|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
I use BIAB to make jazz numbers, using the (wonderful) jazz bass & piano Real Tracks and Real Drums. (I don't use midi at all).
I make the BIAB SGU files on a good recent Dell Latitude; render the SGUs to WAV files (with the maximum allowable +30db volume increase), then convert the WAV files to MP3's at 192bps.
The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?
My second question is: I spend a lot of time mixing - ie getting the volume balance between the three instruments right. Is there any benefit in doing that in Real Band, rather than BIAB ? Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?
Many Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583 |
Since you are using RealTracks and RealDrums, you didn't indicate whether you used the audiophile versions (true WAV files) or the standard version (WMA files, which can be converted to WAV, but are still lossy audio from the original audiophile WAV's).
If using the WMA files, then by creating MP3's, you are re-compressing the files and losing additional fidelity from files that had already lost some fidelity when they were originally converted to WMA. So my recommendation would be to use either the WAV files themselves (which is the best you'll get), or convert to higher rate (256 or 320). While 192 makes pretty good MP3's, there is still an audible difference between that and the higher rates (do a side-by-side comparison and you'll hear it). Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Secondly, I find it easier to mix the balance using RealBand rather than in BIAB. You have a lot more control and can use additional effects on a track-by-track basis, as well as the overall mix.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
+1 Each time you run a conversion you will lose quality. The tracks are shipped compressed to 160bps in a WMA format. Theoretically, you'll never get better quality than 160. If you have the space, convert your song to WAV and leave it there. Converting WMA to WAV to MP3, according to some audiophiles, is a big No-No. This is known as transcoding and some strange sounds can result. The one I've heard most is a a 'swirling, swishing' sound, especially with the cymbals. This will be less noticeable in performance than if making a CD. But as John said... Quote:
Of course, your audience may never know or care.
Also +1 on RealBand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
Hi,
I do have some experience in this area and I'd like to pass on some info that may help you>
1. Before worrying about sampling rates, etc, it is far more important to worry about the encoder used for the conversion. A good and free way to go is to download Audacity. Also download the LAME encoder!!! This is very important. Make sure that encoder is installed in the Audacity folder in your Program files. When you export your WAV files in Audacity, LAME will be used automatically.
2. Bit and Sample rate are important, as well as choosing variable bit rate (VBR) You can do an experiment yourself, try converting to MP3 and make 2 files, 1 with VBR, the other without. Next, choose at least 160 for the first file, and 256 for the second. You will hear a big difference! Also you should notice that the 256 VBR file has much smoother and realistic dynamics.
I use BIAB everyday in making new tracks for my iPod, as I play many gigs with this setup. I am always on the lookout for a better way to do the above procedure. Maybe other posters have some great tips I don't know about, but this should get you pointed in the right direction.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,153 |
Andy,
In answer to your second question, I think you should move the file to Real Band, and do your mixing there. In addition to the mixing, you can also add effects on a per track basis, as well as effects to the overall sound
Also, the panning and sound staging is a little easier in Real Band.
I would recommend using BIAB as the starting point, and finishing up in Real Band.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Endorsed - both Gay and Edward.
Sound advice
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
John, Rachael, Gary, Ed and Sam -
Many thanks indeed for your time and wise advice.
- It sounds like the best bet is to use the WMA RT files, as downloaded, and to look at the encoding.
- I use iTunes-8 to convert the WAV files to MP3s. I've tended to assume that's a decent converter ? What do you think ?
- I've now tried increasing the bit rate from 192 to 256 and 320, with and without VBR (in iTunes), but I can't really hear the difference. I'm listening through a decent Hi Fi set-up (NAD plus B&W speakers) - but i can't even hear the difference between the 192kbps MP3's and the original WAV files !! Maybe I'm just not listening for the right things....?
(- I've yet to get to grips with RB... That's the next project....)
Thanks again for your generous help. Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,616 |
I don't use iTunes but what I read is that the MP3 encoder is not any good. The blogs say the reason is that Apple wants you to use (for obvious reasons) their AAC format and not MP3. My opinion is that the best MP3 encoder out there is the LAME. It's free, open-source, and is available at http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showforum=55Best thing is to make your WAV file in BIAB and leave it as such. If space is a limitation, investigate lossless formats such as FLAC, WMA lossless, etc. which will compress the WAV by roughly half keeping all of the audio fidelity. Nothing is lost. You will have the best possible sound given that your original RT was WMA 160. If you must convert, there are plenty of conversion front-end GUIs are out there. Avoid using the BIAB built-in MP3 conversion as you are restricted to what codecs you have installed in Windows. As I mentioned in my earlier post, you won't get any better quality than the original 160 WMA files no matter what you convert them to. You should try to minimize your conversions to avoid the transcoding issues. Rachael
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 138 |
Thanks again Rachael,
I'm now comparing the rendered WAV files with files made with different MP3 compression settings in ITunes 8. I'm still finding it hard to hear any difference from 192kbps upwards tho....
Best - Andy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,900 |
Follow That Dream Sam Karaoke King -------------------- Turning that corner again - I have to keep following that dream, no matter what
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 21 |
I wasn't aware of the audiophile difference or I may have gone that route. No one's fault but mine. However, the sound of the tracks I now have are mighty good, I can't say that I percieve any lack of quality. I think WMAs are pretty lossless anyway, aren't they? If they is any difference it will not stop me from making cd's and demos. If I get a big record deal I will buy the audiophiles and redo them. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
That is my thinking on the subject, also, gmanbat.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,217 |
.
>>>...The quality of the resulting MP3 tracks is pretty good. My first question is: is there anything I can do to make the quality even better ?...>>>
At the risk of flogging the obvious, I recommend playing back through the best speakers you can get. I use and recommend Logitech 3-piece computer speakers. I have them in every room in the house and i use them for gigs. Many pros of my acquiantance also use them for gigs.
They are no good for monitoring mixes though...they process the sound too much.
>>>...Are there any other clever tricks for mixing I should know about ?...>>>
Studio monitors do not have to be expensive. I use Radio Shack Miniumus-7 powered by a very good but old Kenwood stereo amp from a flea market. The Kenwood has lots of tone-shaping capability. The key is that it can be set to FLAT when I need it to be flat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,642
Posts735,389
Members38,525
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean