Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694 |
This is a good one to examine because it covers a wide range of vocals.
A "soft" male vocal.
Then a "big, loud" male vocal.
A "soft" female vocal.
And a "big, loud" female vocal.
And the "whole bunch of voices" thing.
There is obviously a huge amount of reverb. And delay. I hear some chorusing effect. There is likely fairly heavy compression to get this vocal range even - that is, of course, a guess - riding faders could account for that, too...
Do this effectively, and you too could have a BILLION Youtube views...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063 |
Cool find. This was one of my favs in 2012. Sound On Sound has a great article on the song and how it was mixed. if you just want to read how the vocals were done, scroll down to Vocals for that info. Link below. Enjoy. https://www.soundonsound.com/people/mixing-gotyes-somebody-i-used-know-francois-tetaz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,902
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,902 |
Thanks Floyd for posting these discussions. They are a great help.
What do I hear? A LOT of very complicated processing that I have little hope of ever emulating no matter what DAW I am using!
Josie. Thanks for the link to the article. It is an very informative read. "Most of the songs on Making Mirrors have a lot of detail, with many different bits and pieces resulting from Wally having cut up and arranged loads of samples — 160 tracks per session was not unusual!"
So...THAT is what it takes to make a modern sounding song....I wonder how many hours were spent on this song alone (let alone the amount of hours of practice and training to even get to this point).
I think most of us on this forum we are "hobbyists" and don't have the training or know-how (or patience) to produce anything even close to this song. There may be some that have the talent but talent is probably not enough to make a song like "Somebody"
There is however, a lesson I CAN take from this.. "When I mix, I always make sure that the vocal performances and edits are top-notch before I do anything else"
I think far too often I get bored of editing and tuning vocals and say "that will do" when in actual fact it wont do and I can easily do better. What is the point of putting badly performed and edited vocals on top of the perfect Realtracks that are generated by Band in a box?
Last edited by JoanneCooper; 05/06/18 09:03 PM.
LyricLab A.I assisted chords and lyric app. Export lyrics and import directly into Band-in-a-Box 2024. https://lyriclab.net Play-along with songs you know and love, download SGU files https://playiit.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,081
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,081 |
I know extremely little about this but I feel reasonably sure a plug-in like Waves vocal rider was used (as fj alluded to). Or maybe they manually rode the faders. I hear more riding than compression as most of the dynamic range does not appear to have stripped out. I’m probably the odd guy out here (ample precedent) but I do no editing of vocals and use minimal effects. Perhaps keener ears than my old pair hear “improvements” that I could make. Dunno. This curmudgeon just doesn’t get this super processed vocal thing; however, I’m absolutely not disparaging it. Irrespective of genre we listen for soul in a vocal. I’m not sure I could offer a good operational definition of that. But I could give many examples of it. Vocals edited for pitch perfection, overly fader ridden, significantly compressed, etc., seem to have the soul sucked right out of them along with nuances that help define the uniqueness of each voice. I think this heavy vocal processing and vocaloids are on a collision course. Bud Disclosure notice: I’m aware I may have strayed from the thread topic with my rant. I’m aware that the older I get the harder it is to stay on topic. I’m further aware that it’s often better to keep my mouth shut and appear ignorant than to open it and confirm the ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,890
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,890 |
floyd,
Thank you for posting these clips of vocals. I've never thought about using Youtube in this way. I've found it really educational to listen and learn.
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Most of the article states use of compression, EQ, and reverb. Not all that complicated.
The de-easing is something you might not have in your arsenal of plugins or hardware.
Sure most of us do not have a stockpile of a bunch of outboard dynamics processors like what is listed. But we did have some and the progression of processing is instructive.
I’ve had this album for about a year. One thing that also gives it a modern feel are the ‘intervalic’ jumps in this and other tracks. I borrow that term from Rick Beato, who you should subscribe to if you enjoyed this video. He has a series called: what makes this song great that breaks down hit songs from a theory and production standpoint. Gotye reminds me of Sting in his somewhat unique choice of interval jumps. Beato calls this ‘intervalic’ when songwriters choose large jumps of notes; large intervals; in their melody.
The whole Gotye album is a treat if you enjoy this song. Stylistically it ranges far from this song, but really nice and surprising in its variety.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063 |
Yeah, interesting thread FJ. One of the things I've noticed with this and most other examples, is that the vocal mix is not static. The processing may even be similar but it is always dynamic - changing from verse to chorus. Sometimes with different processing on even a few words. Much like the arrangement the processing on the vocals evolves and ebbs and flows with the song beyond just fader riding. One of the things that caught my atIention (if I read it right) was compressing the reverb itself. The reverb used on the vocals here is a convolution impulse. Never tried compression on the reverb. I find this stuff interesting and I like to experiment. However, I think NOT ALL but SOME processing just for the sake of piling on more processing can lead to overkill and is often so "subtle" that it's unnecessary for my hobby purposes. Not that I wouldn't like my mixes to sound better with every new mix - of course I would, I'm just saying. (Rant alert.) For me, no matter how much processing a track has or how well or how modern it's mixed, if on a scale of 10 the song is a 5 - it's still gonna be a 5 no matter how great the singer is or the mix is once it's out there competing for attention in the real world. You don't want to screw up a good song with a bad mix but a mix can only do so much. I also don't think the mix in and of itself is solely what makes it sound modern. How it's written, sung and arranged, then mixed is the order of potential effect on the masses in my opinion. Your opinion may differ. (End of rant.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694 |
Josie - Thanks (a ton!) for the link to the article! I was hoping to find something like that. A great addition to having the separated vocal track and the final...
It is a fascinating read.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382
PG Music Staff
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382 |
In the Sound On Sound article Sundance posted, they mention using Cranesong's Phoenix tape saturator. I think this is an effect that a lot of people overlook when recording digitally, and why it's easy to end up with overly clean recordings that sound like they're coming out of a computer. A big difference between what we do and how classic albums were recorded is that they used tape, and that's pretty easy to emulate digitally these days.
I'll throw a bit of saturation on pretty much everything, especially vocals, to get a bit of color on the tracks and make them more harmonically interesting. Soundtoys' Decapitator is my favourite and has been a go-to for the last couple years, and I usually have an instance of Waves' MPX Master Tape in the signal chain when mixing and/or mastering as well.
I also invested in a really nice reverb unit a couple years back (Eventide Space), and I'm pretty blown away with how much difference a really good reverb makes, when compared to cheaper plugins or the reverb built into my mixer.
Cheers Kent PG Music
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,574
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,574 |
Where do you find these Floyd? I have an audio copy of various famous Motown singers that I 'acquired' presumably originally from the studio or the person who has the tapes. They make for interesting listening. PM me if interested.
Windows 10 Home 20H2 Build 19042.487 BIAB 2021 (Build 818) Intel(R) Core(TM), i3-4160, CPU @3.60 GHz RAM 16 GB, 64 Bit X64-based processor Zoom UAC-2 (USB 3 interface-built in midi) VoiceLive 3 Extreme, Sputnik Valve Condenser Mic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 11,694 |
In the Sound On Sound article Sundance posted, they mention using Cranesong's Phoenix tape saturator. I think this is an effect that a lot of people overlook when recording digitally, and why it's easy to end up with overly clean recordings that sound like they're coming out of a computer. A big difference between what we do and how classic albums were recorded is that they used tape, and that's pretty easy to emulate digitally these days.
I'll throw a bit of saturation on pretty much everything, especially vocals, to get a bit of color on the tracks and make them more harmonically interesting. Soundtoys' Decapitator is my favourite and has been a go-to for the last couple years, and I usually have an instance of Waves' MPX Master Tape in the signal chain when mixing and/or mastering as well.
I also invested in a really nice reverb unit a couple years back (Eventide Space), and I'm pretty blown away with how much difference a really good reverb makes, when compared to cheaper plugins or the reverb built into my mixer.
Cheers Kent PG Music
Hi, Kent... would LOVE to hear what your vocals sound like! Any place we can go to do that???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382
PG Music Staff
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,382 |
Hi Floyd,
Nothing online that I can share at the moment, sorry. I don't actually sing myself, just have some projects on the go with some vocalists that I have to keep under wraps until they're ready to be released.
Cheers Kent PG Music
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,272
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,272 |
Floyd, sorry I'm late in commenting, but these examples are so helpful. To be able to clear away everything else to hear what is going on in a single element of so is amazingly useful.
Then to be able to listen to the mix again, it's easier to hear how the pieces of the puzzle fit.
I know it was mentioned, but when this song first came out, I thought it was Gordon himself.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier) TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,652
Posts735,461
Members38,526
|
Most Online2,537 Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|