Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Mac, Quote:
Problem with tab is that it ignores rhythm figures.
This means that you would have to also be able to HEAR a performance of the song, typically through use of a recording, to obtain that necessary information.
For example, if I were to mail you a Tab of a newly written piece with no accompanying recording from which to get and understand WHEN and HOW LONG to play each of the events along the tab timeline, you might not be able to decipher that information.
It depends on the TAB program. I mostly use GuitarPro 4. The TAB notes have stems and values just like standard notation. Also available are all of the musical symbols used in standard notation. Any info about the piece that can be put in standard notation can be used, so it isn’t necessary to hear the piece any more than it would be for std. notation.
By default, it creates stanard notation as you enter your tab, just enter your key signature so the notes are properly shown as sharps or flats. Shucks, you can even turn off the TAB and have just std. notation and print that off to give to your “non-fretted” friends for their instruments. Or turn off the std. notation.
You can also set the number of lines to fit your fretted instrument of choice, (guitar, bass, banjo, mandolin, etc.) You can even use custom tunings and it will properly take that into account when it converts these tabbed notes to std, notation and when naming chords. It will also identify the note name of each string at the beginning of the piece if it’s anything other than std. tuning. Capos can also be taken into account.
It also includes chord diagrams above the tab whenever you want so those note stacks don’t look so confusing. And you can enter custom chords and it will give you several suggestions for a correct name for the chord, or you can enter your own.
Even a much simpler program like TablEdit has many of these same features.
Old TAB programs were archaic and limited, but the new ones have all of the features of std. notation with the added benefit of showing exactly which note to play. Because of the nature of fretted instruments, any note can be played in numerous positions on the neck, all in the same octave. The note looks same in std. notation, but TAB tells you exactly which one to use.
If you are using the above programs instead of a printed copy, you also have the option of MIDI playback of the piece and you can import and export MIDI. GP4 will import MIDI from BIAB and enter 5 or 6 different tracks, one for each instrument. Multiple tracks is a feature I forgot to mention.
While I wish my sight reading skills were up to par with yours and most of the others on here, … they aren’t. But with a good TAB program, they don’t have to be. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Cornet Nev
|
01/22/11 04:14 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
rharv
|
01/22/11 04:55 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
John Conley
|
01/22/11 06:07 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/22/11 06:19 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
furry
|
01/22/11 06:46 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Lawrie
|
01/22/11 10:17 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
DennisD
|
01/22/11 11:40 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mac
|
01/23/11 12:37 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/23/11 01:37 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
MarioD
|
01/23/11 01:55 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Shastastan
|
01/23/11 02:43 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
WienSam
|
01/23/11 05:14 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Lawrie
|
01/23/11 10:34 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Pierre Julien
|
01/23/11 12:19 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
silvertones
|
01/23/11 01:07 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Pierre Julien
|
01/23/11 01:21 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
gibson
|
01/23/11 02:54 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/23/11 10:22 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mac
|
01/24/11 02:37 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/24/11 05:31 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mike sings
|
01/24/11 10:28 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mac
|
01/24/11 12:56 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
jazzsax
|
01/24/11 06:47 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/24/11 07:01 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mac
|
01/25/11 01:04 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/25/11 02:45 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Mike sings
|
01/25/11 03:16 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
John Conley
|
01/25/11 03:38 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Danny C.
|
01/25/11 03:54 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
jford
|
01/25/11 06:04 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Curmudgeon
|
01/25/11 06:34 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/26/11 12:13 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Matt Finley
|
01/26/11 12:52 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Pierre Julien
|
01/26/11 10:43 AM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/26/11 03:22 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
John Conley
|
01/26/11 04:05 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/26/11 11:25 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Cornet Nev
|
01/28/11 10:18 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/29/11 01:42 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/29/11 01:44 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
MartinB
|
01/29/11 02:16 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
rharv
|
01/29/11 02:41 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/30/11 02:36 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
WillM
|
01/31/11 08:35 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
02/01/11 02:43 PM
|
Re: Read the dots, or play by ear?
|
Notes Norton
|
01/24/11 02:47 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,199
Posts776,252
Members39,596
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|