Mal/Matt.
i too am an audient user. in fact i cant complain so far useing the audient for a few months now. hasnt given me one problem. and, comparing the results with big studio gear i once used, i'm very impressed.
i really like the mic pre too plus low latency.

if a song of mine sucks its not because of the audient....its my fault.

but heres my position on sampling rates and bit depths.
and if you peruse various forums youll see
many recording folk whove been round the block a few times agree.
but its an on going debate on such sites
as www.gearspace.com and recording.org etc.
1. i'm of the camp that goes only as far as 44.1/24 bit.
(my reaper daw is set to that, and biab to 44.1/16.)
2. i constantly remind myself that zillions of hits were done before 88.2/96/192 k. also i save a bunch of disk space.
3. ive actually done tests with your "typical man in the street"..who ive found cant tell a diff tween different rates.

i dont want to get into a heated debate, cos its been done too many times on various recording forums.
above is just my opinion after doing real life tests.
somewhere on the net is a scientific research paper that agrees with my position. sorry forgotten where.

merry xmas to all.
om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 11/24/21 06:59 AM.
New Song "PRETTY GIRL" for my wife...Dec 2023
(my vocs....mixed for good earbuds.)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs/prettygirlrbfinalcalfsongsdec2023mp3
(and rock song THE STALLION and bluegrass song... BANKER MAN....90 songs useing bb/rb.)