|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
After a few frustrating days, it seems that my EMU 1820M s/c has died. It came on slowly, brief pauses in the sound output, graduating to dropouts and left channel static, then to become complete static. Our own Mac (also a moderator on: http://www.productionforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10979) provided great help. On his nudging and suggestion, I removed and replaced the computer's power supply unit (PSU), which ruled out the PSU as the problem. Looking into the breakout box (Audiodock is EMU's term) I discovered two capacitors that have the tell-tale bulge on the end (which indicates imminent or actual failure). http://www.productionforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10846Since a replacement unit likely costs more than my card is worth (and I can't actually get the exact replacement), and my location rules out easy access to electronics repair shops, I've concluded that a new unit is in order. One suggestion on that website was: http://www.focusrite.com/products/firewire_interfaces/saffire_pro_24_dsp/It's probably pricey, but definitely looks like it would be in the same category as my EMU (I'm a bit gun-shy of Creative Lab products - my first soundcard was a Creative Extigy, and external USB unit that had buggy software - is this common with them?). Does anyone have hands on experience or knowledge with this Focusrite model? Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
OK, I now realize that this soundcard is too new to have many (if any) users - I believe it was announced in June of this year.
But it sure has nice features.
Last edited by Glenn Kolot; 11/09/09 12:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Well that's sort of asking for someones endorsement of a Ferrari. Doesn't really need one. It's Focusrite!
I will highly endorse the MAudio Delta 1010 though. Don't think you'll find anything better for the money>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Quote:
Well that's sort of asking for someones endorsement of a Ferrari. Doesn't really need one. It's Focusrite!
I will highly endorse the MAudio Delta 1010 though. Don't think you'll find anything better for the money>
Well, I don't know anything about Focusrite - whether they are top notch, mediocre, or just plain expensive.
What is their track record in terms of reliability? And customer support? I had my EMU 1820M for not quite a year, and it was announced it would be discontinued. Three years later, I need a component (there are two cards that go into the computer, and a standalone box that is in trouble), and I'm out of luck.
Yes, I've heard of the 1010. Several on this forum use M-Audio.
Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Glen, People are getting the Saffire for around $200. I haven't heard bad things about them on other forums. Their mic pre-amps are quite nice but I don't know if that makes it into the Saffire product or not. Try asking your question at a forum where there is a broader view of home recording than here at PG - perhaps try www.gearslutz.com, www.kvraudio.com , etc. You won't find the general 'niceness' of people on those forums that you do here, but they have a different perspective on what home recording is all about that might help you weed out choices. If I recall, you mostly record keyboard tracks with direct outs from your digital piano - correct? If so, you may not need a soundcard with mic pre-amps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,167
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,167 |
The 1010lt does play nice in PGProducts, especially RB and PT where you can get full use of all the ports (at the same time).
It is convenient in that you can hook a lot up to it and just select the ports you want to use in the program.
The convertors are older, but still produce nicely, especially in 24 bit
I own two of them, both over four years old and neither has EVER given me an issue
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,693
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,693 |
That's too bad, Glenn. I've had my 1820M for about 3 years now with no problems at all. If mine died I would look at EMU again. Every product will have problems eventually, your's simply happened sooner than most, I guess. Since you're about to chuck it anyway, I would look for a repair shop that can replace those caps if possible. What have you got to lose as long as the repair price isn't too high? It's not that big a unit, maybe you can make a deal with Mac and send it to him? I bet he could fix it if he's willing.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193 |
Glenn,
Would you please detail for us exactly what your recording requirements are? I can't make a suggestion based on what I think you're doing. Also, how much are you willing to spend and what do you want as far as inputs. Finally, what kind of interface are you looking for, Internal, USB, Firewire, or something else.
Thanks,
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
rockstar_not: Yes, I have no need for microphone inputs (I can't sing, and don't have an acoustic piano in part because they are a nightmare to record). But it seems that the more expensive cards have mic inputs. rharv: I've become so used to the onscreen mixer of the 1820M, that I'm looking for something similar - the Focusrite uses the same concept. jazzmammal: Well, mine is four years old, and it worked very well for almost four years - hope this isn't a prediction of things to come for you. The 1820M is in a shop right now, and hopefully they know what they are doing. It was kinda funny - I mentioned that there were three other components (I had disassembled it to find the capacitors that potentially had problems), and the guy asked me how he was going to test it. I smiled and said, that he really didn't want to test it because: (1) there are two cards to install into a computer, (2) software has to be installed and the serial number registered, (3) setup can take at least a couple of hours, and (4) there is a steep learning curve in just setting it up. "OK, he said, then I'll just replace the caps". Righto. If you have trouble with your's, check into: http://www.productionforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=10846I'll report back on success or lack of it. Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193 |
Glenn,
What keyboard are you using again? If I recall, it's a Roland, but I don't recall which one.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Quote:
Glenn,
Would you please detail for us exactly what your recording requirements are? I can't make a suggestion based on what I think you're doing. Also, how much are you willing to spend and what do you want as far as inputs. Finally, what kind of interface are you looking for, Internal, USB, Firewire, or something else.
