Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
2bSolo Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
Jazzmammal,

A few things need to be said.

I'm glad you have had no trouble with RB. I wish I could say the same. As for you being frustrated with me and others asking questions and pointing things out, I don't know what to tell you. If you said that I'm ignorant, I would agree, even though I am trying improve. But the other people who have had problems sound like they know what they are doing.

As far as replicating the problems, I wasn't doing anything unusual. I clicked on the command, followed the prompts and had trouble.

As far as finishing the VST thread, a few days ago I posted that I finally got something to work and that I was ecstatic. Made offers to hug Jim Fogle and Pipeline.

A thread you may have missed suggested that ST3 might not work as a midi sound engine. At least that's the way I understood it. That's why I didn't go back to it.

Re the time stretch, I said it told me it would overlap but it didn't. It left a gap. And again, it always crashes my computer.

Re the Initialize Accompaniment Function, is it supposed to do this when you hit the Edit command? And is it supposed to do it more than once per session? It does for me.

This thread is here for a reason. I noticed that we have a frequent contributor who uses Mixcraft. I sent him a PM to ask about his experience. He suggested I post the questions in the Off-Topic forum.

Finally, I think PG music created a great thing when they made BB. I appreciate their efforts with RB and the help they have given me. But I can not get it to work consistently for me, even when I read the instructions and follow the prompts. At this point, I hope we can agree to disagree and move on.

2b


i5-3210 laptop. Win 10 Home. 2.5ghz, 64 bit. 6gb RAM. Focusrite Scarlet 2i2.
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
@jazzmammal you put users off coming to the forum controlling what they can do, where they can do it. I've seen users come here, you come down on them and they never return. I and other users go out of our way to help anyone no matter how stupid the question may sound or what section it is in. You don't want to put them off from ever coming back. It's all you seem to do these days, maybe you just do it for all the attention, that's what trolls do.....
Just feel it from the other person's perspective, don't wait till you leave this world to hit Rewind then Play and watch and experience it all back in HD Surround, experiencing it from the other's perspective as well.
This may go over your head now what I say but during the Playback process it won't, you'll get it then.
I just have a feeling it's the drink doing it.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,409
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 11,409
Guys, I deleted my prior post. No sense in us all going there. Sometimes Bob, you are spot on with insight and your ability to articulate the complexities of working with electronic music.... and sometimes, well, not so much.

Peace.


Dan, BIAB2024, SoundCloud Win11, i7(12thGen), 32GB, 1TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD), 2TB Libraries, 1 TB(WD-Black), 2TB SSD(M.2 NVMe SSD)Data, Motu Audio Express, Keystation 61, SL88 Studio, Reaper

Off-Topic
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,665
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 6,665
Originally Posted By: jazzmammal
Use some logic David.

Wow, condescending much? blush You said:

Originally Posted By: jazzmammal
RB does NOT CRASH, has NO PROBLEM with VST's.

If RB really doesn't CRASH (your word, in CAPS), it would have caught and recovered from that exception that Pipeline posted. Yet there it is... graphic evidence that RB is capable of crashing.

Now, was it caused by a bug in the code?

By your definition, no. Because (unlike us) you've apparently got access to the RB design document.

Without having done root cause analysis, you made some mighty strong claims about RB having "NO" problems with VSTis. This was based on the fact that lots of people used it without problem. But most especially, it worked for you, because you had a "stock" computer (whatever that is) and the "right" drivers (whatever those are).

It reminds me a bit of the guy who argued that Microsoft wouldn't release an update with bugs, and if people encountered problems, it was because the users had messed up, not Microsoft.

Originally Posted By: jazzmammal
It ain't happening guys there is no problem with these updates unless you've completely messed with your system on your own.

How did that turn out?


-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,374
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 18,374
After a lot of thought I am, albeit reluctantly, making a contribution to this (off-track) thread.

I have no intention of being antagonistic or to challenge anyone's point of view. Everyone is perfectly entitled to share their own opinions.

I am a software programmer and analyst in real-time computer systems with more years experience than I care to remember. Suffice to say, I know a little about software.

A long time ago we were working with another company, developing interfaces to their software. As long as our software performed to their spec's, there was no issue. During our stress testing we quickly determined that if our software made any illegal request, their software crashed. We got them to change their software to recognize that illegal requests were part of real world events. They then handled these correctly. This made their software more robust.

Because one particular VST doesn't cause a program to crash for a user doesn't dictate that the other program is invincible or even slightly robust. A properly managed and structured program needs to correctly handle awry requests, unintelligible interfaces, badly handled message structures, and much more (like an object being placed on the keyboard - yes, it happens).

Programming to handle every possible exception is hard. Harder that just writing the original code. YMMV but mine doesn't. These are just simple facts. No program should crash, even if it is not its fault. If it does, it means it doesn't handle unexpected situations properly, and improvements are required.

Unfortunately I haven't experienced that perfect world yet. I fully believe that programs mentioned here have crashed for some users - not their own fault maybe, outside influence perhaps, but they crash and if they were more robust, they wouldn't.




BIAB & RB2024 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,771
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,771


Since the thread is convoluted, I don't mind making it more so.

OP:

I second all positive comments on Real Band. There are some occasional annoyances in Real Band (small ones) that you will have to get used to until they fix them I guess, but overall it is the most user friendly DAW I have seen and a great place to record audio.

However, if it has gone wonky, there are some files you will have to delete, such as one .ini file and one .cfg file and then restart it so that it can properly configure itself. You would need to call Kent at tech support, tell him what is going on and make sure you are configured properly and also know how to delete certain files in the future to get a fresh config. Ask Kent about that and take notes. Also have a notepad handy to ask any other things you are confused about. After letting Kent help me get set up properly and explain a few things I never had another problem. That was 4 years ago.

Real Band is still my main RECORDING DAW although I mix in Sonar 2018 (Bandlab) and am expert user of Sonar. I find Sonar is very easy, but it does take patience at first to get the gist of it. It takes work, and you have to to read the manual as they say. But once you do "get it"--it is very, very easy.

Reaper is also cool. I have that as well. But in my opinion (and everyone has his or her own tastes) it is less intuitive than Sonar and for me the learning curve on Reaper is actually steeper than Sonar.

On Sonar, if you want an effect on a track you hit the plus sign for insert/add effect. Then you choose from your VST list.

If you want a new stereo bus for instruments or vocals, you click insert new bus. If you want a new synth, go to top menu and select insert soft synth. It just does it. No need to configure anymore. Just play.

If you want to send a track to an effect on a bus (like send the instrument bed or instrument bus to Waves Vocal Rider for analysis as a "sidechain") you right click on the instrument track and hit "insert send" and choose vocal rider from the drop down menu.

Piece of cake.

(Creating "buses" and sends for groups of instruments, especially to create a separate bus/bed for instruments and vocals, and creating "sidechains" are two of the most common areas of knowledge needed for mixing. In the case I described for vocal rider, the sidechain send I described allows vocal rider to analyze the volume of the instruments coming through the instrument bus so it can adjust the volume of the vocals and create an automatic fader, hence "vocal rider" during mixdown. All of these elementary but necessary skills in understanding and applying terms and techniques within a DAW require a phenomenal amount of time reading manuals or talking to people who use these DAWS and who can show you how. Or you can take a class.)

As others have said, it takes a while to learn what all of these terms mean and you have to master their definitions, study what you can, ask questions when you can't figure it out.

BUT, it takes an enormous amount of time to figure it all out, even for the most computer literate so don't get frustrated.

You simply have to make a decision on what you are going to learn and prepare for a long haul and dig in.

For me, again, what I did was:

1.) Make sure I had Real Band properly set up. (Kent had to help me.)

2.) Mastered Real Band.

3.) Began to study and master Sonar after I had mastered Real Band.

It took years.

That was my path. There are many others.

All of them take countless hours of study.

Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
I remember we never use to get the message below until VideoTrack suggest this to PG, the program would just crash totally out.


Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,771
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,771

Ha ha ha ha!

Pipeline you are funny!!

