|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi All
Happy New Year
I am having difficulty understanding overdubbing a backing track with a lead vocal versus including the lead vocal in the mixdown.
Is it better to mixdown the vocal with the rest of the tracks or can I mixdown the Instruments and then add the vocal to that backing track.
What are the pros and cons?
I hope I was clear in my explanation.
Thanks for any advice,Hugh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063 |
Hello Hugh,
Unless it's an instrumental song, the vocal is always the star - the main focus of your song. Your arrangement and your mix is built around the vocal. So mix your vocal and music as a whole. Once your mix is done you can render two versions if you want. One with the vocal and one with just the backing.
Hope that helps.
Happy New Year,
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,688
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,688 |
Is it better to mixdown the vocal with the rest of the tracks or can I mixdown the Instruments and then add the vocal to that backing track. What are the pros and cons? Just a thought I have in remembrance of my own personal amateur mistakes with non-vocals. If you choose to mix down the backing separately, be careful not to include any kind of reverb that you might not be able to reproduce for the voice. Different reverbs on the backing and the voice might sound great individually but completely weird together, if they create a psychoacoustic space that could not exist in reality. =8^)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Thanks Sundance,
So what I am doing is this.
I am mixing all the tracks with the vocals in and arranging all the instruments to suit the vocals.Then can I just render the two separately and blend them in later?.I am finding my backing track is working out great without the vocals but as soon as I mixdown everything together with the vocals in it is not as good ,
The vocals dont seem to have the separation I hear when I listen to a pro song even though I have unmasked the vocal etc from interferring freq etc and have left room for the vocal with panning etc.
When I listen to a pro song the vocal seems to sail along on the top the backing track while still anchored to the backing track.
This is why I am wondering could it be better to attach the two after the mixing process and before the mastering but having mixed the instruments with the vocal in for the mixing process,thanks again H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Thanks Mark
I was thinking along those lines about reverb and delay and its a very good point.I would be rendering them separately but with the effects on that i would be using and wouldnt be adding any further effects to either after rendering,
Perhaps I will try out both and see with the same piece of a song,H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,063 |
Hugh, If you can put up a sample song of yours on SoundCloud or Dropbox with a link here. There are lots of terrific ears on here. That would make it easier to offer tweaking suggestions to get your vocal to sit on top of your mix.
Nobody starts out as a great vocal mixer. Experiment. Try what you're asking and hear for yourself how it sounds.
Josie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,646
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,646 |
"When I listen to a pro song the vocal seems to sail along on the top the backing track while still anchored to the backing track."
It's most likely the compression you are hearing that puts the vocals out front (or 'on top').
Last edited by rharv; 01/03/22 08:09 AM.
Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,688
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,688 |
I was thinking along those lines about reverb and delay and its a very good point. I forget what, but there's software that will analyze a bunch of multitracks and "fix" any reverb it finds so that everything matches. When I saw that I thought, what an odd (and expensive!) product, but apparently the psychoacoustics of reverb are strong in ways you don't have to worry about with other effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 354
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 354 |
I agree with Sundance - mix everything as a whole around your vocals.
A technique I use is:
Turn the volume down on all your tracks and then turn up your tracks in the following audible order:
1. The most important track (typically your lead vocal)- none of the other tracks should be able to dominate this track
2. Then the second most important track (typically solo instrument)
3. Third most important
4. I think
5. You
6. Get
7. The Idea
8. Your least important instrument should never be considered louder than any of the other instruments.
From experience - limit the number of tracks to a minimum - I've been quite surprised to find out - less is more! (yes I know - it's mentioned everywhere)
Then make sure to use panning to create space and the sense of air around each of your tracks.
Use EQ to avoid congestion in the low freq - cut in every track except bass and kick/drums.
Adjust bass and kick/drums, so they don't compete for the same frequencies at the same time - this might need a dynamic EQ to get right.
Use EQ to cut out treble of your less important tracks - a bit like when your hear sounds from a distance the high frequencies are usually not audible at all.
Time for Volume Automation and Compression on each track, to make sure each track sonically stays in their sorted order as decided above.
Then individually on each track preferably as a "Send" (not inside the track itself)- if needed
Add Effects (Modulation, Distortion...carefully, Filtering act)
Add Delay
Add Reverb - use an EQ and cut out all below 300Hz and Above 4000 Hz before the Reverb Plugin/Device otherwise you'll find it very hard to control you low- and high end(Less is more...) Use a reverb with PreDelay especially for vocals to postpone the reverb effect slightly, as it gives more clarity to your vocal.
In the end I usually add a slow compressor on the (Master) Output Track to glue everything together. (A lot of Mastering engineers will tell you not to - and they are right....but I like it, because it adds a tiny scent to the total audio)
The pros:
You get better control of your mix
You can tweak all your tracks until you get the result you want
Fix it in the mix gets so much easier
It feels awesome, when you manage to put a sublime mix together
The cons:
It takes a lot of time and practice
It sometimes feels counter intuitive, because you almost have to start from scratch at every song you make
You sometimes reach the state of dispair and just wish to stop existing :-)
...the alternative solution:
Buy Waves CLA Plugin Suite, this will get the job done quickly 9 out of 10 times), it usually sounds pretty good and professional - and it's not too pricey. Yes! you're left with the features (and limitations) of the plugin, but it's time saving.
...the ultimate alternative ...and expensive solution:
Get a pro to do it for you
I don't know if this was what you asked for...but now at ended up writing it anyway....*pressing submit now*
MacMini M1 - BIAB2021 - Logic Pro X - iZotope Music Production Suite - Scaler 2 - far too many Waves plugins and Line 6 Guitars and boards + a fantastic Yamaha THR10ll mini Amp - Avid MBOX Studio
Peters' Garage is available on all major streaming services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
"When I listen to a pro song the vocal seems to sail along on the top the backing track while still anchored to the backing track."
It's most likely the compression you are hearing that puts the vocals out front (or 'on top').
What makes it a "pro" song has a lot to do with pro gear. Get yourself one of these, and you will be able to compete. https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/1176LN--universal-audio-1176lnExpensive, true; but you could probably sell it used for almost what you paid. Regards, Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,629
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,629 |
"When I listen to a pro song the vocal seems to sail along on the top the backing track while still anchored to the backing track."
It's most likely the compression you are hearing that puts the vocals out front (or 'on top'). Agreed. Intelligent use of compression (not overcompressing, and also not undercompressing) is key. EQ'ing around the vocals as well - find out the main frequency the vocals are sitting at, and use an EQ to reduce those frequencies from the other instruments that have audio in that range. I agree with Sundance - mix everything as a whole around your vocals.
*SNIP* I agree with everything here. Always mix the song with respect to all the other tracks. You need those other tracks there to figure out what to do with the vocals, and you need the vocals there to figure out what to do with the other tracks. As much as I love the 1176 compressor and what it can do on any audio source, I've never subscribed to the theory of "spend money on gear to get professional results". I've used 1176's, 610's, Avalons, API's, SSL boards, DDA boards, Neumann mics, oldschool equipment, custom made stuff (and I custom build a lot of my own electronics) - but all of that fancy gear maybe adds less than 10% more "good stuff" to your sound (unless you're going for a very specific niche sound). I've personally worked on tracks that have 50,000+ plays using minimal equipment, and have worked on tracks on a $350,000 SSL console with nearly a million bucks worth of additional gear where the song never saw the light of day. You are the most important part of the process. If you get yourself any reasonably good audio interface with reasonably good preamps (modern interfaces from Steinberg, Focusrite, Audient, MOTU, and other big name brands are all good), and educate yourself on how to use the plugins included with your DAW (third party plugins are great, but so are the ones you got for free with your DAW), you can get professional results. If you don't believe me, look up Finneas O'Connell - he produced and mixed Billie Eilish in his bedroom, mostly "in the box" in Logic Pro. Also look up I Mother Earth - IIRC one of their latest songs (either The Devil's Engine or We Got The Love, can't remember which) was recorded entirely on SM57 mics and mixed in the box, and those are songs that peaked in the top 10 charts.
I work here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,335
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,335 |
I tend to create the instrument tracks and get a fairly good mix before I add vocals. Vox are one of the last things that goes into the mix for me. Lead vox first, then any doubles and harmony will follow that.
Mixing is best done in an orderly fashion. Bass and drums to start then the rest. Your vocal should sit nicely into and slightly on top of the instrumental bed. Of course, the genre will determine exactly how deep into the mix or on top of the mix your lead vocal will end up. Country tends to have the vocal more on top and up front while metal and rock tend to have it buried a tad more.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Peter
Sorry for the late reply and thank you for the advice and detailed answer.
I ended up having a problem or lack of understanding regarding Reaper which I use.Reaper has 5 pan modes and the default mode is not the correct mode when using stereo tracks and when I got the panning issue sorted out it cleared a path for the vocals.
I then did what you suggested here which I had done before but I rethought my process when it came to reverb and I put two dedicated reverb tracks for the mid and for the side .I also panned the reverb send left or right according to how I panned their original track so I could get the reverb out of the way of the vocal and increase the side information without decreasing the vocal.
"Then individually on each track preferably as a "Send" (not inside the track itself)- if needed
Add Effects (Modulation, Distortion...carefully, Filtering act)
Add Delay
Add Reverb - use an EQ and cut out all below 300Hz and Above 4000 Hz before the Reverb Plugin/Device otherwise you'll find it very hard to control you low- and high end(Less is more...) Use a reverb with PreDelay especially for vocals to postpone the reverb effect slightly, as it gives more clarity to your vocal."
I also use more compression on the vocal which added an extra few percent.I hope to post a an Mp3 as suggested by Sundance for you guys to listen too soon
Thanks for the help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Guitarhacker,
I think that is the terminolgy I wanted to say but couldnt.
My vocals werent doing this and I found out that in Reaper I was using the wrong panning mode for stereo tracks which really helped when I changed and that I wasnt processing my reverb properly which helped greatly when I dug into that problem,
"Your vocal should sit nicely into and slightly on top of the instrumental bed."
Thanks for the advice much appreciated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Simon
Again thanks for the advice and I will look up those suggestions,
I appeared to have two major problems and a couple of smaller fixes
I use Reaper and it has 5 pan modes and I was using ther wrong one for the Stereo Real Tracks and I also had a reverb problem and I solved this by using two dedicated reverb channels one for the mid and one for the side information .I also panned all my reverb of the instrumental backing track to get it out of the way of the vocal.
I also used more compression which was suggested.
The other was I was using a vocal i had got done that I had used for the same song in a completely different genre which didnt suit.A smaller issue but relevant
Thanks for the detailed advice and i will post my song for a listen as soon as its ready
h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Bob
Reccomendations are always the best buys,so I will look it up and check out what it can do,
Thanks for the advice H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Rharv
I did put some more compression and it did help a good bit thanks.
My main problem was I was using the wrong panning modes in Reaper for stereo tracks and that I had re adjust my reverb on my reverb channel,
thanks for the repy appreciated h
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 470 |
Hi Sundance
Will drop a sample of the song when its finished for a listen and some feedback thanks for the help H
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,646
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,646 |
Hi Rharv
I did put some more compression and it did help a good bit thanks.
My main problem was I was using the wrong panning modes in Reaper for stereo tracks and that I had re adjust my reverb on my reverb channel,
thanks for the repy appreciated h For vocals, compression helps to get it out front .. the panning method/mode helps to focus/define it Do you want the vocals to sound out front in a big room, or sound like the vocalist is intimately close to the listener? That's the fun of mixing For me, vocals usually go on a Mono track, not stereo, and that avoids some problems early If you have a stereo track, you may want to try making it Mono and see if it becomes easier
Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,702
Posts736,224
Members38,546
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean