Originally Posted By: RobH
The truth is those track were originally played by those artist, but they have been sliced and diced up and recreated by the software. So tech nickley it is not them actually playing the track. Or something like that. Now my head hurts!


I think RobH sums up the reality in this statement.
I also believe that the use of "Named" artists by PGM is also a marketing and sales strategy. Yes, these musicians are good and can probably be relied on to turn up and record quickly and efficiently. There are likely many anonymous session musicians out there who could do as good a job, maybe better, in their own style or in the style of a "Named" artist, but due to their anonymity, don't add marketing value.

Each time this question of credits comes up, the old cynic inside asks;
Is this about marketing and sales/inferring a connection with the "Name", or a genuine ethical conundrum?

Vintage