Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#366099 09/19/16 05:20 AM
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Hey Peeps,

So I have been studying about loudness and loudness meters, and LUFS and all that stuff and even have the meters (IK Mastering Console, ToneBoosters EU Levels Meters, etc.) But I am still confused.

They keep talking about -24 LUFS being "the norm" for broadcast and even have screen shots. (See below)

But when I run any modern song through one of these--Let's say Glen Campbell's latest--just to be on the "milder side", it is WAY out of that -24 range and totally in the red.

The only tune I could find in my library that shows up as -24 LUFS is an Audrey Hepburn tune Moon River from that old movie and that is just kind of a thin blue strip of a .wav, hardly what you see today. I.E. it is SOFT.

So, I guess my question is how are you you supposed to master at -24 LUFS and get anything anywhere near modern sounds if Audrey Hepburn is the reference?

I know I am ignorant, but I am totally confused.

http://transom.org/2015/the-audio-producers-guide-to-loudness/

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Toneboosters-EBU-meter_PS-390x644.jpg (43.5 KB, 154 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
P.S.

Here are the charts from an acoustic song I am about to post that goes to -24 sometimes, but is mostly at -15. (LUFS). It has a nice, well balanced acoustic sound.

Is it necessary to force it to never go above -24 and if so under what circumstances??

Also, is that a tool you can use to "gate" it at that level and normalize to LUFS (the broadcasters must have one) and if so, what is that tool. I know how to limit or gate in dbs, but this seems to be talking about a completely different standard.

Thanks!!

(See attachment LUFS 1 as well).

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
LUFS 1.png (824.45 KB, 9 downloads)
LUFS2.png (412.25 KB, 148 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,874
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,874
You have Audrey Hepburn singing Moon River in your library?


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
I KNEW you were going to say that Herb. I KNEW it.

Yes, my wife Gayle sings it in our repertoire and I have it for us to practice. Also, I happen like it myself. I also like Judy Garland singing Somewhere over the Rainbow if you don't mind.

Thanks for the feedback on the question.

Catch you later.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
Hi David,

Thank you for posting this. I have never stumbled across LUFS before and since your post, I've been doing a bit of homework. It's definitely something worth getting a handle on.

I found the below video by Ian Shepherd an excellent presentation on understanding how peak, RMS, integrated loudness and LUFS correlate. The video is 19 minutes long and it was time really well spent.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31zHqzjRn4c

From the Youtube clip, it seems that many of today's songs will have a LUFS around -11. Since, according to the video, -23 integrated loudness is the required value for broadcasting, a piece of music that has an engineered value of -11 will be turned down by 12dB (the difference between -11 and -23) at the time of broadcasting.

As a comparison, the video clip also says that a piece of classical music that has an integrated loudness of less than -23 will be lifted up to -23 at broadcasting.

My overall, still-early-days-novice take on this is that the -24 LUFS that you mention is not necessarily an audio level that sound engineers strive to achieve when mixing and mastering, it's what they strive to achieve when adjusting audio for broadcasting as radio or TV.

Thanks for starting me on a new journey!

Regards,
Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
What are you feeding into the meter? If you have movie sound tracks I'm thinking you are using digitized media of some type and there's no way to know how the audio is already compressed. Without a reference tone for each recording you feed the meter, there's simply no way to know the provenance of the audio.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Yes Noel there is quite a lot to learn. I will write more later, but your post is spot on--except I think they are taking more about the news standard of "loudness unit" gating and not db reduction, per se. But your numbers are accurate in the RMS realm, and I guess we leave it up to broadcasters to do their thing should we get so lucky.

There is SO much to learn. If you click on the attachment on the first post you will see a meter strip that is very helpful to me to improve dynamics, presence, and perceived loudness. I am learning from engineers that you have to set the vocals precisely first, then gradually add in other stuff, keeping an eye on ALL meters, to see which instrument suddenly flips the switch and throws the mix out of whack. It can be as simple as a bright acoustic pushed too high--or anything. One misstep and you lose control of the dynamics.

Quite fascinating actually.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
You are absolutely right. I was just talking about overall loudness, really, and how many different standards there are now for what is loud, and how many "numbers" are supposed to be the ruling number.

I think Noel's reply cut to the core--but I still have much more reading and experimenting to do.

Thanks for the reply.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
David,

I see that you are using the TB_EBULoudness_V3 plugin. I downloaded that one, too. It's pretty good.

If you're interested, there's one called MLoudnessAnalyzer from Melda Production.

https://www.meldaproduction.com/MLoudnessAnalyzer

It's excellent and has both VU scales as well as graphs (which I like). It's completely free and comes bundled with a pot-potpourri of plugins that are a mixture of free and limited trial. When installing, it's not necessary to install all plugins. It's possible to simply choose those that are of interest. (I only selected the Loudness Analyzer.)

I can tell that this journey is going to be exciting! I look forward to where it takes me. If I come across anything really eye/ear-opening, I'll post it in this thread.

Regards,
Noel



MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Also, Ozone 7 Advanced comes with Insight. It's a metering suite that comes with a meter that shows the LUFS stuff referenced in the original post.

Insight




Steve

BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics.
PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,493
Thanks Steve!

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,599
David,

Just recently I found out a little more about LUFS...

According to sound enthusiasts and sound engineers on the 'net, these days it seems that Youtube, iTunes, Spotify are making use of LUFS when it comes to processing audio uploads. The values give are usually in the vicinity of

  • Youtube = -14 LUFS
  • Spotify = -12 LUFS
  • iTunes = -16 LUFS

While -23 LUFS is the level agreed on for radio broadcasting, for user audio preparation, the rule of thumb is that the value with the greatest negative magnitude will have most dynamics and the value with the lowest negative magnitude will have a more compressed/limited sound (i.e. -16 LUFS will offer more dynamics in the performance than -10 LUFS). This is additional to any compression or limiting that is present in the pre-LUFS-adjusted track.

The below article offers some insight into various settings.

https://www.logicprohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=124442

The good news is that it's not necessary to understand how LUFS works to be able to use it. All that is required is to...

  • Determine what suitable LUFS value the audio should be adjusted to (e.g -14).

  • Adjust it to that value.

  • It is not necessary to adjust a track to the broadcast value of -23. Should a track be picked up for broadcasting, the studio will adjust the track's level accordingly.

When using Soundcloud (which doesn't seem to optimise uploaded audios), if all tracks are adjusted to near the same LUFS value, the tracks will sound relatively uniform. Thus, as a listener plays through the tracks, they will not need to adjust the volume control excessively.

Regards,
Noel




MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,574
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,574
Originally Posted By: Noel96
Should a track be picked up for broadcasting, the studio will adjust the track's level accordingly.

This has been my experience on every radio station where my music was played. They set the gain and compress the life out of it, no matter what.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!

These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!

This Free Bonus PAK includes:

  • The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK: -For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
  • MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
  • Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
  • Playable RealTracks Set 5
  • RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
  • SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
  • iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
  • 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
  • FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
  • MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
  • Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
  • RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
  • SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)

Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!

All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!

It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.

What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?

XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!

Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!

The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.

The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.

Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.

Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.

2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.

Holiday Weekend Hours

As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:

April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours

Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!

— Team PG

Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,252
Posts802,368
Members40,075
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
Schusterpech, Kingloud, Elle, bechda, geswho22
40,075 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 128
zedd 111
DC Ron 88
rsdean 87
Noel96 63
Today's Birthdays
dryan08
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5