Chord changes cannot be copywritten so the idea that someone could own the I IV V chord progression is out. There are tons of songs based on those changes but every one of them does have a discrete melody and instrumental hooks like the guitar lick in Satisfaction for example.

Now fast forward to the last 20 years or so. Everybody over 50 has been complaining about how much the majority of modern music is all rhythm feel with minimal melody and few chord changes. How many times have we all said that it all sounds the same or close to it? That a trained monkey could come up with some of these so called songs? One bass groove droning over a loud annoying drum beat with even more annoying kindergarden level "lyrics". I have often thought that now if someone thinks someone else stole their song, how could they argue it? The only thing to argue about is the overall feel based on the rhythm tracks.

This case obviously went that way. I'm thinking (hoping?) that this will push songwriters back to the old days when song structure and melody really mattered.

Bob

Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.