With all this talk about modern songs and processing on vocals I thought it may be interesting if we posted some of our isolated vocals and talked a little about what we did to achieve them. In this way we can all comment, compare and learn!
I'll start!
Here is an isolated vocal from my album in progress with Lebz.
I did the following: 1. Recorded using my Scarlett solo and Rhode NT3 condenser mic. 2. Fixed timing and tuning errors using Melodyne 3. Manually reduced breath noises on lead vocal. 4. Ran the lead vocal through Izotope Nectar (Folk solo enhancement preset) 5. Added a little delay to the already processed vocal. 6. Added a bit of "Old Rotary" to the already processed vocal 7. Did some parallel processing by mixing the processed vocal in with the raw (tuned) lead vocal. 8. The harmonies I didn't do anything except fix timing and tuning with Melodyne and remove all the breath noises.
Thanks for the comments. Herb YOU are the one who put me onto Melodyne and quite literally changed my life. I am forever in your debt!!
Dave "Old Rotary" is a kind of old speaker type effect. Floyd was saying that he thought that Ed Sheeran's vocal had it on. I just used a free trial plugin. I may purchase it.. Google PSP Lotary and you should find it if your are interested... Will post the final mix shortly...
Interesting example Joanne...enjoyed reading what you did.
John Lennon asked the Beatles' engineer if he (John) could hang by his feet in the studio and twirl around - really. The notion was to pass by the mic on each revolution while singing (a vocal effect idea he had for Tomorrow Never Knows). The engineer, Geoff Emerick, more sensibly tried a Leslie rotary speaker (typically heard with a Hammond B3 organ) and thus the "rotary" vocal sound began.
FIFTY+ YEARS ago. Modern? Ha! What goes around comes around! Yeah...awful pun.
Bud
PS Geoff Emerick's book offers tremendous insight into their studio creativity. The Beatles would tell George Martin what they wanted but Geoff had to figure out how to do it.
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
John Lennon asked the Beatles' engineer if he (John) could hang by his feet and twirl around. The notion was to pass by the mic on each revolution while singing (for a vocal effect idea he had for Tomorrow Never Knows). The engineer, Geoff Emerick, more sensibly tried a Leslie rotary speaker (typically heard with a Hammond B3 organ) and thus the "rotary" sound began.
I'm missing something here. Specifically the part I'm not clear about is how did Geoff mount John to the rotary speaker?
Quote:
FIFTY+ YEARS ago. Modern? Ha! What goes around comes around! Yeah...awful pun.
I actually like a good pun. Well played.
Quote:
PS Geoff Emerick's book offers tremendous insight into their studio creativity. The Beatles would tell George Martin what they wanted but Geoff had to figure out how to do it.
I hadn't heard of this. Very cool. They had some WILD productions. Thanks for the info!
Duct tape? Is that the answer to the rotary speaker mount?
Last edited by HearToLearn; 05/18/1810:45 AM.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
....Duct tape? Is that the answer to the rotary speaker mount?
Yeah, unfortunately Gorilla Tape had not made the scene.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
On your example, I suspect removing the breathing may take a little out of it. It's well done and will likely fit a mix well; they have their own space/sound. Breathing adds a little 'intimacy' which (in my head) I hear as the direction the song is heading.
Quote:
And....lets hear yours....
^ It's interesting because when I started to follow your lead and create a vocal only track it was difficult to try to not hear the other parts (that I knew existed) in my head as I listened. It will also be interesting to see how your actual full song fits into my 'preconceived impression' of the rest of the tracks after hearing the vocals.
Last edited by rharv; 05/18/1812:46 PM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
I find Nectar 2’s Breath Controller an excellent tool. You can set the sensitivity to completely remove the breaths or to just reduce them to keep the intimacy. Just turn it on, set the sensitivity and forget about it. It is very, very accurate.
If appropriate to the thread I’ll post a demo on how effective it is using one of Janice’s vocals.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
Interesting stuff coming out of this thread, especially all the history about the rotary speaker. If Floyd had not mentioned it in the Ed Sheeran thread I would never have known a thing about it. I still need to decide if it is worth purchasing or not
Bud, yes please post a sample of the breath control stuff from Nectar. I do tend to spend quite a bit of time manually reducing breath noises so it would be nice to short cut my work flow.
Scott: looking forward to hearing yours.
Mario, thanks for the link to the rotary speaker plug. I will check it out.
I will post the final mix of the song once this thread has run a bit (give others a chance to listen to the vocal only first).
Here are two short clips that will demonstrate the Izotope Breath Controller that is packaged with Nectar 2.
It's a very simple plug-in to remove or partially remove breath intake sounds. Basically just turn it on and set the sensitivity. For this demonstration I used more "removal" than I typically would. I like to leave a bit...we are humans after all
If interested, the fx are essentially what I've used for nearly 30 years on her vocals - mostly irrespective of genre. A little compression, a little reverb and two very slight eq tweaks. Now that I'm digital I add a little tape saturation. Some times on a double track I'll add a little delay to one track. That's it. I never do any vocal edits of any type. We typically do two takes and about 75% of the time she will prefer the first one. We only record about once every three weeks or so and it's typically a 20 minute session so I don't profess to be any kind of expert. When she says she's ready to record...she's ready! She will "live with" a song with her bluetooth earpiece around the house until ready. Janice has no interest in vocal editing and I'm not going to be so presumptuous as to try it and assume I can better what she says is a take that she likes I realize that practically everybody nowadays from the best singers to the average edit vocals so I certainly don't think our way is the "right" way to do it - it's just the way we do it.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
That Nectar did a nice job, clean and not intrusive. Gotta love iZotope.
Here's one for fun (hopefully). Verse vocals were doubled in real time (recorded Barry using two takes on separate tracks). This gave us 'almost' the effect we wanted, but he sang in tune with himself too much, as he could hear his first take while he sang his second. So I ran slight tuning on one of them, which gave us more of what we wanted. Of course there is also reverb and EQ involved. Chorus vocals are pretty much just EQ and reverb. Two tracks Barry, one me during choruses. http://masteringmatters.com/stuff2/VoxSolod.mp3
Here's my first song from February Album Writing Month; very simple songs: two tracks, electric piano and 1 vocal track sang improvised.
Playlist on Soundcloud has the full two track song, then the vocal solo'ed with all processing, then the vocal dry.
This was the first song that I recorded using an old Electrovoice SRO RE11 microphone. These are not good mics in general.
As I tried it out, I really didn't care for the midrange bump it seems to have, but it does have a bit of a vintage sound to it. So I just left it.
Processing on the isolated vocal: A mono channel strip plugin that has a high pass filter, compression and some EQ (It's Mackie's mono channel strip plugin that came with Tracktion when Mackie owned Tracktion), on a send I have some pretty wet reverb.
You will have to tell Janice that her vocal has a built in breath removal tool. She sings, and it takes my breath away! Seriously, what great tone! It always helps when you start with something that already sounds good.
Now, that being said, you really do a great job on your processing. Everything is sounding so good to me.
I am curious, and please excuse my ignorance, does the breath removal tool work as well for spoken word/voice-overs as well? I'm guessing so; but thought I would ask if you found that to be the case.
Thanks. Those two examples really showed how well it works.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
1.) I am singing rock and roll so I don't want it to be perfect. I don't cut and paste because to me that destroys the emotion. I have to keep re-recording until I get a take that maintains the emotional build from beginning to end or I don't like it.
2.) I cut out breaths in Audacity before I import to DAW if I am singing rock 'n' roll. If I am not singing rock 'n' roll I don't usually take as many breaths. Rock 'n' Roll can get noisy though.
3.) I am looking for a warm dynamic range of at least 13 and I don't want the vocals to go in to the red zone because that means the dynamics have been stripped. I want them in that green range where the vocal chords are still present and the timbre blends in with other instruments such as acoustic guitar.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!
Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.