BUT, don't you know that's a FEATURE. Come on man.

smile

Off-Topic
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
C
Expert
Offline
Expert
C
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,459
Originally Posted By: MusicStudent
2bsolo
Your experience is same as mine. I worked with RB for a longtime and I still do, but for me it is get in and get out as soon as possible. Reaper on the other hand is a joy to work in. Primarily given that on my system it is and has been for years Rock-Solid.


Same experience here. I've tried RB many times, but it's so unstable in my system that I can't barely use it.


BIAB 2024, latest build.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Mixcraft has a fairly tight integration with video, and a pretty cool notation editor. But the only way for you to decide is to try them both. One will feel more natural. Pick that one. Marry it. Learn it.

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
2bSolo Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
Thanks Rockstar_not. Whichever one I choose, it will be like adopting a puppy. Mine to keep.


2b


i5-3210 laptop. Win 10 Home. 2.5ghz, 64 bit. 6gb RAM. Focusrite Scarlet 2i2.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
I can't believe how some just don't get what I'm trying to say. Here it is again and it's to you Pipeline.

You keep posting error boxes and crashes yet you never explain exactly what you did to cause that to happen. With all your experience and knowledge and I do admire you for that, haven't you ever been a beta tester for anybody? Don't you know the protocols for reporting stuff like that?

To the comment about me saying people who like to mess with or "customize" their systems with registry hacks and the like also tend to be the ones who have the most problems. That came up in a thread some months ago and Deryk I think it was confirmed that in the thread. As staff, he's trying to be diplomatic but he said basically the same thing. They have to try and diagnose a problem when they're not dealing with a stock Windows system.

2bsolo, why not start a thread in the RB forum about the time stretch? You're thinking RB is messed up, I'm thinking you simply missed a step.

For now, I'll just focus on your issues with Sampletank and you thinking because a few people, again a few not dozens, have said they can't get it to work either which makes you think there must be some problems with using it with PG products.

Yes, it's tricky but that's just digital audio so here's some basic info for you and maybe you already know this or not, I don't know. Start with your OS. Everybody who's using Win 10 is running a 64 bit system. Thousands of programs are 32 bit including Biab/RB. That's no problem, 32 bit programs will run fine on a 64 bit OS. However, speaking specifically of audio DAW's now, a 32 bit host like Biab/RB will not natively run a 64 bit plugin like ST3. ST2 was 32 bit but ST3 is 64 bit only so you need Jbridge to run it.

That's point one where some run into problems. Simply understanding all the nuances of a 64 bit OS running a 32 bit DAW host using a 64 bit plugin can just go over the heads of some people and they never get it. This goes to my oft repeated comment about needing to be a computer nerd to work with digital audio.

Point two is IKM's authorization system. That alone can cause some folks lots of grief. That and how ST installs, that's tricky by itself and has nothing to do with the host such as Biab/RB.

Point three is the confusion between a DXi and a VST. ST will install both but you need to use the VST version, not the DXi version. And that's another thing, you need to know the difference between a DXi and a VST.

Point four is following Biab/RB Help files to first select a VST correctly and second to set it up as your default synth. Just writing these points out is confusing even me, I'm trying to make sure I've got this right.

This is called welcome to digital audio but just because it's confusing and it's sooo easy to misunderstand something and miss a step still doesn't mean there's something wrong with PG's software. Using VST's including ST works fine, there is no inherent problem with it.

Bob

Last edited by jazzmammal; 11/19/18 08:29 AM.

Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
Satisfied Customers with RealBand ?
Deep in Denialville Basil !


Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,687
Denialville? Really?

Why do you keep denying us the details of your crashes so we can see for ourselves? I keep asking and you keep avoiding the question. All you do is post jokes. I think that's called deflection.

Am I a satisfied customer? Yes within the parameters of RB doing what the documentation says it can do. Is that enough for you, obviously not and that's totally cool btw. I have no problem with that, all I'm saying is RB works as advertised and PG advertises that it works well with VST's for example which it does.

I have a problem when you're saying to a nooby, forget RB it's crap. Name another DAW that can work with all the thousands of RT/RD's and generate multiple comp tracks of various instruments in the same song. Name me a DAW that has a chord grid that allows you to generate multiple RT's at a time by the bar, by the phrase, by a whole song, AND THEN if that's not enough you can load styles and do it all again! Then change the chord grid and generate more new tracks in the same song just to hear what some chord subs sound like. At each generation you can change the RT's so you can have up to 48 tracks of completely different RT's. Who does that? NOBODY.

And don't talk about Rapid Composer or the new Studio One Chord Track. Those are useful but they are not even on the same planet as what RB can do with Real Tracks. Handling styles and RT/RD's has absolutely nothing to do with traditional DAW functions, all of that is unique to RB yet RB has pretty decent DAW functions including midi and working with VST's in addition to all that. If you're looking at it as a DAW only then sure there are gazillions of other DAW's out there but none can do what RB does.

Bob


Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Originally Posted By: jazzmammal


Am I a satisfied customer? Yes within the parameters of RB doing what the documentation says it can do. Is that enough for you, obviously not and that's totally cool btw. I have no problem with that, all I'm saying is RB works as advertised and PG advertises that it works well with VST's for example which it does.

Bob


I agree and that also is true with BiaB. Use them as intended and you will be fine.

If one is into RTs, audio recording, but using very little MIDI then RB is the way to go. But if you are heavily into MIDI as I am then there are better alternatives out there. However after saying that I always have said that if you do not have a DAW then learn with RB. YMMV


I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Off-Topic
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
P
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
P
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 7,954
Originally Posted By: 2bSolo
I am in the process of deciding what DAW I will change to. I like RB, but there are some things that happen repeatedly and they are annoying. Plus, I have found a few things that other DAWs have that RB doesn't.....

Originally Posted By: jazzmammal
I have a problem when you're saying to a nooby, forget RB it's crap...

If you can name one user that has used RB more than me, put more into making RB better, promoted RB more than anyone else, then I will leave the forum now never to return.
Please give me a little respect, you have no idea what goes on behind the scenes but maybe some day soon you will learn.
Originally Posted By: jazzmammal

And don't talk about Rapid Composer or the new Studio One Chord Track. Those are useful but they are not even on the same planet as what RB can do with Real Tracks.

If BB/RB can do what RapidComposer can do I will get rid of it.

You are the one promoting Studio One 4 https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=498195#Post498195

EDIT: RB is like WinXP it crashes and gets blue screen, can you conceive of a Win7 Win10 RB 64bit that don't crash and don't get blue screen ???
can we aim for that or force ourseleves to stick with XP and run the newer OSs down ??
(all the years and audio apps I have used the only app ever to give Win7 a blue screen "ever" is BB & RB)

All this pushing is bringing out the true reason why you are doing this, what was hidden under the surface.
It seems like you want RB to stay just as it is with no improvements unless authorized by you. How do you stop this ? Attack them, drive them away never to return, you don't want to hear constructive criticism and honesty !!! Denialville all over again. It can be very fearful change.

Have you written an article on what the Mac users should do without RB 64bit ? what DAW should they use or are they allowed to even use a DAW, just as your saying 2bSolo must use RB and he is not allowed to use a DAW because if he does then it is contradicting you and it's saying to you that RB is crap and this is totally unacceptable to you, and here we go: Denialville all over again, what is the stage after denial, will you get to it in this lifetime ??





Off-Topic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
By The Way, 2bSolo. What computer system are you using? Can you give some details about what it is.
Example; I open the Control Panel and click on System. It shows me these details.
Intel Core i5-3230M CPU
2.60Ghz
8.00 GB Ram
64-bit
Etc...
I'm trying to stay on your original topic. The computer system you are using might have a bearing on what programs you can or can not use.
I'm thinking maybe you get crashes because your system might not be adequate or something. Not enough RAM. Or, maybe you have some software conflicts going on. Or, maybe a virus or something. If this is the problem then you might get similar issues with any DAW you change to. I'd hate to see you go through a change to a different DAW just to have more issues.
I know I used to have issues until I removed/uninstalled iTunes. It was a few years ago and I don't remember exactly what it was but it was something frustrating right after I installed iTunes so I figured that was the problem. It took me a few weeks to finally trace my steps back to when the trouble began. I deleted iTunes, restarted and all was back to normal. Maybe you have something like that going on.
So, tell us what you are working with there.
Also, I noticed someone mention the difference between 32 and 64 bit. A 64 bit machine will run either 64 or 32 bit programs and plug ins. And, a 64 bit DAW program on a 64 bit machine will run 64 bit and 32 bit plug ins. It will run both. But, a 32 bit machine won't run a 64 bit program. A 32 bit program won't run 64 bit plug ins regardless if it is on a 64 bit machine. If you are trying to run 64 bit plug ins on a 32 bit version of RB it's not going to work. jBridge is suppose to remedy this in most cases but I imagine a big plug in like SampleTank might struggle once you start loading its channels with instrument samples.
Anyhow, I commend your patience as the PG forum congress attempts to settle their differences.


