|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 416
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 416 |
I thought I'll post this just in case anyone else have (also) been blissfully unaware of how to really create good recordings. (I'm not saying I have it perfect NOW but I am surely on my way) I have been dabbling with BIAB and before RB was there PT and if the correct method was documented anywhere I surely did not see it (maybe I should really start reading the documentation) I was satisfied with my recordings but they were never quite clear enough ...but "what can you expect from home recordings anyway?" Then a chap at work decided to build himself a home studio (his retirement plan)and is planning to record school concerts and local muso's planning a career of fame. He was blown away by BIAB and the potential to add it to his arsenal to help people quickly create demo tracks and him recording them. However he bought Cubase with an M-Audio 2424 Firewire. He had NO experience recording at this stage so we started sharing and mutual discussions. He also found an OLD guy who operates a home studio with OLD equipment making professional recordings and this guy agreed to teach him the ropes a bit and wants to pass some of his extra work to him. So a week ago he had his first session and I got the passed on version and notes .... What I never did ...(or understood) was 1. Set up and select the compressor BEFORE starting the recording. I searched and found Noel96's instructions/tips on how to use the PGDynamics Compressor invaluable ( http://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=185394After recording: 2. Use a limiter 3. If required use a De-esser ( I download the Tonmann De-Esser) I re-recorded 14 of my songs this weekend and it sounds brilliant! (I just had to share it with people who will understand)
I'm doing allright for Country Trash ....
I used to care, but things have changed (Bob Dylan)
BIAB 2022W + RB
M-Audio FastTrack C600, Rode NT2-A
Digitech VoiceLive 4
Epiphone Sheraton, Ibanez 12str, Washburn 6str, Cort 6Str Nylon
Yanagisawa Tenor Sax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 177
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 177 |
Thanks a million for revisiting this key lesson on dynamics controls. Much appreciated! Just applied it to a song I've been working on and got remarkable clarity and presence... I'll share the result when I've got my part integrated...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792 |
TBH, that really is NOT the way to record. All recordings should be "clean" as in no effects, no processing, nothing.
Then when mixing and mastering the engineer has pristine audio to deal with.
Recording, mixing and mastering are three distinct and VERY different processes.
just my 2c fwiw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 177
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 177 |
Reasonable thought, though this isn't, at least for me, about recording, per se. It's about playing back pre-recorded Real Tracks, many of which have received much processing on their way to becoming a Real Track, before being mixed down to a complete song wave file. So, Noel's idea is really a way to smooth dynamics, on instruments (real tracks) in mix-down, that do have a significant dynamic range that could be enhanced, smoothed, through use of compression. I think it's really what your comment intended, again, since the tracks have already been recorded as Real Tracks, and are being mixed down to a stereo wave file. Try it..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792 |
Ahh I get you, no probs  - yep already done all of that sort of thing  except my "weapon" of choice is Sonar. Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 416
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 416 |
Hi Joden,
I agree but the way this old guy explained it to us is that the compressor just assists with managing the input signal ... no other effects are added at this point, so it still stays completely clean.
In this case I am the artist, the recorder and the engineer!
Whether or not this is the way to record is maybe wrong or at least debatable but as they say , "the proof is in the pudding" and for me the final product is now 100% better ....
(if this is wrong then I could be still using my equipment incorrect but up to now I could not make headway with THAT so my new workflow is now adopted (for me)
I'm doing allright for Country Trash ....
I used to care, but things have changed (Bob Dylan)
BIAB 2022W + RB
M-Audio FastTrack C600, Rode NT2-A
Digitech VoiceLive 4
Epiphone Sheraton, Ibanez 12str, Washburn 6str, Cort 6Str Nylon
Yanagisawa Tenor Sax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,311 |
As another old guy, perhaps I can throw some light on this.
Back in the day, we used to track everything to tape through a compressor because it was the only way to get a decent signal to noise ratio. If you compressed the recorded signal afterwards, it compressed the tape hiss as well and brought up the noise floor. We made system work, but occasionally an inexperienced engineer would ruin a good take by using the wrong compressor setting.
With digital, the noise floor is so low that it's quite possible to track without a compressor in most cases and then compress or upward limit afterwards. The result is pretty much the same, but the engineer gets to experiment more.
The importance of good principles when tracking cannot be over-emphasized. If something is recorded badly it won't mix well and mastering will not improve it either.
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,333 |
I never use a compressor on the input for a BB/RB track or when I record live tracks. I WANT all those dynamics to be present in the track. I can work with those varying levels to make a good sounding track.... but I can not un-compress something later if I don't like it or make it fit properly.
I use compression on the back side only. With digital, there are plenty of ways to get good strong clean signals into the tracks up front.
I have noticed that RB & BB create strong, clean tracks, so there is no need to compress them at all. Any FX included from inside BB/RB is beyond my control but I have never heard the need to do anything to them on the front side as I import them to SONAR.
In Sonar, I use EQ, and reverb on some tracks. The EQ is mostly gentle depending on the instrument and I have some custom presets for piano, drums and bass.
I use Ozone and some other stuff to massage the tracks & busses as needed. I almost never use compression in a stand alone event in a track. Look at my songs. Open them in a wave editor and you don't see evidence of compression.... typical things like clipped tops and overs.... nope, not there. I'm not against compression, it's just that I use it sparingly and in the right way and place.
I can get my music plenty loud without using over-compression. I believe most people misuse compressors and limiters and think they are only for making the music louder.
Rather than using compression on the front side, I'd rather use technique to record a smooth track to start. With BB & RB renders, I have not seen problems in volume levels that could not be solved with a simple volume envelope. Remember, compression is cumulative, and when you compress going in, compress in a track and then compress and limit the output, you have one squashed sounding track in the end when it's played on a decent sounding system.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 792 |
Yep totally agree Guitarhacker.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,695
Posts736,144
Members38,545
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean