Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

Art MPA II

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Art MPA II.jpg (172 KB, 145 downloads)
Last edited by Paul Haynes; 03/14/24 01:20 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,887
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,887
I used to use the first model. It did give a warmer tone to the sound, owing to a vacuum tube. I believe it was a compressor as well.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by Matt Finley
I used to use the first model. It did give a warmer tone to the sound, owing to a vacuum tube. I believe it was a compressor as well.

Hi, what did you use it on? Vocals or instrument?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,887
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,887
Both, at different times.


BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
PH.

fyi ive done thousand of vocal tracks over the years useing everything from a 50 buck art to very high end commercial studio consoles and outboard pre's.
maybe others will disagree but comparing the final mixes i would say the consumer buying your song from my tests anyway is more interested if the song floats their boat.
in conclusion imho assuming the pre is working correctly i would say the trick is how the vocals are treated post recording.

if you doubt me there is a highly entertaining lengthy thread on gearspace.com where audio examples are posted re 50 buck art versus higher cost fare to see if people could tell the diff without knowing which was which. the reveal was a hoot.
just search gearspace for it.

if you are concerned just rent a bunch of pre's for a week from a gear store and record vocs with each to compare.this should assuage your concerns. do your own tests.

in summary i believe there are other things to worry about other than the pre.
for more info you tube has lots of comparisons.
now i'm gonna go do some vocs on an old germanium transistor pre..lol.
ps also on gearspace is a hilarious thread comparing the legendary
diy 5 dollar pre versus high end stuff.

happiness.

om 🇨🇦 🇬🇧

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 03/15/24 05:15 AM.

New Song "PRETTY GIRL" for my wife...Dec 2023
(my vocs....mixed for good earbuds.)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs/prettygirlrbfinalcalfsongsdec2023mp3
(and rock song THE STALLION and bluegrass song... BANKER MAN....90 songs useing bb/rb.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
Originally Posted by Paul Haynes
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

I guess I'd first have to ask, what kind of Mic are you using?

That could make a lot of difference in any answers I could offer, and I would hope it would affect others input as well.
Also, what did you have previously to compare it to?
Since you asked if it might 'improve' the vocals, that is a comparison that would need the starting point. A vs B ..


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
I agree with Harv.

The best thing to spend your money on is a great mic, and of course you need a good interface.

Almost every other treatment these days can be done with software in post prod.

But that is just me. Everyone has their own "sound" they are going for.

You may need an old 1950s ribbon mic if you can find one for 10,000.

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,990
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,990
I boughnt one of these quite a while ago
https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/behringer-mic100
it gets good writeups and is amazingly cheap but frankly i stoppped using it as the recorded tracks were not significantly enhanced and I get good results using eq and other fx quite sparingly on a signal from a condenser mic straightr into the behringer UMC204HD which i presmu has much the same preamps but without the tube.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
This little thing is free. Gets great reviews and for a reason. Niiiiiiccee.


https://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/booteq-mkiii-released/

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Boot EQ.jpg (235.01 KB, 70 downloads)
Last edited by David Snyder; 03/17/24 07:15 AM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
David.

very nice. kudos for finding that.
i'm gonna try to find time to test it.
there are many free channel strips on the net if one googles 'channel strip vst plugin.'

happiness

om


New Song "PRETTY GIRL" for my wife...Dec 2023
(my vocs....mixed for good earbuds.)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs/prettygirlrbfinalcalfsongsdec2023mp3
(and rock song THE STALLION and bluegrass song... BANKER MAN....90 songs useing bb/rb.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 7,773
The same website has a lot of free plugins by this guy, Variety of Sound. They are all awesome.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
PH.

fyi ive done thousand of vocal tracks over the years useing everything from a 50 buck art to very high end commercial studio consoles and outboard pre's.
maybe others will disagree but comparing the final mixes i would say the consumer buying your song from my tests anyway is more interested if the song floats their boat.
in conclusion imho assuming the pre is working correctly i would say the trick is how the vocals are treated post recording.

if you doubt me there is a highly entertaining lengthy thread on gearspace.com where audio examples are posted re 50 buck art versus higher cost fare to see if people could tell the diff without knowing which was which. the reveal was a hoot.
just search gearspace for it.

if you are concerned just rent a bunch of pre's for a week from a gear store and record vocs with each to compare.this should assuage your concerns. do your own tests.

in summary i believe there are other things to worry about other than the pre.
for more info you tube has lots of comparisons.
now i'm gonna go do some vocs on an old germanium transistor pre..lol.
ps also on gearspace is a hilarious thread comparing the legendary
diy 5 dollar pre versus high end stuff.

happiness.

om 🇨🇦 🇬🇧

Thanks for your reply. I'm always keen to consider anything that improves my vocals. I lack confidence and am a perfectionist. I hear my vocal flaws and do my best to iron them out.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by rharv
Originally Posted by Paul Haynes
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

I guess I'd first have to ask, what kind of Mic are you using?

That could make a lot of difference in any answers I could offer, and I would hope it would affect others input as well.
Also, what did you have previously to compare it to?
Since you asked if it might 'improve' the vocals, that is a comparison that would need the starting point. A vs B ..

