To me, Eddie's original post isn't so much about changing to BIAB from RB but questioning why there is such a disparity 90% BIAB to 10% RB posts disparity between the programs and what he may be missing by his exclusive use of RB.

Eddie is missing the speed increase of a BIAB generation versus a RB generation of a chord chart.
Eddie is missing the advantages in auditioning styles and realtracks that the BIAB Stylepicker has over the RB Stylepicker
Eddie is missing the speed increase of a BIAB regeneration of chord chart changes over a RB total song regeneration in RB.
Eddie is missing many tools easily accessible in BIAB that are not available on the RB chord chart page or else they are hidden in submenus.

That Eddie lost the original version of a BIAB song he wanted to preserve because opening the BIAB file in RB caused the tracks to regenerate can only happen in RB or Power tracks if it will open a BIAB. I don't have PT and don't know if it will or not. The point is, BIAB tracks must be exported as midi or audio in order for any other DAW other than RB for those tracks to regenerate. Opening any BIAB rendered midi or audio file in RB rather than opening the sgu will preserve the original sound that was rendered from BIAB.

Reading Eddie's comments about his personal workflow indicates to me that he will likely find that starting his projects in BIAB will be worth his time to explore without much of a learning curve because he can use his same process to enter chords in the chord chart that he does in RB.





Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 02/03/18 06:12 AM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.