Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
I have a small Fostex PS3.1 monitor system; powered subwoofer that also houses amps for the small 2-way satellites.

Recently I've picked up a cheap set of Sony bookshelf speakers with 6.5" woofers and a hi-fi amp.

The Sony's have a much more balanced mid-range, but lack in low end that the subwoofer of the Fostex provides.

I would like to use both systems in parallel but defeat the satellite speakers using load resistors in place of the speakers.

What is the best way to measure the impedance of the satellites? Using a simple multi-meter with the speaker leads removed shows an impedance of 4.2 Ohms.

Would I be able to used one of these 4 ohm 100W load resistors in place of each satellite?: http://www.parts-express.com/4-ohm-100w-non-inductive-dummy-load-resistor--019-015

The amp in this system really doesn't come close to 100W output, and I probably don't need this kind of power dissipation capability, but it was the easiest to find at 4 ohm.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Why not use the two systems independently? Just pick up a cheap sub at a garage sale, and you have two complete systems. I picked up an Infinity 100 watt sub for $20 at a garage sale.



Regards,

Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Bob, my eye is on the lookout for a nice powered sub. Then the whole Fostex system will be likely be put up for sale. The sony bookshelf speakers and the pioneer amp were acquired independently at thrift shops for a grand total of 21$ so far. If I can get a decent powered sub that's not blown for that I'll be a happy camper and the Fostex system will probably be gone. There's not much room for both systems. The Sony speakers are kind of big. If I keep the Fostex, I will have to build some type of wedge bracket for them to sit on top of the Sonys. If I can figure out how to post a photo here from Flickr I will post it.

Last edited by rockstar_not; 09/08/15 05:19 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Scott,

Looks like you have some space on the sides of your console - why not get a pair of speaker stands (or wall mounts) and get your big speakers a bit farther away from your mix position? They look a bit close.

p.s. The Infinity sub I got at a garage sale is an 8" down-firing speaker with a 100 watt internal amp. It's so powerful, I hook it up to our small PA for rehearsals. grin



Here's one you might look at:

http://cosprings.craigslist.org/ele/5206003798.html


Regards,

Bob

Last edited by 90 dB; 09/09/15 01:37 AM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
You can probably use the sub by itself and simply leave the satellite speakers disconnected.

It's Ohms law at work..... solid state amps develop more power the lower the load becomes. that's why many solid state amps have warnings on the speaker outputs not to go below a certain speaker impedance. The higher the impedance, the less power they will deliver. An open circuit with no speakers will not develop any power. If you place "loading" resistors on the outputs, the amps will see it as a low load and try to produce the power at that load level. Most modern amps will not be harmed by open outputs. But,,,,, if that freaks you out....

To use loading resistors...... read this>>>

You are also dealing with 2 different resistances.... first, you have the DC coil resistance which is what you measured with the meter.... 4.2 ohms. That is a constant. It will always be that number.

All coils have inductance and therefore inductive reactance or AC resistance when an alternating current is passed through them. This inductive reactance will vary depending on the frequency. It is 90 degrees out of phase with the DC resistance and adds to that 4.2 ohms at that 90 degree angle. It will give you a certain resistance at a given frequency. Added to the DC coil resistance, it determines the impedance of the speaker. It's for this reason that most speakers are rated at 8 ohms or 16 ohms at a given freq.... IIRC 1000hz for test purposes (might be lower for larger cone speakers).

All that to say, if you wish to go the power resistor route.... go with 8 ohms and rate the power dissipation accordingly.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Thanks for the replies.

As for close-ness of mix position, I should snap another photo with me sitting at the desk. I would say that the distance between the face of these speakers and my mix position is probably 2.5-3', though I haven't measured it.

I've never mixed loud, and my hearing is still pretty decent the last time I had an audiogram done a couple years ago.

I should note that the bigger speakers are not nearfield monitors. I seem to recall reading many moons ago that if one is not using speakers designed for near-field like these bookshelf stereo speakers, that getting them closer to the ears, and mixing at lower levels is the preferred way to go. I don't have a source for this.

-Scott

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,636
I dunno, I'd think one of the features of NearFields would be to have true representation at closer range/less volume. I'd assume turning down a set of non-NearFields would more likely affect performance of the actual speaker.
So I'd probably move them back a bit instead.
Just my way of thinking. I don't have a source either, and I'm sure every speaker is different.

As far as the amp, I wouldn't worry about resistors if it was me either.
Not sure if having a load or not would affect crossovers.. if they were active crossovers .. worst case the sub may get some higher frequency signals which it couldn't produce well anyway.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,871
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,871
When you add the satellite speakers, you are decreasing the impedance (load) the amp sees because the load is wired in parallel, which actually means the amp develops more power. I think Herb is correct, particularly about the fixed impedance of one speaker, but here we are talking about two or more as the load for an amp: leave the satellite speakers unplugged.

A long time ago, I attempted to use my Peavey PA head as just a mixer. I thought it would be wise to place some resistors in place of the missing unpowered speakers. Knowing the amp was capable of 400 watts into 4 ohms, I thought I would be safe and used large 100-watt 2-inch long resistors on each channel. I did not even turn up the volume, but within seconds, the resistors were melting. Powered down real fast!

I concur with Rharv that unless the monitors were designed to be near-fields, they might work better at more distance (but still at ear level).

I concur with Scott about mixing at low levels, and I've said that here many times. There's a lot less ear fatigue over a long session. I always check a mix by turning the mix volume to barely audible, and if I can hear all the parts, I know it will work when turned up.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,639
Posts735,353
Members38,524
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
OlvaJownDay, Tranner Track, Ely Bass, Barking, SYOTR
38,524 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 182
DC Ron 98
dcuny 89
DrDan 70
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5