Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Hi Folk,
Just bit the bullet and bought BIAB everything PC.

Looking to setup up a small studio in my "man cave" pretty basic requirement I suspect but am totally new to DAW. In fact I had to look up what it meant. Just started playing the guitar and have a couple of descent microphones for vocals and would like to integrate BIAB, guitar, microphone, other music and tracks into a recording studio.

Am looking at a Yamaha MG12XU mixer which has USB Port and Yamaha bundle Cubase AI entry level DAW software with the mixer. Looking at the Cubase AI it seems it does all the basics that I would need.

Trying to get my head around if this is the way to go? One of the things I am not sure of if I went this path wether I need two seperate PC's, one for BIAB to feed a Yamaha source input and then a PC for the DAW attached to the Yamaha?

I like the flexibility of having channels available to bring other sources into my mixes that the Yamaha or any other mixer you folks may suggests as a better option?

I am good with setting up an amp or powered speakers as monitors and the like. Just would really appreciate the best way to integrate BIAB into a small studio system?

I am retired and happy to spend some dollars on setting up a system that I will use quite often. Appreciate some suggestion and advice on the best way to set up a small studio system without introducing much in the way of compromise.

Cheers,

Ian

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Simplest is to run BiaB all alone.
Then, after you get as far as you can in BiaB, drag the tracks to your DAW. and continue working there.

If you want to use BiaB features in a DAW setting, you also have acquired a program called Realband (comes free with BiaB).
It is a 48 track DAW with BiaB features, like generate, etc. .. and in many ways is much more powerful. Plus you can simply Save a BiaB file and Open it in RB to keep working..

Many people never realize they have it or what it can do, since BiaB is the flagship program, but RB is very unique in it's own right.

If you go to the page below, then scroll down a bit until you see the tabs, then click the Realband tab, you can read more about it.

http://www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.new.htm

and this link has a little more info
http://www.pgmusic.com/bbwin.features.htm
(again have to scroll down to the Realband section)


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 18,892
For DAW work, I use both Realband and Reaper.

As rharv has mentioned above, Realband has the versatility of BIAB (and more) when it comes to creating backing tracks. This makes it indispensable for me. It's very powerful.

Once I have the tracks I want, I then move into Reaper. While I could do all I wanted in Realband, Reaper offers a few things that I find value like tuning vocals, a number of different shaped volume envelopes and sliding of audio files.

At the end of the day, most of the DAWs I've come across are good. It's simply a matter of learning one and getting used to it.

Regards,
Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2024
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,289
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,289
Fleetz....

As Noel states most DAW software has it's place.
It a matter of finding one that has an interface and workflow that is appealing to your way of thinking/learning.
Many companies offer demo programs should you decide to try something other than Cubase.
(I've been with Cakewalk since 1993 and use Sonar X3.)

Personally, I don't think (2) separate PC's is necessary.
Just one that has sufficient beef to accommodate the demands of audio recording/processing.

Do you already have monitors?

You'll likely get a plethora of suggestions here.
Good luck....happy spending. smile

Back to it....

Last edited by chulaivet1966; 05/05/17 02:10 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Hi Ian,

I have a couple of questions:
1-do you need all of the inputs on the Yamaha MG12XU mixer?
2-is the Yamaha MG12XU mixer an audio interface, commonly called a sound card?

I don't think that the mixer is an audio interface. There are a number of audio interfaces available at a wide variety of prices; the price often depends on the mic preamps and the number of inputs needed. Many people here use Focusrite audio interfaces. If you only are going to record your guitar and sing simultaneously then all you need it this one:
https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/Scarlet2i2G2

Most of the time you may record each track individually. You would record the guitar then record your vocal. Don't worry about mixing as most all, if not all, DAWs have mixers built in. Also if the Yamaha is not an audio interface then you will have to buy one anyway.

The only other thing you will need to start is a pair of near field monitors. PC speakers, headphones and stereo systems do not have the flat or near flat response needed for recording music.

I do not use RealBand, I use Sonar as my DAW, but I have played with RealBand. My guess is that RealBand is more powerful than the Yamaha tied Cubase AI. Note be careful of DAWs that are tied to certain hardware as they are proprietary. You can get non-proprietary entry level DAWs from Sonar, Cubase and virtually every other DAW software out there. But since you don't have a favorite DAW right now I strongly suggest you use RealBand. Not only is it a powerful DAW you also have the most knowledgeable and friendly people here on the forums to help you if needed. To me these are the most important things to someone new to recording and DAWs.

{EDIT} I see a couple of others answered as I was slowly typing mine.

Last edited by MarioD; 05/05/17 02:09 PM.

I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Thanks for the great replies.

You folks certainly have rebalanced my thinking which is great. Wasn't aware of Realband and that it was a DAW. Given BIAB is still on it way here it is probably worth holding of on the Yamaha until I can fire up Realband and have a look.

Currently only have a laptop but it is an i5, has 2gig RAM and a 500Mb HDD. It only has a basic 3.5mm mic and earphone audio I/O. So no expadability options of perhaps swapping out a sound card.

Just liked the flexibility of the Yamaha to run in some balanced microphones, guitars acoustic and electric) and other sources. Probably a bit of old school on the audio front. Like to have some monitoring and some conrtrol over EQ, compression, padding, phantom powering etc etc thought this might in part compensate for limited laptop I/O. Also do like buttons and direct control.

The Focusrite looks a nice compact mixer. It may well be that once I get into it this will be adequate. I have always been an over engineering kinda guy. The extra hundred or so dollars to get a MG10XU or MG12XU is not too much of an issue. I have some other audio playout sources that would be nice to run into the mixer for just listening to music with some decent monitor speakers. It is in a man cave after all.

What you have opened my eye and thought process to is would I need the XU version mixer? That is USB I/O? They do a version without and no Cubase A1. If Realband does the business then Cubase is not needed and could get just the basic mixer version.

Will look into Reaper and Soanar DAWs as well, man there is a plethora of them out there.

Ideally was looking to get clear in my mind a definite way to go as I am off to the US next week catching up with some friend ps there. The range and the amazing prices always presents an opportunity to bring some bits back. Unfortunately the timing might not be that great given BIAB won't arrive here until after I have left.

Was hoping that there was going to be a clear cut way to stitch a system together but way too many options and ways to do it.

Haven't ruled out the possibility of building up an AV PC as I might look to do some video editing possibly using Blackmagic DaVinci Resolve software. Which is another reason I am thinking a 10/12 mixer. Resolve software on its own is a possible DAW solution. Never one to do things by halves.

We live in exciting times. Imagine firstly trying to do what we can achieve today with great tools like BIAB and all the amazing low cost editing tools. 25 years ago you would have had to sell your house to afford to do what we have now that probably cost around a $1000 or so dollars to do.

Crazy nuts what this can do for $299...there is even a free version that does an amazing amount. www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve

Thanks again for all the great replies very much appreciated.

Regards,

Ian

Last edited by Fleetz; 05/06/17 04:40 AM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Ian, the first thing I would do is upgrade the RAM on your PC. 2GB is barely enough to run the operating system, much less other applications. If you only have 32-bit Windows, you should go to 4GB (that's all 32-bit Windows can address). If you have a 64-bit version of Windows and your laptop supports it, I would go to at least 8-GB.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Thanks John,

Was looking sideways at the RAM requirement yesterday. I saw that 1G RAM was min but +2G was recommended.

My system is a 64 bit.

Upgrading is not a big deal, definitely think it is going to be worth doing........or it might be the catalyst to build another PC with some serious grunt, i7 6700, tons of RAM, SSD's and a decent sound card.

Boys and their toys!

Cheers,

Ian

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Ian, welcome to the forum. I haven't read the whole thread, but two recent things caught my eye:

First, if you stay with your current laptop, you should not use the internal soundcard, but you do not need to 'swap it out'. Just buy a USB audio interface. Something as simple as a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 would do so much better than the built-in card.

Second, although your computer "system is 64 bit", double-check what your Windows is. Control Panel, System will show if the version of Windows is 32-bit or 64. Only if it is 64 can you benefit from more than 4 GB RAM, as John said.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Conversely, you could look at a control surface.


https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/FaderPort8


This gives you the tactile feel of a mixer and integration with your DAW, and a ton more options.


Regards,


Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Cheers Matt,

It is 64 bit Windows 7 at the moment....might upgrade to Windows 10 soon.

Regards,

Ian

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
That's a serious bit of kit!

Regards,

Ian

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
I use a very similar product, the Behringer X-Touch. Prior to that, I used an even more powerful Tascam FW-1884, but they didn't keep the drivers up to date. Note that either the Faderport 8 or the Behringer work very well in a DAW, but as of now BIAB does not support them.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 417
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 417
I have been using Samplitude Pro X for a number of years and it seems to perfectly fit along side BIAB, it users 'audio objects' to edit in a similar way as block chording with BIAB
There is an official free version called Samplitude Pro X Silver which still has the same audio engine as the big brother and comes with a wealth of very good plugins and the Vandal Guitar SE emulation software.
http://dl03.magix.net/samplitude_silver_soundcloud_us.exe
Brian


Brian Cadoret
BIAB 2024 Pro with BIAB2023 UltraPAK build 1111. Samplitude Pro X4 Suite. Mixcraft 10.5 Pro Studio
Focusrite 2i2 Scarlett
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz 3.20 GHz
Installed RAM 8.00 GB


Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,576
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,576


Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit 16GB RAM\2018 13” MacBook Air casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2023 everything pk both with Current builds
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Cheers for the links ....I watched a few of Graham's you tube videos late last night into the wee small hours. He explains thing great.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Thanks for the input folks.

Think you have convinced me that I don't need the Yamaha mixer. The standalone USB interfaces look to be the smart way to go.

Just need to pick a unit that ticks the boxes and plays nicely with initially Realband DAW but select one that will work with others DAWs. Seems these USB interfaces are pretty universal?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Anyone using a Steinberg UR22mkII interface?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
OK... so you've gotten some good advice to this point.

Here's my take on gear.

Determine what you're going to use it for. Are you going to record bands and other musicians or is this a one man hobby studio where it's mostly just going to be you and maybe the occasional friend?

If you plan to record bands, you will need a mixer. If you're doing the solo thing, then you do not need a mixer unless you just want something to take up desk space and have to dust from time to time.

My studio rig is very basic.

I have a decent computer. i5 Intel quad core with nice sized hard drives. Nothing fancy, just solid. I run XP Pro 32 bit.

I have a Focusrite interface. (external sound card) It has midi and audio inputs and multiple audio outputs. Built in preamps and phantom power running ASIO as the driver.

I use a pair of Mackie MR-5 monitors and a 10" 100w sub.

Basically... that, is my studio. No mixer needed. I plug in my mic and guitar to the Focusrite and there it is. Ready to roll and rock.

In my computer, I run Band in A Box as well as it's companion Real Band and I also run Cakewalk's Sonar X1 DAW. While getting a DAW in a bundle with other gear is free, I recommend that you buy a full version of a DAW as opposed to using the LE "free" versions since they often have disabled features. Cakewalk has a nice DAW that comes with several nice synths and costs $50 to get started. They have packs that bundle it with some other stuff you will likely want, for more money. Look at Music Creator 7 and Sonar Home Studio. I get the feeling they're replacing MC7 with SHS. Both are excellent starting DAW's, priced right and fully capable of doing everything you need.

I write the songs in BB and then use Real Band to render the tracks to wave. I then copy them into Sonar where I work on them and add my live tracks for vocals and guitar. Mixing and treatment is done in Sonar.

A couple thousand dollars invested in good equipment will get the job done nicely. Then, you can set about the task of learning how to make it all work to produce good music. That's the fun part.

Last edited by Guitarhacker; 05/07/17 02:41 AM.

You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Originally Posted By: Fleetz
Hi Folk,
Just bit the bullet and bought BIAB everything PC.

Looking to setup up a small studio in my "man cave" pretty basic requirement I suspect but am totally new to DAW. In fact I had to look up what it meant. Just started playing the guitar and have a couple of descent microphones for vocals and would like to integrate BIAB, guitar, microphone, other music and tracks into a recording studio.

Am looking at a Yamaha MG12XU mixer which has USB Port and Yamaha bundle Cubase AI entry level DAW software with the mixer. Looking at the Cubase AI it seems it does all the basics that I would need.

Trying to get my head around if this is the way to go? One of the things I am not sure of if I went this path wether I need two seperate PC's, one for BIAB to feed a Yamaha source input and then a PC for the DAW attached to the Yamaha?

I like the flexibility of having channels available to bring other sources into my mixes that the Yamaha or any other mixer you folks may suggests as a better option?

I am good with setting up an amp or powered speakers as monitors and the like. Just would really appreciate the best way to integrate BIAB into a small studio system?

I am retired and happy to spend some dollars on setting up a system that I will use quite often. Appreciate some suggestion and advice on the best way to set up a small studio system without introducing much in the way of compromise.

Cheers,

Ian




Fleetz,


The best thing you could do at this stage is read. You can spend a ton of money on stuff you don't really need.

BIAB/Realband is a self-contained production suite.

You may find that all you really need is an interface and a decent mic. Save your money for plugins! grin


Regards,

Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Agree I have had excellent advice, changed my thinking.

Doing plenty of reading and you tube video at the moment.

Regards,

Ian

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Originally Posted By: 90 dB


The best thing you could do at this stage is read. You can spend a ton of money on stuff you don't really need.

BIAB/Realband is a self-contained production suite.

You may find that all you really need is an interface and a decent mic. Save your money for plugins! grin




Indeed. Research and ask questions from the folks who have the gear you're thinking about buying. Nothing wrong with wanting something, but don't make the mistake of buying crap gear. Get the good stuff if you can afford it.

In my case, I spent a couple thousand to get started. A new dedicated computer, the software for it, the monitors, a good condenser mic, and the interface. I sold my mixers when I figured out that I didn't need them and used the money to buy,..... as Bob suggested..... plugins.

The only thing that really reveals that you're looking at a music studio is the Yamaha keyboard and the guitar amp on the stand.

Do your research and make an informed buying decision. Buy good gear not the flashy "does 5 different things" gizmo stuff. ( it slices, it dices, it puree's and feeds your dog too)


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Whatever gear you decide on, don't skimp on a mic. A decent condenser (I use a Studio Projects T3 Tube myself) will record vocals, guitar amps, cymbals, lots of sources.

And a brand-new SM58.....just because. wink


https://ehomerecordingstudio.com/best-vocal-mics/



Regards,


Bob

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,326
Originally Posted By: 90 dB
Whatever gear you decide on, don't skimp on a mic. A decent condenser (I use a Studio Projects T3 Tube myself) will record vocals, guitar amps, cymbals, lots of sources.

And a brand-new SM58.....just because. wink

https://ehomerecordingstudio.com/best-vocal-mics/

Regards,


Bob


Ditto.

Do not buy or use a USB mic.... just don't.

Get a good, "real" condenser mic.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Mics and preamps .. always fun to talk about.
Yes, if you look at old pictures of vocalists, you'll see lots of SM-58s. I've had a few vocalists insist they get to do a few tracks using this mic, if they agree to try the one I selected (often LDC).
However, I question how many of the other mics on the same stage are SM-57s.
You won't see a SM-58 on a snare or a guitar amp as often as an SM-57 at the same level of performance. They both have earned their place. If money isn't the issue (as mentioned originally) having both would be nice. I'd rather use a 57 on snare, guitar amp, and acoustic guitar than a 58. For myself, I like my vocals in a 57 more than a 58. But I know many vocalists really like their SM58.

As far as condenser mics, there are lots of good ones, and the preamp being used can also make a difference as to which is better in 'setup A' vs 'setup B'.
I think having a good preamp opens the opportunity to make every mic better, so it can be a wise investment in a different way. You may not 'need' it, but if it makes lots of other equipment better, it can be a valid wise investment.

I notice 90db mentioned a Studio Projects mic; for me I've never regretted getting a Studio Projects preamp.
All my mics sound better through the VTB1, including the 57 and the 58, than when using the same mic through one of the mixer preamps or such.

Just something to consider. I feel I took too long to learn this lesson myself, so thought I'd pass it along as related to the thread.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,082
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 14,082
I think some of the strongest advice offered her is to get a good condenser mic and interface and save money for plugins.

You can find a MXL 990 condenser for $100 if you shop creatively. Add a Scarlet 212 first generation interface for $120 and with a mic cable, stand and pop filter and you are good to go. Unless you mix with cans exclusively you will likely soon want some decent monitors down the road.

And yeah, the plug-ins. Izotope's Ozone, Nectar, and Neutron are IMO game changers...as are many others.

Have fun on the journey...it's definitely more journey than destination.

Bud

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Some type of room treatment and some type of isolation to record vocals with a mic.
My recording/mixing room is semi live. I'd guess a little more on the drier, less reflective side. The wall behind my screen and monitors has a canvas art deco thing with foam stuffed invisibly into the back 1 1/4 depth of it. The wall behind me has a thick 6 x 8 art deco throw rug stapled to it. To my left and right are book shelves with books, guitar amps, and other junk.
For recording vocals I rigged up some U clamps, (the kind used to hold electrical conduit to a wall) upside down on top of one of the taller book shelves. I run 1 inch PVC pipe into the U clamps. The PVC pipe stick out about 3 ft across or right behind my computer desk chair. I drape a couple layers of sleeping bags over the pipes and record my vocals underneath. I'm 2 - 3 feet away from my DAW desk and wireless mouse. The whole thing sets up and tears down in a few minutes and stores between the book shelf and the wall or on top of the book shelf.
I don't need a mixer but I sure find it useful. I use a Yamaha MG12CSX (not USB) propped up vertical on a guitar stand on the desk to the left of my screen and left monitor. It's basically a monitoring, practice, listening, lessons mixer. I have 2 - 3 pairs of separate listening monitors, one which is a typical 2.1 computer speaker set with a subwoofer, connected to the various outputs plus a 4 channel headphone amp running off the the headphone jack. The monitoring output of my Audio Interface goes into 2 channels on the mixer. For recording I plug my mics and instruments into the Audio Interface which goes USB directly to the DAW, by-passing the mixer. The MG mixer set up like this allows me to add a little of the MG's built in reverb to headphones during vocal recording, easily raise and lower the volume of 2 - 3 monitoring speaker sets, flip mono/stereo on the fly, plug in my hardware synth and drum machine for stereo/mono playback and recording, practice mic and vocal techniques, play around in all sorts of ways like getting my electric or acoustic guitar tone dialed close before I go out and play somewhere.
Anyway, I don't "Need" it but I would replace it if it fried. Maybe with a 8 - 10 channel but not one of the USB units. At least not one of the current USB mixers on the market. I'd stick with a good Audio Interface for USB to DAW.

Last edited by Tobias; 05/11/17 10:50 AM.

Does the noise in your head bother me ?
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Originally Posted By: Tobias
... I'd stick with a good Audio Interface for USB to DAW.

Which one?

I'm someone who believes the convertor and preamps make a lot of difference in a recording, thus curious on your opinion on the interface. That Yamaha mixer you have does have nice preamps in my experience, and I wouldn't mind using them to record with, but eventually the signal needs to go to digital.
So which interface do you use?
Why would you not get a USB version of that mixer. The preamps are nice, so maybe the convertors? I'm curious.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
I don't really know which one I'd choose since I haven't shopped around recently. Currently using Berhinger UMC204HD interface. It probably wouldn't be my first choice if budget was not such a concern. However, I do get a really nice recorded sound and playback with it. Especially compared to when I was using a mixer connected directly to the computer sound card via 1/8 stereo input. The UMC204HD touts "Midas" preamps. I'm in no delusion that they are the exact preamps used on their highest quality consoles though. But, who knows? I do think the room and the mic have a whole lot to do with it also.

Yes, I agree, the Yamaha MG mixers have very decent mic preamps and a nice circuit all the way through to each output.

The reason I would not get a USB version of any current small foot print mixer is because I think/assume it would be limited compared to the current set up I have. The little USB boards I've seen don't have all/as many routing/assigning abilities as my dated MG124CX. (Not MG12CSX as stated earlier.)
And, I'm assuming there is some type of quality difference between a bare-bone 2 channel interface for $150 - $250 and a full function 2 channel USB mixer for around the same price. Did they cut corners somewhere? But, I admit, I am making assumptions and have not recently done any comparisons. I certainly wouldn't want to lose the functionality I'm currently getting in a multi-task situation.
I did use a borrowed Focusrite 2i2 interface (1st generation) for a little while and I like the Behringer UMC204HD more. I think it sounds better, takes a hotter/louder input signal before distorting, has 6 outputs plus a louder headphone playback, and a few more buttons to poke at on the front. But, I'm not claiming to be the interface expert here.


Does the noise in your head bother me ?
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
The UMC204HD also has midi cable in/out connections for hardware synths and such. Which I do use. I have limited USB ports and did not want to add a USB hub. I don't see hardware midi connections on the USB mixers. So, the external Audio Interface along with a separate mixer seems to give me the options I use most often.


Does the noise in your head bother me ?
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,099
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,099
I think the best mixer/audio interface currently is the Behringer x32. It has 40 inputs, 32 Midas mic preamps and 16 output channels. There are almost endless routing options and the on board effects and presets are pretty awesome. Additionally, Cymatic makes a dedicated X32 Multitrack Recorder/Player Expansion Card that records 32 channels simultaneously to a hard disk/flash drive eliminating the need for a computer to record.

They make several x32 versions and if you are satisfied to use the Core Model that is dependent on an Ipad or Android to control it, they are quite reasonable in cost. It is rack mountable but requires a stage box for inputs. The cost of the two make it more reasonable to purchase the Rack model unless you need to separate the unit from the inputs in a studio. The Producer and Compact versions are just scaled down models of the X32 but the internal software is the same for all the units with the exception the scaled down models have four effects engines instead of the eight effects engines of the full console.

The compact model is suitable in size for a home studio. The x32 series also has many of the Behringer Touch module features included on the board. Resolution is up to 48/16 bit. It also has a stereo flash drive recorder that is highly configurable with routing options.

There are other good contenders as well. Personally, I have a Soundcraft Signature MTK that records 22 channels and returns 24 as well as stereo recording capability. Other than the interface, it is an analog board. The USB returns operate as inserts and each channel USB return is activated by a button.

Presonus recently introduced a similar analog/audio interface mixer series.

The options are getting better with the mixer/interface hybrids.

Charlie


Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 05/12/17 02:58 AM.

BIAB Ultra Pak+ 2024:RB 2024, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
F
Fleetz Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
F
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 25
Thanks for the great responses and interesting options to consider. Sorry for the tardy reply, I am currently in the USA catching up with good friends, it been pretty hectic and the odd headache from one glass of wine too many and late nights....err early mornings. smile

Whilst I have been here I have managed to get a MXL-770 large condenser mic and SM-58. My mate here has a Behringer analog mixer and some descents monitors so we tried the 770 and 58 out just to check they are working before I head back to Oz and they sound great. I got the 770 for $73 on Amazon Prime delivered to my mates place. I am amazed at the performance for the price.

Still yet to decide which USB interface to run with. Its become a bit like a Chinese menu with the options that are available. When I get back hopefully my BIAB Everything would have arrived and I can start getting my head around that.

Definitely want to have a look at the included DAW that is incorporated in BIAB before deciding which USB interface to run with, if for whatever reason the BIAB isn't the preferred DAW I would possibly be influenced by the included "light" versions of Cubase AI or Pro Tools Light etc as to which USB interface to go with.

Have not ruled out a small mixer just to manage all the other sources, monitors etc. the mixer as Tobias mention needs not to be USB. I sold on a dedicated USB interface for the DAW just not which one at the moment.

Happy not to rush into what DAW, USB interface, monitor speakers, possible mixer etc until I get back and qualify exactly I am going to need to manage initially by way of I/O's and have a little think about what might happen in the future so as not to box myself in with the just now requirement. Time to get some butchers paper out and scratch out some drawings with devices, signal and work flows.

Also have taken on board some of the comments relating to the room acoustics. I probably have two wall surfaces that are likely going to need some acoustic foam treatment. I have nice dense curtians that cover windows on the other two sides which will soften any reflections. Need to get back with the microphones and do some tests.

Another 3 days here and then back to Oz. Probably won't eat or drink for a week when I get back to offset the insane hospitality I am experiencing here with my friends!

Thanks again one and all for all the fantastic input, it really is appreciated. Again my apologies for the tardy reply to all you great responses.

Regards,

Ian




Last edited by Fleetz; 05/16/17 11:45 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Guys, I hope you won't mind me interjecting a question here rather than starting a new thread. When using the BIAB/RB DAW, Will I find any basic processing such as equalization or reverb, or will all of that need to come from plug-ins? Also, would you recommend DX or VST plug-ins? Thanks very much all!


Best, Warren

Warren A. Keller- Woodwindist/Producer
Spontaneous Groovin' Combustion
Tune 9 Music- SESAC
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
It will come from Plugins. They include basic EQ,Reverb,Compression,Distortion etc plugins as DX during the install.
VST is supported and you'll have a wider variety of selection using VST for additional plugins (many free good ones).


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Thank you rharv! So, some decent DX plugins are included with BIAB/RB then? Nice. I know there are some really nice things out there such as Slate products, and as you say- some nice freebies like the (Anwida Soft DX Light) reverb I like for Audacity. Looking forward to moving up to the PG Music products!


Best, Warren

Warren A. Keller- Woodwindist/Producer
Spontaneous Groovin' Combustion
Tune 9 Music- SESAC
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Anwida is nice, as are many other free reverbs.

My favorite is Ambience, because of all the control.
Pre-reverb EQ, another EQ/Filter on the reverb output, room size and delay, cutoffs .. just lots of control over the sound. Plus it has a MIDI Learn feature so you can control via MIDI if desired.
Anwida is much simpler.

http://magnus.smartelectronix.com/#Ambience
Get the Full version. He worked with PGMusic to optimize this plugin for their products and is nag-free.

The other plugins on this page are pretty good also, with Nyquist being a fairly unique EQ. Again, a lot of control.
The downloads here have been safe for many years, but as always use caution and pay attention during install. I've not had to re-install it for years.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Thanks again RHARV. This is a GREAT forum- polite people with accurate and timely answers, who can actually spell and write!;>) What a joy in today's online environment!

I recently made a legitimate and polite comment about Yamaha saxes on a Woodwind & Brasswind YouTube video, and got trolled by the rudest guy you could imagine- I'm a snowflake, get back to the woodshed, I should delete my comment because it showed what a crybaby I am, does he need to buy me tissues, I wouldn't be happy with a horn if Henri Selmer himself custom crafted it for me, etc. And the guy (his well-earned YT handle was 'Junk Mail'), saw nothing wrong with this unwarranted attack. And in the end, with him having no intention of letting me have the last word, I had to forego my 1st amendment right and delete the thread. I didn't want any bad mojo out there on WWBW's page.

I digress, but I am truly grateful for you guys and the kind attitudes here. :>)


Best, Warren

Warren A. Keller- Woodwindist/Producer
Spontaneous Groovin' Combustion
Tune 9 Music- SESAC
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Hi Warren,

The only thing that I can add to this conversation is do not DL a bunch of effects! DL the demos or the free ones, find one eq, compressor and reverb that you like and learn how to really use it. Master one eq, compressor and reverb and you will find it easier to mix and master. Although the controls of each can be somewhat universal the lay of said controls should match your workflow. Learning just three effects is a lot better and less time consuming than going through a ton of them, looking for the holy grail of eg, compressor or reverb without really knowing what you are doing. YMMV


I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
I like that approach MarioD- 'KISS' is always best. Otherwise, you can get lost in the gear and shut the creative process down! Better to nail something that works well. Any recommendations? Thanks Mario!


Best, Warren

Warren A. Keller- Woodwindist/Producer
Spontaneous Groovin' Combustion
Tune 9 Music- SESAC
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,583
Unless it's changed, if you use Anwida Lite Reverb, you should switch to the VST version and you won't get the annoying popup anymore (as you do with the DX version). I discovered that by accident a number of years ago.


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2024/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 201
JF, Thanks! Haven't seen a popup? Even the new DX v. is great. You can still access Audacity while Anwida is open to play/rewind, etc. I'll leave Audacity once I get cranking in RB DAW however.


Best, Warren

Warren A. Keller- Woodwindist/Producer
Spontaneous Groovin' Combustion
Tune 9 Music- SESAC
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,640
Keep in mind you don't have to 'leave Audacity' .. I keep it it installed here. Just adjust workflow to suit. Audacity can be handy at times.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,660
Posts735,517
Members38,528
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
gman97040, kadju, theyearofjess, OlvaJownDay, Tranner Track
38,527 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 173
DC Ron 103
dcuny 88
WaoBand 74
rsdean 72
Today's Birthdays
David Robinson, louiep, Ozkar, Timothy W. Cook
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5