|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,398
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,398 |
Here is a table that I put together showing how the world listens to music these days. It compares what is available in BIAB standard and audiophile versions to how the world listens. Because the quality of the music cannot be artificially increased from its source but can be compressed from a source with minimal artifacts, it opens the question of whether the standard offering of BIAB can or should increase its compressed bit rate to better match where the majority of the world is listing to music. Of course, there are many tradeoffs in this discussion such as size of the files, hard drives that they have to ship to you versus the current 128K bit rate of the .wma file. If the standard version is increased to at least 160 kbps to 256 kbps it would put it in the ballpark of where the majority of the world listens to music. ` Yes, there are many codecs and lossless discussions, but even MS wma 8-10 offers all the way up to a professional quality sound so it's just a matter of what is the best right size for PGM and the current majority of the music listening. Your thoughts? ![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/50pb5cvx/Music-Bitrates.png)
Studio One (latest version), Win 11 23H2 , i9 -10940X 3.3 GHz, 32GB Mem, a 4K 40" monitor, PreSonus Studio Live III Console as interface/controller. secondarily test on Reaper, Cakewalk, and S1 on Surface Pro 3 Win 10 (latest versions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,906
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,906 |
Hmm ... potential audio war  FWIW, here are my thoughts; I'm sure others will differ. Background: I'm not absolutely certain when I did this, but 2009 looks likely when I was mid-fifties so my hearing would already have been fading. I compared MP3, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC, the first two at several bit rates, looking for the "indistinguishable from the CD". 128kbps didn't do it. 160kbps on MP3 seemed marginal ... mostly OK with a few "Oh" moments. 160kbps on Ogg was better. Faster bit rates were fine for me. With my codec, decompressed FLAC was binary identical to the source. If I did that again, I'd now use FLAC or similar, but I'm not sure how that would fit with PGM's marketing. Back then I settled on Ogg Vorbis 44.1k and 160kbps. I think there are good arguments for going to 48k sampling as I think resampling down should be better then resampling up. Once inside the software itself, there's then the tradeoff between sample-rate plus sample depth and the amount of CPU time needed to process the data. My temptation in that case is to say stick with 48k sampling and 32-bit floating point and don't get carried away with more, because that will just hit the number of tracks and number of plug-ins. Using graphics cards as the engine might recalibrate that. All caveats apply, YMMV. Edit .. Just an FYI aside: The reason I compared only MP3, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC, not WMA, is that as a Linux user there was no WMA. There are also, of course, more formats available today than there were 15 years ago.
Last edited by Gordon Scott; 03/23/24 03:34 PM. Reason: FYI addendum.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
Kawai MP6, Korg M50, Ui24R, Saffire Pro 40.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11; Win8.1: Scarletts
BIAB2022 UltraPAK, Reaper, a bunch of stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877 |
I’m glad you brought this up. We have had lots of discussions about this but not in a while.
Nice chart. I question one thing in your chart. In my opinion, a rate of 128 kbps is not the same audio quality in an MP3 as it is in a WMA. As I wrote many years ago in the first sticky post in the Tips & Tricks Forum, the BIAB WMA files at 128 sound to me like an MP3 running at 160 to 192. I would have placed the ‘Standard’ entry in the BIAB column at the 160 row. Plus, some of the BIAB sounds are mono, which I think reduces the artifacts a bit.
You are correct about file sizes being bigger the better the quality gets. The discussions we’ve had on possibly downloading the audiophile version always include the suggestion to use lossless compression. I only use 320 for an MP3, and I switched to FLAC for most uses a few years back.
Avoiding yet another hard drive each year would be nice, especially for the folks in Europe paying the VAT. And if the audiophile version with compression still couldn’t be made small enough for most to download, perhaps it could ship just the updated or new files on some form of flash drive. Whatever applies to the discussion of making the audiophile size smaller should be useful for the regular version at some improved higher rate.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,487
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,487 |
Get rid of wma and have a crossplatform compressed format.
For Audiophile I showed wavpack to be an alternative to give 24bit 48khz at a lot smaller size than wav/aiff but no quality loss and allows multichannel encoding.
This is all from years n years ago, 24/48 it's a no brainer for higher quality, but it's an old argument like not needing 64bit because we have JBridge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,398
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,398 |
Matt, the wma files in BIAB show as 128 kbps.
I was generally cataloging it to make the point. I only mentioned MP3 to remind people of what was used in the 90s.
I have read that AAC codec produce a better quality than MP3 codecs for the same bit rate but have not seen the same for wma vs mp3. At that bit rate they would be approximately the same.
The real point of this thread is there a desire to get the minimal quality up to the current streaming quality on the Internet? This can be done with many different codecs today.
Musocity
You're driving a different point and I think most would agree that there are more modern ways to get at least CD quality for the audio file version and this would allow PGM to release on a high quality on smaller drives.
P.S. I was surprises to find out the world is listening to something less than CD quality of the 80s.
Studio One (latest version), Win 11 23H2 , i9 -10940X 3.3 GHz, 32GB Mem, a 4K 40" monitor, PreSonus Studio Live III Console as interface/controller. secondarily test on Reaper, Cakewalk, and S1 on Surface Pro 3 Win 10 (latest versions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 25,877 |
I could spend time researching this but it’s no point because I completely agree with you that the audio quality for the regular version of BIAB (for Windows), wherever you chart it, should be improved.
BIAB 2024 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 6.5 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6; Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus Studio 192, Presonus Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Video: Next-Level AI Music Editing with ACE Studio and Band-in-a-Box®
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 German for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Wir waren fleißig und haben über 50 neue Funktionen und eine erstaunliche Sammlung neuer Inhalte hinzugefügt, darunter 222 RealTracks, neue RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, "Songs with Vocals" Artist Performance Sets, abspielbare RealTracks Set 3, abspielbare RealDrums Set 2, zwei neue Sets von "RealDrums Stems", XPro Styles PAK 6, Xtra Styles PAK 17 und mehr!
Paket | Was ist Neu
Update Your PowerTracks Pro Audio 2024 Today!
The Newest RealBand 2024 Update is Here!
The newest RealBand 2024 Build 5 update is now available!
Download and install this to your RealBand 2024 for updated print options, streamlined loading and saving of .SGU & MGU (BB) files, and to add a number of program adjustments that address user-reported bugs and concerns.
This free update is available to all RealBand 2024 users. To learn more about this update and download it, head to www.pgmusic.com/support.realband.htm#20245
The Band-in-a-Box® Flash Drive Backup Option
Today (April 5) is National Flash Drive Day!
Did you know... not only can you download your Band-in-a-Box® Pro, MegaPAK, or PlusPAK purchase - you can also choose to add a flash drive backup copy with the installation files for only $15? It even comes with a Band-in-a-Box® keychain!
For the larger Band-in-a-Box® packages (UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition), the hard drive backup copy is available for only $25. This will include a preinstalled and ready to use program, along with your installation files.
Backup copies are offered during the checkout process on our website.
Already purchased your e-delivery version, and now you wish you had a backup copy? It's not too late! If your purchase was for the current version of Band-in-a-Box®, you can still reach out to our team directly to place your backup copy order!
Note: the Band-in-a-Box® keychain is only included with flash drive backup copies, and cannot be purchased separately.
Handy flash drive tip: Always try plugging in a USB device the wrong way first? If your flash drive (or other USB plug) doesn't have a symbol to indicate which way is up, look for the side with a seam on the metal connector (it only has a line across one side) - that's the side that either faces down or to the left, depending on your port placement.
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows® Today!
Update your Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows for free with build 1111!
With this update, there's more control when saving images from the Print Preview window, we've added defaults to the MultiPicker for sorting and font size, updated printing options, updated RealTracks and other content, and addressed user-reported issues with the StylePicker, MIDI Soloists, key signature changes, and more!
Learn more about this free update for Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows at www.pgmusic.com/support_windowsupdates.htm#1111
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 Review: 4.75 out of 5 Stars!
If you're looking for a in-depth review of the newest Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows version, you'll definitely find it with Sound-Guy's latest review, Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Windows Review: Incredible new capabilities to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs.
A few excerpts:
"The Tracks view is possibly the single most powerful addition in 2024 and opens up a new way to edit and generate accompaniments. Combined with the new MultiPicker Library Window, it makes BIAB nearly perfect as an 'intelligent' composer/arranger program."
"MIDI SuperTracks partial generation showing six variations – each time the section is generated it can be instantly auditioned, re-generated or backed out to a previous generation – and you can do this with any track type. This is MAJOR! This takes musical experimentation and honing an arrangement to a new level, and faster than ever."
"Band in a Box continues to be an expansive musical tool-set for both novice and experienced musicians to experiment, compose, arrange and mix songs, as well as an extensive educational resource. It is huge, with hundreds of functions, more than any one person is likely to ever use. Yet, so is any DAW that I have used. BIAB can do some things that no DAW does, and this year BIAB has more DAW-like functions than ever."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums66
Topics81,660
Posts735,516
Members38,528
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean