Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Hi all,

I'm' looking for the cheapest Guitar to PC interface with acceptable low latency I can use with my soft-synths. If I use the JamOrigins software, my understanding is that I need to use a guitar audio interface. The other alternative is to use a guitar-Midi converter - of which I've found 2 at pretty low prices:

http://www.amazon.com/Behringer-UCG102-Guitar-to-USB-Interface/dp/B000PAPO9W

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Promotions-Guita...=item5af4e6cf4a

Anybody researched and tried some of these products, or have some suggestions ?

Thanks in advance,
Joe

Last edited by Joe V; 12/31/13 07:39 AM.
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,818
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,818
Joe check very carefully on these. I did a search and found and it showed the Behringer model has no MIDI I/O, thus it is not an audio to MIDI converter. I could not find any information on the Promotions unit but I suspect it to be the same.

Google/Bing audio to midi converter software and you will find a number of them. Some are free so you can try them if you want. Be sure to check if they are mono or polyphonic. I have tried a couple of free ones and they worked somewhat, I had to do a lot of MIDI editing, but that was quite a while ago.

The absolute best polyphonic audio to MIDI converter I have found is in Melodyne Editor, however it is quite expensive. I have done a number guitar and bass audio to MIDI conversions with no editing what so ever. I have found that this software does a better job than my old Casio strat MIDI guitar!

The other options are either a MIDI guitar controller or a guitar with a MIDI controller built in. Fishman http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/TriplePlayPU/
has what is supposed to be a good MIDI guitar controller but again it is quite expensive.

I hope this helps.


Me, it's not about how many times you fail, it's about how many times you get back up.
Cop, that's not how field sobriety tests work.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,803
Joe i think you are to some degree not understanding soft synths. (if i am wrong i apologize) Both devices you listed are simple audio I/O interfaces, that will allow you to plug a guitar into a computer and record it. Softsynth respond to midi data, and not audio wave files. As Mario mentioned a Midi guitar will trigger softsynth, but not a typical guitar.

If you want to record your guitar, or play it thru the computers sound system those are fine, but if you want to trigger midi and fire the samples in a softsynth you have to look elsewhere.


Lenovo Win 10 16 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2022, Realband, Harrison Mixbus 32c version 9.1324, Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app, Komplete 49 key controller.
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Joe, the scuttlebutt out these days is all about this software solution, which one just plugs their guitar with pickup on it into the Audio input of the soundcard.

http://jamorigin.com/products/midi-guitar/

I have not found the time to get some firsthand experience with this yet, but its on my long list of things to get done.

Reports from the field have been pretty good, though.

--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,574
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted By: Joe V
Hi all,

I'm' looking for the cheapest Guitar to PC interface with acceptable low latency I can use with my soft-synths.

===================
define these terms what will you accept
cheapest
low latency

=======================

If I use the JamOrigins software, my understanding is that I need to use a guitar audio interface.

==============

JamOriginVideos uploaded and replied to a comment from chugbry
Some people have been able to use MIDI Guitar successfully with an acoustic guitar connected to a audio interface, but an electric guitar is preferred. We do not recommend using an acoustic guitar and a microphone due to the signal noise.
Latency is dependent on buffer sizes and possible audio device drivers, please check that you use a low buffer size.
There shouldn't be any issues with tracking rhythm guitar.
https://www.youtube.com/user/JamOriginVideos
===========

The other alternative is to use a guitar-Midi converter

=================
you will need to be precise in your picking and fretting or be prepared to do a lot of editing

you also need to understand the characteristics of the instrument you're emulating you can't strum a piano

===============



i'm experimenting with you rock guitar

https://www.youtube.com/user/YouRockGuitar/videos

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=yourock+guitar+gen2&sm=1

sadly my playing skills need a lot of work but i'm happy with it so far

Last edited by pghboemike; 12/31/13 09:13 AM.

Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit 16GB RAM\2018 13” MacBook Air casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2023 everything pk both with Current builds
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Thanks for all of your comments. Of course I'm looking for the 'best acceptable performance at the lowest price'.

Since I want to play my softsynths on my laptop, per the JamOrigins documentation, you need a low latency (e.g. ASIO) AUDIO interface to your laptop - internal soundcards will NOT work (per JamOrigins website, if you are using a mini-plug, you are on the wrong path).

So that leaves
1.) if I use JamOrigins, I must buy a low-latency external laptop audio interface that uses ASIO

2.) if I do NOT use JamOrigins, I can use a Guitar-MIDI device - I currently have a GI-20, but I'd prefer something cheaper, smaller, and easier to transport.

Thanks for introducing me to some new products I didn't think of using Mario - I will check them out.

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
I'd bet Jamorigins would work with laptop internal soundcard, ASIO4ALL wrapper - and a bit of electronics knowledge on how to connect the type of guitar pickup used to the Mic jack on the laptop properly.

Think, "Resistive Pad" likely an L or Y pad, to reduce the AC voltage from the guitar pickup down to Mic input level. Heck, one 25 to ~150K Pot, wired as voltage divider, with guitar pickup across outside legs and wiper going to mic hot would likely do the trick.


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,921
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,921
Joe, into the mix with "small" and "cheap" you need to throw "accurate" and perhaps "rugged." I think the Roland GI-20, which is designed for the purpose, is your best bet. Besides, you can't get any cheaper than "I already have it!" cool

Happy New Year!

Richard


"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,574
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,574
may be useful

searches google for links in forums that mention jamorigins

https://www.google.com/search?q=inurl%3Aforum&rlz=1C1CHFX_enUS565US565&oq=inurl%3Aforum&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i58.38546j0j4&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8#es_sm=93&espv=210&q=inurl%3Aforum+JamOrigins&tbs=qdr:y


highlight the link and open in a new tab

midiguitar used with biab @ 10min

+1 melodyne editor

Last edited by pghboemike; 12/31/13 02:42 PM.

Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit 16GB RAM\2018 13” MacBook Air casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2023 everything pk both with Current builds
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 92
B
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
B
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 92
Sonuus gm2, guitar to midi converter, cheap, works pretty well, monophonic only...Bobby


http://www.sonuus.com/products_g2m.html

Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
I have a few guitars equipped with GK's, they all go though my GR-50. The GR-50 I now use only as a MIDI I/O device. If the GR-50 were to break I'd look for a GI or another GR MIDI I/O replacement. The GR-50 was my very first synth, of any kind, but now 25 years later its sounds really show their age (same as Roland D-110). I do have fun with the GR sounds sometimes but it is unlikley any internal sounds will show up in any music work.

Sorry I get side tracked easily.

I went ahead and pulled trigger today on this Jam Origins MIDI Guitar. I've been playing with it last few weeks and the idea of it really appealed to me and it works fairly well. Tracks well given you can get a good clean audio input. I use a M-audio FW 410 right now.

Truth in advertising: best I can do is 2.7 ms delay. That is, the best I can get with this SW, my PC, the FW 410 and it's ASIO drivers or even ASIO4ALL is 2.7 milliseconds. Disregarding the delay, once the sound gets TO the SW - it tracks as well as my GK/GR set up. And this thing has individual string (and note) sensitivity setups just like setting up a GK on a "by string basis."

All in all, I think it is worth the $99.95 I paid, especially given they are still working on it and updates look to be free. In MY set-up it works really well and my PRIMARY use is to get notes and chords into the PC (I can't play keys to save my life) without having to fire up my rack and I can use any guitar in hand (haven't tried mic'ing an acoustic yet). Also looking forward to trying real time "lead along" to BIAB/RB/PT/SONAR work - TBD with that delay what outcomes/frustrations will be on that front.

But with all such things YOUR MILAGE MAY VERY! I thought that disclaimer needed spelled out - not abbreviated. Now the standard caveat, I have no financial, personal, or professional connections to this company other than as a new customer.

Larry

Last edited by Larry Kehl; 01/01/14 05:51 PM.

Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Originally Posted By: Larry Kehl
I have a few guitars equipped with GK's, they all go though my GR-50. The GR-50 I now use only as a MIDI I/O device. If the GR-50 were to break I'd look for a GI or another GR MIDI I/O replacement.


I run my GK pup thru the original GR-20.

Same deal.


--Msc

Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
J
Joe V Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Just out of curiosity - does a 2.7 ms delay make it very difficult to keep up with a drummer during a lively song ? I've found the delay with my GK-20 makes it very hard to say, allow me to play bass in real-time with an up-tempo song. Everything I play is behind the beat, and I find it too difficult to compensate for that. Then again, I haven't really put enormous energy into trying to minimize that delay yet.

Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 258
D
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
D
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 258
In the context of sensory physiology, a 2.7 msec delay is not even noticeable as a delay. It is an order of magnitude too small, except under special circumstances such as rhythmic synchronicity, measured under laboratory conditions. Nothing to worry about in the context of playing along with accompaniment.

Last edited by Dan Tong; 01/01/14 08:46 PM.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
I know that's what "studies" say but trust me - as a musician I DO notice it.

I know when I pluck a string (the tactile sensation) and when I hear sound (auditory) they should be in unison and they are not, and I am conscious of it: it IS noticeable. And on critical stuff - I would use pure MIDI HW to get work done. This is not Jam Origins SW fault - it's my AUDIO path into the SW fault.

It will drive you nuts over time (no pun intended).

However, when I play keys I don't notice it but I am not a key player so my reflex between key strike and sound is not as "attuned" (accidental pun)- a good pianist/keyboardist who is use to instantaneous response would probably also notice it and I suspect a horn player in particular using a controller would also notice it.


Larry

Last edited by Larry Kehl; 01/01/14 09:07 PM. Reason: EDITED out stuff not pertinent

Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 258
D
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
D
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 258
I trust you, but possibly your measurement of latency is incorrect. Are you measuring the latency from plucking the string to when the MIDI sound appears? It's not easy to make this measurement accurately without the right equipment.

The delay with MIDI guitars is generally caused by the detection mechanism/methodology. All MIDI/Synth guitar systems have latency issues, because it takes a certain amount of time for the system to analyze the pitch of the vibrating string and therefore the problem tends to be worse with the lower notes (lower cycle duration).

Keyboard driven synth don't have this vibrating string detection problem and therefore no one (including you) complains about delays.

Last edited by Dan Tong; 01/02/14 02:00 AM.
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Physics.

Quote:

The velocity of sound increases slightly with higher temperatures. For example, at an elevation of 0 feet above sea level, at a temperature of 50 degrees (Fahrenheit), sound will travel 110.7 feet in 100 milliseconds (ms).

At 90 degrees F, it will travel 115.14 feet in the same 100 ms. This will force the wavefront angle of sound from loudspeakers to track slightly downward, bending toward the cold air layer.


Now let's round things off in order to make it easy to investigate the situation.

Let's work with an easy, centralized figure of sound traveling at about 100 Feet in 100 milliSeconds. Good "rule of thumb" for fast calcs in the head on this subject, BTW.

At 2.5mS actual audio latency, the "delay" involved would be the equivalent of playing live with others who were -- 2.5 Feet away from you.

A 25mS latency would then be the equivalent of playing along with someone who was 25 feet away from you.

Also, the reported mS Latency figure in the computer can vary as much as 100% - simply because some softwares report a "one way" figure as to latency in mS, others report a "round trip" figure, or the amount of time it takes for the signal to go into the computer, get processed, and come back out at an audio output for monitoring purposes. Still, when the latency is below around the 25mS mark, not very many can really notice the difference when faced with a true double blindfold test on the subject. To date this engineer has found not one musician who could pass that test, regardless of musical prowess or what they THOUGHT they could detect.

Bottom line, a true 2.5mS, or even 6mS audio latency is indeed not detectable by human beings when the subject is sound waves.

http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/print/whats_the_delay_the_effects_of_weather_conditions_on_sound

Today's modern sound reinforcement engineers can work wonders using software-defined time alignment, based on the same physics.

The most recent outdoor Country Music Festival event, the sound engineering actually made history with such a purpose-designed and tuned system. Zero Latency anywhere in the live venue, onstage or anywhere in the audience.

Unbelievable large venue live sound situation. Curt Jenkins led the sound engineering. Wow.

Listen to it, that is Live realtime audio feed, man.

The performers enjoyed near-studio audio intimacy at the same time. Multiple acts, rapid-fire, too.

The audience is able to SING ALONG, in a large stadium venue, in realtime with the band when they are called upon to do so. (!)




How it was done:

http://www.prosoundweb.com/article/cma_music_festival_rocks_music_city_with_l-acoustics_k1/

Today, we KNOW what the true parameters of human perception of audio latency is, the modern sound engineer must also tune the system for the realtime Barometric Air Pressure and Ambient Temperature - and they can, and they do.

This ain't Woodstock with the Altec Lansing power amps that used tail light bulbs as emitter resistor "compression". Not hardly.


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,475
Yep must have been being so close to CO and breathing in the fumes from there. I know better than that, I will now remove foot from mouth - no excuse simply spaced out yesterday.

I was reporting information SEEN, not verified, or even THOUGHT about (duh!) - I could've killed (literally) people in my last job with that kind of sloppiness.

Bottom-line: The MIDI Guitar SW by Jam Origins DOES have a PERCEPTIBLY LONGER delay then the GK/GR-50 (how much is TBD - see below for GR measured numbers) - because what I hear on PC with that Jam Origins SW triggering a VSTi is LONGER than I do with GR-50 doing it's thing. In my case, that delay, while it would be off-putting if I had to live with it forever on all critical work, was NOT a deal breaker for me.

Disregarding the small but perceptible delay, with a clean audio signal, the SW does track well (but that is like the difference between precision and accuracy - they are not the same thing). The delay is noticeable - but not deal killing (for me). It is in the "neighborhood" (Topology or Real Analysis anyone?) of "less than a 'slap back' delay", which I usually set at around 90-110 ms, but more than GR-50 (see below - for me that is a worst case of ~43 ms).

============

Now my numbers:

1: 2.7 MS is best I can run and record audio reliably with no glitches as long as simple (stereo) Input and not a complex project but I usually run at 5.8 MS (i.e., 256 samples @ 44.1- I could trim that a little by going to 48Khz or 96Khz but I don't) gives me a "buffer" against issues - in a long recording (I don’t go back and auto tune, or fix stuff on a by note or phrase basis, etc. it is what it is as recorded)

2: Using a GK equipped guitar - analog path into rack Lexicon Signature 284 to mixer, out mixer to PC in right channel. Simultaneously the hexaphonic pickup into the GR-50, to one of two sound sources:

a. Trigger its internal sounds which then leave as analog to same mixer as guitar audio but all on left channel - recorded in Audacity (so synth is right - guitar is left). With this I get an average of low E-string rise of sample to triggered synth sound rise of sample of ~ 42 ms and on high E-string ~13ms (as expected - shorter time).

b. Same set-up but instead of recording GR-50 tone, I let GR-50 do its pitch-to-midi, then out to midi patch bay to XV-5080 and it was then the XV-5080 analog signal out recoded in left channel (guitar still in right as with GR-50). Now you THINK it would take LONGER (convert to MIDI then route same to a patch bay, plus the two cable delays, then to XV where a sound is finally triggered) BUT on Low E it was averaging around ~34 ms and on high E is ~25 ms.

I will chalk these enigmatic time delta's up to "quickie back of envelope" type experiment and not using identical tones (near identical rise times needed) - I should have used a pure sine wave, or at least IDENTICAL patches, on both synths - but "close enough" and gives idea of times for my non-PC, non-ASIO, non-Jam Origins SW - MIDI generation.

So CLEARLY the GK/GR-50 combination has a small, and yes it is perceptible delay (you can feel it and hear it and NOW it is consistent with the numbers Mac has above), but even at that it is, and has been, more than adequate and sufficiently so for me to call it, for all intents and purposes, "real-time" for last 25 years.

I need to run same experiment on PC with this Jam Origins MIDI Guitar SW. I was seeing 2.7ms on the SW screen and thought "well that’s the delay I'm HEARING" - my bad and I KNOW (knew) better but spaced out.

Larry


Last edited by Larry Kehl; 01/02/14 07:20 PM.

Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
When attempting to use jamorigins MIDI conversion software along with any kind of software wynthesizer, you and your pc must overcome TWO rather differently programmed - and typically cpu/resource taxing softwares.

That's got to take more time.

Perhaps jamorigins for the MIDI conversion, firing a hardware MIDI synth for the purpose of recording the MIDI guitar, taking advantage of the hardware synth's near-zero latency and the fact that it does not use cpu cycles, etc. would be appropriate.

After the Recording to MIDI is done, one could than apply Software MIDI synth/sampler at playback to achieve desired lush sounds.

Even with my good old GK pup/GR-20 setup, I know that I can't expect to simply play the guitar and get the kind of response one would "normally" achieve when just playing the guitar "like a guitar should be played" so I don't go there. Hammer-ons, Pulloffs, Slurs, that kind of playing doesn't lend itself to getting tracked very well with a lot of MIDI guitar solutions IME. Well, I recall one Yamaha made setup that was pretty awesome along those lines, trouble was that it would have cost about two thousand dollars to go that route.


--Mac

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,636
Posts735,303
Members38,522
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Ely Bass, Barking, SYOTR, Bpnsrinu, DanyLevy
38,522 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 181
DC Ron 99
dcuny 89
DrDan 72
Today's Birthdays
govinspector
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5