OK, since you failed to answer my basic questions I have to conclude 1. You have never worked on the RealPlayer development team or any other software development team 2. You have never written software to process video or audio 3. You are clueless on the inner workings of the RealPlayer program
For someone lacking in such basic qualifications I find it quite odd that you can you tell me that official information from RealNetworks is wrong. What kind of special knowledge does Byron Dickens have that RealNetworks, Wikipedia and a state of the art AI bot doesn’t have??
Once again, you now know what extraordinary claims require.
But here is another opportunity to redeem and establish your credibility.
What language(s) was the RealPlayer program written in back in 1995? What language(s) was the RealPlayer program written in back in 2015? What language(s) is the RealPlayer program written in today? Has AI ever been incorporated into RealPlayer? Has RealNetworks ever sub-contracted any portion of the code writing to a sub contractor? How many different methods are there to convert video files to audio files on the Windows platform? What are the drawbacks of the FFmpeg library? Is this library used in RealPlayer today? Do you even know what FFmpeg is? Can you produce a system block diagram describing how RealPlayer operates on video sources?
Byron, I don’t want opinion, hearsay, inuendo, beliefs or other generic day dream mumbo-gumbo to these questions. I want crisp, fact-based, informed, truthful, logical answers based on your experience. My guess is you don’t have any. Guess what? Programmers and marketing people at RealNetworks DO. They can answer these simple questions and those you or I can’t even think of. It’s THEIR product and this is called design authority or project ownership. Based on your answers (or non-answers above) I will judge whether you have design authority here or not.
I'll bet the development team rolled their eyes at such nonsense and resisted.The marketing guys should have known better and very likely did, but felt they had to dumb it down for a scientifically ignorant and only quasi literate public that has little interest in such niceties as using language accurately. Can you prove that you are not quasi literate by answering the above questions ?
In these fights, the marketing department always wins. Says who? And based on what? What is your evidence for this claim at RealNetworks or anywhere else? My experience with marketing professionals coupled with your non-answers to my questions tells me that you could learn much from sitting at the feet of the marketing director at RealNetworks.
Make no mistake, this is not about you two against me. This is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against generative AI. This is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against Wikipedia. And most relevant, this is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against RealNetworks.
If you want to pull the sled with the big dogs, you have to be a big dog. RealNetworks is a big dog, so is Wikipedia and so is today’s generative AI chat bots. Alaskan Malamutes can cut it, Mexican Chihuahuas can’t.
Imagine if I were to pompously and arrogantly claim that material regarding the inner workings of BiaB as described on the PGMusic website is flat wrong . . . I’d be jerk. PGMusic, their employees and associates are the only ones fully qualified to discuss BiaB with any real authority. Everyone else is far less qualified; or maybe even a clown. So too with RealPlayer.
Someone smarter than me once said “If you find yourself in a deep hole, the first thing to do is stop digging.”
PS> I downloaded another video this week and converted it to an MP3 audio file . . . yes, using RealPlayer. And it works like a charm in my DAW . . . woof woof
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Your questions are totally irrelevant. They are a red herring. That's why I'm not going to answer them.
I not only was not part of the design team, I have never worked for Ford Motor Company in any capacity yet I have detailed technical knowledge of how my car works.
You tell me what logical inference can be made from this fact.
Drop a video into your NLE and tell us what you see. Better: do as Mario suggested and take a silent video, "convert" it to audio and tell us what happens.
Fact: In your NLE you can separate the video from the audio. You can get rid of one or the other, make changes to one independently of the other and/or move them or parts of them in relation to one another.
Fact: when rendering your project or transcoding it you can independently choose the video and the audio codec.
You tell me what the obvious logical conclusion is
Last edited by Byron Dickens; 08/19/2308:01 AM.
Byron Dickens
BIAB. CbB. Mixbus 32C 8 HP Envy. Intel core i7. 16GB RAM W10. Focusrite Scarlett 18i 20. Various instruments played with varying degrees of proficiency.
I did. Steve and my definitions of convert and extract are different. So be it. No harm, no foul.
Peace
+1 PM me if you'd like to see if a meeting of the minds is possible. There's still much to be explored on this subject.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
When one download application glitches another download application may not. +++ HERE +++ is a Windows YouTube to MP3 application that works well for me.
Like Dan I am also fond of using Audacity's "Record What You Hear" mode which works very well.
Jim, just to let you know over the past two days Audacity downloads of Youtube audio has failed me completely. I don't know what has changed, but this is familar history for me when it comes to Youtube downloads. So I tried your recommendation and it worked perfect for 3 out of 3 attempts (ya I have a new project in mind). Just have to figure out now if I need to pay something or if it is free?
PS, tried RealPlayer and was not sucessful in several attempts.
Thanks
Dan, The link I provided is for the free version of the 4K YouTube to MP3 application. You can purchase a license to unlock additional features but I haven't found a need. +++ HERE +++ is a webpage that explains the benefits of purchasing a license and how much the various license plans cost.
Make no mistake, this is not about you two against me. This is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against generative AI. This is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against Wikipedia. And most relevant, this is about Byron Dickens and Mike Halloran against RealNetworks.
I have nothing against AI, Wiki or RealNetworks.
I have everything against your attitude when you were presented with an opportunity to learn from people who do know their subjects. We posted in good faith with the best of intentions and only kept replying so that you might learn. Trust me, we have learned.
This, however, may be the funniest thing that I have ever read on these pages. Thank you for this laugh.
Quote:
In these fights, the marketing department always wins.
Any of us who have ever worked in sales, marketing or management know the accuracy of that.
If you think we're the ones who look bad as a result of this thread, that's just another of your many mistakes.
BIAB 2023 Audiophile, 24/60 Core M2 Mac Studio Ultra/8TB/192GB Sonoma, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP Digital Performer 11, LogicPro Finale27.4, Dorico5, Encore5, SmartScorePro64, Notion6, Overture5
But you do have something against them . . . you won't except what they are saying about RealPlayer converting video files into audio files when clearly they know much, much more than you.
You seem like an otherwise rational guy so let me try this.
If you choose to be adamant about RealPlayer extracting audio then please explain how that is done. Does their software skip every 3rd byte in the source file and . . . . pooof, audio appears? Or does it skip every 13th bit and then take the square root of the remainder? Or maybe the first and 3rd fifth of the file is video and everything else is audio?
I've given you my evidence . . . times 3. Where is yours?
Mike, with all due respect, this is not a kindergarten schoolyard where you can say "My daddy invented paper, walked on the moon and is the strongest man on earth." Rather, this is the adult world where credibility and fact-based evidence matters; provide some.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
It is extracted for one because most video does not interweave the structure of the audio and video so it's not about counting bits or multiplying. They are separate inside the file. You extract the audio part of a file that is labeled a video file. (video file semantically means 'video' but it often contains audio too, go figger)
Conversely, the audio section of a video file is usually 24/48 in a given codec .. so if the application has an end result of something other than that, then it did indeed convert it (as it extracted it).
Semantics .. some of the worst arguments to get into or suffer through, especially when in some cases both sides can be correct!
It's OK to try to look at it from the other side and think "yeah, I see why he'd say that" Sometimes it's even true from both sides.
Last edited by rharv; 09/14/2312:33 PM.
Make your sound your own! .. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
It is extracted for one because most video does not interweave the structure of the audio and video so it's not about counting bits or multiplying. They are separate inside the file.
I can see that when I (yet again) asked Mike to explain how the extraction is done that my tounge-in-cheek question was taken literally. So let me try again, this time being more obvious.
Does their software skip every 3rd byte in the source file only if you ask nicely, dance around the flag pole 4 times under a full moon in the rain while howling with lit candles in both hands and . . . . pooof, audio appears?
If you haven't noticed, I'm evidence-driven. Personal beliefs, heresay and opinions don't mean much to me.
Q. As for semantics, could it be that you are the one wrong about semantics/terminology and not RealNetworks? A. Yes
Here is my evidence. But I am flexible. Get RealNetworks to change their "semantics" and I'll certainly change mine.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Why do I do this. I should leave this alone but...
BassThumper's original question related to changing a YouTube video file to an MP3 audio file.
Mike's response was to say one can't convert video to audio.
But that was not what Bass Thumper had said.
Below is an image of before and after media-info reports for a YouTube mp4 file changed to a mp3 audio file by the simply doing: $ ffmpeg -i SavedYachts\ 140MB\ Medium.mp4 SavedYachts\ audio.mp3
You will see that it has indeed 'extracted' the audio, but it has then converted from the mp4's AAC LC to an mp3 audio stream, probably in a different coding and certainly at a different data rate, before repackaging in mp3 file format.
One could equally argue that the conversion 'extracted' the video and dumped it.
In either case the new mp3 file is of a different type to the mp4, with different packaging data, so the file has been converted.
'Extraction' may well be part of the process, but the whole process from start to end is a conversion.
A final binary compare shows the two files differ right from the very first byte, despite these both being mpeg files. The file types and the file header information are different.
Last edited by Gordon Scott; 09/15/2308:12 AM. Reason: type date->data
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. Kawai MP6, Korg M50, Ui24R, Saffire Pro 40. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11; Win8.1: Scarletts BIAB2022 UltraPAK, Reaper, a bunch of stuff.
In either case the new mp3 file is of a different type to the mp4, with different packaging data, so the file has been converted.
Thank you Gordon. Here is further evidence that corroborates this from an FFmpeg perspective.
This should now be established truth, settled science and confirmed fact.
Let's all move on. . . whewwww, this took a loooong time.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677 BiaB 2024 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. Kawai MP6, Korg M50, Ui24R, Saffire Pro 40. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11; Win8.1: Scarletts BIAB2022 UltraPAK, Reaper, a bunch of stuff.
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!
His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean