Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Some users select the standard version, which is supplied on WMA files, and some opt for the more expensive Audiophile version, which is supplied as WAV files.

Is there a noticeable improvement in quality in the Audiophile version?

Presumably differences in quality must be detectable?

I'm interested to receive objective feedback from users, on both the perceived and demonstrated benefits (if any) between the two product versions.

I wonder would you share your views and observations?

Thanks
Trevor


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Trevor,

I have both, and I do hear a noticeable improvement with the Audiophile versions. Particularly with acoustic guitar samples and cymbals; but the other instruments, like strings, are definitely clearer and more present with the “A” version.

To me, it is most noticeable when several instruments are combined. I can hear the compression inherent in the WMA files individually, but the effect is really apparent when comparing complete mixes. There is a compounding effect when combining the separate samples. This compression will become even more apparent when you apply mix or mastering compression – it can suck all of the dynamics out of your mix.

Also, a lot of the stuff I use BIAB for are cover songs, destined to be played through a PA. I can hear the difference between the two versions when played through a PA. (Not sure if that is germane to your situation, just thought I'd mention it).

Some folks say that you really can't hear a difference, but I know that I can. Hope this helps.


Regards,


Bob

Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,378
Thanks Bob, your comments are appreciated. I wonder what percentage of users have the Audiophile version? Hopefully, some more will chime in.


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,882
This topic shows up regularly over the years, but it has only been discussed once in recent weeks if I recall correctly, and that was fairly brief.

I can hear a difference between the .WMA files used by the regular version of BIAB, and the .WAV files used by the audiophile version.

To hear a difference, I submit one must have all three of these things: pretty good ears, decent playback equipment, and a reasonably good listening environment.

Bob has mentioned good examples of some of the sounds where differences will be most noticeable. My list of those would feature acoustic guitar, acoustic piano, and cymbals.

I also agree with Bob's point that you begin to hear more of a difference when mixing several tracks. Noise in files is additive in a mix.

There are two historical points that may be relevant as well. In the early days of RealTracks, there was more of a difference until BIAB started using the Elastique algorithm for changing pitch and tempo. Also, using the uncompressed .WAV files made regeneration of a song a little faster. Who knows how much faster it was, but it was noticeable and I recall a guess of 10 to 20% being thrown around. It is for this reason that BIAB added the command to uncompress the .WMA files, even though it made no difference in the sound. If BIAB sees a .WAV file, it uses it; otherwise it must uncompress the .WMA file, and that does take a bit of time.

Having said these things, I must temper my comments by saying that any difference is small and subtle. I believe the regular version of BIAB will suffice for anyone who is not using BIAB to produce a commercial product. Indeed, we also know from the forum that some have great success using the regular (non-audiophile) version for commercial use.

Also keep in mind that updating the audiophile version will cost more each new version. You will usually have to wait a week or so for new patches of RealTracks to be released in audiophile form.

Hope that helps a little.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
S
Expert
Offline
Expert
S
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
My ears are not that good, but I'm doing it for others that might have good ears, but I can see the difference.


Band-in-a-Box for Windows
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796
Now there's a nice northern lighting on the subject .. Wavelab? My opining is the Audiophile version sounds definitely better, and indeed when mixing different sounds together from tracks to a stereo mix it seems less muddy IMO. But digitized acoustic instrument recordings to 16 bit will always sound less than the real thing, especially when stacked together. Make some room for the new pony ... Probably why equalizers are so popular, lets ruin "pure" sound some more. Use of a proper master clock improves digital recordings quite a bit; i was really surprised once doing live recordings with a classical orchestra, using an old 16 bit Akai Dr8 as backup recorder clocked externally. Both director and composer liked the Akai's registration better than the professional used equipment, playback on a very expensive set of mastering speakers and amp. So who's the fool that wants to be fooled, maybe me LOL. - F

Last edited by fiddler2007; 01/28/14 11:54 AM. Reason: correction
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,662
Posts735,550
Members38,532
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
Jeffrey thomas, skyanderson3, akbrpra, Benfil77, William L
38,532 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 164
DC Ron 101
dcuny 85
rsdean 74
WaoBand 74
Today's Birthdays
jazzkeith, Mavrick20002, Pain-Driven, rolfie, Roycol
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5