Thanks,
Gary
Gary:
Good questions. My needs are actually quite simple:
1. Audio IN/OUT - when I play the piano, Pianoteq generates the sound. I use only one instrument, so don't require multiple INS/OUTS.
2. Midi IN/OUT - for same reasons as above. The piano's midi signal triggers Pianoteq to generate piano sounds.
3. Stable ASIO operation (requires good drivers). Many otherwise good cards don't meet this.
4. Headphone out with volume control.
5. Good AD/DA converters.
6. Would like to have onscreen mixer.
7. Would like PCI - my computer is four years old and isn't PCIe, and I'm not in a hurry to change it.
All of the above were very well provided by the 1820M - which will hopefully be operational by Friday. Although, I'm not counting on it.
My piano is a (polished mahogany) Roland KR-7 http://www.roland.com/products/en/KR-7/index.html
Nice action, good touch. Isn't noticeably different from a good grand (at least to me).
As I've noted before, the piano and computer are in separate rooms (back to back on a common wall). I've run all the cables through the wall and they are not long - typically two metres in length.
The EMU was in the $500 plus range - as I recall, the exchange rate then was about $0.66 CAD = $1.00 US). Today it's about 0.97CAD = $1.00 US. I'm not afraid to lay out a similar sum today, and I'm not going to sacrifice for a few $$.
Firewire would be OK (better than USB?), but it seems that to enable the required throughput, an internal (PCI) would serve better. Besides I have two hole in the back of my computer where the 1820M was (it filled two slots, although one didn't connect directly to the MOBO - it connected to the 1010 card which was in a slot).
Hope that covers everything.
Glenn
PS - they've just released Pianoteq 3.5. Comes in two versions, Standard and Pro. I was part of the beta testing team for the new Pro version, and received a full Pro version no cost to me. It's quite interesting - there are 22 parameters that can be adjusted for each of the 88 notes. Actually this is a bit overwhelming, but can be useful if one likes to re-voice various notes of the piano. Much improved sound engine from version 3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193 |
Glenn, As I'm reading this, I need to clarify a few questions. First, are you exclusively using Pianoteq? The reason I ask is because that is a program on your computer. The sounds it generates are being generated internally to your computer, and can be played back by any sound card. Also, they can be rendered as a wave file without use of any sound card, except to play them back. In fact, the following song was recorded using the Pianoteq demo, and rendered directly to my desktop. It was played back on two different sound cards, and sounded the same. I DID NOT use a sound card to record this, it was a direct render from a MIDI file. It would be possible to record your playing as a midi file, and then do the same thing. http://www.catsmeowcafe.com/Music/RootbeerRag.wmaRootbeer Rag. Sounds like Billy Joel playing it to me. About 5.7MB. Since you can record this either as a VSTi or a Stand Alone application, any application that is a VSTi host would allow you to play it. Then, you could configure that application to save it internally as a wave file. What that means is that you can play into the application; Real Band, Sonar, whatever; and record the track as audio, again, without the need of a sound card. This song, Kitten on the Keys (Zez Confrey, played by Sue Kellerman) was recorded using Pianoteq as a VSTi inside of Sonar. www.catsmeowcafe.com/Music/Kitten.wmaIf you are also recording the sounds of the Roland, then that makes a difference, because you want the sound of the Roland added to the mix. I'm not sure why you spent $500 on a sound card. From what you're telling me, you didn't need to. Unless I'm missing something, I would recommend the old faithful M-Audio 2496, which has an unbalanced stereo in, an unbalanced stereo out, S/PDIF ins and out, and MIDI in and out. Everything you're telling me says you'll be happy with it. It even has a mixer control panel on screen. Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Quote:
Glenn,
As I'm reading this, I need to clarify a few questions.
First, are you exclusively using Pianoteq? The reason I ask is because that is a program on your computer. The sounds it generates are being generated internally to your computer, and can be played back by any sound card. Also, they can be rendered as a wave file without use of any sound card, except to play them back.
In fact, the following song was recorded using the Pianoteq demo, and rendered directly to my desktop. It was played back on two different sound cards, and sounded the same. I DID NOT use a sound card to record this, it was a direct render from a MIDI file. It would be possible to record your playing as a midi file, and then do the same thing.
http://www.catsmeowcafe.com/Music/RootbeerRag.wma
Rootbeer Rag. Sounds like Billy Joel playing it to me. About 5.7MB.
Since you can record this either as a VSTi or a Stand Alone application, any application that is a VSTi host would allow you to play it. Then, you could configure that application to save it internally as a wave file. What that means is that you can play into the application; Real Band, Sonar, whatever; and record the track as audio, again, without the need of a sound card.
This song, Kitten on the Keys (Zez Confrey, played by Sue Kellerman) was recorded using Pianoteq as a VSTi inside of Sonar.
www.catsmeowcafe.com/Music/Kitten.wma
If you are also recording the sounds of the Roland, then that makes a difference, because you want the sound of the Roland added to the mix.
I'm not sure why you spent $500 on a sound card. From what you're telling me, you didn't need to.
Unless I'm missing something, I would recommend the old faithful M-Audio 2496, which has an unbalanced stereo in, an unbalanced stereo out, S/PDIF ins and out, and MIDI in and out. Everything you're telling me says you'll be happy with it. It even has a mixer control panel on screen.
Gary
Well Gary, you've made some interesting points:
1. I don't use the onboard piano sound of my Roland anymore.
2. Don't know why I had missed that rendering a midi to wave with Pianoteq didn't need the soundcard (rendering isn't done in real time - it takes about half the time as does playing in real time - it's just generating a wave file, so the S/C isn't being used). PT uses the midi commands to supply the piano sounds and obviously doesn't go through the S/C. At one time I played the midi file in real time in PT and recorded the sound with Goldwave, but that's too time consuming. The one advantage of doing this is that I can use the real time effects of the EMU (usually just reverb which is quite a bit more sophisticated than the reverb on PT).
3. How I edit a midi file is by playing it in Pianoteq (to get the sound), and midi editing in Powertracks. All I really need is something that will give half decent sound while I'm listening/editing. You're right - it doesn't require an expensive S/C.
You are correct, the 2496 would probably work for me. Now if I can just find one (I'll check the local Long and McQuade - I did see at least one M-Audio box there today).
Thanks for straightening me out. I needed it.
Just one more question - does the 2496 have a headphone out with volume control?
And again thanks to Mac for his assistance on the Multimedia Production Forums with diagnosing the EMU.
Glenn
Last edited by Glenn Kolot; 11/11/09 12:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Glen, the 2496 does not, nor do any of the other PCI audio cards from M-Audio cards, have a headphone out. These cards are almost always used by folks that have them connected to a mixer of some kind.
PCI cards with headphone outs are somewhat rare from what I recall years ago doing the same research you are now doing. Creative Live series cards had them - along with the Platinum versions that had a great front-panel 'Live Drive' I/O bay with a headphone jack and volume knob for the headphones.
Your needs would likely be better suited by purchase of the same EMU card, or a Creative card or going outboard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Scott: That's what I thought - no headphone out on the 2496. I e-mailed EMU about replacing the Audiodock (external box that has the phone connection), and this is their reply: > At this point, our webstore has not been fully setup yet or updated so > we cannot assure if there will be enough stock of an 1820M Audiodock. > Probably, you can try looking something like this in Ebay in the > meantime. When I checked their online store, it appears that they don't have any 1820M Audiodocks - just the 1820. And the one online review of the 1820 doesn't inspire me to stay with EMU: http://us.store.creative.com/EMU-1820-Di...rsReviewsWidgetSo I guess I'll be looking for a while if the repair doesn't work. Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193 |
Glenn, As Scott said, the M-Audio does not have a headphone output. If you aren't running dedicated monitors, try this instead. Hook the Analog output of the sound card to the input of this, and then you can have up to four people listen with headphones at the same time. http://www.long-mcquade.com/products/1233/You can also find more expensive solutions. Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Gary:
We were posting at the same time. I could have a look at that box. Yesterday at Long and McQuade, I spent 3/4 hour looking at boxes of audio devices, and never had one salesperson offer any help. Two days before, the "digital piano expert" didn't know that the Roland V-Piano uses physical modeling not samples. Rarely does one find such incompetence as exists at this Long and McQuade outlet. I've been in other LM stores (Edmonton, Calgary) that were great, but this one is mostly staffed by duds.
Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Glen, I just found the Saffire pro ad in the latest issue of Mix. One thing that it has that has me VERY interested is room simulation capability on the headphone outputs.
I have access to extremely flat frequency response in-ear monitors and the big downfall of mixing with in-ear monitors as with any headphones is that you get an exaggerated sense of panning due to the lack of speaker bleed.
This product is aimed at persons mixing with headphones. I may convince my workplace to pick one of these up.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 19
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 19 |
I still use an 0404 and I love it however it has no headphone out. But what about the 1616 with the MicroDock breakout box? Would that suit your needs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,296 |
Scott:
Now if I can just convince ME to spend the money. What was the price in US$?
Glenn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,317
Posts777,663
Members39,617
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean