|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31 |
A recent thread on playing live with BIAB was very helpful to me. Many thanks to Matt Finley, Notes Norton, Jim Fogle, and others for sharing their expertise and insights. Before COVID hit, I had played about 20 gigs running my Yoga 920 laptop direct to PA using the headphone output. The sound was excellent, but I had one snap, crackle, or pop too many, so I want to switch to USB. My main objective is to reduce any unexpected/unpleasant noise rather than to maximize sound quality. These will be low-key, low-volume gigs, so I plan to use my new Eon One Compact as a super portable, all-in-one PA. It runs on batteries and has four inputs, including two XLR combo jacks, one mono 1/4” jack, and one 1/8” aux in. Because the entire rig runs on batteries, I'm not concerned about ground loops. Even if I plug in the Eon One, it has two USB ports to power the laptop and/or another device if need be. So now I am trying to decide between using the Audioquest Dragonfly or a USB direct box along the lines of this Mackie. Price is not a consideration. My main concern is keeping the rig ultra-portable and simple, which favors the Dragonfly. On the other hand, if there is a compelling reason to go for something like the Mackie, I will. Both are passive devices. Would love to have some advice from those more experienced in this area. It's a small purchase, but I've really got to stop my habit of buying music-related gizmos that end up gathering dust…!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
I have quite a dustbin myself after over six decades of playing professionally. And that’s not counting the instruments.
About the 1/8” headphone jack, I don’t remember which thread yours was, but I’m willing to bet I said DON’T USE ONE! So, good for you. All you need is one electronic thunderstorm to be convinced.
Now I’ll look up the equipment you just mentioned.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
Well, I just scanned that Dragonfly info. I can’t find anything that says what the output is, only that it is for headphones. I sure hope it isn’t a (you guessed it) 1/8” jack.
And, this is a DAC unit meant for audiophiles. It seems very much unsuited for a live sound application. You are feeding high sample and bit rate music into an amplifier loaded with hiss and noise. Not that there’s anything wrong with such an amp.
A bus powered Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 would do.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
The Mackie looks like a much better fit to me, with XLR out.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31 |
Thanks, Matt. Somehow I guessed I was not the only one with loads of "spare parts" laying about :-)
The Dragonfly output is 1/8 inch.
I thought the noise issues with 1/8 inch outputs would be solved if the signal from the laptop was converted to USB via the Dragonfly, then routed to the 1/8 inch auxiliary in jack on the powered speaker. Is this incorrect?
Do you think there would be a significant sound quality or noise reduction difference having the BIAB signal going into an XLR port (with the Mackie) as opposed to going into the 1/8 inch aux in port (with the Dragonfly)? I could easily switch the guitar to the 1/4” jack and put the BIAB signal into one of the XLR ports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
My problem with the 1/8” jack is the fact that is is poorly designed. What works ok in 1/4” size doesn’t work when smaller. I ran an electronics store in the 70s and saw many failures. The metal contacts fatigue and the contact becomes intermittent. Then the slightest movement of the cable causes horrible static to be amplified.
Don’t buy anything for pro audio use that uses 1/8” jacks anywhere in the signal path.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,433
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,433 |
Great conversations and recommendations! I'm following closely as I try to convert from a "studio" setup to a "live" setup without adding to my equipment collection!
Jeff
Win11, Intel i7 7700K 4.2Ghz, 32Gb RAM, 2x1Tb HD, 500Gb NVMe, BIAB/RB 2025, MOTU 828MK3 audio, MOTU Midi Express, Yamaha Montage 7, DX7II, TX802, Motif XS Rack, Roland Fantom XR Rack, Oberheim Matrix 1000, VoiceLive3 Extreme, Kontakt 6, SampleTank 4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31 |
Gotcha, Matt. That is the first time I have heard a clear and coherent explanation of this issue. It makes sense when I think about the many hundreds of times I have inserted and re-inserted the headphone plug into the 1/8 inch headphone jack on this laptop while arranging tunes.
Many thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673
Product Manager
|
|
Product Manager
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673 |
Between the two options presented, I'd probably go for the Mackie, since it's built for stage use. The Dragonfly looks like it would break after one gig. I'd also avoid the Focusrite 2i2 suggestion as it can probably break much easier than the Mackie, although sonically it would be fantastic.
I'd suggest a USB mixer if possible and just use the Eon as a speaker, since I assume you'd need a mixer of some sort and a separate mixer would put the controls more easily available. Mackie, Yamaha, and Soundcraft all make nice small-format mixers with USB.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
Agreed. But Simon, have you used a small Focusrite? The case is metal (painted aluminum, I think) and they are quite solid. I've used a 2i4 on remote gigs for many years.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811 |
The DACs on all the "Fast USB 2", uSB 3, Thunderbolt 3 compact interfaces introduced since October 2019 are from the same family — and they're extremely good. The only differences are the number of Ins/Outs/Mic Pres/Headphone Amps the various part numbers support. I've written an article on this but, till published, I can't post the details other than I've torn a number of them down and seen the ink on the chip set. I can say that the 8 mic Pre/MIDI/2x headphone/8 out version costs $6.30 each if you buy 1,000 or more. Despite the claims of the marketing departments and online reviewers who parrot those blurbs (and never look under the hood), no one is making their own — and I do mean no one. So, buy the current generation of whatever has the features you are looking for. Some are built like a tank with pan pots/switches and have onboard effects but no MIDI (Mackie). Others have proprietary "vintage" circuits (SSL). Most have I/O Mix/Blend controls (except the Scarlett—none have it). Some have hi-gain circuits in front of the mic pres (M-Audio Air can handle a SM7B and many ribbon mics w/out a Cloudlifter). Some come with many GB VIs and effects (NI, MOTU). The list goes on. The M-Audio Air series is externally powered, has a number of different I/O configurations, most have MIDI… the 192|14 is 8 x 8 with 4 mic pres, 2 DIs, 2 Line Ins and 2 headphone amps for $329 or less. Fewer features cost less. Interestingly, M-Audio's marketing department claims that the 192|14 is only 8 x 4 — you'd think that they'd want to sell some. You can read my full review here under MikeH: 192|14 I'm not pushing M-Audio. In fact, I do not care what you buy. As long as it's the current generation, it's all (really) good. If you like the way the Scarlett Gen 3 or the Mackie PROFxv3 or MOTU M2/4 etc. get it. Do not pay attention to RT Latency numbers — it's all the same and dependent on sample rates and buffer size. The difference between them is less than moving your ears 2 feet closer or further to your monitor speakers with the PreSonus Thunderbolt 3 interfaces being the fastest—barely. It's all inexpensive. I would not buy the older gear. No matter how it gets marked down on closeout, the new stuff is the better bargain.
BIAB 2024 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673
Product Manager
|
|
Product Manager
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673 |
Agreed. But Simon, have you used a small Focusrite? The case is metal (painted aluminum, I think) and they are quite solid. I've used a 2i4 on remote gigs for many years. Yes, I have a 2i2 3rd gen right next to me, and I had a 2i2 1st gen before I upgraded to my current RME. I consider the Focusrite "studio or home" reliable but not "toss it around at a gig and pour beer on it" reliable. The main reason is because the pots and jacks are only board mounted, not fixed to the case at all. So if you trip on a cable and yank the Focusrite to the floor it can break the jack off the PCB much easier than the Mackie who's jacks are screwed to the metal case. This may or may not be an issue to the OP, if he takes care of his stuff and doesn't let others handle it for him. The DACs on all the "Fast USB 2", uSB 3, Thunderbolt 3 compact interfaces introduced since October 2019 are from the same family — and they're extremely good. The only differences are the number of Ins/Outs/Mic Pres/Headphone Amps the various part numbers support. I've written an article on this but, till published, I can't post the details other than I've torn a number of them down and seen the ink on the chip set. I can say that the 8 mic Pre/MIDI/2x headphone/8 out version costs $6.30 each if you buy 1,000 or more. Despite the claims of the marketing departments and online reviewers who parrot those blurbs (and never look under the hood), no one is making their own — and I do mean no one. So, buy the current generation of whatever has the features you are looking for. Some are built like a tank with pan pots/switches and have onboard effects but no MIDI (Mackie). Others have proprietary "vintage" circuits (SSL). Most have I/O Mix/Blend controls (except the Scarlett—none have it). Some have hi-gain circuits in front of the mic pres (M-Audio Air can handle a SM7B and many ribbon mics w/out a Cloudlifter). Some come with many GB VIs and effects (NI, MOTU). The list goes on. The M-Audio Air series is externally powered, has a number of different I/O configurations, most have MIDI… the 192|14 is 8 x 8 with 4 mic pres, 2 DIs, 2 Line Ins and 2 headphone amps for $329 or less. Fewer features cost less. Interestingly, M-Audio's marketing department claims that the 192|14 is only 8 x 4 — you'd think that they'd want to sell some. You can read my full review here under MikeH: 192|14 I'm not pushing M-Audio. In fact, I do not care what you buy. As long as it's the current generation, it's all (really) good. If you like the way the Scarlett Gen 3 or the Mackie PROFxv3 or MOTU M2/4 etc. get it. Do not pay attention to RT Latency numbers — it's all the same and dependent on sample rates and buffer size. The difference between them is less than moving your ears 2 feet closer or further to your monitor speakers with the PreSonus Thunderbolt 3 interfaces being the fastest—barely. It's all inexpensive. I would not buy the older gear. No matter how it gets marked down on closeout, the new stuff is the better bargain. The DAC itself is probably the least part of the equation when it comes to sound quality. The analog components between your audio source and the DAC chip play a much bigger part. Like you mentioned with the SSL that it has it's "vintage" circuit, but it probably has higher quality components than the M-Audio or Focusrite. Either way, you probably won't hear the difference, and not many people can.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31 |
Mike and Simon, many thanks for these spot-on comments. I am especially impressed because while I don't understand 80% of your technical comments, the recommendations come through loud and clear :-)
As a related aside, the Eon One Compact has a built-in mixer for its four channels (two XLR/1/4" combo jacks, one 1/4" jack, and one 1/8" aux in jack). One of the XLR jacks has phantom power. It has basic analog controls on the body of the speaker, but the Bluetooth app offers impressive EQ/effects control over each individual channel, plus a master out EQ.
Unfortunately no USB input.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673
Product Manager
|
|
Product Manager
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 2,673 |
Yup, that's why the SM58 is the gold standard for live vocal mics! Well, for rock shows at least... Mike and Simon, many thanks for these spot-on comments. I am especially impressed because while I don't understand 80% of your technical comments, the recommendations come through loud and clear :-)
As a related aside, the Eon One Compact has a built-in mixer for its four channels (two XLR/1/4" combo jacks, one 1/4" jack, and one 1/8" aux in jack). One of the XLR jacks has phantom power. It has basic analog controls on the body of the speaker, but the Bluetooth app offers impressive EQ/effects control over each individual channel, plus a master out EQ.
Unfortunately no USB input. You're very welcome Tim, glad to put my knowledge to good use! That Eon sounds pretty good, always been a fan of JBL stuff.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,033 |
Yup, that's why the SM58 is the gold standard for live vocal mics! I've got one. It's kept in a bag of spare gear and usually never leaves my car, but I know it will work if I need it.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811 |
Would Peavey exist without that? No matter how much beer was dumped into your amp or PA, there was no way it wasn't going to work once the beer was dumped out. What do you mean by, "does it sound good?" That was never the point.
BIAB 2024 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811 |
Yes, I have a 2i2 3rd gen right next to me, and I had a 2i2 1st gen before I upgraded to my current RME. I consider the Focusrite "studio or home" reliable but not "toss it around at a gig and pour beer on it" reliable. The main reason is because the pots and jacks are only board mounted, not fixed to the case at all. So if you trip on a cable and yank the Focusrite to the floor it can break the jack off the PCB much easier than the Mackie who's jacks are screwed to the metal case.
This may or may not be an issue to the OP, if he takes care of his stuff and doesn't let others handle it for him.
The DAC itself is probably the least part of the equation when it comes to sound quality. The analog components between your audio source and the DAC chip play a much bigger part. Like you mentioned with the SSL that it has it's "vintage" circuit, but it probably has higher quality components than the M-Audio or Focusrite.
Either way, you probably won't hear the difference, and not many people can.
With the new stuff, the DAC, Mic Pres and 'phone amps are all on the same chip. It's much quieter and has a noticeably faster round trip than the previous gen. You won't hear the difference between your Scarlet Gen 3 and any of the others because there is none (the marketing departments don't want you to know this, of course). You should hear a big difference between it and your 1st gen, however. As for hearing the difference between brands, again, no. Except for SSL's switchable circuit and M-Audio tweaking of the pres, it all sounds the same because it is all the same. The switches, jacks, pots, circuit boards, layout etc. — that's where things vary. I may use the M-Audio at my desk but a Mackie PROFx10v3 or my old 1402vlz is what goes to the gig.
BIAB 2024 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,811 |
Back to the OP. The Dragonfly Red is also using a chip from the same family as all the new Fast USB interfaces. This one I wouldn't have to tear down to see since they advertise one of the brands that DAC chip is sold under.
For the same $169.99 as the Dragonfly Red, you can get a 2-channel interface such as the Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen. The Presonus Studio 24c adds MIDI and an I/O blend control for $10 less. For another $10 less, there is the Mackie PROFx6v3 with 6 channels in and onboard effects with pan switches in a mixer format—no MIDI, however.
Again, all use the same DAC (and its excellent) but there are four levels of functionality.
BIAB 2024 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 31 |
Back to the OP. The Dragonfly Red is also using a chip from the same family as all the new Fast USB interfaces. This one I wouldn't have to tear down to see since they advertise one of the brands that DAC chip is sold under.
For the same $169.99 as the Dragonfly Red, you can get a 2-channel interface such as the Scarlett 2i2 3rd gen. The Presonus Studio 24c adds MIDI and an I/O blend control for $10 less. For another $10 less, there is the Mackie PROFx6v3 with 6 channels in and onboard effects with pan switches in a mixer format—no MIDI, however.
Again, all use the same DAC (and its excellent) but there are four levels of functionality. Thanks, Mike, this has been a real education for me. I just ordered the two-channel Mackie, because my only application for this is to get a good laptop signal into a powered speaker for live performance using the smallest/lightest/most reliable hardware possible. Given that the powered speaker is mono and will have only one available input for the laptop signal, my initial thought on summing the output is to go to Preferences > Overrides and uncheck "panning" under "Allow loading of any of these settings". Anything I'm missing here/other ideas on summing the stereo output?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,299
Posts777,462
Members39,614
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean