Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
Rustyspoon, I don't have "concrete bugs" for you but I do have 10+ years of experience with this software and many more years experience writing and selling software.

I don't understand your hurry in removing essential functionality before the BIAB Annual Paid User Beta Testing is completed!

And removing large chunks of code is never something to be done casually. Have you ever wondered why computer game producers leave all their test code (cheats and Easter eggs to us gamers) in the released product? The reason is, to remove that code may cause more harm than good.

Your proposal is a good one but premature.

-1

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
"before the BIAB Annual Paid User Beta Testing is completed"
LOL

I don't believe request is premature. This is a wishlist, and I have no doubts,if it will be considered (removing obsolete pickers), it will be no earlier than we will get VST3 support, which I hope we will receive by the end of February.

In my humble view, one of the biggest issues with BIAB is redundancy / unwanted and unneeded complexity that comes with maintaining obsolete and unfinished features. Previous pickers are perfect example of that. Another (from newer ones) is F8 vs Alt F8. When Alt+F8 was introduced, it should have been completed with a few remaining tools of F8, and F8 put to rest and replaced by non-modal version. There quite a few examples of that nature. New MTP Library is a big step in the right direction, given several known issues are fixed, it is pretty much complete. Why carry all the weight and scare new customers with all other pickers?
-----------------------------------------------

The point of this thread is to identify shortcomings (if any) of new MTP Library compared to all previous pickers and have constructive discussion pointing developers making right decisions based of user wants/needs, not on hypothesis of what "might" happen. That is their job to worry about programming.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,570
Originally Posted by Rustyspoon#
"The point of this thread is to identify shortcomings (if any) of new MTP Library compared to all previous pickers and have constructive discussion pointing developers making right decisions based of user wants/needs
I like that goal a lot more than the thread's title "Please remove all previous pickers."

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,099
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,099
Software coding , fixing the software for new users, redundancy, and other coding issues aside, what's the operation issue if any?


BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,374
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,374
Old habits die hard for some. I think that the simplest solution is to keep the current buttons in place, but redirect them all to the appropriate tabs in the new Multi-Picker.


BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
JJJ,
As soon as those issues are identified and addressed, it's my wish for previous pickers to be GONE - GOODBYE!... and thank you for your service.
-----
Charlie,
new users are scared by unneeded complexity. "Operation issue" is an issue! I I don't believe that accumulating old code and maintaining about 30% of useless menus is a "good thing". Bugs, user confusion, should I continue or you know what I will say next? We (humanoids) are not robots to keep memorizing redundant multiple ways of doing one thing & unorthodox workarounds. Likely some find joy in it. Not me.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 112
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 112
Originally Posted by Rustyspoon#
Bashing might not be the right word. Disagreeing without a specific reason. That is what I meant.

" can't say what bothers me specifically"
When you do, post it. If reasonable/beneficial, I will gladly support it.

" it's still not done very well"
Explain. That is what the Wishlist is for.

Honestly, I'm just taking a bit of a breather. I had high hopes for this update but, while everyone else seems happy, I'm completely unenthusiastic with it.
I need to calm down a bit before I hate on it too much so that I can post my thoughts in a less angered manner.

Fwiw, I am absolutely 100% behind your idea to remove unnecessary items and I'd take that a lot further than just the pickers. I just don't want this to happen unless the alternatives are as good, preferably better.

I'm quite clearly the odd one out who despises putting anything behind unnecessary mouse clicks. Compare the previous realtracks picker to the one in the multipicker and a whole bunch of stuff, which was right there on the page, is now behind more clicks.

I'm impatient and I want everything to happen and be accessible as quickly and easily as possible. This isn't normal DAW type software, as we all agree. I don't know how others use it but I use it as an ideas pad where I can trial things quickly without multiple clicks and drop down menus when they aren't needed. It wasn't quite so bad in the past but now we have so much to choose from we can spend a long time trialing and regenerating many many times over. This should be click listen, not click click menu sub-menu search click click listen.

Add to that we have a search and filter that is almost pointless - nothing new there, it's been that way forever but it's just becoming annoying now. What often takes half an hour should be able to do in minutes.

I will post more about my frustrations but like I say, I just need to take a breath so that I don't unintentionally offend anyone.

Last edited by Lee N; 12/12/23 05:10 PM. Reason: spelling
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Lee,
Ohh it will take quite a lot to offend me smile Please don't worry about that.

New Multipicker Library is far better than everything what we had before. Sure, it does have a few known issues, hopefully they are fixed in no time.
You mentioned "number of clicks". Take your time pinpoint exactly where you need more clicks and write it here when you are ready.
Filtering it seems the same as with previous pickers, and while I am not in "love" with it, it works as expected. We would all benefit from "nested" filtering, but that is good topic for another thread.
----------
You mentioned:
"I don't know how others use it but I use it as an ideas pad where I can trial things quickly without multiple clicks"
Me too. And new 2024 version is better than anything that we had before. I am a bit sick now, but I will record a better video when I get better. Meanwhile, please watch my short clip. Maybe it will give you some ideas of workflow using new MTP Library:
https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=788290#Post788290

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 112
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 112
Originally Posted by Rustyspoon#
Me too. And new 2024 version is better than anything that we had before. I am a bit sick now, but I will record a better video when I get better. Meanwhile, please watch my short clip. Maybe it will give you some ideas of workflow using new MTP Library:
https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=788290#Post788290

I'm sure it is better. I'm just a bit deflated and also not had much time to play around. The first thing I did was test out partial regen for drums (one of the main reasons I upgraded) only to find out it doesn't work. With that I gave up and will try again when I'm more inspired to try again. I'll give your video a watch. Thanks

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
C
Expert
Offline
Expert
C
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
Another great candidate to be (mercilessly) eliminated would be the (now) obsolete, redundant and ugly Track Settings and Actions window (CTRL + F7).

Last edited by Cerio; 12/19/23 01:26 PM.

BIAB 2024, latest build.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
While I support the idea of removing things to streamline the program, mightn't this have the potential to impact significantly on the effectiveness of the community of helpers in the Windows/Mac forums, etc?

For example, if someone has a problem with BIAB 2016 (say) and I ask them to describe the process they go through that causes the problem, I can presently re-create their actions step by step (mostly). If things change too much, though, that would not be possible. Similarly, if I give a set of diagrams and step-by-step instructions on how to solve a problem, those solutions would be based on my current version of BIAB and if the change between my version and a user's version is too great, my solutions would have limited value.

Explanation-type problems that arise due to a lack of consistency between versions can already be seen in some posts in the "Tips and Tricks" forum where present versions of BIAB don't have an exact relationship with past versions.

For example, the below set of instructions regarding plugins is relevant to BIAB 2018.

https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=451623#Post451623

The system is now completely different. If a user of BIAB 2018 had a plugin problem, solving it becomes much harder if the solutions are based on BIAB 2024 as the reference version.


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2024
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Ahh, Noel,
It is absurd thinking and philosophy that those who spend their hard earned money yearly, supporting progress should suffer from redundancy and unnecessary complexity that "possibly" can occur for somebody who doesn't (support the progress and PGM music in general).

Out of good will, and simply because you are a nice person, you can surely help someone who for one reason or another didn't upgrade IN YEARS but make everyone else suffer for those reasons is flawed thinking in every possible way.

Sorry Noel, I feel this one belongs to: doing good deeds on other peoples backs.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Since I agree with both Noel and Misha maybe the answer would be an either or option, much like control T for the GUI? Maybe even tie the old picker to the old GUI? Or have it a separate option?

Just my two cents.


I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
Expert
Online Embarrased
Expert
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
But it seems to me that all the functionalities of the previous selectors are not included in the MP? I've noticed several over time. Which means no, it's not a good idea.


Biab Audiophile 2024 11.11, Win11
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Mario,
I think you are confusing backward compatibility vs redundancy and simply outdated features.
I do understand the need for older GUI as some people's vision degrades with age and big buttons are something that they are more comfortable with,
but something like new MTP Library, which makes things so much easier in every way and has everything that older picker offered with same familiar layout, I simply don't see a single valid argument to keeping those which makes program more confusing than it already is.

---------

MoultiPass
"But it seems to me that all the functionalities of the previous selectors are not included in the MP?"

What is that you are missing? Explain. Just throwing words out mean little. I am asking, because if you are "missing" something, you argument should look like: I om Ok with request If A and B is added from X Y pickers, otherwise No.

That way we can make those specific requests to PGM and try to persuade a change of making program cleaner, instead of more cluttered with redundant and outdated items.

Last edited by Rustyspoon#; 12/25/23 09:40 AM.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
Expert
Online Embarrased
Expert
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
I'm just showing you the old Rt selector. I use each of these buttons. In the MP you have to look for them in the right-click submenus. If you hide all the options in right clicks, people will no longer use them and we will lose freedom. Right click or buttons, the most meaningful for me is the button.Why make it complicated? If you only use the new one, that's up to you. But don't penalize others.

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Mp1.png (33.28 KB, 198 downloads)

Biab Audiophile 2024 11.11, Win11
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 5,791
Moultipass,
so the "missing" functions are there, and not missing (per your initial post) except for convenience of several buttons that you are personally (and likely few other users) are used to?
Correct?

I don't agree with your "penalize others" comment. I think it is far more damaging to software and ultimately users leaving huge chunks of redundant code just to satisfy a few "convenient" buttons. Instead of trying to formalin specimens, put forward idea(s) how to make new MTP library better - to suit your needs. In my view many popular, well supported ideas from this section of the forum do make it to yearly release.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
C
Expert
Offline
Expert
C
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
Removing old / outdated / redundant GUI elements is all about simplifyng the GUI, simplify documentation, simplify software manteinance, reduce bugs, reduce clutter, avoid confusion for new users, improve consistence between GUI elements, improve ease of use and enhance user experience.

I don't really see any strong reason to maintain those old, outdated pickers, but I do see many benefits for the program if the developers decide to remove them.

Last edited by Cerio; 12/26/23 08:30 AM.

BIAB 2024, latest build.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 255
S
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
S
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 255
I agree - remove the old reduntant stuff from the GUI.
I have not found any functions in the old menus that are not also available in the new Multipicker.
If the old stuff is kept, then the gui will never improve just become more cluttered.
One of the more confusing things I know is when the same function appears in several places.
It makes me wonder why? Is there something that differs between these functions in these places?
I have never seen any other software that keeps the old gui stuff when improving the gui.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
Expert
Online Embarrased
Expert
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 1,362
I think it is absolutely obvious that we are heading straight towards this simplification, which will take time since everything is nested in Biab and each action can be done in 3 different ways. I simply noticed that with a release on 5/12, asking for such a deletion on 6 could cause some users a form of frustration. But you would really have to be blind not to imagine that we are necessarily going to simplify the whole thing.


Biab Audiophile 2024 11.11, Win11
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,660
Posts735,518
Members38,528
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
gman97040, kadju, theyearofjess, OlvaJownDay, Tranner Track
38,527 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 173
DC Ron 103
dcuny 88
WaoBand 74
rsdean 72
Today's Birthdays
David Robinson, louiep, Ozkar, Timothy W. Cook
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5