If you'd like forum members to double-check a procedure could you please outline, step by step, what you are doing so that we can repeat your process and see what happens. We can then try and find solutions for you.
It is pretty obvious that almost no one uses the midi based stylemaker any more. It is quite easy to check. No 1. Start a new song then start a new style. Program a bass riff to play ONLY on the interval of "up a 2nd". Enter chords into song, key of C, chords are C,D,E,F,G,A,B,C. Programmed riff will play on all progressions EXCEPT E to F and B to C. No 2. As above BUT program a riff to play ONLY on the interval of "up a 5th". If the song key is C,Db,A,Bb,B then it will work. If the song key is E,F,Gb,G,Ab,D#,F#,G#. then it will NOT work as "up a 5th" but it WILL work if programmed as "Down a 4th"
I have previously posted to support that stylemaker will NOT play a correct scale in all keys. They have verified that this is a fault in programming.
I seriously doubt stylemakers ability to work at all.
Thank you for the extra information it helps a lot.
I'm not an expert at using Stylemaker but when I tried the above, I couldn't replicate your problem; it worked for me. Do you use BIAB 2017? (I'm using the current version with the latest build.)
While this might be due to my limited understanding, one thing I noticed when playing around in Stylemaker is that it doesn't seem possible to predict what octave a bar's first bass note will play in when a song/style is generated.
For example.... Using the style I created, with the bass static on the root note, I entered the progression C-Dm-G-Am-Em-F-C. When I generated the song the first time...
the bass began on C (as expected) and, from there, followed the below pattern.
rose a 2nd to D
**rose a 4th to G
**jumped down a 7th to A
rose a 5th to E
climbed a 2nd to F
**dropped a 4th to C
The next time I generated the song...
the bass started on C
rose a 2nd to D
**dropped a 5th to G
**rose a 2nd to A
rose a 5th to E
climbed a 2nd to F
**climbed a 5th to C
I've used ** to show where bass changes into different octaves occurred between the two generations.
Because it doesn't seem possible to know whether a bass note will rise or fall when chords change, my present opinion is that it's probably necessary to consider both options when using Stylemaker. (I anticipate that this is why both those options are present.)
Thus, when one sets up a bass riff (say), it's necessary to preempt the above two up/down possibilities that may occur when the computer generates the song.
As an example, if I use a riff that I want to play when the bass (or chord, presumably) rises a 5th, I also need to set up a partner (or complimentary) riff that will be used in the event that the bass drops a 4th rather than rises a 5th (see image below).
Computers can only do what they are told and by not considering both up/down options when a chord changes,(e.g. the bass goes down a 4th rather than up a 5th and there are no instructions regarding what to do in this event), instrumental silence could occur periodically.
Also, here's something else to try... I found it useful to set the "Relative Weight" to 9 rather than the default 5. (This forces the pattern to play always when the programming requirement is met.)
Hope these thoughts make sense and provide some thoughts that might help. As already mentioned, please keep in mind that I'm not and expert with Stylemaker. Let us know how you go. I'm very interested.
There does not appear to be any progress on my earlier notification to support. I am using the latest update, and have done so since 2010 as well as the new version every year.
I will be more explicit so you can see what I mean.
Start new song, start new style (Test1) In stylemaker bass section 8 beat program C (2 beats) E (3rd above 2 beats), same next bar. save with no masks and weight of 5
that is only one 8 beat riff.
4 beat program beat 1 C, beat 2 B, beat 3 D, beat 4 Db. Save with a weight of 9 (always) and next inteval "up 2nd"
in the song set key to C set 1 chord for each bar (C, D, E, F, G, A, B, C) that is 8 bars
Open notation, set to bass and generate.
As you can see, when it does not recognise a 2nd it defaults to the first 2 notes of the 8 beat riff (this is the default) and if you set a different Key that it happens at different points.
Thanks for the second lot of extra information. That was exactly what I was after. Now I can replicate your process and reproduce your problem.
I also found that the F chord produces F natural on the last beat rather than the required F#/Gb.
I've discovered that if one removes the 8 beat pattern so that only the 4 beat pattern remains, it generates properly (because there is no other alternative). The problem seems to be linked to intervals other than major intervals (i.e. F to E and B to C are minor seconds).
For example, if you enter the chords C, Dm, Em, F, G, Am, Bm7b5, C (1 per bar) and then generate, it's possible to see that the pattern is no longer considered, even though the weighting is set to 9 and the chord type is set to 'any'.
The behaviour is definitely inconsistent.
I help test pre-release updates so I will pass this information on to PG Music and include a link to this thread.
Quote:
For those who know Stylemaker and would like to have a look at the style Erol is referring to, the SGU and STY files can be downloaded using the following link.
Thanks Noel, I am an old school jazz piano player and have been VERY frustrated in trying to generate realistic double bass lines, the problems first showed with realtrack jazz bass lines .....very busy with unsuitable rhythms and intervals .... 5th or 3rd played on chord change ..... for my style of playing .... and I can not correct realtracks.
So I thought I will use midi bass lines that I can correct anything I consider is not appropriate.
I do like BIAB, and I do know they have their hands full, but BIAB needs to be musically correct above all else.
I totally understand and I agree with you. It should work.
I've now passed the information on to BIAB programmers (these include Dr Gannon). I have provided the SGU and STY files as well as graphics that show the problem generations (see the images below; in Image 1, the two 4 beat patterns are the same - one is set to 'up a 2nd' and the other is set to 'down a 7th').
If you have anything that you'd like to add, please either make a post here (I'll pass on your comments) or write to Support and include the URL of this thread so that they can read the discussion in detail.
Thank you for inspiring me to get involved more heavily with Stylemaker. I've only ever hiked around the edges of it in the past.
Now, after trying to solve your problem, I have a much more insightful understanding of what it does. It's a very impressive aspect of BIAB! With the masks for controlling riffs, etc., with good source MIDI, and with good MIDI software such Kontakt this would be an amazing tool. I'm going to be playing around with it quite a bit more.
You are right Noel, Stylemaker IS the most impressive aspect of BIAB. Lets hope it can be at a workable level soon.
As good as many bass players are ... they rightly object to the piano player dictating how and what they should play at certain parts of a song, and knowing what the bass will play is vital to the piano. As much as I like live bass players ... it would remove a lot of stress to have midi bass/drums at many gigs.
As much as I like live bass players ... it would remove a lot of stress to have midi bass/drums at many gigs.
Haha, I had to laugh at this one. I would add the word "good" in there as in I like good live bass players... I'm in LA, most are very good but man, nothing like a weak bass player to ruin a gig. I've been playing LH bass on B3 for 40 years and I've been told by several drummers that I'm better than a lot of bass players they've played with. My problem is I'm not JoeyD, I can hold down the bass great but it also restricts my solos (Jimmy Smith said the bass is the boss) so I appreciate a good bassist. If the bass/drums are cookin, I get very energetic with two handed solos but I can't do that if I'm playing bass.
As far as the Stylemaker, you're right. On the forum at least it gets no love at all, I doubt if more than one or two posters use it. I've never used it so I can't comment on your problem.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!
Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean