I don't mind the idea that "banjo" or "organ" might go on a "strings" track, because it's still based on the idea that you're adding a miscellaneous instrument to an otherwise-standard arrangement. However, the idea that one might add ONLY one miscellaneous instrument is limiting. I wouldn't call the program overall difficult to use, but there are staggering obstacles to workflow.

And to the rest of you, saying "No, if you change anything, you'll break it": stop sympathizing with your kidnappers. You paid for it, and they're coming after you every year asking for upgrade dollars. Expect your money's worth. It's 70% of a great program, and it's stubborn about fixing that infuriating other 30%.