|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479 |
The thing that really stands out for me is HOW PROCESSED they are.
Wow, every plugin known to man.
On Hey Jude, all Paul McCartney did was sing.
We've come a long way. Everybody go to the Waves site and get out your credits cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
First thing I noticed was how even the soft passages were with the louder passages. Most of the time, my vocals fade away at the end of the phrase and get lost. Obviously compression, but likely also some judicious fader work.
Second thing I noticed was the EQ. Can't say I know precisely how to "get there", but for modern music, high and clear is the way to go. Third thing, they didn't completely eliminate "breathes". Made for a more natural sound in this genre.
All of that, with other effects tricks, made the vocals stand out cleanly and ride the build of the song.
I can't say for sure, but I wouldn't doubt there is some pitch correction going on here too, in spots. Might be a different effect, but there seems to be a bit of that "sound" here and there. Again, for this style of modern country, to un-blue some of those notes seems perfectly fine. There is plenty of soul remaining.
Nice to be able to have that "guide". I liked the acapella version just fine, actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
That may have been all McCartney did, David. But that's not all George Martin and the engineers did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479 |
Yeah, I realize they used effects at Abbey Road, but very minimal compared to today. I know the kind of effects they are using and that they are using a lot of them--and I know because I think I have most of them. However, to the extent they are using them I can no longer hear a human voice. I hear a robot and that is cool if that is what you like to listen to. I like hearing vocal chords not an overdose of plugins but that is just me. I also know I am in the minority, perhaps, but that is ok. Just a personal observation on a public post. Very interesting post, though, don't get me wrong. I did learn something from it. But for a comparison, here are the effects I like the best. I think this is it. They will be on special at Waves next month. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN1km_3J2us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
I was actually hoping to hear the vocals as they were recorded when I clicked play. Maybe a side-by-side demo of that with the vocal track as it was mixed would have been more instructive, but I doubt that's why they did this.
If you really listen to Johnny Cash's late recordings, there's no doubt they were processed in some ways. Even the early recordings were, way before digital, if in no other way than by the nature of the analog devices available to them.
No human voice with much backing sounds "good" recorded, though I agree this is something of overkill and not what I'd be trying to do with my own particularly ugly and hard to mix vocals. I just think they used good practice. I prefer a delay over a reverb, for example, but when you listen to the full mix, it's not overpowering. They made their choices, though it's not really my favorite way to hear vocals either.
There's some instructive value in that. Ramping up the FX is how you learn what they do. Finding the sweet spot is more subjective. For the most part, I think they succeeded within their genre and for their audience even though I'd rather listen to Johnny Cash.
Last edited by Tangmo; 09/24/18 04:26 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753 |
It's interesting to hear how the lead vocal is accompanied by harmony almost the entire time. Yet, the harmonies are mixed in with the full track to be barely noticeable most of the time. Well, I mean, barely noticeable to the casual listener which is different for for those of us who perform, record and mix.
To me it does sound like the harmonies are hard pitch corrected and the lead vocal is tightly doubled with gentle pitch correction in selective places,... a lot of selective places.
I don't hear a lot of over compression on the vocals but it was likely volume automated, along with good mic technique from a well trained vocalist to keep it in front just enough.
This comparison also helps me hear how the music track has just the right EQ gap for the particular vocalist. That's something I really need to work on. It doesn't sound so much like it was EQ'd to make it fit but more like the proper instrumentation naturally left that space for the vocals. Near the end the vocals and music start to blur a little which increases activity to keep interest. But by then the vocal lines are pretty much embedded in the brain to the extent that the music does not cover them up.
Of course I'm guessing at all of this.
BTW, my opinion of this song; It's a terrible song done very well. A song like this would never be in my set list. Did someone mention this is Modern Country? I would say, it's a pop song about love and booze with a resonator solo. Not enough elements to qualify for Country and overwhelming pop elements. This is the kind of song that gets me to switch radio stations. Oh, I appreciate the professionalism, talent, all that. It's just not for me and I don't really enjoy it. It doesn't get me to sing along.
But, I can learn a lot from it that's for sure.
Does the noise in your head bother me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753 |
According to wikipedia;
"Before the duo's foundation, [Shay] Mooney was a solo artist on T-Pain's Nappy Boy Entertainment label,. . ."
So, no surprise if pitch correction might be in use. At least it's not "Cher-ish". And, I confess, I use it often enough on myself and others I record. The free MAutoPitch from Melda Production.
The article also alludes to the duo being headed for a pretty big career.
Does the noise in your head bother me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,885
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,885 |
Admittedly, these vocals are heavily processed. That is appropriate for the style and genre of where the song lands. It is "radio Pop/Country" - and has to compete with all the other radio Pop/Country out there. It is a "modern" treatment of vocals. That is certainly "not for everybody" and is not appropriate for all types of music. Not many people (certainly on these forums) write or produce music aimed at being "more commercial". The singer-songwriter and old style Country and Rock can get by with far less processing - to remain sounding "vintage"...
But, it doesn't hurt - and might well help - for folks to train their ears to hear what has been done with these vocals to place them where they intend to go (radio, modern ears and earbuds). The use of as much delay as reverb is likely new to some. As mentioned, the level of soft sections to loud sections is important in any recording. The use of harmony through so much of the sing, while again, not necessarily right for all genres, is interesting - also the fact the much of it is a third below the main vocal...
The vocals are clean and crisp, but not with a bunch of jacked-up high EQ (which is a mistake many make) - so they remain "warm" and still cut through the mix - a worthy goal in any vocal recording.
It is nice to have the vocal-only recording for comparison. We got little of that in the past. And "little tricks" learned from studying something like this can translate into something "new" in your own music - and give it a "fresh" sound. If all you ever do is "the same old thing" then your music will remain sounding like "the same old thing".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,042
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,042 |
I think every time I mix a song I try something new on the vocal. That's how you get better at this game I think.
The delay+reverb was new to me until the last time you posted the vocal only tracks a few months back, and it works a treat. Also sidechain compression to control the reverb and delay, I used that for the last couple of songs.
For us doing mostly blues/classic rock type music I keep other effects to a minimum to keep it "real", but I find it very interesting to listen to stuff like this. In particular, as you mentioned, the way they handled the harmonies.
Thanks for posting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,885
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,885 |
Continuing to experiment and continuing to learn are what it's all about.
(your vocals [processing on Chris'} have continued to notch up with each new post)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,017
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 11,017 |
Part of the equation for the song, mix and vocals is the intended audience. The people attending the concerts, buying the gear, following the acts on social media, purchasing the downloads and, most importantly, supporting the advertisers are in high school to early thirties. They are just starting out and building their place in society.
In addition to modern country they listen to hip hop, rap, pop, their parent's music and ours when they have too. It makes sense modern country reflects their musical interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,479 |
To make things even more complicated (or less, as the case may be) I ordered the Waves Maserati Vocal plugin VX1, for 20 dollars with my credit.
It has many of the effects Floyd has been referring to in his columns, but with more subtlety and less brittleness than some other plugins. It is really warm for pop and rock vocals.
I compared it to CLA and Nectar this morning and decided it will be my main front and center Vocal plugin from here on out though I will use the other plugins I have for additional tracks, just mixed down lower in the mix depending on how I want the sound (like The Abbey Road ADT.)
I tend to have as many as six instances of the main vocal alone with different effects and one pushed up higher and the rest as flavor.
Also, I find background vox are different than main vox. In that context Waves CLA Vocals is PERFECT for background because it does give you that modern processed feel, whereas I now prefer Maserati for the main.
Nectar is still cool in its place but it is a little too brittle for me to be up front.
I put another $10 coupon on this forum, so if you decide to go this route you could maybe get this for $20 bucks or so today.
* Be careful googling demos of this plug in on YouTube. Stick to known sites like Waves. Norton just blocked a trojan attack on a simple unsuspicious-looking youtube demo. Crazy world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,823
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,823 |
Yep... it is what it is. And that's the way it's going to be for a very long while in pop music.
Doing what they (Dan + Shay) are doing is relatively easy.
1. Sing the main track relatively close to the melody
2. Use pitch correction software to fix the track
3. Use pitch correction software to create one or more "harmony tracks" by cloning.
4. Edit the notes that don't work with the major 3rd/major 5th harmony to something that does work.
Back in the old days when the Beatles were recording, they would spend sometimes as much as several days working on the vocal doubling track to get it perfect. They didn't have the convenience of digital editing and correction software. Listening to their work in that context makes it even that much more amazing....and that it was done mostly with 4 tracks on tape.... at least in the early days.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 785
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 785 |
Yeah, I realize they used effects at Abbey Road, but very minimal compared to today. I know the kind of effects they are using and that they are using a lot of them--and I know because I think I have most of them. However, to the extent they are using them I can no longer hear a human voice. I hear a robot and that is cool if that is what you like to listen to. I like hearing vocal chords not an overdose of plugins but that is just me. I also know I am in the minority, perhaps, but that is ok. Just a personal observation on a public post. Very interesting post, though, don't get me wrong. I did learn something from it. But for a comparison, here are the effects I like the best. I think this is it. They will be on special at Waves next month. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uN1km_3J2usYep David, I still like to hear the human quality in vocals, not always perfect but, always with feeling. CLiff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,080
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,080 |
My old ears are too long gone for me to make much of a statement regarding what I heard - so now I prove it  I read all the responses before listening and I was expecting some entirely different from what I heard. I anticipated a smashed non-organic feel. What I heard didn't fit that bill. There was an edge of resonance to the vocal that along with the remaining breath intakes made it feel intimate (as in close). Modern pop...hell, I don't know but I think it would sound fine in a typical Americana mix. Grains of salt...actually boatloads and FWIW's galore. Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
That was largely my impression too, Bud. Hell, I'd LOVE to have had the skills, tools, or outside help to massage most of mine into something similar--just, perhaps, not as much.
I'd have especially loved the "outside help". The worst part about mixing my vocals is that I have to listen to my vocals.
*weeping* I just want to hit the d--n notes! Is that so wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,080
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 16,080 |
That was largely my impression too, Bud. Hell, I'd LOVE to have had the skills, tools, or outside help to massage most of mine into something similar--just, perhaps, not as much.
I'd have especially loved the "outside help". The worst part about mixing my vocals is that I have to listen to my vocals.
*weeping* I just want to hit the d--n notes! Is that so wrong? Mercifully I've never even recorded mine But my recording of Janice's vocals has been quite a sonic journey for me from our analog bluegrass days (stage and studio) to today with our more Americana bluesy approach. I don't know if my approach would be considered modern or not but FWIW I'll mention it. - I use Nectar's breath controller to reduce but never eliminate breath intakes. - I never comp vocals and I don't own a pitch editor...nothing against them at all -- just don't need it. - 75% of the time I'll double her vocal track and stack them both dead center. For the top track I have a custom Nectar 2 preset with a little reverb, compression and an EQ setting (that I've used for years). On the bottom is another custom Nectar 2 preset that differs from the above with a little delay, no reverb, different compression and some tape saturation. I mix them about 60%/40% regarding gain. I've always enjoyed pretending I know what the hell I'm doing but folks do seem to like her vocals. And the processing may sound like a lot but there are very, very small doses of the effects. Bud PS Apologies for the off topic ramble...
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,105
Posts800,288
Members40,034
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean