Quote:

I'm not a person who will devote too much time trying to figure out how something works. That's just me though. I can say that yes, most of my software selections have gone that way. In other words, I didn't buy them without first knowing what I needed to accomplish. Trouble with BIAB and RB IMHO is that newbies don't necessarily know why they need it or what features they'll use for what -- I mean it's all pretty much gobbly-gook to me right now although I'm much better off than I was in Feb of this year with I first started. I must admit though, patience is NOT one of my virtues when it comes to computer software however.



Russell, what you're describing is pretty much all of us here, certainly me. I'm leaving for work in a few minutes so don't have time for a detailed post right now and I've answered several of your posts in other threads. As a noob, learn both Biab and RB at the same time. Everything described so far as to how to use Biab also applies to RB. RB does everything Biab does with only a few very specific exceptions that you may not even need. But as I said in the other thread it adds a many more capabilities. This is why when I'm actually working on something I use RB only, not Biab. If I'm just playing around, maybe setting up a gig that I might use Biab then of course I use Biab but for serious recording using all the elements of Biab tracks, midi tracks, audio tracks, mixing and mastering, RB is it.

Bob

Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.