Hi Experts, Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...
Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?
I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?
If not,when and where is the best time to use this?
Cheers,
Neil C Warrington UK
Dell Inspiron 5748 iPad Mini. iRig HD2. BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank. Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle. Amplitube,BIAS FX. Behringer MS20 Monitors. Several guitars. Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
I use Audacity always as the next to last step in my process.
I do the best job of mixing that I can in the step before that, carefully watching my meters, and doing the best I can with EQ, also using compressors on certain tracks like bass and drums (or others if they need it.)
Then I will open the export in Audacity. I am looking for a .wav file that looks smooth and curvy (like a, well, wave) and not jagged or ragged with many spikes or transients. I am sure you know the picture I am talking about--it looks more like the image of a drum .wav than a song .wav---it looks "shredded." (The screenshot below gives you an idea of what a mix that needs compression and normalization will look like.) If I see that, I know I have no other choice but to compress and normalize. So I use a mild compression in Audacity (1.5:1), then normalize to -0.7.
Then I will use negative amplification to "trim the hair" of any remaining spikes that will reduce my headroom.
If it does not need compression at this phase, I will normalize it to -0.7 in Audacity before going further. My point is, if it is ragged you have to both compress AND normalize. If the mix looks elegant to the eye, all you to do is normalize, and yes, that is normal.
From here, I proceed to mastering in something like Ozone, or another tool, depending on the genre.
I NEVER boost to 0 dB with the next to last step .wav though. I always want to go into Ozone with a -0.7 mix so the effects used in the mastering tool (you have to have one) have room for transient shaping, maximizing, Eq-ing, etc. That is where you set your threshold.
I sometimes set the threshold to -.1 but most of the time -.2. I just don't think you have to max it out.
For the type of stuff I do, I find you begin to lose nuances when you max it to the limit and I would rather people hear dynamics.
I do not want to compress at the next to last phase unless I have to, because mastering tool presets add compression and I do not want compression times compression. But, if you start with a ragged .wav as your export, you have little recourse because it will be next to impossible to control your dynamics or loudness in the mastering phase before you clean things up a bit.
In the best of all worlds though, I try and mix so that I do not need to do this Audacity compression step before mastering, but it does not always work out that way.
Hope that makes sense.
David Snyder Songwriter/Renaissance Man Studio + Fingers
I used to always normalise all tracks to 0.00 dB. For BIAB users who read this and don't know what 'normalise' means, the term refers to scaling a waveform (i.e. sound) so that its highest peak reaches 0.00 dB. Most peaks in the wave will be noticeably less than 0.00 dB. Normalising does not change sound integrity if it stays under 0.00 dB; in most cases, it simply raises the volume of the sound.
Then I read somewhere that it's always best to leave a little bit of audio headroom so that if a track has effects added to it, the effect processor has audio 'space' to work in so that it can maintain the integrity of the sound while adding, and after adding, the effect. In a number of articles, I came across the minimum recommended normalising value of -0.3dB and so I started using that.
These days, I normalise to -3.0 dB. I chose this value randomly after watching a friend mixing a song he had composed -- he is an audio engineer at a nationwide radio station and I noticed that he never normalised to 0.00 dB and always had substantial headroom above (and below) the highest peaks in the audio waveform. Since he is a professional in this field, I took his lesson on-board.
Audio that comes from BIAB mostly needs to be normalised. Wave volumes (that is, 'peak heights') are set by PG Music in a style such that the mixer will always show '90'. This means that some audio, when transferred to a DAW, will be noticeably quieter than other audio. To make it easier to work with these varying-volume audio stems, I always like to increase the height of the wave as it makes both editing and mixing that wave much easier. I'm happy working with -3.0 dB normalisation these days. It gives me a good clarity of sound.
Hi Experts, Just to continue getting my money's worth in the PG forums this holiday period,and further develop some audio skills...
Is the use of audio Normalisation routine at any point in the mixing>mastering process?
I've been routinely normalising all my audio tracks relative to 0dB up to now,and while it doesn't appear to have degraded any work,I'm just wondering if the more experienced community use this technique?
If not,when and where is the best time to use this?
Cheers,
Neil C Warrington UK
Good question. So.... yeah I tend to use it on everything as my LAST step. What it does is pretty simply. You select the level. As most have said they choose 0dB as the reference level. So, normalization looks at the file you are wanting to normalize and it finds the highest peak in the song. It moves that peak to 0dB. It amplifies everything else by the same amount. Nothing is amplified more than anything else, like would happen in a compression level to 0dB for example.
As I understand it, this is how it works. It's never given me any issues. They recommend -3dB for MP3. and Waves can go to 0dB..... BUT.... if you plan to have a mastering house master your song, they normally want around -6dB so they have room to work without squashing anything.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
I use normalisation totally differently. When I pull the tracks into my daw (usually Reaper) I normalise all the tracks to -10db to -15db depending largely on the number of tracks. With all tracks playing I then like to be about -6db or less. I have a quick listen . I might renormalise (usually drums and bass) to put them up a couple of dB to have them better in the mix. I then do the mixing. At the end of the mixing process I like to have about -4db to -6db or less for headroom for the “mastering”. The final stage in the mastering chain has a limiter which I use to lift the track to -14 LUFS with a true peak of -1db. This way the songs all come out about the same level, reasonable balanced and ready for use.
In nearly all cases if I pull them into Audacity the songs are at -1db a different way to arrive at the same result.
I often use MP3 files to use when performing I put these through MP3Gain which in a sense renormalises again.
All seems like extra work but IMHO it in fact saves time.
Tony
Last edited by Teunis; 12/30/1812:18 PM.
HP i7-4770 16GB 1TB SSD, Win 10 Home, Focusrite 2i2 3rd Gen, Launchkey 61, Maton CW80, Telecaster, Ovation Elite TX, Yamaha Pacifica 612 BB 2022(912) RB 2022(2), CakeWalk, Reaper 6, Audacity, Melodyne 5 Editor, Izotope Music Production Suite 4.1
I never use the Normalize function anymore. In Studio One there is a way to raise the track level gain by just selecting the event and dragging it up and down. This simply adjusts the volume level of the track without changing the dynamics of the track. It also does not change the Volume fader either. I like to get it around -12db per track and no more than -6db. I always leave headroom for when it is ready to master. Studio One also has a built in plugin called Mixtool that does this to the track as well as phase.
Most DAWs have a gain level knob of some sort for doing this.
Brian
BIAB 2026 Ultrapack- Fender Studio Pro 8, Windows 11, Mac Mini M4 with Logic Pro 11, Melodyne Studio, Luna Pro
Superb range of suggestions,many thanks everyone...and anyone else who wishes to throw in their Two Bob's worth..
I'm quite suspicious now that a problem piece of work I'm dealing with at the moment,also mentioned in this forum(which Brian also offered up some suggestions towards)may be due to the fact that all the guitar stems have been normalised relative to 0dB and that once mixed down,alongside the use of AudioSnap in Cakewalk,may be the cause of the issue.
I've never even considered normalising to a value other than 0dB,so this will definitely on the "To Try" list next time
Not a negative commentary on Cakewalk by the way,which must qualify as freebie of the year,merely my possible erroneous usage of AudioSnap.
Here's to Build 611 taking us to VST nirvana...
Thanks Guys!
Neil Cummins Warrington UK
Dell Inspiron 5748 iPad Mini. iRig HD2. BIAB,RB 2019,Cakewalk,Auria Pro,Cubasis,Garageband,Sampletank. Lots of VST,DXi and FabFilter Pro Bundle. Amplitube,BIAS FX. Behringer MS20 Monitors. Several guitars. Always trying to leave the audience wanting less.
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean