 1,000Hz and the other at 500Hz, when the two mix, either in the electronics or "in the air" - we will also find that there is an additional 1500Hz tone in there (the sum) and also a 500Hz tone as well (the difference).

Now let's put that first tone at exactly one octave higher, which is simply doubling the frequecy.

2,000Hz and 500Hz now yield those two other frequencies when mixed, but they are now 2500Hz sum and 1500Hz difference.

Notice that the 1500Hz is present in both examples.

Now let's move over to Music Terminology.

The 1, 3, and 5 of the simple Major Triad (KISS) does exactly the same thing as the above.

Therefore, no matter which octave any of the three notes (frequencies) is placed in, we will find the same harmonic relationships going on in there somewhere.

Therefore the three notes perform the same basic harmonic function regardless of where on the keyboard or guitar, octave-wise or inversion-wise that you play them.

However, musically speaking, if the three simple triad inversions are played "standalone" without a Bass note, the lowest note chosen actually defines the chordname and therefore the actual key of the chord at the moment.

C, E, G - The root position C triad. When played standalone as I typed it, this would identify itself as a C Major Triad because the C is the lowest frequency played and the E, being 4 half steps above the C, defines the Major Scale that the Triad is derived from.

1st Inversion, E, G, C, standalone, would have to be identified as an Eminor7#5 chord. (But if the Bass is in there playing a C root, it would become the C Triad again.)

2nd Inversion, G, C, E, standalone would be the G6sus4 chord, but again, if the Bass is playing in C Major, it would be the C chord no matter the stacking, due to the frequency relationship math.

It is also important to realize that my example of the math is intentionally oversimplified for the sake of clarity of concept.

In reality, the interaction of the various frequencies and waveforms we have to use in making what we call Music can get pretty deep pretty quickly. That is why Audio Engineers will often use Fourier Transform software analysis to get to the bottom of what's really going on with the frequencies of music.

The most important thing I can tell you about all of his sort of thing is not to get all involved with trying to figure out these kind of things if your goal is to play music. That can become the proverbial kiss of death, a kill to your primary goal, which is to play the instrument with the ability to turn in the Strong Performance.

Or, as my late father once told me years and years ago, "Look. Plenty of guys who can barely read and write the spoken language, couldn't pass an admissions test to get into a school, figured this stuff out and became some of the greats you listen to on your phonograph all the time!"

Indeed.

To become good at doing anything, one must first simply do the drills that the teacher tells us to do, whether they are music lessons or martial arts katas, grasshopper, and keep doing them, applying both the repetition of practice and the tutoring of the master and one day you will find that the understanding light suddenly illuminates.

To perform like Bruce Lee did, you first have to know the Katas, completely, in order to be able to throw them away and just BE with it. There is no shortcut to that kind of performance.

"LEARN it, Forget it, then PLAY."

Note well which one of those three comes first, and GET BACK TO PRACTICING. Not Posting. All Posting will do is make you a better internet poster.



--Mac

Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Thanks for your great responses - now I'll get back to practicing : )
...but I LIKE talking 'theory' and 'philosophy' - even though it doesn't put bread on the table - or make me a better player in and of itself.

Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,739
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,739
Originally Posted By: Mac
Joe, remember that stuff taught back in EE school in the frosh or soph year where you learned about heterodyning?

Simply put, if we have to waveforms of differing frequency and we mix them, there will be created two other waveforms at about half the amplitude or so of the two original waveforms, one would be the SUM of the two frequencies and the other would be the DIFFERENCE value.

This is physics and applies "across the board" not just at RF frequencies.

Therefore, if we have two audio sinewaves of equal amplitude, one at 1,000Hz and the other at 500Hz, when the two mix, either in the electronics or "in the air" - we will also find that there is an additional 1500Hz tone in there (the sum) and also a 500Hz tone as well (the difference).

Now let's put that first tone at exactly one octave higher, which is simply doubling the frequecy.

2,000Hz and 500Hz now yield those two other frequencies when mixed, but they are now 2500Hz sum and 1500Hz difference.

Notice that the 1500Hz is present in both examples.

Now let's move over to Music Terminology.

The 1, 3, and 5 of the simple Major Triad (KISS) does exactly the same thing as the above.

Therefore, no matter which octave any of the three notes (frequencies) is placed in, we will find the same harmonic relationships going on in there somewhere.

Therefore the three notes perform the same basic harmonic function regardless of where on the keyboard or guitar, octave-wise or inversion-wise that you play them.

However, musically speaking, if the three simple triad inversions are played "standalone" without a Bass note, the lowest note chosen actually defines the chordname and therefore the actual key of the chord at the moment.

C, E, G - The root position C triad. When played standalone as I typed it, this would identify itself as a C Major Triad because the C is the lowest frequency played and the E, being 4 half steps above the C, defines the Major Scale that the Triad is derived from.

1st Inversion, E, G, C, standalone, would have to be identified as an Eminor7#5 chord. (But if the Bass is in there playing a C root, it would become the C Triad again.)

2nd Inversion, G, C, E, standalone would be the G6sus4 chord, but again, if the Bass is playing in C Major, it would be the C chord no matter the stacking, due to the frequency relationship math.

It is also important to realize that my example of the math is intentionally oversimplified for the sake of clarity of concept.

In reality, the interaction of the various frequencies and waveforms we have to use in making what we call Music can get pretty deep pretty quickly. That is why Audio Engineers will often use Fourier Transform software analysis to get to the bottom of what's really going on with the frequencies of music.

The most important thing I can tell you about all of his sort of thing is not to get all involved with trying to figure out these kind of things if your goal is to play music. That can become the proverbial kiss of death, a kill to your primary goal, which is to play the instrument with the ability to turn in the Strong Performance.

Or, as my late father once told me years and years ago, "Look. Plenty of guys who can barely read and write the spoken language, couldn't pass an admissions test to get into a school, figured this stuff out and became some of the greats you listen to on your phonograph all the time!"

Indeed.

To become good at doing anything, one must first simply do the drills that the teacher tells us to do, whether they are music lessons or martial arts katas, grasshopper, and keep doing them, applying both the repetition of practice and the tutoring of the master and one day you will find that the understanding light suddenly illuminates.

To perform like Bruce Lee did, you first have to know the Katas, completely, in order to be able to throw them away and just BE with it. There is no shortcut to that kind of performance.

"LEARN it, Forget it, then PLAY."

Note well which one of those three comes first, and GET BACK TO PRACTICING. Not Posting. All Posting will do is make you a better internet poster.

--Mac



How's that go again? Could you perhaps whistle it? You know, maths and arithmetic were the three things I hated most at achool wink

Last edited by ZeroZero; 11/15/13 03:37 PM.

Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
Woodshedding - Learning to Play!
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Originally Posted By: ZeroZero


How's that go again? Could you perhaps whistle it? You know, maths and arithmetic were the three things I hated most at achool wink


You and me both, ole buddy.

I figured out at some point that the blame should be placed on the teaching methods and the teachers, though.

Had to resort to autodidactic study in order to understand.

Along the way, the art of reading became my staunchest ally and good friend.

My approach to research is simple enough; I'm just always on the lookout for a few clues at the scene o' the crime...


--Mac

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,689
Posts736,026
Members38,541
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
hcginjections2024, carloncho, jofigueroajr, Zunzez, Isrra29
38,540 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 176
DC Ron 108
rsdean 98
WaoBand 76
dcuny 75
Noel96 75
Today's Birthdays
flashlarue, gary133, kirbonite
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5