I have 2x mics I use for recording my vocals. Beyerdynamic M88TG + Rode K2

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by David Snyder
I agree with Harv.

The best thing to spend your money on is a great mic, and of course you need a good interface.

Almost every other treatment these days can be done with software in post prod.

But that is just me. Everyone has their own "sound" they are going for.

You may need an old 1950s ribbon mic if you can find one for 10,000.

smile

I use a Beyerdynamic M88TG + Rode K2 going into a Presonus Audiobox 22VSL with XMAX Class A preamps.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by David Snyder
This little thing is free. Gets great reviews and for a reason. Niiiiiiccee.


https://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/booteq-mkiii-released/

Thanks for that. I have LOADS of plug ins. Spent a few hundred ££ on WAVES plus a lovely Lexicon Reverb set of plugins and others including those from StudioOne.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
So I bought one to try out of curiosity. I've used it on my Takamine & M88TG and on both multiple test recordings both sounded better in that recordings were fuller & warmer I would say. Presonus although clean sounding, sounds thinner by comparison. It's a keeper. Looks cool on my desk also!

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
IMG_1261.jpg (330.82 KB, 54 downloads)
Last edited by Paul Haynes; 03/18/24 02:36 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
Thanks for the update on your experience with it.
Yes it does look cool.
I'd be interested to know how the variable Impedance works in real life.
Can it handle both a LCD and something like an SM-57 or SM-58 OK?
An SM mic (or similar) would benefit from much different settings.
It looks like each channel can have it's own impedance, so that would be nice.

Last edited by rharv; 03/18/24 03:36 PM.

Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 2,642
var impedence.

For those happy with current pre but no var imp feature...never used but art have a new product called rp1.
it has a variable imp input. for ribbon and dynamic mics.
so one can go i guess as follows
mic to rp1 to next device in chain.
it also is a signal booster.
for more info see arts web site.

for other similar var imp gear and boosters.
just google. eg i just came across alctron ?

hth.

om


New Song "PRETTY GIRL" for my wife...Dec 2023
(my vocs....mixed for good earbuds.)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs/prettygirlrbfinalcalfsongsdec2023mp3
(and rock song THE STALLION and bluegrass song... BANKER MAN....90 songs useing bb/rb.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 412
Originally Posted by rharv
Thanks for the update on your experience with it.
Yes it does look cool.
I'd be interested to know how the variable Impedance works in real life.
Can it handle both a LCD and something like an SM-57 or SM-58 OK?
An SM mic (or similar) would benefit from much different settings.
It looks like each channel can have it's own impedance, so that would be nice.

I've only played with it a little so far but have tried two mics - Beyerdynamic M88TG and Rode K2. Both have a 200 impedance. I've cranked it up higher on both and lowered down to 100. I'm not sure how I would explain the difference? Its subtle. To me my mics sound warmer around 100. Pushing it higher (600+) and there seems to be more detail and the volume seems to increase slightly. I think I prefer the warmer effect if that's what you call it?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,643
I used those mics as a reference because their reported impedance is lower than a lot of them.

"Rated impedance is 150Ω (310Ω actual) for connection to microphone inputs rated low impedance"

The others probably appear louder and clearer when higher because that is the impedance they expect.
Starving a mic is different than giving it too much, so the two mics you used and the two mics I mentioned would likely show different results to the ear.

So many SM-57 and 58's out there still in use, but many interfaces do not have a way to adjust for them.
I have a separate preamp that works just fine, and if I insert it before the interface it's fine. But having an interface that did it in the first place is a nice feature.
That said, my Preamp also offers the additive tube feature .. so works a treat on other stuff as well.

If that ART has an 'instrument' in switch, may be fun to se what your guitar or bass sounds like through it.


Make your sound your own!
.. I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®

The Bob Doyle Media YouTube channel is known for demonstrating how you can creatively incorporate AI into your projects - from your song projects to avatar building to face swapping, and more!

His latest video, Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box, he explains in detail how you can use the Melodist feature in Band-in-a-Box with ACE Studio. Follow along as he goes from "nothing" to "something" with his Band-in-a-Box MIDI Melodist track, using ACE Studio to turn it into a vocal track (or tracks, you'll see) by adding lyrics for those notes that will trigger some amazing AI vocals!

Watch: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box


Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!

Paket | Was ist Neu

Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!

Add updated printing options, enhanced tracks settings, smoother use of MGU and SGU (BB files) within PowerTracks, and more with the latest PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 update!

Learn more about this free update for PowerTracks Pro Audio & download it at www.pgmusic.com/support_windows_pt.htm#2024_5

The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!

The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!

Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.

This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245

The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option

Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!

Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!

For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.

Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.

Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!

Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.

Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!

Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!

With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!

Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111

Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!

If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.

A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."

"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."

"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."

Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics81,673
Posts735,790
Members38,535
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
Newest Members
adolesentcodger, Elizabeth Stephen, Jeffrey thomas, skyanderson3, akbrpra
38,534 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 177
DC Ron 107
rsdean 87
dcuny 81
WaoBand 70
Today's Birthdays
Jay Street, JazzLOCO Almenas, smallchamber
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5