Does the noise in your head bother me ?
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 20,821
Tobias, I agree with you about things running in the background. That is why many many times I have said turn off everything running in the background like your anti-stuff. Also in device manager disable your Ethernet card. That way your computer clock is only running your music generating software. This is why my music computer is off-line 99% of the time; the only time it is on line is for updates, both Win 10 and software.

I have a 64 bit, Intel i7, 16 gigs of ram computer and I have had RB crash. However I very rarely use RB so the problem could have been me. Because I rarely use RB I have no desire to determine what caused the crashes. YMMV


I want my last spoken words to be "I hid a million dollars under the........................"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
2bSolo Offline OP
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
I am going to try and reply to all of these comments.

First, I am not a PG Music basher. Without their products, I would not be able to record my songs the way I hear them. My impression,strictly an impression, is that BB is the primary product and that it gets more attention than RB from the company.

I like many things about RB, particularly the interface.

Jazzmammal is right about getting started with ST3. It is difficult. If hadn't had trouble with other VST's, I wouldn't have brought it up. But I did. I love being able to use RT's. Changing DAWs won't change that. However, I can't record my songs without midi. For that, I need to be able to use VST's. If I can't get them to work consistently with RB, I need something else.

As far as the crashes on Time Stretch, why should I try to recreate it when I am following the prompts? IMO, if you follow the prompts, it should work and the computer shouldn't crash. And you shouldn't have to do special setups or delete files that come with the program. If that's the trick, PG should take those out and do an update.

One thing about the Time Stretch feature: It seems you can stretch the track by dragging it. When I read the instructions for Time Stretch on RB, I don't see that feature. Did I overlook it?

As far as my computer, it is an i5 running Win10. It has 6gb of RAM. Processor speed is 2.6ghz. 64 bit. Works fine on BB. Tobias, I am going to try to find out if something else is causing this. Thanks for the tip.

As far as another DAW crashing: I am starting a song with Reaper. I haven't paid for it yet. I will look for crashes as I do that. So far, it has not balked or crashed once. Other users on this forum have had similar experiences with RB and solved them by moving to Reaper.

Finally, a word to Jazzmammal. I appreciate your perspective and I have told you so. I have asked you if we could just agree to disagree. If you have other comments for me about this issue, would you send me a PM rather than post them to the forum?

Thanks to all for your help.

2b


i5-3210 laptop. Win 10 Home. 2.5ghz, 64 bit. 6gb RAM. Focusrite Scarlet 2i2.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
2bSolo, your computer looks more than adequate for BIAB, as you say. If you want to be sure, you could download and run the free Geekbench 4 and report your single-core speed here. I'm guessing you will get 3500 or so, and anything above around 2000 is fine (my numbers - not official standards).

For others, I am the one who suggested 2bSolo post his question here, in the Off-topic Forum. We have often had great discussions about non-PG Music software here, including what DAW to use. His question was Mixcraft vs. Reaper. Not RealBand.

I apologize to you, 2bSolo, for all the angst some posters added to this topic and for getting you into this situation. You did nothing to cause it.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,660
Posts735,520
Members38,528
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
gman97040, kadju, theyearofjess, OlvaJownDay, Tranner Track
38,527 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 173
DC Ron 103
dcuny 88
WaoBand 74
rsdean 73
Today's Birthdays
David Robinson, louiep, Ozkar, Timothy W. Cook
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5