Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
N
NeilC Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
N
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
Hi Experts,
Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...

Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?

I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?

If not,when and where is the best time to use this?

Cheers,

Neil C
Warrington
UK


Dell Inspiron 5748
iPad Mini.
iRig HD2.
BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank.
Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle.
Amplitube,BIAS FX.
Behringer MS20 Monitors.
Several guitars.
Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,335
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,335
Neil,

Yes. With caveats. To me it depends on the mix.

I use Audacity always as the next to last step in my process.

I do the best job of mixing that I can in the step before that, carefully watching my meters, and doing the best I can with EQ, also using compressors on certain tracks like bass and drums (or others if they need it.)

Then I will open the export in Audacity. I am looking for a .wav file that looks smooth and curvy (like a, well, wave) and not jagged or ragged with many spikes or transients. I am sure you know the picture I am talking about--it looks more like the image of a drum .wav than a song .wav---it looks "shredded." (The screenshot below gives you an idea of what a mix that needs compression and normalization will look like.) If I see that, I know I have no other choice but to compress and normalize. So I use a mild compression in Audacity (1.5:1), then normalize to -0.7.

Then I will use negative amplification to "trim the hair" of any remaining spikes that will reduce my headroom.

If it does not need compression at this phase, I will normalize it to -0.7 in Audacity before going further. My point is, if it is ragged you have to both compress AND normalize. If the mix looks elegant to the eye, all you to do is normalize, and yes, that is normal.

From here, I proceed to mastering in something like Ozone, or another tool, depending on the genre.

I NEVER boost to 0 dB with the next to last step .wav though. I always want to go into Ozone with a -0.7 mix so the effects used in the mastering tool (you have to have one) have room for transient shaping, maximizing, Eq-ing, etc. That is where you set your threshold.

I sometimes set the threshold to -.1 but most of the time -.2. I just don't think you have to max it out.

For the type of stuff I do, I find you begin to lose nuances when you max it to the limit and I would rather people hear dynamics.

I do not want to compress at the next to last phase unless I have to, because mastering tool presets add compression and I do not want compression times compression. But, if you start with a ragged .wav as your export, you have little recourse because it will be next to impossible to control your dynamics or loudness in the mastering phase before you clean things up a bit.

In the best of all worlds though, I try and mix so that I do not need to do this Audacity compression step before mastering, but it does not always work out that way.

Hope that makes sense.


Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Needs compression and Norm.jpg (78.45 KB, 89 downloads)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,832
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,832
Hi Neil,

I used to always normalise all tracks to 0.00 dB. For BIAB users who read this and don't know what 'normalise' means, the term refers to scaling a waveform (i.e. sound) so that its highest peak reaches 0.00 dB. Most peaks in the wave will be noticeably less than 0.00 dB. Normalising does not change sound integrity if it stays under 0.00 dB; in most cases, it simply raises the volume of the sound.

Then I read somewhere that it's always best to leave a little bit of audio headroom so that if a track has effects added to it, the effect processor has audio 'space' to work in so that it can maintain the integrity of the sound while adding, and after adding, the effect. In a number of articles, I came across the minimum recommended normalising value of -0.3dB and so I started using that.

These days, I normalise to -3.0 dB. I chose this value randomly after watching a friend mixing a song he had composed -- he is an audio engineer at a nationwide radio station and I noticed that he never normalised to 0.00 dB and always had substantial headroom above (and below) the highest peaks in the audio waveform. Since he is a professional in this field, I took his lesson on-board.

Audio that comes from BIAB mostly needs to be normalised. Wave volumes (that is, 'peak heights') are set by PG Music in a style such that the mixer will always show '90'. This means that some audio, when transferred to a DAW, will be noticeably quieter than other audio. To make it easier to work with these varying-volume audio stems, I always like to increase the height of the wave as it makes both editing and mixing that wave much easier. I'm happy working with -3.0 dB normalisation these days. It gives me a good clarity of sound.

Just my 2 cents worth.

Regards,
Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2025
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,343
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,343
Originally Posted By: NeilC
Hi Experts,
Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...

Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?

I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?

If not,when and where is the best time to use this?

Cheers,

Neil C
Warrington
UK


Good question. So.... yeah I tend to use it on everything as my LAST step. What it does is pretty simply. You select the level. As most have said they choose 0dB as the reference level. So, normalization looks at the file you are wanting to normalize and it finds the highest peak in the song. It moves that peak to 0dB. It amplifies everything else by the same amount. Nothing is amplified more than anything else, like would happen in a compression level to 0dB for example.

As I understand it, this is how it works. It's never given me any issues. They recommend -3dB for MP3. and Waves can go to 0dB..... BUT.... if you plan to have a mastering house master your song, they normally want around -6dB so they have room to work without squashing anything.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 745
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 745
Learn something new everyday.

Thanks all!

...Deb

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,173
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,173
I use normalisation totally differently. When I pull the tracks into my daw (usually Reaper) I normalise all the tracks to -10db to -15db depending largely on the number of tracks. With all tracks playing I then like to be about -6db or less. I have a quick listen . I might renormalise (usually drums and bass) to put them up a couple of dB to have them better in the mix. I then do the mixing. At the end of the mixing process I like to have about -4db to -6db or less for headroom for the “mastering”. The final stage in the mastering chain has a limiter which I use to lift the track to -14 LUFS with a true peak of -1db. This way the songs all come out about the same level, reasonable balanced and ready for use.

In nearly all cases if I pull them into Audacity the songs are at -1db a different way to arrive at the same result.

I often use MP3 files to use when performing I put these through MP3Gain which in a sense renormalises again.

All seems like extra work but IMHO it in fact saves time.

Tony



Last edited by Teunis; 12/30/18 12:18 PM.

HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home,
Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612
BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 570
B
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
B
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 570
I never use the Normalize function anymore. In Studio One there is a way to raise the track level gain by just selecting the event and dragging it up and down. This simply adjusts the volume level of the track without changing the dynamics of the track. It also does not change the Volume fader either. I like to get it around -12db per track and no more than -6db. I always leave headroom for when it is ready to master. Studio One also has a built in plugin called Mixtool that does this to the track as well as phase.

Most DAWs have a gain level knob of some sort for doing this.

Brian


BIAB 2025 Ultrapack- Studio One Pro 7 Windows 11, Mac Mini M4 with Logic Pro 11, Melodyne Studio

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
N
NeilC Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
N
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
Superb range of suggestions,many thanks everyone...and anyone else who wishes to throw in their Two Bob's worth..

I'm quite suspicious now that a problem piece of work I'm dealing with at the moment,also mentioned in this forum(which Brian also offered up some suggestions towards)may be due to the fact that all the guitar stems have been normalised relative to 0dB and that once mixed down,alongside the use of AudioSnap in Cakewalk,may be the cause of the issue.

I've never even considered normalising to a value other than 0dB,so this will definitely on the "To Try" list next time

Not a negative commentary on Cakewalk by the way,which must qualify as freebie of the year,merely my possible erroneous usage of AudioSnap.

Here's to Build 611 taking us to VST nirvana...

Thanks Guys!

Neil Cummins
Warrington
UK


Dell Inspiron 5748
iPad Mini.
iRig HD2.
BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank.
Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle.
Amplitube,BIAS FX.
Behringer MS20 Monitors.
Several guitars.
Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support

Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins

Join the conversation on our forum.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.

Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.

If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,308
Posts777,555
Members39,615
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
kottke, kaleu, Claudio Paolini, bjornen71, CATBELLOU
39,614 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 141
zedd 119
DC Ron 106
WaoBand 105
rsdean 91
nonchai 87
Today's Birthdays
Manos
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5